Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless

From	Sergio <invalid@invalid.com>
Newsgroups	sci.physics
Subject	Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless
Date	2016-03-09 15:09 -0600
Organization	Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID	<nbq3dl$30i$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References	<f2218e86-7e1a-4153-9e62-ddf713267740@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

On 3/9/2016 11:31 AM, James McGinn wrote:
> On Tuesday, March 8, 2016 at 10:40:59 PM UTC-8, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote:
>
>> Um, Jim? You're talking to the guy who proved that CO2-driven AGW
>> violates the Laws of Thermodynamics, and thus is a fairy tale. CO2 has
>> been proven by NASA to be a global *cooling* gas.
>


>  And the facts are that nobody has ever detected gaseous
> H2O in earth's atmosphere.


That is a lie.

You call your imagination a fact.

It is exceptionally clear that you are a liar.


If not, prove it. Where is your proof ?

none, so you lie.

James McGinn is a Liar.  Got That ?

Thread

Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-09 09:31 -0800
  Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-09 11:52 -0600
    Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-09 10:12 -0800
      Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-09 15:08 -0600
        Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-09 13:17 -0800
          Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-09 15:52 -0600
  Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-09 20:38 +0100
    Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-09 12:04 -0800
      Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-10 05:55 +0100
        Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-09 21:16 -0800
          Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-10 07:39 +0100
            Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless on!on@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2016-03-10 11:49 +0000
            Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 04:58 -0800
              Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-10 18:36 +0100
                Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 14:31 -0800
                Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 17:11 -0600
                Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 15:18 -0800
                Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 19:31 -0600
                Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-11 07:29 +0100
                Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 23:50 -0800
                Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-13 05:59 +0100
        Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-10 07:19 +0100
          Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 05:18 -0800
            Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 05:35 -0800
              Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-03-11 00:21 -0500
            Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 06:38 -0800
            Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-10 19:01 +0100
              Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 12:20 -0800
                Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 15:31 -0600
                Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 14:13 -0800
                Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-11 07:45 +0100
                Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-11 01:00 -0800
                Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-13 06:39 +0100
                Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-12 22:16 -0800
                Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-13 07:59 +0100
                Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-12 23:25 -0800
                Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-14 05:43 +0100
                Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-14 14:24 -0500
              Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless Scotland The Puny <breainiac@ball.net> - 2016-03-10 17:55 -0500
                Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 17:13 -0600
        Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless on!on@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2016-03-10 11:37 +0000
    Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-03-10 07:02 +0000
      Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-10 02:33 -0500
        Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-10 17:00 +0800
          Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-10 12:18 -0500
      Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 04:57 -0800
      Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-10 18:26 +0100
        Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-03-10 23:52 +0000
          Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 17:01 -0700
  Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-09 15:09 -0600
  Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 03:20 -0800
    Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 04:52 -0800
      Re: Global Warming Hysteria Has Proven That Peer Review Without Substance is Worthless Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 05:33 -0800

csiph-web