Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #560825 > unrolled thread
| Started by | James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-03-09 09:31 -0800 |
| Last post | 2016-03-10 05:33 -0800 |
| Articles | 13 on this page of 53 — 14 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-09 09:31 -0800
Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-09 11:52 -0600
Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-09 10:12 -0800
Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-09 15:08 -0600
Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-09 13:17 -0800
Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-09 15:52 -0600
Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-09 20:38 +0100
Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-09 12:04 -0800
Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-10 05:55 +0100
Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-09 21:16 -0800
Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-10 07:39 +0100
Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless on!on@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2016-03-10 11:49 +0000
Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 04:58 -0800
Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-10 18:36 +0100
Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 14:31 -0800
Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 17:11 -0600
Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 15:18 -0800
Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 19:31 -0600
Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-11 07:29 +0100
Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 23:50 -0800
Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-13 05:59 +0100
Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-10 07:19 +0100
Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 05:18 -0800
Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 05:35 -0800
Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-03-11 00:21 -0500
Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 06:38 -0800
Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-10 19:01 +0100
Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 12:20 -0800
Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 15:31 -0600
Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 14:13 -0800
Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-11 07:45 +0100
Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-11 01:00 -0800
Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-13 06:39 +0100
Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-12 22:16 -0800
Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-13 07:59 +0100
Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-12 23:25 -0800
Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-14 05:43 +0100
Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-14 14:24 -0500
Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless Scotland The Puny <breainiac@ball.net> - 2016-03-10 17:55 -0500
Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 17:13 -0600
Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless on!on@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2016-03-10 11:37 +0000
Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-03-10 07:02 +0000
Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-10 02:33 -0500
Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-10 17:00 +0800
Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-10 12:18 -0500
Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 04:57 -0800
Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-10 18:26 +0100
Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-03-10 23:52 +0000
Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 17:01 -0700
Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-09 15:09 -0600
Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 03:20 -0800
Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 04:52 -0800
Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 05:33 -0800
Page 3 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3]
| From | on!on@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-10 11:37 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <1mjw82w.5minxz1bqaj62N%on!on@anon.invalid> |
| In reply to | #561028 |
Snickerturd the Fake Neighborhood Vote Wanker Ersatzus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> scribbled furiously: > Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> > > James McGinn, in > <news:e25b40f2-a02e-4093-ac5b-166f1e8ed741@googlegroups.com> did > thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > > > Snickerturd the Fake Neighborhood Vote Wanker Ersatzus > > <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote in purple crayon: > > >> Morons will STFU. I repeat, morons will STFU. That means you, Jim. > > > I can't<SMACKAKOOK!> > > Oh, but I have indicated how and why I'm right, Jim. [...] And there it is again, Fakey's favoured tactic of last resort: delete the question that he can't answer and run away, casting trite insults and aspersions over his shoulder as he runs. Pffft, what a fake. <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C6nDKP4rEIU> -- \|/ (((Ï))) Mr On!on, earnest seeker after truth
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-10 07:02 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <dkckg0F329fU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #560888 |
On Wed, 09 Mar 2016 20:38:26 +0100, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote: > meaning you owe me $100,000, Jim. You *will* pay, > Jim. > Or you'll drive him crazy? That's extortion, FNVHE. Plus, he probably lives in a state where one can't have unilateral contracts. Which means you can stop your feet all you like with no recourse, even if he had signed a contract, which he didn't. (Obviously.) -- -v
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-10 02:33 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <op.yd3lxxaftm21m2@benson.localhost> |
| In reply to | #561068 |
On Thu, 10 Mar 2016 02:02:24 -0500, vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 09 Mar 2016 20:38:26 +0100, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
> Emeritus wrote:
>> meaning you owe me $100,000, Jim. You *will* pay,
>> Jim.
>>
>
> Or you'll drive him crazy?
>
> That's extortion, FNVHE.
>
> Plus, he probably lives in a state where one can't have unilateral
> contracts. Which means you can stop your feet all you like with no
> recourse, even if he had signed a contract, which he didn't.
> (Obviously.)
>
at the rate he's going, he's not ever going to get a song made about him
just by demanding it on usenet. :/
--
"sines, sines, everywhere there's sines
blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind"
http://imgur.com/a/yMFsu
-
FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID:
<3dcad3dd0a0d39727506717506883c26@dizum.com>
">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics
>> equations unlike fakey the supposed know-it-all:
>> phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x)
>> phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi)
>> voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in time:
>> 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) = 240*sin(2*pi*60*x)
Wrong, as has already been proven. What does it say below, you fecking
*moron*?
"The _sum_ E(θ) ≡ E(a) + E(b) can be written thusly:""
it says that you don't even know how to correctly apply mathematics to
real-world AC electricity, snickerTurds.
http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-10/single-phase-power-systems/
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/02170.png
"To mathematically calculate voltage between “hot” wires, we must subtract
voltages, because their polarity marks show them to be opposed to each
other:"
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/12112.png
http://www.samlexamerica.com/support/documents/WhitePaper-120240VACSingleSplitPhaseandMultiWireBranchCircuits.pdf
on page 2:
** NOTE: The phase of Hot Leg 2 (Phase B) is in the
opposite direction - i.e., 180° apart from the phase
of Hot Leg L1 (Phase A)
*COUGH*
SPNAK!!
-
i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in ASCII
art if you ask nicely.
see: Message-ID: <4ba4a50aaaebc7fb8a348293c5cf9f13@dizum.com>
-
snickerTurds can't seem to refute the following:
- begin snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --
/*
HOW TO RUN: download arbitrary precision libraries from:
http://www.hvks.com/Numerical/arbitrary_precision.html
place those files in a directory and save this file as
snickerSinewaveStew.cpp inside that same directory.
compiles with:
gcc -Wall -I. precisioncore.cpp snickerSinewaveStew.cpp -lstdc++
run with:
./a.out
enjoy the LULZ ;)
*/
#include <fprecision.h>
#include <iostream.h>
using namespace std;
int main(){
//float_precision MIN=float_precision(0);
//float_precision MAX=float_precision(0);
float_precision STEP=float_precision(.0001);
float_precision t=float_precision(0); // time variable
float_precision sum=float_precision(0); // sum of SnickerTurd's
ridiculous sinewave mess
float_precision snickerPrediction=float_precision(2550.25); //
snickerTurd's erroneous k0oK-k'lame Sum
float_precision PI;
PI =_float_table(_PI,25);
// this while loop will run forever, but snickers doesn't understand why
while(sum < snickerPrediction){
// fakey's Sinewave Stew(TM) see: MID:
<db672705e57e4932eba3632562e0a941@dizum.com>
sum = (float_precision(150) * float_precision(
sin(float_precision(120)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(20.25) * float_precision(
sin(float_precision(33)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(1400)* float_precision(
sin(float_precision(150)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +(float_precision(20)*
float_precision(sin(float_precision(5013)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(600)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(13)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)))
+
(float_precision(360)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(1209)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)));
// perhaps show a few values larger than +2300 to educate teh
snickerTurds
if(sum>float_precision(2300)){
cout << "t=" << t << " sum=" << sum << std::endl;
}
t = t+STEP;
}
/*
Message-ID: <c8523e6d9c31e3282bbe581fa525a2a8@dizum.com>
"Oh, yeah... it's 2550.25 volts... so why does your graph not even
reach 2500 volts, given that eventually all the sinewaves will
constructively interfere (ie: *add* to each other) to *sum* to 2550.25
volts?"
Fakey, it doesn't reach 2500 volts because the summation of your sinewaves
never reaches that. They never reach their max values at the same time.
That's how stupid you are.
Message-ID: <731d08dcc702b9a8a13077ffc201e91f@dizum.com>
"I most certainly *did* prove otherwise. It can't even arrive at the
correct sinewave summation voltage of 2550.25 volts"
Fakey, you only *proved* that you are too inept to graph the equations and
notice a few things about the interactions of their frequencies when
summed.
the next line of code is never executed, but snickers DEFINITELY can't
figure out why it isn't and instead has a bunch of lame excuses while
still having not produced a value for t where the sum=2550.25, as he has
k0okily proklamed in many usenet messages.
*/
cout << "snickerTurds was right! the sum is " << sum << " at time t=" <<
t <<endl;
}
- end snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --
-
Fakey irrationally demands a theme song to foam to:
"all I really want your pathetic pwned ass to do is write me a classic
rock song as tribute to your Usenet Lord and Master..."
<f4f9193fa7d28b760a9de681e61427e7@dizum.com>
-
Somewhere Abouts Round Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:25:03 -0500, Friendly
Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
<snicker>
Fag. LOL
Idiot. LOL
Moron. LOL
Tranny. LOL
Libtard. LOL
Crackhead. LOL
GableTard. LOL
DildoRider. LOL
Bad Musician. LOL
Stick Figure. LOL
Terrible Liar. LOL
Sinewave Spammer. LOL
Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL
on top of old snick-ers, all covered with Fag. LOL
is where my usenet lord and mas-ter
can go straight to hell*
*hell doesn't exist. hope everybody is having a productive evening.
-
http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg
http://cafepress.com/kooktown
http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg
-
If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers
containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to
yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints
to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful
information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public. :)
if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you
downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try:
http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2
-
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop
The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as
it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects
or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it
presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written,
Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework
before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason
many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating
opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd
-
Coming soon! To a newsgroup near you!:
$ perl fakeyBot.pl
FakeyBot> I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you,
look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassing
bile from behind an anonymous dizum account? <snicker>
You> Robert Michael Wolfe
FakeyBot> Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-toed
boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks,
Robert. <snicker>
Robert> you talk about cocks a lot.
FakeyBot> Oh, I talk about sex a lot?
Robert> gay sex, mostly...
FakeyBot> Fag!
(just as useful as the original!)
-
snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n
friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message
<b5e7da79a455d0c9227b1b50e25e7ea1@dizum.com>:
"That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the
largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to
the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users were
using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then we
figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers
while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using
process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden
service. It's not rocket science.
_The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum how
I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can
get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my
distinct impression was that the "anonymity
research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to
trade CP._ (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a
kiddie pr0n network.)
That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation
Onymous was just icing on the cake."
-
Golden Killfile, June 2005
KOTM, November 2006
Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007
Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006
Busted Urinal Award, April 2007
Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008
Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007
AUK Mascot, September 2007
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-10 17:00 +0800 |
| Message-ID | <48d2eblrjk4shce9faflqoocnatp4k810l@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #561077 |
"\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> wrote: > On Thu, 10 Mar 2016 02:02:24 -0500, vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote: > > > On Wed, 09 Mar 2016 20:38:26 +0100, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler > > Emeritus wrote: > >> meaning you owe me $100,000, Jim. You *will* pay, > >> Jim. > >> > > > > Or you'll drive him crazy? > > > > That's extortion, FNVHE. It probably is extortion, and Her Nibbles doesn't know when (or how) to shut up. > > Plus, he probably lives in a state where one can't have unilateral > > contracts. Which means you can stop your feet all you like with no > > recourse, even if he had signed a contract, which he didn't. > > (Obviously.) Supposedly Jim offered it as a prize for anyone who could prove water vapor in the atmosphere. If someone putatively proved that, is there an exchange of value? I don't know. Jim may also have further details somewhere about the "offer". Realistically, fakey is never going to out himself by filing a kooks00t. > at the rate he's going, he's not ever going to get a song made about him > just by demanding it on usenet. :/ Fakey's so vain, he probably thinks that song is about him.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-10 12:18 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <op.yd4c0ze8tm21m2@benson.localhost> |
| In reply to | #561086 |
On Thu, 10 Mar 2016 04:00:01 -0500, Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
<bender@the.future> wrote:
> "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave.,
> Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907
> Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1>
> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 10 Mar 2016 02:02:24 -0500, vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:
>>
>> > On Wed, 09 Mar 2016 20:38:26 +0100, Friendly Neighborhood Vote
>> Wrangler
>> > Emeritus wrote:
>> >> meaning you owe me $100,000, Jim. You *will* pay,
>> >> Jim.
>> >>
>> >
>> > Or you'll drive him crazy?
>> >
>> > That's extortion, FNVHE.
>
> It probably is extortion, and Her Nibbles doesn't know when
> (or how) to shut up.
>
>> > Plus, he probably lives in a state where one can't have unilateral
>> > contracts. Which means you can stop your feet all you like with no
>> > recourse, even if he had signed a contract, which he didn't.
>> > (Obviously.)
>
> Supposedly Jim offered it as a prize for anyone who could
> prove water vapor in the atmosphere. If someone putatively
> proved that, is there an exchange of value? I don't know.
> Jim may also have further details somewhere about the
> "offer".
>
> Realistically, fakey is never going to out himself by filing
> a kooks00t.
>
>> at the rate he's going, he's not ever going to get a song made about him
>> just by demanding it on usenet. :/
>
> Fakey's so vain, he probably thinks that song is about him.
there were rumors.
--
"sines, sines, everywhere there's sines
blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind"
http://imgur.com/a/yMFsu
-
FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID:
<3dcad3dd0a0d39727506717506883c26@dizum.com>
">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics
>> equations unlike fakey the supposed know-it-all:
>> phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x)
>> phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi)
>> voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in time:
>> 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) = 240*sin(2*pi*60*x)
Wrong, as has already been proven. What does it say below, you fecking
*moron*?
"The _sum_ E(θ) ≡ E(a) + E(b) can be written thusly:""
it says that you don't even know how to correctly apply mathematics to
real-world AC electricity, snickerTurds.
http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-10/single-phase-power-systems/
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/02170.png
"To mathematically calculate voltage between “hot” wires, we must subtract
voltages, because their polarity marks show them to be opposed to each
other:"
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/12112.png
http://www.samlexamerica.com/support/documents/WhitePaper-120240VACSingleSplitPhaseandMultiWireBranchCircuits.pdf
on page 2:
** NOTE: The phase of Hot Leg 2 (Phase B) is in the
opposite direction - i.e., 180° apart from the phase
of Hot Leg L1 (Phase A)
*COUGH*
SPNAK!!
-
i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in ASCII
art if you ask nicely.
see: Message-ID: <4ba4a50aaaebc7fb8a348293c5cf9f13@dizum.com>
-
snickerTurds can't seem to refute the following:
- begin snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --
/*
HOW TO RUN: download arbitrary precision libraries from:
http://www.hvks.com/Numerical/arbitrary_precision.html
place those files in a directory and save this file as
snickerSinewaveStew.cpp inside that same directory.
compiles with:
gcc -Wall -I. precisioncore.cpp snickerSinewaveStew.cpp -lstdc++
run with:
./a.out
enjoy the LULZ ;)
*/
#include <fprecision.h>
#include <iostream.h>
using namespace std;
int main(){
//float_precision MIN=float_precision(0);
//float_precision MAX=float_precision(0);
float_precision STEP=float_precision(.0001);
float_precision t=float_precision(0); // time variable
float_precision sum=float_precision(0); // sum of SnickerTurd's
ridiculous sinewave mess
float_precision snickerPrediction=float_precision(2550.25); //
snickerTurd's erroneous k0oK-k'lame Sum
float_precision PI;
PI =_float_table(_PI,25);
// this while loop will run forever, but snickers doesn't understand
why
while(sum < snickerPrediction){
// fakey's Sinewave Stew(TM) see: MID:
<db672705e57e4932eba3632562e0a941@dizum.com>
sum = (float_precision(150) * float_precision(
sin(float_precision(120)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(20.25) * float_precision(
sin(float_precision(33)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(1400)* float_precision(
sin(float_precision(150)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +(float_precision(20)*
float_precision(sin(float_precision(5013)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(600)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(13)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)))
+
(float_precision(360)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(1209)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)));
// perhaps show a few values larger than +2300 to educate teh
snickerTurds
if(sum>float_precision(2300)){
cout << "t=" << t << " sum=" << sum << std::endl;
}
t = t+STEP;
}
/*
Message-ID: <c8523e6d9c31e3282bbe581fa525a2a8@dizum.com>
"Oh, yeah... it's 2550.25 volts... so why does your graph not even
reach 2500 volts, given that eventually all the sinewaves will
constructively interfere (ie: *add* to each other) to *sum* to 2550.25
volts?"
Fakey, it doesn't reach 2500 volts because the summation of your sinewaves
never reaches that. They never reach their max values at the same time.
That's how stupid you are.
Message-ID: <731d08dcc702b9a8a13077ffc201e91f@dizum.com>
"I most certainly *did* prove otherwise. It can't even arrive at the
correct sinewave summation voltage of 2550.25 volts"
Fakey, you only *proved* that you are too inept to graph the equations and
notice a few things about the interactions of their frequencies when
summed.
the next line of code is never executed, but snickers DEFINITELY can't
figure out why it isn't and instead has a bunch of lame excuses while
still having not produced a value for t where the sum=2550.25, as he has
k0okily proklamed in many usenet messages.
*/
cout << "snickerTurds was right! the sum is " << sum << " at time t="
<<
t <<endl;
}
- end snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --
-
Fakey irrationally demands a theme song to foam to:
"all I really want your pathetic pwned ass to do is write me a classic
rock song as tribute to your Usenet Lord and Master..."
<f4f9193fa7d28b760a9de681e61427e7@dizum.com>
-
Somewhere Abouts Round Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:25:03 -0500, Friendly
Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
<snicker>
Fag. LOL
Idiot. LOL
Moron. LOL
Tranny. LOL
Libtard. LOL
Crackhead. LOL
GableTard. LOL
DildoRider. LOL
Bad Musician. LOL
Stick Figure. LOL
Terrible Liar. LOL
Sinewave Spammer. LOL
Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL
on top of old snick-ers, all covered with Fag. LOL
is where my usenet lord and mas-ter
can go straight to hell*
*hell doesn't exist. hope everybody is having a productive evening.
-
http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg
http://cafepress.com/kooktown
http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg
-
If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers
containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to
yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints
to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful
information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public. :)
if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you
downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try:
http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2
-
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop
The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as
it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects
or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it
presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written,
Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework
before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason
many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating
opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd
-
Coming soon! To a newsgroup near you!:
$ perl fakeyBot.pl
FakeyBot> I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you,
look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassing
bile from behind an anonymous dizum account? <snicker>
You> Robert Michael Wolfe
FakeyBot> Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-toed
boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks,
Robert. <snicker>
Robert> you talk about cocks a lot.
FakeyBot> Oh, I talk about sex a lot?
Robert> gay sex, mostly...
FakeyBot> Fag!
(just as useful as the original!)
-
snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n
friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message
<b5e7da79a455d0c9227b1b50e25e7ea1@dizum.com>:
"That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the
largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to
the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users were
using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then we
figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers
while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using
process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden
service. It's not rocket science.
_The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum how
I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can
get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my
distinct impression was that the "anonymity
research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to
trade CP._ (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a
kiddie pr0n network.)
That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation
Onymous was just icing on the cake."
-
Golden Killfile, June 2005
KOTM, November 2006
Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007
Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006
Busted Urinal Award, April 2007
Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008
Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007
AUK Mascot, September 2007
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-10 04:57 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <0e4c1eb8-580d-4f62-bc40-978eb07254a0@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #561068 |
On Wednesday, March 9, 2016 at 11:02:27 PM UTC-8, vallor wrote: > On Wed, 09 Mar 2016 20:38:26 +0100, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler > Emeritus wrote: > > meaning you owe me $100,000, Jim. You *will* pay, > > Jim. > > > > Or you'll drive him crazy? > > That's extortion, FNVHE. > > Plus, he probably lives in a state where one can't have unilateral > contracts. Which means you can stop your feet all you like with no > recourse, even if he had signed a contract, which he didn't. (Obviously.) I wouldn't have made the offer if I didn't know for a fact that it will never be claimed.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-10 18:26 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <5388afe7cc1b3ff12334cb3556c9cfbc@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #561068 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> vallor, in <news:dkckg0F329fU1@mid.individual.net> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > On Wed, 09 Mar 2016 20:38:26 +0100, Friendly Neighborhood > Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote: >> meaning you owe me $100,000, Jim. You *will* pay, Jim. > Or you'll drive him crazy? > > That's extortion, FNVHE. So do something about. Or STFU. Your choice. <snicker> > Plus, he probably lives in a state where one can't have unilateral > contracts. Which means you can stop your feet all you like with no > recourse, even if he had signed a contract, which he didn't. (Obviously.) Well, that leaves only one other option, doesn't it. Continue to destroy his kooky conspiracy theory until he's begging to pay me just to be rid of me to spare what shreds of sanity I allow him to keep. <snicker> -- Shiny Tinfoil Brain (aka Bite My Shiny Metal Ass) didn't know: ===================================== The Euler equation is a subset of equations known as the Euler-Fourier Formulas, thus that a sinewave is a transformation of a circle (which should have been intuitive, given that generators *rotate* to create *sinusoids*); That cross correlation is used with Fourier transforms; That superposition is the same as wave interference; That wave interference works the same for standing or traveling waves; That RMS and peak-to-peak voltage are two different things; That RMS isn't a DC voltage; That 170 volt peak, 120.208 volt RMS L-N 3-phase service gives 208.207 volts RMS L-L; That 4444525800 != 4400000000 != 1; The difference between frequency and period of a sinewave; That there's no difference between 'i' and 'j' in electrical engineering, physics and control systems engineering; What a positive or negative vector is; That the vector sum of 3-phase AC constitutes a closed loop per Kirchhoff's Voltage Law, thus that the three phases sum to zero; That "mnemonic" is not spelled "mneumonic"; That his claim: "Water is tetrahedral. It actually has 4 poles, 2 positive and 2 negative." is nonsense from a blathering moron. That water does not have negative poles. The oxygen has an electronegativity of 8+, the hydrogens 1+. That the term "electronegativity" denotes a *positive* nucleal charge. What the definition of the word "equivalent" is. And the moron continues to demonstrate his inability to read a graph. ===================================== SPNAK! <snicker>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-10 23:52 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <dkefljFd34uU3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #561180 |
On Thu, 10 Mar 2016 18:26:09 +0100, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
Emeritus wrote:
> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>
> vallor, in <news:dkckg0F329fU1@mid.individual.net> did thusly jump head
> first into the wood chipper again:
>
>> On Wed, 09 Mar 2016 20:38:26 +0100, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
>> Emeritus wrote:
>
>>> meaning you owe me $100,000, Jim. You *will* pay, Jim.
>
>> Or you'll drive him crazy?
>>
>> That's extortion, FNVHE.
>
> So do something about. Or STFU. Your choice.
Such a dichotomy in choices would indicate a serious lack of imagination.
>
> <snicker>
That one wasn't worth a "snicker", more like a "durrrr".
>> Plus, he probably lives in a state where one can't have unilateral
>> contracts. Which means you can stop your feet all you like with no
>> recourse, even if he had signed a contract, which he didn't.
>> (Obviously.)
>
> Well, that leaves only one other option, doesn't it. Continue to destroy
> his kooky conspiracy theory until he's begging to pay me just to be rid
> of me to spare what shreds of sanity I allow him to keep.
Again, limiting your choices like that betrays a decided lack of
imagination.
Have you considered expanding your consciousness through a healthy
discipline, chems, or other efficacious means?
ObSciPhysics:
fluidballs(6) XScreenSaver manual fluidballs(6)
NAME
fluidballs - the physics of bouncing balls.
SYNOPSIS
fluidballs [-display host:display.screen] [-visual vis‐
ual] [-window] [-root] [-count number] [-size number]
[-gravity number] [-wind number] [-elasticity number]
[-delay number] [-nonrandom] [-no-shake] [-fps]
DESCRIPTION
Models the physics of bouncing balls, or of particles in
a gas or fluid, depending on the settings. If "Shake
Box" is selected, then every now and then, the box will
be rotated, changing which direction is down (in order
to keep the settled balls in motion.)
--
-v
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "%" <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-10 17:01 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <97pnbn.9dt.17.1@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #561320 |
vallor wrote: > On Thu, 10 Mar 2016 18:26:09 +0100, Friendly Neighborhood Vote > Wrangler Emeritus wrote: > >> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> >> >> vallor, in <news:dkckg0F329fU1@mid.individual.net> did thusly jump >> head first into the wood chipper again: >> >>> On Wed, 09 Mar 2016 20:38:26 +0100, Friendly Neighborhood Vote >>> Wrangler Emeritus wrote: >> >>>> meaning you owe me $100,000, Jim. You *will* pay, Jim. >> >>> Or you'll drive him crazy? >>> >>> That's extortion, FNVHE. >> >> So do something about. Or STFU. Your choice. > > Such a dichotomy in choices would indicate a serious lack of > imagination. > >> >> <snicker> > > That one wasn't worth a "snicker", more like a "durrrr". > >>> Plus, he probably lives in a state where one can't have unilateral >>> contracts. Which means you can stop your feet all you like with no >>> recourse, even if he had signed a contract, which he didn't. >>> (Obviously.) >> >> Well, that leaves only one other option, doesn't it. Continue to >> destroy his kooky conspiracy theory until he's begging to pay me >> just to be rid of me to spare what shreds of sanity I allow him to >> keep. > > Again, limiting your choices like that betrays a decided lack of > imagination. > > Have you considered expanding your consciousness through a healthy > discipline, chems, or other efficacious means? > > ObSciPhysics: > > fluidballs(6) XScreenSaver manual fluidballs(6) > > NAME > fluidballs - the physics of bouncing balls. > > SYNOPSIS > fluidballs [-display host:display.screen] [-visual vis‐ > ual] [-window] [-root] [-count number] [-size number] > [-gravity number] [-wind number] [-elasticity number] > [-delay number] [-nonrandom] [-no-shake] [-fps] > > DESCRIPTION > Models the physics of bouncing balls, or of particles in > a gas or fluid, depending on the settings. If "Shake > Box" is selected, then every now and then, the box will > be rotated, changing which direction is down (in order > to keep the settled balls in motion.) does this come in blue
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-09 15:09 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <nbq3dl$30i$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #560825 |
On 3/9/2016 11:31 AM, James McGinn wrote: > On Tuesday, March 8, 2016 at 10:40:59 PM UTC-8, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote: > >> Um, Jim? You're talking to the guy who proved that CO2-driven AGW >> violates the Laws of Thermodynamics, and thus is a fairy tale. CO2 has >> been proven by NASA to be a global *cooling* gas. > > And the facts are that nobody has ever detected gaseous > H2O in earth's atmosphere. That is a lie. You call your imagination a fact. It is exceptionally clear that you are a liar. If not, prove it. Where is your proof ? none, so you lie. James McGinn is a Liar. Got That ?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-10 03:20 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <d971ab4f-f36b-4091-bc0e-c86bc238ff39@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #560825 |
Dne středa 9. března 2016 18:31:26 UTC+1 James McGinn napsal(a): > Facts are facts. And the facts are that nobody has ever detected gaseous > H2O in earth's atmosphere. Fact is you have never really tried to verify it. So you are either a liar either an ignorant.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-10 04:52 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <d2c3a4db-00e1-44bd-9e3e-e08619c71d31@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #561104 |
On Thursday, March 10, 2016 at 3:21:01 AM UTC-8, Poutnik wrote: > Dne středa 9. března 2016 18:31:26 UTC+1 James McGinn napsal(a): > > > Facts are facts. And the facts are that nobody has ever detected gaseous > > H2O in earth's atmosphere. > > Fact is you have never really tried to verify it. > So you are either a liar either an ignorant. I don't spend my time looking for bigfoot either.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-10 05:33 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <dc23554f-389d-44b6-815e-cded5d180864@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #561114 |
Dne čtvrtek 10. března 2016 13:52:57 UTC+1 James McGinn napsal(a): > On Thursday, March 10, 2016 at 3:21:01 AM UTC-8, Poutnik wrote: > > Dne středa 9. března 2016 18:31:26 UTC+1 James McGinn napsal(a): > > > > > Facts are facts. And the facts are that nobody has ever detected gaseous > > > H2O in earth's atmosphere. > > > > Fact is you have never really tried to verify it. > > So you are either a liar either an ignorant. > > I don't spend my time looking for bigfoot either. Neither for known evidences and general rules, what allows you to make up any physics you want.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 3 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3]
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web