Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #561180

Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

vallor, in <news:dkckg0F329fU1@mid.individual.net> did thusly jump
head first into the wood chipper again:

> On Wed, 09 Mar 2016 20:38:26 +0100, Friendly Neighborhood
> Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote:

>> meaning you  owe me $100,000, Jim. You *will* pay, Jim.

> Or you'll drive him crazy?
> 
> That's extortion, FNVHE.

So do something about. Or STFU. Your choice.

<snicker>

> Plus, he probably lives in a state where one can't have unilateral 
> contracts.  Which means you can stop your feet all you like with no 
> recourse, even if he had signed a contract, which he didn't.  (Obviously.)

Well, that leaves only one other option, doesn't it. Continue to
destroy his kooky conspiracy theory until he's begging to pay me just
to be rid of me to spare what shreds of sanity I allow him to keep.

<snicker>

-- 

Shiny Tinfoil Brain (aka Bite My Shiny Metal Ass) didn't know:
=====================================
The Euler equation is a subset of equations known as the Euler-Fourier
Formulas, thus that a sinewave is a transformation of a circle (which
should have been intuitive, given that generators *rotate* to create
*sinusoids*);

That cross correlation is used with Fourier transforms;

That superposition is the same as wave interference;

That wave interference works the same for standing or traveling waves;

That RMS and peak-to-peak voltage are two different things;

That RMS isn't a DC voltage;

That 170 volt peak, 120.208 volt RMS L-N 3-phase service gives 208.207
volts RMS L-L;

That 4444525800 != 4400000000 != 1;

The difference between frequency and period of a sinewave;

That there's no difference between 'i' and 'j' in electrical
engineering, physics and control systems engineering;

What a positive or negative vector is;

That the vector sum of 3-phase AC constitutes a closed loop per
Kirchhoff's Voltage Law, thus that the three phases sum to zero;

That "mnemonic" is not spelled "mneumonic";

That his claim: "Water is tetrahedral. It actually has 4 poles, 2
positive and 2 negative." is nonsense from a blathering moron.

That water does not have negative poles. The oxygen has an
electronegativity of 8+, the hydrogens 1+.

That the term "electronegativity" denotes a *positive* nucleal charge.

What the definition of the word "equivalent" is.

And the moron continues to demonstrate his inability to read a graph.
=====================================

SPNAK!

<snicker>

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-09 09:31 -0800
  Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-09 11:52 -0600
    Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-09 10:12 -0800
      Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-09 15:08 -0600
        Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-09 13:17 -0800
          Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-09 15:52 -0600
  Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-09 20:38 +0100
    Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-09 12:04 -0800
      Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-10 05:55 +0100
        Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-09 21:16 -0800
          Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-10 07:39 +0100
            Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless on!on@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2016-03-10 11:49 +0000
            Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 04:58 -0800
              Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-10 18:36 +0100
                Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 14:31 -0800
                Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 17:11 -0600
                Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 15:18 -0800
                Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 19:31 -0600
                Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-11 07:29 +0100
                Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 23:50 -0800
                Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-13 05:59 +0100
        Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-10 07:19 +0100
          Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 05:18 -0800
            Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 05:35 -0800
              Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-03-11 00:21 -0500
            Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 06:38 -0800
            Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-10 19:01 +0100
              Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 12:20 -0800
                Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 15:31 -0600
                Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 14:13 -0800
                Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-11 07:45 +0100
                Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-11 01:00 -0800
                Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-13 06:39 +0100
                Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-12 22:16 -0800
                Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-13 07:59 +0100
                Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-12 23:25 -0800
                Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-14 05:43 +0100
                Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-14 14:24 -0500
              Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless Scotland The Puny <breainiac@ball.net> - 2016-03-10 17:55 -0500
                Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 17:13 -0600
        Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless on!on@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2016-03-10 11:37 +0000
    Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-03-10 07:02 +0000
      Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-10 02:33 -0500
        Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-10 17:00 +0800
          Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-10 12:18 -0500
      Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 04:57 -0800
      Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-10 18:26 +0100
        Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-03-10 23:52 +0000
          Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 17:01 -0700
  Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-09 15:09 -0600
  Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 03:20 -0800
    Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 04:52 -0800
      Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 05:33 -0800

csiph-web