Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #556134 > unrolled thread

Wow, look at all the spankards bleating...

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  Wow, look at all the spankards bleating... Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-24 06:44 +0100
    Re: Wow, look at all the spankards bleating... Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2016-02-23 22:10 -0800
      Re: Wow, look at all the spankards bleating... Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-24 19:19 +0100
        Re: Wow, look at all the spankards bleating... Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-24 11:57 -0700
    Re: Wow, look at all the spankards bleating... kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-27 03:32 -0500
      Re: Wow, look at all the spankards bleating... Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2016-02-27 00:40 -0800
        Re: Wow, look at all the spankards bleating... kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-27 04:44 -0500
      Re: Wow, look at all the spankards bleating... Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-27 20:18 +0100
        Re: Wow, look at all the spankards bleating... vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-02-28 04:17 +0000
          Re: Wow, look at all the spankards bleating... "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-27 21:21 -0800
            Re: Wow, look at all the spankards bleating... Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-28 19:25 +0100
              Re: Wow, look at all the spankards bleating... Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-28 12:04 -0700
                Re: Wow, look at all the spankards bleating... Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-29 03:23 +0800
                  Re: Wow, look at all the spankards bleating... Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-28 12:30 -0700
                    Re: Wow, look at all the spankards bleating... Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-29 03:56 +0800
                      Re: Wow, look at all the spankards bleating... "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-28 14:58 -0500
                  Re: Wow, look at all the spankards bleating... Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-29 07:43 +0100
        Re: Wow, look at all the spankards bleating... kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-28 02:25 -0500
          Re: Wow, look at all the spankards bleating... Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-28 19:00 +0100
            Re: Wow, look at all the spankards bleating... Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-28 11:21 -0700
              Re: Wow, look at all the spankards bleating... "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-28 14:03 -0500
            Re: Wow, look at all the spankards bleating... kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-28 14:23 -0500
              Re: Wow, look at all the spankards bleating... "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-28 14:29 -0500
              Re: Wow, look at all the spankards bleating... Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-29 07:53 +0100
                Re: Wow, look at all the spankards bleating... Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-29 05:44 -0700

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

#556134 — Wow, look at all the spankards bleating...

.... all day, and it's all about the latest victory of their Usenet
Lord and Master, accomplished via a relative handful of posts. Too
easy... because the spankards are morons.

SPNAAAAAAAK!

<snicker>

-- 

Kensi the moron wrote:
================================
The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2, and its area is 4*pi*r^2, so
the curvature is 4*pi
================================

Kensi the moron said the Gaussian curvature = 1 / r^2 *and* the
Gaussian curvature = 4 * pi.

Therefore, 1 / r^2 = 4 * pi
Therefore, r = 0.28209479176

Kensi the moron says every sphere in the entire universe has a radius
of 0.28209479176. Of course, being a moron, kensi didn't specify the
units.

The moron also said the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is dependent
upon that sphere's radius. Wholly incorrect.

Kensi the moron was corrected:
================================
Did... did you just say "the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2" *and* "the
Gaussian curvature = 4*pi" therefore "1/r^2 = 4*pi"? Now you
backpedal, LunkHead.

You mean the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2 * (4*pi*r^2) therefore =
(4*pi), and therefore the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is
independent of r due to its symmetry, thereby proving your original
"The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2" blather *wrong*?
================================

But Kensi the moron persists in insisting that what he wrote isn't
fucked up, and that the Gaussian curvature of a sphere *does* depend
upon its radius, because he doesn't understand the equations he's
trying to use, he doesn't know the difference between 'constant
curvature' and 'Gaussian curvature', he doesn't know what an integral
is, and he's a halfwit who can't figure out even basic geometry
problems.

Now remember, this is the same moron who k'lames he's an
astrophysicist... yet he's stated that the Riemann curvature tensor
concept being the central mathematical tool in the theory of general
relativity and the modern theory of gravity, and the curvature of
space-time being described by the geodesic deviation equation, is
"science fiction" and "a howler".

In addition, the moron k'lamed that 4-D Minkowski space-time was
mostly positive Gaussian curvature, with only small areas of negative
Gaussian curvature, which proves the moron has no idea of the effects
of mass or magnetism upon the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold.

He has k'lamed that the Gaussian curvature of the universe is
predominantly positive, which means Lunkhead believes that massive
objects such as planets, stars and black holes ride *above* the
tangential plane of the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, thereby
making the planes of principal curvature positive Gaussian curvature,
and thus causing gravity to *repel*.

Lunkhead the moron has k'lamed that magnetism has "*no* effect" upon
the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, then backpedaled and said there
was a "small amount of positive curvature due to the energy density in
the field", thereby proving he doesn't know how magnetism affects the
4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, and denies the existence of
magnetic attraction.

Thus, Kensi the moron has described a universe in which planets could
not maintain their orbits, a universe in which magnets could not work,
and therefore a universe which could not exist.

Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow at a colder temperature
than the surrounding atmosphere is somehow violating the First and
Second Laws of Thermodynamics and giving off "blackbody radiation".

Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow gives off "blackbody
radiation" at wavelengths that would put the temperature of the snow
at 489 F.

Kensi is the same moron who first denied the existence of the
~11-micron infrared atmospheric window, then backpedaled and k'lamed
that snow emitted outside that ~11-micron window, and was proven
wrong. Then the spankard moron tried to use the backpedal of
"blackbody radiation" being at a different wavelength than spectral
emission, yet again demonstrating that the moron has no clue how
spectral absorption and emission works.

Kensi is the same moron who denies the NASA SABER study proving that
CO2 is a global *cooling* gas _because_ of the ~11-micron infrared
atmospheric window.

The reality exposed by the NASA SABER study also proves the Klimate
Katastrophe Kook Anthropogenic Global Warming k'lame of CO2 being a
global warming gas is a fairy tale that violates the First and Second
Laws of Thermodynamics, thus destroying CO2-induced AGW, yet this same
moron continues to cling to his delusions.

Kensi is the same moron who continues to cling to his delusion that
global warming causes more intense hurricanes, despite three
peer-reviewed studies proving the exact opposite.

Kensi is not an astrophysicist, he's far too stupid to be. He's just a
slumpy dumpy frumpy lumpy loser trying to pretend that he's
intelligent... and failing badly.

That would be because Kensi is a moron with an underpowered brain that
struggles (and fails) to understand reality.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#556141

x-no-archive: yes

On 2/23/2016 9:44 PM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote:
> .... all day, and it's all about the latest victory of their Usenet
> Lord and Master, accomplished via a relative handful of posts. Too
> easy... because the spankards are morons.
>
> SPNAAAAAAAK!
>
> <snicker>


Do you think the awards should be revived, like the proverbial phoenix?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#556250

Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Janithor, in <news:najhhj$at9$2@news.albasani.net> did thusly jump
head first into the wood chipper again:

> On 2/23/2016 9:44 PM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote:

>> .... all day, and it's all about the latest victory of their Usenet
>> Lord and Master, accomplished via a relative handful of posts. Too
>> easy... because the spankards are morons.
>>
>> SPNAAAAAAAK!
>>
>> <snicker>

> Do you think the awards should be revived, like the proverbial phoenix?

Would that contribute to the already benchmark level of hilarity as
the kooks get drop-kicked across Usenet daily?

<snicker>

-- 

Kensi the moron wrote:
================================
The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2, and its area is 4*pi*r^2, so
the curvature is 4*pi
================================

Kensi the moron said the Gaussian curvature = 1 / r^2 *and* the
Gaussian curvature = 4 * pi.

Therefore, 1 / r^2 = 4 * pi
Therefore, r = 0.28209479176

Kensi the moron says every sphere in the entire universe has a radius
of 0.28209479176. Of course, being a moron, kensi didn't specify the
units.

The moron also said the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is dependent
upon that sphere's radius. Wholly incorrect.

Kensi the moron was corrected:
================================
Did... did you just say "the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2" *and* "the
Gaussian curvature = 4*pi" therefore "1/r^2 = 4*pi"? Now you
backpedal, LunkHead.

You mean the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2 * (4*pi*r^2) therefore =
(4*pi), and therefore the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is
independent of r due to its symmetry, thereby proving your original
"The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2" blather *wrong*?
================================

But Kensi the moron persists in insisting that what he wrote isn't
fucked up, and that the Gaussian curvature of a sphere *does* depend
upon its radius, because he doesn't understand the equations he's
trying to use, he doesn't know the difference between 'constant
curvature' and 'Gaussian curvature', he doesn't know what an integral
is, and he's a halfwit who can't figure out even basic geometry
problems.

Now remember, this is the same moron who k'lames he's an
astrophysicist... yet he's stated that the Riemann curvature tensor
concept being the central mathematical tool in the theory of general
relativity and the modern theory of gravity, and the curvature of
space-time being described by the geodesic deviation equation, is
"science fiction" and "a howler".

In addition, the moron k'lamed that 4-D Minkowski space-time was
mostly positive Gaussian curvature, with only small areas of negative
Gaussian curvature, which proves the moron has no idea of the effects
of mass or magnetism upon the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold.

He has k'lamed that the Gaussian curvature of the universe is
predominantly positive, which means Lunkhead believes that massive
objects such as planets, stars and black holes ride *above* the
tangential plane of the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, thereby
making the planes of principal curvature positive Gaussian curvature,
and thus causing gravity to *repel*.

Lunkhead the moron has k'lamed that magnetism has "*no* effect" upon
the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, then backpedaled and said there
was a "small amount of positive curvature due to the energy density in
the field", thereby proving he doesn't know how magnetism affects the
4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, and denies the existence of
magnetic attraction.

Thus, Kensi the moron has described a universe in which planets could
not maintain their orbits, a universe in which magnets could not work,
and therefore a universe which could not exist.

Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow at a colder temperature
than the surrounding atmosphere is somehow violating the First and
Second Laws of Thermodynamics and giving off "blackbody radiation".

Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow gives off "blackbody
radiation" at wavelengths that would put the temperature of the snow
at 489 F.

Kensi is the same moron who first denied the existence of the
~11-micron infrared atmospheric window, then backpedaled and k'lamed
that snow emitted outside that ~11-micron window, and was proven
wrong. Then the spankard moron tried to use the backpedal of
"blackbody radiation" being at a different wavelength than spectral
emission, yet again demonstrating that the moron has no clue how
spectral absorption and emission works.

Kensi is the same moron who denies the NASA SABER study proving that
CO2 is a global *cooling* gas _because_ of the ~11-micron infrared
atmospheric window.

The reality exposed by the NASA SABER study also proves the Klimate
Katastrophe Kook Anthropogenic Global Warming k'lame of CO2 being a
global warming gas is a fairy tale that violates the First and Second
Laws of Thermodynamics, thus destroying CO2-induced AGW, yet this same
moron continues to cling to his delusions.

Kensi is the same moron who continues to cling to his delusion that
global warming causes more intense hurricanes, despite three
peer-reviewed studies proving the exact opposite.

Kensi is not an astrophysicist, he's far too stupid to be. He's just a
slumpy dumpy frumpy lumpy loser trying to pretend that he's
intelligent... and failing badly.

That would be because Kensi is a moron with an underpowered brain that
struggles (and fails) to understand reality.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#556261

On Wed, 24 Feb 2016 19:19:45 +0100 (CET), Friendly Neighborhood Vote
Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

>Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>
>Janithor, in <news:najhhj$at9$2@news.albasani.net> did thusly jump
>head first into the wood chipper again:
>
>> On 2/23/2016 9:44 PM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote:
>
>>> .... all day, and it's all about the latest victory of their Usenet
>>> Lord and Master, accomplished via a relative handful of posts. Too
>>> easy... because the spankards are morons.
>>>
>>> SPNAAAAAAAK!
>>>
>>> <snicker>
>
>> Do you think the awards should be revived, like the proverbial phoenix?
>
>Would that contribute to the already benchmark level of hilarity as
>the kooks get drop-kicked across Usenet daily?

And then you woke up.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#557159

On 24/02/2016 12:44 AM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote:
> <snicker>
>
> --
>
> Kensi<FOOM!>

Aww, is ko0ky still obsessing over me? Yep, so much that I'm now his 
default .sig-o-haet when he isn't replying to somebody.

I think I should be declared his official dogwhistle holder now, hmm?

*snicker*

-- 
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here."                                                     ~Checkmate

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#557161

x-no-archive: yes

On 2/27/2016 12:32 AM, kensi wrote:
> On 24/02/2016 12:44 AM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote:
>> <snicker>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Kensi<FOOM!>
>
> Aww, is ko0ky still obsessing over me? Yep, so much that I'm now his
> default .sig-o-haet when he isn't replying to somebody.
>
> I think I should be declared his official dogwhistle holder now, hmm?
>
> *snicker*


Someone needs to bring back the awards.  It's like Somalia or Syria in 
here without a lawful authority.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#557172

On 27/02/2016 3:40 AM, Janithor wrote:
> On 2/27/2016 12:32 AM, kensi wrote:
>> Aww, is ko0ky still obsessing over me? Yep, so much that I'm now his
>> default .sig-o-haet when he isn't replying to somebody.
>>
>> I think I should be declared his official dogwhistle holder now, hmm?
>>
>> *snicker*
>
> Someone needs to bring back the awards.  It's like Somalia or Syria in
> here without a lawful authority.

Watch it, punk, or I'll issue you a Tinfoil Sombrero.

-- 
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here."                                                     ~Checkmate

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#557305

Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Ko0O0oki kensi the LunkHeaded LibTard, in
<news:narmvb$cue$2@gioia.aioe.org> did thusly jump head first into the
wood chipper again:

> On 24/02/2016 12:44 AM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
> Emeritus wrote:

>> <snicker>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Kensi<FOOM!>

> Aww, is ko0ky still obsessing over me? Yep, so much that I'm now his 
> default .sig-o-haet when he isn't replying to somebody.
> 
> I think I should be declared his official dogwhistle holder now, hmm?
> 
> *snicker*
> 
> -- 
> "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
> the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
> "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
> in here."                                                     ~Checkmate

Awww, look at spankard backpedal away from all that SPNAK!age in my
..sig... the anti-science nitwit doesn't dare try to refute my
truthiness... that was a hard-learned lesson, eh, LunkHead?

Even now, you can't face that spankage... you can only snip it out,
bleat out a mewling 'victolly!' and run away. Again.

SPNAK!

<snicker>

Message-ID: <65d0f5e1ad03d42086b4a492e0eba763@dizum.com>
========================================================
========================================================
> <http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=134389570800>  

Kensi was "vacationing"... in Pembroke, Ontario, Canada... quite by
coincidence, you understand... LunkHead was there with Nadegda,
apparently.

And Nadegda and Kensi most definitely were *not* there to double-team
on Paul Derbyshire's mushroom-slathered meatpole.

Paul Derbyshire is a life-long virgin, you see. He'll never touch
anything more feminine than his hand with a Barbie-doll wig glued to
it, paste-on eyes, and his mother's hooker-pink lipstick smeared
between thumb and index finger knuckle. Ironically, he's named his
f(e)isty lover "kensi". She's really hot in the sack... an expert in
getting anal. Sometimes, she takes it so deeply it pokes out of her
mouth!

Oh, here's Kensi:
<http://goo.gl/hdpXFC>

She's Paul Derbyshire's regular Saturday night thang. Ain't she purdy?
I'm sure a lot of guys have hit that. Chimpy's hit that... twice.

Strangely and quite coincidentally, Paul Derbyshire calls his right
thumb "Nadegda". I found a picture of Nadegda, too.

<https://goo.gl/sbdRcq>

You don't wanna know what she's into. *Really* kinky stuff. Suffice to
say sometimes she invites along her four sisters for what she calls
"sexy spelunking". You know what they say... fugly chicks gotta go
kinky. LOL

> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sdyBYSuqQBQ>

> P.S. How's the astrophysics coming along? Have you visited 
> any good telescopes lately?

Ask kensi which observatories nearby have time standard control
capability. That's something every astronomer should know, right?

<snicker>
========================================================
========================================================

I note you've studiously avoided answering which observatories have
time standard control capability, LunkHead... only those who actually
work at an observatory would even know about such a thing, let alone
which observatories have that capability... but then, everyone knows
lumpy dumpy frumpy slumpy wannabes always out their womanly socks
because they're too stoooopid to play the part of the identity they've
assumed. Perhaps for your next sock, you should play the part of a mop
jockey or a streetwalker... that'd be something you could handle,
dude.

<snicker>

-- 

Kensi the moron wrote:
================================
The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2, and its area is 4*pi*r^2, so
the curvature is 4*pi
================================

Kensi the moron said the Gaussian curvature = 1 / r^2 *and* the
Gaussian curvature = 4 * pi.

Therefore, 1 / r^2 = 4 * pi
Therefore, r = 0.28209479176

Kensi the moron says every sphere in the entire universe has a radius
of 0.28209479176. Of course, being a moron, kensi didn't specify the
units.

The moron also said the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is dependent
upon that sphere's radius. Wholly incorrect.

Kensi the moron was corrected:
================================
Did... did you just say "the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2" *and* "the
Gaussian curvature = 4*pi" therefore "1/r^2 = 4*pi"? Now you
backpedal, LunkHead.

You mean the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2 * (4*pi*r^2) therefore =
(4*pi), and therefore the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is
independent of r due to its symmetry, thereby proving your original
"The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2" blather *wrong*?
================================

But Kensi the moron persists in insisting that what he wrote isn't
fucked up, and that the Gaussian curvature of a sphere *does* depend
upon its radius, because he doesn't understand the equations he's
trying to use, he doesn't know the difference between 'constant
curvature' and 'Gaussian curvature', he doesn't know what an integral
is, and he's a halfwit who can't figure out even basic geometry
problems.

Now remember, this is the same moron who k'lames he's an
astrophysicist... yet he's stated that the Riemann curvature tensor
concept being the central mathematical tool in the theory of general
relativity and the modern theory of gravity, and the curvature of
space-time being described by the geodesic deviation equation, is
"science fiction" and "a howler".

In addition, the moron k'lamed that 4-D Minkowski space-time was
mostly positive Gaussian curvature, with only small areas of negative
Gaussian curvature, which proves the moron has no idea of the effects
of mass or magnetism upon the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold.

He has k'lamed that the Gaussian curvature of the universe is
predominantly positive, which means Lunkhead believes that massive
objects such as planets, stars and black holes ride *above* the
tangential plane of the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, thereby
making the planes of principal curvature positive Gaussian curvature,
and thus causing gravity to *repel*.

Lunkhead the moron has k'lamed that magnetism has "*no* effect" upon
the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, then backpedaled and said there
was a "small amount of positive curvature due to the energy density in
the field", thereby proving he doesn't know how magnetism affects the
4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, and denies the existence of
magnetic attraction.

Thus, Kensi the moron has described a universe in which planets could
not maintain their orbits, a universe in which magnets could not work,
and therefore a universe which could not exist.

Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow at a colder temperature
than the surrounding atmosphere is somehow violating the First and
Second Laws of Thermodynamics and giving off "blackbody radiation".

Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow gives off "blackbody
radiation" at wavelengths that would put the temperature of the snow
at 489 F.

Kensi is the same moron who first denied the existence of the
~11-micron infrared atmospheric window, then backpedaled and k'lamed
that snow emitted outside that ~11-micron window, and was proven
wrong. Then the spankard moron tried to use the backpedal of
"blackbody radiation" being at a different wavelength than spectral
emission, yet again demonstrating that the moron has no clue how
spectral absorption and emission works.

Kensi is the same moron who denies the NASA SABER study proving that
CO2 is a global *cooling* gas _because_ of the ~11-micron infrared
atmospheric window.

The reality exposed by the NASA SABER study also proves the Klimate
Katastrophe Kook Anthropogenic Global Warming k'lame of CO2 being a
global warming gas is a fairy tale that violates the First and Second
Laws of Thermodynamics, thus destroying CO2-induced AGW, yet this same
moron continues to cling to his delusions.

Kensi is the same moron who continues to cling to his delusion that
global warming causes more intense hurricanes, despite three
peer-reviewed studies proving the exact opposite.

Kensi is not an astrophysicist, he's far too stupid to be. He's just a
slumpy dumpy frumpy lumpy loser trying to pretend that he's
intelligent... and failing badly.

That would be because Kensi is a moron with an underpowered brain that
struggles (and fails) to understand reality.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#557481

On Sat, 27 Feb 2016 20:18:41 +0100, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
Emeritus wrote:

> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
> 
> Ko0O0oki kensi the LunkHeaded LibTard, in
> <news:narmvb$cue$2@gioia.aioe.org> did thusly jump head first into the
> wood chipper again:
> 
>> On 24/02/2016 12:44 AM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
>> wrote:
> 
>>> <snicker>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Kensi<FOOM!>
> 
>> Aww, is ko0ky still obsessing over me? Yep, so much that I'm now his
>> default .sig-o-haet when he isn't replying to somebody.
>> 
>> I think I should be declared his official dogwhistle holder now, hmm?
>> 
>> *snicker*
>> 
>> --
>> "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
>> the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David
>> Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in
>> here."                                                     ~Checkmate
> 
> Awww, look at spankard backpedal away from all that SPNAK!age in my
> ..sig... the anti-science nitwit doesn't dare try to refute my
> truthiness... that was a hard-learned lesson, eh, LunkHead?
> 
> Even now, you can't face that spankage... you can only snip it out,
> bleat out a mewling 'victolly!' and run away. Again.

I'm not sure why, but my eyes have learned to read only the first three 
or four words of paragraphs like the preceding two, before the visual 
cortex protests with a "scram" signal that could be translated as "gawd, 
there he goes again."

> <snicker>

What would happen if you could see such things as others see them?

-- 
 -v

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#557504

In article <djfamdFje79U4@mid.individual.net>, vallor@cultnix.org 
says...


> 
> On Sat, 27 Feb 2016 20:18:41 +0100, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
> Emeritus wrote:
> 
> > Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
> > 
> > Ko0O0oki kensi the LunkHeaded LibTard, in
> > <news:narmvb$cue$2@gioia.aioe.org> did thusly jump head first into the
> > wood chipper again:
> > 
> >> On 24/02/2016 12:44 AM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
> >> wrote:
> > 
> >>> <snicker>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>>
> >>> Kensi<FOOM!>
> > 
> >> Aww, is ko0ky still obsessing over me? Yep, so much that I'm now his
> >> default .sig-o-haet when he isn't replying to somebody.
> >> 
> >> I think I should be declared his official dogwhistle holder now, hmm?
> >> 
> >> *snicker*
> >> 
> >> --
> >> "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
> >> the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David
> >> Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in
> >> here."                                                     ~Checkmate
> > 
> > Awww, look at spankard backpedal away from all that SPNAK!age in my
> > ..sig... the anti-science nitwit doesn't dare try to refute my
> > truthiness... that was a hard-learned lesson, eh, LunkHead?
> > 
> > Even now, you can't face that spankage... you can only snip it out,
> > bleat out a mewling 'victolly!' and run away. Again.
> 
> I'm not sure why, but my eyes have learned to read only the first three 
> or four words of paragraphs like the preceding two, before the visual 
> cortex protests with a "scram" signal that could be translated as "gawd, 
> there he goes again."
> 
> > <snicker>
> 
> What would happen if you could see such things as others see them?

Did... did the Faggy Fakeytard just k'lame AGAIN that Kensi is a Paul 
Derbyshire sock... and Nads too?  Why, yes!  Yes he did... except that 
most of us have known or strongly suspected it for quite some time.  
Thing is, I actually like Paul Derbyshire... he's an excellent troll, 
and smart enough to slap that Faggy Fakeytard all over Usenet.  That's 
why I gave him the first and only Checkmate Hammer of Thor (tm).  Why, 
it's even better than my own Hammer of Thor that I won after only three 
months in AUK.  Keep up the good work, Paul!

BTW... it would be just terrible if you ever got around to outing what 
you know about that Faggy Fakeytard... it's not like he doesn't deserve 
it.  Just planting a seed...

<snicker>

-- 

Checkmate, AUK DoW #1, new FNVW of AUK, and Fakey's master
AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore)
Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Vote  (Post-Burnore)
Originator of the "Dance for me" (tm) lame
Copyright © 2016 
all rights reserved 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#557606

Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Jim "Jism Junkie Gerbil Cannon" Gorman (aka Chimpy the Coin-Slot
Operated SuckMonkey, aka Checkmate The PickleTickler), in
<news:MPG.313c23a8fde210fa98c969@news.altopia.com> did thusly jump
head first into the wood chipper again:

> In article <djfamdFje79U4@mid.individual.net>, vallor@cultnix.org 
> says...

>> On Sat, 27 Feb 2016 20:18:41 +0100, Friendly Neighborhood
>> Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote:

>>> Ko0O0oki kensi the LunkHeaded LibTard, in
>>> <news:narmvb$cue$2@gioia.aioe.org> did thusly jump head first into the
>>> wood chipper again:

>>>> On 24/02/2016 12:44 AM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
>>>> wrote:

>>>>> <snicker>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>>
>>>>> Kensi<FOOM!>
>>> 
>>>> Aww, is ko0ky still obsessing over me? Yep, so much that I'm now his
>>>> default .sig-o-haet when he isn't replying to somebody.
>>>> 
>>>> I think I should be declared his official dogwhistle holder now, hmm?

>>> Awww, look at spankard backpedal away from all that SPNAK!age in my
>>> .sig... the anti-science nitwit doesn't dare try to refute my
>>> truthiness... that was a hard-learned lesson, eh, LunkHead?
>>> 
>>> Even now, you can't face that spankage... you can only snip it out,
>>> bleat out a mewling 'victolly!' and run away. Again.

>> I'm not sure why, but my eyes have learned to read only the first three 
>> or four words of paragraphs like the preceding two, before the visual 
>> cortex protests with a "scram" signal

Then you must be a libtard... they're all allergic to reality. LOL

Which means you're actively rejecting that doctorate-level education
you could be receiving for free. But hey, if you can get through your
pathetic life knowing next to nothing, then why bother trying to
improve your lot in life, eh? That is, after all, why the Democrat
party is largely populated by moochers and losers, whom the Democrat
party politicians cater and pander to with abandon.

<snicker>

>> that could be translated as "gawd, there he goes again."

Which is accurately translated as "Gawd, there he goes again,
promulgating more truth I can't refute!"

<snicker>

>> What would happen if you could see such things as others see them?

Then the world would be a very confusing place, as it must be for you
morons. LOL

> Did... did the Faggy Fakeytard just k'lame AGAIN that Kensi is a Paul 
> Derbyshire sock... and Nads too?

You'll be getting right on providing the MID where I've ever said
"Kensi is a Paul Derbyshire sock", Chimpy, or you'll be forced to
admit you're a bleatfarting moronic halfwitted
mushroom-slathered-meatpole horking faggot.

As for Nadegda... "she" was outed by Ray Banana "accidentally"
exposing the IP address in Nadegda's posts... and it geolocated to
Pembroke, which is why Nadegda disappeared. LunkHead tried damage
control by k'laming that "Nadegda" was "vacationing" in Pembroke
(thereby admitting that Nadegda was in Pembroke)... then tried to
k'lame it was someone frogging "Nadegda"... then fell silent on the
topic, knowing that sock is well and truly dead.

<snicker>

>  Why, yes!  Yes he did... except that 
> most of us have known or strongly suspected it for quite some time.  
> Thing is, I actually like Paul Derbyshire...

Hence your getting into two "hawt wet 69s" (Chimpy's words) with Paul
Derbyshire... and your attempting to get into a third. Because you're
a fag like that.

<snicker>

> he's an excellent troll,

He's a moron who blathers unscientific bullshit and can't help but out
his womanly socks, whereupon he starts blathering even more stupidity,
backpedaling and building strawmen to beat the band. I've drop-kicked
LunkHead straight across Usenet on multiple occasions because his puny
little brain can't seem to grasp reality.

<snicker>

> and smart enough to slap that Faggy Fakeytard all over Usenet.

Hmmmm, that must be why I drop-kicked LunkHead clear across Usenet...
the moron k'lames the Laws of Thermodynamics don't apply in LunkHead
Land, that heat can flow from colder to hotter; that snow can exist at
489 F; that gravity repels; that increasing cloud cover over snow, ice
or water causes warming... all wrong.

<snicker>

> That's why I gave him the first and only Checkmate Hammer of Thor (tm).

Because you love mushroom-slathered meatpole? What a fag! LOL

> Why, it's even better than my own Hammer of Thor

You mean the "awards from a kook" that the old guard stAUKer cabal
were handing out like candy to garner acolytes? And you fell right in
line... the only time you stepped *out* of line is after I'd so
decimated the old guard stAUKer cabal that they were too weak to
counter your silly little limp-wristed slaps. Whereupon you started
k'laming you'd defeated all of them, because you're a pathetic
historical revisionist Walter Mitty type who can only k'lame to have
defeated the old guard stAUKer cabal in two months (after backpedaling
from your one month k'lame) because I stomped them flat for three
years... IOW, you k'lame to have done in two months what I did in
three years because I did for three years what you're too much of a
pants-shitting coward to ever do.

So you're a liar *and* a deceitful backstabbing turncoat to those who
considered you an ally. You're Andre M. 'Bit Rot' Winsor with a
massive drug habit and a penchant for morbidly obese dudes in pink
spandex and lubed-up boxing gloves. LOL

Who outed Bit Rot and ran him off? Oh yeah... this guy. Now you k'lame
differently, Walter Mitty.

<snicker>

> that I won after
> only three months in AUK.  Keep up the good work, Paul!

Awww, look at Chimpy bowing before that spankard Paul Derbyshire...
worshiping a craven image because you so fear the Ultimate Deity is
never a wise course, Chimpy.

<snicker>

> BTW... it would be just terrible if you ever got around to outing what 
> you know about that Faggy Fakeytard

Bwahahaha! Which is nothing. The slump-shouldered little moron has
nothing. It's been 583 days since LunkHead k'lamed he could out me due
to his "kookology experience", "profound psychological insight" and
"cryptanalysis skills", yet he's thus far run from six challenges to
out me, for 583 days and counting (ie: he doesn't dare provide any of
his so-called "proof", for fear that he outs the fact that he's
kooking out and seeing me everywhere).

We're waiting, LunkHead. Tick, tock, tick, tock...

> ... it's not like he doesn't deserve 
> it.  Just planting a seed...

You're just pathetically begging. Both for another "hawt wet 69"
(Chimpy's words) from mushroomboi, and for the slope-shouldered
know-nothing moronic loser to out me. You'll get the first in spades,
I'm sure... the second you'll never get.

<snicker>

Message-ID: <a76a23be8f4a22ea6c31dde5b3e2dd8c@dizum.com>
========================================================
========================================================
<https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/alt.usenet.kooks/yhNtCQr1rpE/GlDtnrGgMxsJ>
<http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=145664837800>

From: Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
Newsgroups: alt.usenet.kooks
Subject: Re: A REVIEW: How much does Keith "Murphy" McElroy suck at
this Usenet thing?
Date: Sat, 4 May 2013 00:58:29 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <km1mfl$t4j$7@dont-email.me>
Injection-Info: mx05.eternal-september.org;
posting-host="67.70.58.178";
Summary: Murphy is a kook with hundreds, if not thousands, of sock
puppets
Keywords: Murphy
X-Mailer: Forte Agent 4.2/32.1118
========================================================
========================================================

Nadegda got outed as that lumpy dumpy frumpy slumpy shroomtard Paul
Derbyshire by Ray Banana. When LunkHead learned of this, he
immediately started backpedaling and k'laming that "Nadegda" was
actually just "vacationing" in Pembroke. LOL!

Message-ID: <65d0f5e1ad03d42086b4a492e0eba763@dizum.com>
========================================================
========================================================
> <http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=134389570800>  

Kensi was "vacationing"... in Pembroke, Ontario, Canada... quite by
coincidence, you understand... LunkHead was there with Nadegda,
apparently.

And Nadegda and Kensi most definitely were *not* there to double-team
on Paul Derbyshire's mushroom-slathered meatpole.

Paul Derbyshire is a life-long virgin, you see. He'll never touch
anything more feminine than his hand with a Barbie-doll wig glued to
it, paste-on eyes, and his mother's hooker-pink lipstick smeared
between thumb and index finger knuckle. Ironically, he's named his
f(e)isty lover "kensi". She's really hot in the sack... an expert in
getting anal. Sometimes, she takes it so deeply it pokes out of her
mouth!

Oh, here's Kensi:
<http://goo.gl/hdpXFC>

She's Paul Derbyshire's regular Saturday night thang. Ain't she purdy?
I'm sure a lot of guys have hit that. Chimpy's hit that... twice.

Strangely and quite coincidentally, Paul Derbyshire calls his right
thumb "Nadegda". I found a picture of Nadegda, too.

<https://goo.gl/sbdRcq>

You don't wanna know what she's into. *Really* kinky stuff. Suffice to
say sometimes she invites along her four sisters for what she calls
"sexy spelunking". You know what they say... fugly chicks gotta go
kinky. LOL

> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sdyBYSuqQBQ>

> P.S. How's the astrophysics coming along? Have you visited 
> any good telescopes lately?

Ask kensi which observatories nearby have time standard control
capability. That's something every astronomer should know, right?

<snicker>
========================================================
========================================================

I note you've studiously avoided answering which observatories have
time standard control capability, LunkHead... only those who actually
work at an observatory would even know about such a thing, let alone
which observatories have that capability... but then, everyone knows
lumpy dumpy frumpy slumpy wannabes always out their womanly socks
because they're too stoooopid to play the part of the identity they've
assumed. Perhaps for your next sock, you should play the part of a mop
jockey or a streetwalker... that'd be something you could handle,
dude.

<snicker>

-- 

Kensi the moron wrote:
================================
The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2, and its area is 4*pi*r^2, so
the curvature is 4*pi
================================

Kensi the moron said the Gaussian curvature = 1 / r^2 *and* the
Gaussian curvature = 4 * pi.

Therefore, 1 / r^2 = 4 * pi
Therefore, r = 0.28209479176

Kensi the moron says every sphere in the entire universe has a radius
of 0.28209479176. Of course, being a moron, kensi didn't specify the
units.

The moron also said the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is dependent
upon that sphere's radius. Wholly incorrect.

Kensi the moron was corrected:
================================
Did... did you just say "the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2" *and* "the
Gaussian curvature = 4*pi" therefore "1/r^2 = 4*pi"? Now you
backpedal, LunkHead.

You mean the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2 * (4*pi*r^2) therefore =
(4*pi), and therefore the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is
independent of r due to its symmetry, thereby proving your original
"The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2" blather *wrong*?
================================

But Kensi the moron persists in insisting that what he wrote isn't
fucked up, and that the Gaussian curvature of a sphere *does* depend
upon its radius, because he doesn't understand the equations he's
trying to use, he doesn't know the difference between 'constant
curvature' and 'Gaussian curvature', he doesn't know what an integral
is, and he's a halfwit who can't figure out even basic geometry
problems.

Now remember, this is the same moron who k'lames he's an
astrophysicist... yet he's stated that the Riemann curvature tensor
concept being the central mathematical tool in the theory of general
relativity and the modern theory of gravity, and the curvature of
space-time being described by the geodesic deviation equation, is
"science fiction" and "a howler".

In addition, the moron k'lamed that 4-D Minkowski space-time was
mostly positive Gaussian curvature, with only small areas of negative
Gaussian curvature, which proves the moron has no idea of the effects
of mass or magnetism upon the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold.

He has k'lamed that the Gaussian curvature of the universe is
predominantly positive, which means Lunkhead believes that massive
objects such as planets, stars and black holes ride *above* the
tangential plane of the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, thereby
making the planes of principal curvature positive Gaussian curvature,
and thus causing gravity to *repel*.

Lunkhead the moron has k'lamed that magnetism has "*no* effect" upon
the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, then backpedaled and said there
was a "small amount of positive curvature due to the energy density in
the field", thereby proving he doesn't know how magnetism affects the
4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, and denies the existence of
magnetic attraction.

Thus, Kensi the moron has described a universe in which planets could
not maintain their orbits, a universe in which magnets could not work,
and therefore a universe which could not exist.

Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow at a colder temperature
than the surrounding atmosphere is somehow violating the First and
Second Laws of Thermodynamics and giving off "blackbody radiation".

Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow gives off "blackbody
radiation" at wavelengths that would put the temperature of the snow
at 489 F.

Kensi is the same moron who first denied the existence of the
~11-micron infrared atmospheric window, then backpedaled and k'lamed
that snow emitted outside that ~11-micron window, and was proven
wrong. Then the spankard moron tried to use the backpedal of
"blackbody radiation" being at a different wavelength than spectral
emission, yet again demonstrating that the moron has no clue how
spectral absorption and emission works.

Kensi is the same moron who denies the NASA SABER study proving that
CO2 is a global *cooling* gas _because_ of the ~11-micron infrared
atmospheric window.

The reality exposed by the NASA SABER study also proves the Klimate
Katastrophe Kook Anthropogenic Global Warming k'lame of CO2 being a
global warming gas is a fairy tale that violates the First and Second
Laws of Thermodynamics, thus destroying CO2-induced AGW, yet this same
moron continues to cling to his delusions.

Kensi is the same moron who continues to cling to his delusion that
global warming causes more intense hurricanes, despite three
peer-reviewed studies proving the exact opposite.

Kensi is not an astrophysicist, he's far too stupid to be. He's just a
slumpy dumpy frumpy lumpy loser trying to pretend that he's
intelligent... and failing badly.

That would be because Kensi is a moron with an underpowered brain that
struggles (and fails) to understand reality.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#557616

On Sun, 28 Feb 2016 19:25:21 +0100 (CET), Friendly Neighborhood Vote
Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

>backpedaling and building strawmen to beat the band

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#557635

Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> wrote:

> On Sun, 28 Feb 2016 19:25:21 +0100 (CET), Friendly Neighborhood Vote
> Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
> 
> >backpedaling and building strawmen to beat the band

That's why i drop-kicked fakey's wimpy ass all across
Usenet.  What a maroon!

-- 
"...a sinewave is a Fourier transformation of a circle."
  --Fakey

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#557641

On Mon, 29 Feb 2016 03:23:58 +0800, Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
<bender@the.future> wrote:

>Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 28 Feb 2016 19:25:21 +0100 (CET), Friendly Neighborhood Vote
>> Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
>> 
>> >backpedaling and building strawmen to beat the band
>
>That's why i drop-kicked fakey's wimpy ass all across
>Usenet.  What a maroon!

You are his uselessnet lard and mustard.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#557647

Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> wrote:

> On Mon, 29 Feb 2016 03:23:58 +0800, Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
> <bender@the.future> wrote:
> 
> >Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> wrote:
> >
> >> On Sun, 28 Feb 2016 19:25:21 +0100 (CET), Friendly Neighborhood Vote
> >> Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
> >> 
> >> >backpedaling and building strawmen to beat the band
> >
> >That's why i drop-kicked fakey's wimpy ass all across
> >Usenet.  What a maroon!
> 
> You are his uselessnet lard and mustard.

Yes, and every time fakey is SPNAKed, he must spend hours
google-raping then post reams of screed.

Jump, fakey!  No rest for you today!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#557649

On Sun, 28 Feb 2016 14:56:03 -0500, Bite My Shiny Metal Ass  
<bender@the.future> wrote:

> Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 29 Feb 2016 03:23:58 +0800, Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
>> <bender@the.future> wrote:
>>
>> >Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Sun, 28 Feb 2016 19:25:21 +0100 (CET), Friendly Neighborhood Vote
>> >> Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >backpedaling and building strawmen to beat the band
>> >
>> >That's why i drop-kicked fakey's wimpy ass all across
>> >Usenet.  What a maroon!
>>
>> You are his uselessnet lard and mustard.
>
> Yes, and every time fakey is SPNAKed, he must spend hours
> google-raping then post reams of screed.
>
> Jump, fakey!  No rest for you today!

what a waste of a sunday for him!

-- 
"sines, sines, everywhere there's sines
blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind"
http://imgur.com/a/yMFsu

-

FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID:  
<3dcad3dd0a0d39727506717506883c26@dizum.com>

">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics
>> equations unlike fakey the supposed know-it-all:
>>  phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x)
>> phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi)
>>  voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in time:
>> 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) = 240*sin(2*pi*60*x)

Wrong, as has already been proven. What does it say below, you fecking  
*moron*?

"The _sum_ E(θ) ≡ E(a) + E(b) can be written thusly:""

it says that you don't even know how to correctly apply mathematics to  
real-world AC electricity, snickerTurds.

http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-10/single-phase-power-systems/
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/02170.png
"To mathematically calculate voltage between “hot” wires, we must subtract  
voltages, because their polarity marks show them to be opposed to each  
other:"
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/12112.png

http://www.samlexamerica.com/support/documents/WhitePaper-120240VACSingleSplitPhaseandMultiWireBranchCircuits.pdf

on page 2:

** NOTE: The phase of Hot Leg 2 (Phase B) is in the
  opposite direction - i.e., 180° apart from the phase
  of Hot Leg L1 (Phase A)

*COUGH*
SPNAK!!

-

i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in ASCII  
art if you ask nicely.
see: Message-ID: <4ba4a50aaaebc7fb8a348293c5cf9f13@dizum.com>

-

snickerTurds can't seem to refute the following:

- begin snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --
/*
HOW TO RUN: download arbitrary precision libraries from:

http://www.hvks.com/Numerical/arbitrary_precision.html

place those files in a directory and save this file as  
snickerSinewaveStew.cpp inside that same directory.

compiles with:

gcc -Wall -I. precisioncore.cpp snickerSinewaveStew.cpp -lstdc++

run with:

./a.out

enjoy the LULZ ;)

*/
#include <fprecision.h>
#include <iostream.h>

using namespace std;

int main(){

   //float_precision MIN=float_precision(0);
   //float_precision MAX=float_precision(0);

   float_precision STEP=float_precision(.0001);
   float_precision t=float_precision(0);    // time variable
   float_precision sum=float_precision(0);  // sum of SnickerTurd's  
ridiculous sinewave mess
   float_precision snickerPrediction=float_precision(2550.25);  //  
snickerTurd's erroneous k0oK-k'lame Sum
   float_precision PI;
   PI =_float_table(_PI,25);

   // this while loop will run forever, but snickers doesn't understand why
   while(sum < snickerPrediction){

     // fakey's Sinewave Stew(TM) see: MID:  
<db672705e57e4932eba3632562e0a941@dizum.com>
     sum = (float_precision(150) * float_precision(  
sin(float_precision(120)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +  
(float_precision(20.25) * float_precision(  
sin(float_precision(33)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +  
(float_precision(1400)* float_precision(  
sin(float_precision(150)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +(float_precision(20)*  
float_precision(sin(float_precision(5013)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +  
(float_precision(600)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(13)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)))  
+  
(float_precision(360)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(1209)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)));

     // perhaps show a few values larger than +2300 to educate teh  
snickerTurds
     if(sum>float_precision(2300)){
       cout << "t=" << t << " sum=" << sum << std::endl;
     }
     t = t+STEP;
   }
/*

Message-ID: <c8523e6d9c31e3282bbe581fa525a2a8@dizum.com>
"Oh, yeah... it's 2550.25 volts... so why does your graph not even
reach 2500 volts, given that eventually all the sinewaves will
constructively interfere (ie: *add* to each other) to *sum* to 2550.25
volts?"

Fakey, it doesn't reach 2500 volts because the summation of your sinewaves  
never reaches that.  They never reach their max values at the same time.   
That's how stupid you are.

Message-ID: <731d08dcc702b9a8a13077ffc201e91f@dizum.com>
"I most certainly *did* prove otherwise. It can't even arrive at the
correct sinewave summation voltage of 2550.25 volts"

Fakey, you only *proved* that you are too inept to graph the equations and  
notice a few things about the interactions of their frequencies when  
summed.

the next line of code is never executed, but snickers DEFINITELY can't  
figure out why it isn't and instead has a bunch of lame excuses while  
still having not produced a value for t where the sum=2550.25, as he has  
k0okily proklamed in many usenet messages.

*/
   cout << "snickerTurds was right! the sum is " << sum << " at time t=" <<  
t <<endl;
}
- end snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --

-

Fakey irrationally demands a theme song to foam to:
"all I really want your pathetic pwned ass to do is write me a classic  
rock song as tribute to your Usenet Lord and Master..."  
<f4f9193fa7d28b760a9de681e61427e7@dizum.com>

-

Somewhere Abouts Round Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:25:03 -0500, Friendly  
Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

<snicker>

Fag. LOL
Idiot. LOL
Moron. LOL
Tranny. LOL
Libtard. LOL
Crackhead. LOL
GableTard. LOL
DildoRider. LOL
Bad Musician. LOL
Stick Figure. LOL
Terrible Liar. LOL
Sinewave Spammer. LOL
Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL

on top of old snick-ers, all covered with Fag. LOL
is where my usenet lord and mas-ter
can go straight to hell*

*hell doesn't exist.  hope everybody is having a productive evening.

-

http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg

http://cafepress.com/kooktown

http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg

-

If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers  
containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to  
yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints  
to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful  
information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public.  :)

if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you  
downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try:  
http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2

-

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop
The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as  
it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects  
or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it  
presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written,  
Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework  
before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason  
many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating  
opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd

-

Coming soon!  To a newsgroup near you!:

$ perl fakeyBot.pl
FakeyBot>       I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you,  
look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassing  
bile from behind an anonymous dizum account?  <snicker>
You>    Robert Michael Wolfe
FakeyBot>       Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-toed  
boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks,  
Robert. <snicker>
Robert> you talk about cocks a lot.
FakeyBot>       Oh, I talk about sex a lot?
Robert> gay sex, mostly...
FakeyBot>       Fag!

(just as useful as the original!)

-

snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n  
friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message  
<b5e7da79a455d0c9227b1b50e25e7ea1@dizum.com>:
"That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the
largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to
the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users were  
using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then we  
figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers  
while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using  
process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden  
service. It's not rocket science.

_The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum how  
I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can  
get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my  
distinct impression was that the "anonymity
research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to
trade CP._  (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a  
kiddie pr0n network.)

That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation
Onymous was just icing on the cake."

-

Golden Killfile, June 2005
KOTM, November 2006
Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007
Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006
Busted Urinal Award, April 2007
Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008
Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007
AUK Mascot, September 2007

 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#557791

Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Brain), in
<news:t7i6dbttasn7643o1l9dm0gm0eir7nohqi@4ax.com> did thusly jump head
first into the wood chipper again:

> That's why i drop-kicked fakey's wimpy ass all across
> Usenet.  What a maroon!

Oh, sure you do... hence my .sig. Spankard.

<snicker>

-- 

Shiny Tinfoil Brain (aka Bite My Shiny Metal Ass) didn't know:
=====================================
The Euler equation is a subset of equations known as the Euler-Fourier
Formulas, thus that a sinewave is a transformation of a circle (which
should have been intuitive, given that generators *rotate* to create
*sinusoids*);

That cross correlation is used with Fourier transforms;

That superposition is the same as wave interference;

That wave interference works the same for standing or traveling waves;

That RMS and peak-to-peak voltage are two different things;

That RMS isn't a DC voltage;

That 170 volt peak, 120.208 volt RMS L-N 3-phase service gives 208.207
volts RMS L-L;

That 4444525800 != 4400000000 != 1;

The difference between frequency and period of a sinewave;

That there's no difference between 'i' and 'j' in electrical
engineering, physics and control systems engineering;

What a positive or negative vector is;

That the vector sum of 3-phase AC constitutes a closed loop per
Kirchhoff's Voltage Law, thus that the three phases sum to zero;

That "mnemonic" is not spelled "mneumonic";

And the moron continues to demonstrate his inability to read a graph.
=====================================

SPNAK!

<snicker>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#557516

On 27/02/2016 2:18 PM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus 
bleated out 206 lines of froth in response to just 6 lines of mine:

>> Aww, is ko0ky still obsessing over me? Yep, so much that I'm now his
>> default .sig-o-haet when he isn't replying to somebody.
>>
>> I think I should be declared his official dogwhistle holder now, hmm?
>>
>> *snicker*

That's an amplification factor of what, over 34? Got this kOOk revved up 
good and fast it seems. Maybe time to let him cool down again for a while.

*snicker*

> the anti-science nitwit doesn't dare try to refute my truthiness...

You *do* know what "truthiness" means, don't you?

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=truthiness

Looks like you made a Freudian slip there, ko0ky, and admitted to 
something that part of you was trying desperately not to admit to.

*snicker*

-- 
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here."                                                     ~Checkmate

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#557596

Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Ko0O0oki kensi the LunkHeaded LibTard, in
<news:nau7db$2h8$1@gioia.aioe.org> did thusly jump head first into the
wood chipper again:

> On 27/02/2016 2:18 PM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
> Emeritus SPNAK!'d the living shit out of an anti-science nitwit:

Awwww, did LunkHead cowardly snip out all that data which proved him
*wrong*? LOL!

>>> Aww, is ko0ky still obsessing over me? Yep, so much that I'm now his
>>> default .sig-o-haet when he isn't replying to somebody.
>>>
>>> I think I should be declared his official dogwhistle holder now, hmm?
>>>
>>> *snicker*

I think LunkHead should be declared Science Spankard Of The Year.
You've been 180 degrees out on nearly everything, including
astrophysics, as outlined in my .sig.

SPNAK!

> That's an amplification factor of what, over 34? Got this kOOk revved up 
> good and fast it seems. Maybe time to let him cool down again for a while.

Translation:
"My Usenet Lord and Master spanked me. He spanked me good. I'm going
to have to run away again for a while. I can't stand this level of
mauling. My Usenet Lord and Master is far too intelligent to ever
beat. He's proven there's no way I can be an astrophysicist! I think
the Gaussian curvature of space is positive, which would make gravity
*repel*, and I didn't even know that the Riemann curvature tensor
concept is the central mathematical tool in the theory of general
relativity and the modern theory of gravity. I stoooopidly k'lamed
that the curvature of space-time being described by the geodesic
deviation equation is "science fiction" and "a howler". I don't
believe in the Laws of Thermodynamics, I think cloud cover over ice or
snow *increases* temperature, and I *still* believe in that CO2
Anthropogenic Global Warming fairy tale which the NASA SABER study
decimated. I've been proven wrong about all of that. I'm well and
truly SPNAK!'d. I'ma go hunt for shrooms and dress my fist up in a
little yellow wig and my mom's hooker-pink lipstick."

<snicker>

Message-ID: <a76a23be8f4a22ea6c31dde5b3e2dd8c@dizum.com>
========================================================
========================================================
<https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/alt.usenet.kooks/yhNtCQr1rpE/GlDtnrGgMxsJ>
<http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=145664837800>

From: Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
Newsgroups: alt.usenet.kooks
Subject: Re: A REVIEW: How much does Keith "Murphy" McElroy suck at
this Usenet thing?
Date: Sat, 4 May 2013 00:58:29 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <km1mfl$t4j$7@dont-email.me>
Injection-Info: mx05.eternal-september.org; 
posting-host="67.70.58.178";
Summary: Murphy is a kook with hundreds, if not thousands, of sock
puppets
Keywords: Murphy
X-Mailer: Forte Agent 4.2/32.1118
========================================================
========================================================

Nadegda got outed as that lumpy dumpy frumpy slumpy shroomtard Paul
Derbyshire by Ray Banana. When LunkHead learned of this, he
immediately started backpedaling and k'laming that "Nadegda" was
actually just "vacationing" in Pembroke. LOL!

Message-ID: <65d0f5e1ad03d42086b4a492e0eba763@dizum.com>
========================================================
========================================================
> <http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=134389570800>  

Kensi was "vacationing"... in Pembroke, Ontario, Canada... quite by
coincidence, you understand... LunkHead was there with Nadegda,
apparently.

And Nadegda and Kensi most definitely were *not* there to double-team
on Paul Derbyshire's mushroom-slathered meatpole.

Paul Derbyshire is a life-long virgin, you see. He'll never touch
anything more feminine than his hand with a Barbie-doll wig glued to
it, paste-on eyes, and his mother's hooker-pink lipstick smeared
between thumb and index finger knuckle. Ironically, he's named his
f(e)isty lover "kensi". She's really hot in the sack... an expert in
getting anal. Sometimes, she takes it so deeply it pokes out of her
mouth!

Oh, here's Kensi:
<http://goo.gl/hdpXFC>

She's Paul Derbyshire's regular Saturday night thang. Ain't she purdy?
I'm sure a lot of guys have hit that. Chimpy's hit that... twice.

Strangely and quite coincidentally, Paul Derbyshire calls his right
thumb "Nadegda". I found a picture of Nadegda, too.

<https://goo.gl/sbdRcq>

You don't wanna know what she's into. *Really* kinky stuff. Suffice to
say sometimes she invites along her four sisters for what she calls
"sexy spelunking". You know what they say... fugly chicks gotta go
kinky. LOL

> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sdyBYSuqQBQ>

> P.S. How's the astrophysics coming along? Have you visited 
> any good telescopes lately?

Ask kensi which observatories nearby have time standard control
capability. That's something every astronomer should know, right?

<snicker>
========================================================
========================================================

I note you've studiously avoided answering which observatories have
time standard control capability, LunkHead... only those who actually
work at an observatory would even know about such a thing, let alone
which observatories have that capability... but then, everyone knows
lumpy dumpy frumpy slumpy wannabes always out their womanly socks
because they're too stoooopid to play the part of the identity they've
assumed. Perhaps for your next sock, you should play the part of a mop
jockey or a streetwalker... that'd be something you could handle,
dude.

<snicker>

>> the anti-science nitwit doesn't dare try to refute my truthiness...

> You *do* know what "truthiness" means, don't you?
> 
> http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=truthiness

I'm using it in its 10th and 11th senses, LunkHead.

And you're still the anti-science nitwit who doesn't dare try to
refute my truthiness.

SPNAK!

> Looks like you made a Freudian slip there, ko0ky, and admitted to 
> something that part of you was trying desperately not to admit to.
> 
> *snicker*

Translation:
"BLLLEEAAAATTT! I'm the anti-science nitwit who's had my ass SPNAK!'d
red by truthiness! I can't refute any of it, so I'll attempt to divert
attention away from the fact that I've proven I'm so retarded I can't
process reality!"

SPNAK!

<snicker>

-- 

Kensi the moron wrote:
================================
The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2, and its area is 4*pi*r^2, so
the curvature is 4*pi
================================

Kensi the moron said the Gaussian curvature = 1 / r^2 *and* the
Gaussian curvature = 4 * pi.

Therefore, 1 / r^2 = 4 * pi
Therefore, r = 0.28209479176

Kensi the moron says every sphere in the entire universe has a radius
of 0.28209479176. Of course, being a moron, kensi didn't specify the
units.

The moron also said the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is dependent
upon that sphere's radius. Wholly incorrect.

Kensi the moron was corrected:
================================
Did... did you just say "the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2" *and* "the
Gaussian curvature = 4*pi" therefore "1/r^2 = 4*pi"? Now you
backpedal, LunkHead.

You mean the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2 * (4*pi*r^2) therefore =
(4*pi), and therefore the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is
independent of r due to its symmetry, thereby proving your original
"The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2" blather *wrong*?
================================

But Kensi the moron persists in insisting that what he wrote isn't
fucked up, and that the Gaussian curvature of a sphere *does* depend
upon its radius, because he doesn't understand the equations he's
trying to use, he doesn't know the difference between 'constant
curvature' and 'Gaussian curvature', he doesn't know what an integral
is, and he's a halfwit who can't figure out even basic geometry
problems.

Now remember, this is the same moron who k'lames he's an
astrophysicist... yet he's stated that the Riemann curvature tensor
concept being the central mathematical tool in the theory of general
relativity and the modern theory of gravity, and the curvature of
space-time being described by the geodesic deviation equation, is
"science fiction" and "a howler".

In addition, the moron k'lamed that 4-D Minkowski space-time was
mostly positive Gaussian curvature, with only small areas of negative
Gaussian curvature, which proves the moron has no idea of the effects
of mass or magnetism upon the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold.

He has k'lamed that the Gaussian curvature of the universe is
predominantly positive, which means Lunkhead believes that massive
objects such as planets, stars and black holes ride *above* the
tangential plane of the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, thereby
making the planes of principal curvature positive Gaussian curvature,
and thus causing gravity to *repel*.

Lunkhead the moron has k'lamed that magnetism has "*no* effect" upon
the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, then backpedaled and said there
was a "small amount of positive curvature due to the energy density in
the field", thereby proving he doesn't know how magnetism affects the
4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, and denies the existence of
magnetic attraction.

Thus, Kensi the moron has described a universe in which planets could
not maintain their orbits, a universe in which magnets could not work,
and therefore a universe which could not exist.

Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow at a colder temperature
than the surrounding atmosphere is somehow violating the First and
Second Laws of Thermodynamics and giving off "blackbody radiation".

Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow gives off "blackbody
radiation" at wavelengths that would put the temperature of the snow
at 489 F.

Kensi is the same moron who first denied the existence of the
~11-micron infrared atmospheric window, then backpedaled and k'lamed
that snow emitted outside that ~11-micron window, and was proven
wrong. Then the spankard moron tried to use the backpedal of
"blackbody radiation" being at a different wavelength than spectral
emission, yet again demonstrating that the moron has no clue how
spectral absorption and emission works.

Kensi is the same moron who denies the NASA SABER study proving that
CO2 is a global *cooling* gas _because_ of the ~11-micron infrared
atmospheric window.

The reality exposed by the NASA SABER study also proves the Klimate
Katastrophe Kook Anthropogenic Global Warming k'lame of CO2 being a
global warming gas is a fairy tale that violates the First and Second
Laws of Thermodynamics, thus destroying CO2-induced AGW, yet this same
moron continues to cling to his delusions.

Kensi is the same moron who continues to cling to his delusion that
global warming causes more intense hurricanes, despite three
peer-reviewed studies proving the exact opposite.

Kensi is not an astrophysicist, he's far too stupid to be. He's just a
slumpy dumpy frumpy lumpy loser trying to pretend that he's
intelligent... and failing badly.

That would be because Kensi is a moron with an underpowered brain that
struggles (and fails) to understand reality.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#557601

On Sun, 28 Feb 2016 19:00:06 +0100 (CET), Friendly Neighborhood Vote
Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

> as outlined in my .sig.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web