Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless

From	vallor <vallor@cultnix.org>
Newsgroups	alt.usenet.kooks, sci.physics
Subject	Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless
Date	2016-03-10 07:02 +0000
Message-ID	<dkckg0F329fU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References	<f2218e86-7e1a-4153-9e62-ddf713267740@googlegroups.com> <f7cdf8b51e79787065a0c82f02e74e55@dizum.com>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On Wed, 09 Mar 2016 20:38:26 +0100, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
Emeritus wrote:
> meaning you  owe me $100,000, Jim. You *will* pay,
> Jim.
> 

Or you'll drive him crazy?

That's extortion, FNVHE.

Plus, he probably lives in a state where one can't have unilateral 
contracts.  Which means you can stop your feet all you like with no 
recourse, even if he had signed a contract, which he didn't.  (Obviously.)

-- 
 -v

Thread

Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-09 09:31 -0800
  Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-09 11:52 -0600
    Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-09 10:12 -0800
      Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-09 15:08 -0600
        Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-09 13:17 -0800
          Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-09 15:52 -0600
  Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-09 20:38 +0100
    Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-09 12:04 -0800
      Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-10 05:55 +0100
        Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-09 21:16 -0800
          Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-10 07:39 +0100
            Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless on!on@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2016-03-10 11:49 +0000
            Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 04:58 -0800
              Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-10 18:36 +0100
                Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 14:31 -0800
                Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 17:11 -0600
                Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 15:18 -0800
                Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 19:31 -0600
                Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-11 07:29 +0100
                Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 23:50 -0800
                Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-13 05:59 +0100
        Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-10 07:19 +0100
          Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 05:18 -0800
            Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 05:35 -0800
              Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-03-11 00:21 -0500
            Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 06:38 -0800
            Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-10 19:01 +0100
              Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 12:20 -0800
                Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 15:31 -0600
                Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 14:13 -0800
                Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-11 07:45 +0100
                Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-11 01:00 -0800
                Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-13 06:39 +0100
                Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-12 22:16 -0800
                Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-13 07:59 +0100
                Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-12 23:25 -0800
                Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-14 05:43 +0100
                Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-14 14:24 -0500
              Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless Scotland The Puny <breainiac@ball.net> - 2016-03-10 17:55 -0500
                Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 17:13 -0600
        Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless on!on@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2016-03-10 11:37 +0000
    Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-03-10 07:02 +0000
      Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-10 02:33 -0500
        Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-10 17:00 +0800
          Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-10 12:18 -0500
      Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 04:57 -0800
      Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-10 18:26 +0100
        Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-03-10 23:52 +0000
          Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 17:01 -0700
  Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-09 15:09 -0600
  Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 03:20 -0800
    Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 04:52 -0800
      Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 05:33 -0800

csiph-web