Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #531300 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-11-09 02:20 +0000 |
| Last post | 2015-11-10 15:58 +0000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 291 — 26 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 02:20 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-08 20:25 -0600
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 02:43 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-08 20:54 -0600
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 09:20 -0800
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 12:58 -0600
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 13:23 -0800
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. "Herp Derpington" <invali@example.com> - 2015-11-09 19:42 -0800
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-11-10 05:36 -0800
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 02:46 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 03:21 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 18:44 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 17:12 -0600
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 23:35 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 20:22 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-10 03:51 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-08 20:02 -0700
Circus Alert.. Don't take the bait Fabian Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-08 22:11 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-08 21:12 -0600
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 04:22 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-08 21:50 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 05:13 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-08 22:38 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2015-11-16 18:59 +0000
Plenty of non-idiots use Windows. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-11-08 21:30 -0800
Re: Plenty of non-idiots use Windows. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 06:18 +0000
Re: Plenty of non-idiots use Windows. Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-11-09 12:43 +0000
Re: Plenty of non-idiots use Windows. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 12:09 -0700
Re: Plenty of non-idiots use Windows. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 13:03 -0700
Re: Plenty of non-idiots use Windows. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-09 20:26 +0000
Re: Plenty of non-idiots use Windows. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 18:27 -0700
Re: Plenty of non-idiots use Windows. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 06:31 +0000
Fabian Russell is disabled. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-11-08 23:12 -0800
Re: Plenty of non-idiots use Windows. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 13:03 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 03:12 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 13:04 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-11-09 12:39 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 13:01 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 20:04 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-11-09 15:18 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 21:01 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-11-09 16:08 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 18:35 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 13:54 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 20:54 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 21:13 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-09 17:17 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-09 23:24 +0100
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-09 17:36 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 18:37 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 18:32 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 13:04 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 18:30 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 18:44 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-10 03:58 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 21:38 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-10 08:18 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-10 15:15 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-10 10:49 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 12:25 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-10 12:45 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-10 22:30 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-11-10 17:37 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-10 18:04 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-11 01:30 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-10 18:59 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-11 03:15 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-11 07:22 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-12 10:20 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-12 21:32 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-12 14:51 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-12 22:13 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-12 23:17 +0100
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-12 15:28 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-12 22:38 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-12 18:40 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-12 23:24 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-13 00:33 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-11-13 10:57 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-13 12:21 +0100
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-11-13 12:26 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-13 14:57 +0100
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-11-13 17:04 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-13 07:25 -0600
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-13 11:48 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-11-13 17:09 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-13 20:39 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-13 15:43 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-13 21:30 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-11-16 09:27 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-13 22:18 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-11-16 09:29 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-12 18:39 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-11-13 10:55 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-13 10:26 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-12 15:26 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-12 22:42 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-12 16:06 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-12 23:25 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-12 23:36 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-12 18:46 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-13 00:35 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-13 14:54 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-13 14:53 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-12 17:40 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-12 18:37 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-13 00:40 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-12 18:01 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-13 01:29 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-12 18:47 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-13 02:29 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-12 19:34 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-12 21:45 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-12 21:03 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-13 02:26 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-12 19:35 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-13 02:51 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-12 22:00 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-13 03:36 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-12 22:41 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-12 20:00 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-13 03:18 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-13 01:49 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-13 10:27 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-13 11:15 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-11-13 11:30 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-13 11:32 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-13 10:25 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-13 12:27 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-13 10:41 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-13 12:40 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-13 10:47 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-13 12:52 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-13 10:06 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-13 10:25 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-13 10:28 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-13 11:52 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-13 10:02 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-13 12:15 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-12 21:44 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-13 10:24 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-14 01:01 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-13 20:08 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-13 20:17 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-11-11 02:07 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-09 21:48 +0100
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 14:23 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 21:25 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 14:37 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 18:41 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-09 21:07 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-10 04:05 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 21:48 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-10 08:20 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-10 15:18 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 12:29 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 12:28 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-10 12:46 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 16:36 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-10 18:32 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 18:39 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 18:46 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-10 04:09 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 21:47 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-10 08:21 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-10 14:48 +0100
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-10 10:34 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-10 18:27 +0100
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 12:31 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 20:51 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 21:21 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 21:49 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 15:12 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 18:48 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-10 04:14 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 21:47 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 12:33 -0700
GhostScipt works well on Windows. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-11-09 16:09 -0800
Re: GhostScipt works well on Windows. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-09 19:54 -0500
Re: GhostScipt works well on Windows. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 18:49 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-11-11 09:42 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-11 13:29 +0100
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-11-11 13:08 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-09 16:58 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 18:43 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-10 04:18 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 21:46 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 13:49 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 13:48 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 04:56 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-08 22:15 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 05:27 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-08 22:43 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-11-08 22:16 -0600
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 04:26 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-11-09 07:31 -0600
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-11-09 10:14 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 18:02 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 12:15 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 13:06 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-11-09 14:13 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-11-09 06:13 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-11-09 12:32 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-11-09 11:38 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-09 07:51 -0600
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 18:05 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-11-09 13:52 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 13:00 -0600
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 12:17 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 13:07 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-09 21:46 +0100
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 14:26 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 18:52 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-11-10 02:54 +0100
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 13:51 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-10 10:27 +0100
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-11-10 06:52 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-10 13:21 +0100
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-11-10 07:39 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 13:55 -0700
Are the FOSS community "suckers", Kreep? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-10 07:12 -0600
Re: Are the FOSS community "suckers", Kreep? Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-10 08:22 -0500
Re: Are the FOSS community "suckers", Kreep? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-11 09:27 -0600
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 13:58 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-11-10 22:01 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-10 23:15 +0100
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 16:38 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-11 00:45 +0100
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-11 14:15 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-10 18:10 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-11 10:05 +0100
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-11 11:20 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-11 13:27 +0100
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-12 10:36 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-12 22:58 +0100
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-12 15:15 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-11-11 06:15 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 16:37 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-10 09:31 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 13:55 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 13:54 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 21:14 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 18:53 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. dvus <dven1@adelphia.net> - 2015-11-10 18:00 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 16:39 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. dvus <dven1@adelphia.net> - 2015-11-11 18:00 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-11-11 20:02 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. dvus <dven1@adelphia.net> - 2015-11-12 09:22 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-12 11:43 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. dvus <dven1@adelphia.net> - 2015-11-12 18:07 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-13 07:35 -0600
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-13 14:58 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-13 14:57 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. dvus <dven1@adelphia.net> - 2015-11-14 07:30 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-14 12:18 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. dvus <dven1@adelphia.net> - 2015-11-14 22:09 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-14 20:12 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-15 03:31 +0000
To dvus. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-16 11:40 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. dvus <dven1@adelphia.net> - 2015-11-15 10:46 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-16 11:38 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. dvus <dven1@adelphia.net> - 2015-11-16 14:47 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-11-16 20:26 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-16 14:43 -0600
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-16 14:19 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-16 15:38 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-16 15:37 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. dvus <dven1@adelphia.net> - 2015-11-17 05:30 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-11-17 14:57 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. dvus <dven1@adelphia.net> - 2015-11-17 20:04 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-09 08:14 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 10:56 -0600
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 11:25 -0600
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 13:30 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 16:21 -0600
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 20:37 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. dvus <dven1@adelphia.net> - 2015-11-10 18:08 -0500
Fabian_Russell isn't all there. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-11-09 10:31 -0800
Re: Fabian_Russell isn't all there. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 19:15 +0000
Re: Fabian_Russell isn't all there. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 16:23 -0600
Re: Fabian_Russell isn't all there. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 22:35 +0000
Re: Fabian_Russell isn't all there. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 20:41 -0500
Re: Fabian_Russell isn't all there. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 20:39 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 18:40 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 17:05 -0600
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Apollyon <adravirgo@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 15:14 -0800
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 17:36 -0600
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-10 00:07 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 23:53 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-11-10 08:53 -0600
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-10 15:58 +0000
Page 12 of 15 — ← Prev page 1 … 10 11 [12] 13 14 15 Next page →
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-10 07:12 -0600 |
| Subject | Are the FOSS community "suckers", Kreep? |
| Message-ID | <mpq34bhdm0ssclri8imhar7qskgb90jjqq@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #531744 |
> Kreep wrote: >> >> What's the point of this thread? Hey, Kreep. Is the FOSS community really a bunch of "suckers" because companies can use FOSS to make money? You do realize that those companies develop and contribute to FOSS, right? You do realize that commercial exploitation of FOSS is essential to it's long-term success, right? You do realize that this benefits *everyone*, right? "It's called being a sucker." You fsckwitted kreep. -- "So what exactly is your point - that the Linux community is a basically so inept that it gives it's goods away for free so that others can make 'hundreds of millions' while members continue to beg for PayPal donations on their web-sites? It's called being a sucker." - trolling fsckwit "Ezekiel"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-10 08:22 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Are the FOSS community "suckers", Kreep? |
| Message-ID | <diiccvglxufs.1q5pvchzkm8kn.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #531746 |
On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 07:12:49 -0600, chrisv wrote: >> Kreep wrote: >>> >>> What's the point of this thread? > > Hey, Kreep. Is the FOSS community really a bunch of "suckers" because > companies can use FOSS to make money? Yep. Only a complete idiot would give away their hard work so sleazy companies like IBM and Google can make billions from it while they sit in their parent's basement, poor, smelly and chomping on pizza and Coke. And don't kid yourself, Linus wakes up every morning and kicks himself for giving away his kernel. > You do realize that those companies develop and contribute to FOSS, > right? You do realize that commercial exploitation of FOSS is > essential to it's long-term success, right? You do realize that this > benefits *everyone*, right? Sure it is. So? Some people are making tons of money from FOSS. In fact everyone is making money except the fools writing and giving it away. > "It's called being a sucker." Yes it is. > You fsckwitted kreep. Has Gohde instructed you on how to install Linux? I've asked him several times to help you out. -- You Ain't The Biggest Fish In The Crotch.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-11 09:27 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: Are the FOSS community "suckers", Kreep? |
| Message-ID | <vrm64bd4uuvl9sh6rq217jcp7h624obdj4@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #531746 |
chrisv wrote: >Hey, Kreep. Is the FOSS community really a bunch of "suckers" because >companies can use FOSS to make money? > >You do realize that those companies develop and contribute to FOSS, >right? You do realize that commercial exploitation of FOSS is >essential to it's long-term success, right? You do realize that this >benefits *everyone*, right? > >"It's called being a sucker." > >You fsckwitted kreep. > >-- >"So what exactly is your point - that the Linux community is a >basically so inept that it gives it's goods away for free so that >others can make 'hundreds of millions' while members continue to beg >for PayPal donations on their web-sites? It's called being a sucker." >- trolling fsckwit "Ezekiel" Hey, Kreep. How do you reconcile your (ignorant, shitty) opinion that FOSS developers are "suckers" with your attacks against the GPL on the basis that it has restrictions? You know, the restrictions that are needed to *prevent* FOSS developers from being "suckers" for for-profit corporations It's not fair of you to attack FOSS from those two opposing angles, Kreep. FOSS developers are not "suckers", Kreep, but you sure are a fucker. You sure are a shit. -- 'The BSD license doesn't mandate leeching or stealing. It simply gives people complete freedom to share or not to share their work. Leave it to a bunch of lame advocates to now claim that "too much freedom" is a bad thing.' - trolling fsckwit "Ezekiel", attacking the GPL and its supporters
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-10 13:58 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <3N2dnQknU474x9_LnZ2dnUU7-c8AAAAA@bresnan.com> |
| In reply to | #531744 |
On 11/10/15 05:21, Peter Köhlmann wrote: > Ezekiel wrote: > >> >> >> "Peter K�hlmann"<peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote in message >> news:n1sd6e$pat$1@dont-email.me... >>> GreyCloud wrote: >>> >>>> On 11/09/15 13:46, Peter K�hlmann wrote: >>>>> GreyCloud wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 11/09/15 11:05, Fabian Russell wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> As I mentioned, spaces in filenames will choke ANY command parser >>>>>>> (unless quoted or escaped). >>>>>> >>>>>> But not on OS X. More FUD on your part, troll. >>>>>> >>>>>> LOL!!! >>>>> >>>>> Idiot. They will need special attention on OSX as on every other OS >>>>> >>>> >>>> You are the only idiot, along with Fabian, that doesn't know shit about >>>> the cli parser. On OS X it does work, in case you haven't noticed, >>>> Koldtard. >>>> >>> >>> Idiotic dimbulb. You are dumber than a Hadron. A typical Snit >>> >>> Try this (on OSX cli) >>> >>> touch this will be 5 files.txt >>> >>> Now do >>> >>> touch 'this will be 1 file.txt' >>> >>> Then look up your files >>> >>> Come back to us when you have absorbed your shock, you incompetent Snit >>> >> >> What's the point of this thread? Spaces in a filename (or *any* >> command-line arg) don't "choke" any command line parser. The command line >> parser behaves exactly as it should and follows the syntax rules exactly >> as designed. > > Right, it does. > Just as it also does on windows and linux > >> Any command line arg (not just filenames) with a space needs to be quoted. >> This is how it's always been and always will be. Nothing is broken and >> nothing is choking. Things are working exactly as they're supposed to >> work. > > Did I claim anything to the contrary? > Guffaw!!! You've always been proven wrong, koldtard. >> Needing to add quotes around args with spaces doesn't mean something is >> broken or choking. Those are simply the command line grammar rules. >> Similar to grammar rules that exist in SQL, programming languages, etc. > > Learn to read. Something you don't do very well, koldtard. > > My post was to the cretinous claims of a dimbulb calling itself "GreyCloud" > You're a moron, koldtard. > He actually is stupid enough to claim that OSX cli parser is "smart" enough > to recognize this all by itself. If you pose it correctly to the cli, yes. But since you are trying to start a strawmans argument, you lose, luser. > *If* that were the case, OSX would be seriously broken in yet another area > You're are too stupid to run OS X. Too bad you aren't as smart as your kids. > GreyClot should stop drinking that methyl-shit. It destroys braincells I don't. But obviously, since you brought up one of your demons, you should practice what you preach, you braying jackass. -- My problem is that I don't have enough middle fingers.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-10 22:01 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <56426955$0$62656$c3e8da3$dbd57e7@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #531744 |
On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 13:21:53 +0100, Peter Köhlmann wrote: > Ezekiel wrote: > > >> >> "Peter K�hlmann" <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote in message >> news:n1sd6e$pat$1@dont-email.me... >>> GreyCloud wrote: >>> >>>> On 11/09/15 13:46, Peter K�hlmann wrote: >>>>> GreyCloud wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 11/09/15 11:05, Fabian Russell wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> As I mentioned, spaces in filenames will choke ANY command parser >>>>>>> (unless quoted or escaped). >>>>>> >>>>>> But not on OS X. More FUD on your part, troll. >>>>>> >>>>>> LOL!!! >>>>> >>>>> Idiot. They will need special attention on OSX as on every other OS >>>>> >>>>> >>>> You are the only idiot, along with Fabian, that doesn't know shit >>>> about the cli parser. On OS X it does work, in case you haven't >>>> noticed, Koldtard. >>>> >>>> >>> Idiotic dimbulb. You are dumber than a Hadron. A typical Snit >>> >>> Try this (on OSX cli) >>> >>> touch this will be 5 files.txt >>> >>> Now do >>> >>> touch 'this will be 1 file.txt' >>> >>> Then look up your files >>> >>> Come back to us when you have absorbed your shock, you incompetent >>> Snit >>> >>> >> What's the point of this thread? Spaces in a filename (or *any* >> command-line arg) don't "choke" any command line parser. The command >> line parser behaves exactly as it should and follows the syntax rules >> exactly as designed. > > Right, it does. > Just as it also does on windows and linux > >> Any command line arg (not just filenames) with a space needs to be >> quoted. >> This is how it's always been and always will be. Nothing is broken and >> nothing is choking. Things are working exactly as they're supposed to >> work. > > Did I claim anything to the contrary? > >> Needing to add quotes around args with spaces doesn't mean something is >> broken or choking. Those are simply the command line grammar rules. >> Similar to grammar rules that exist in SQL, programming languages, etc. > > Learn to read. > > My post was to the cretinous claims of a dimbulb calling itself > "GreyCloud" > > He actually is stupid enough to claim that OSX cli parser is "smart" > enough to recognize this all by itself. He's a clown. The "OSX cli parser" is just bash. _[/Users/scott]_(scott@OSX)_ $ set | grep VERSION BASH_VERSION='3.2.53(1)-release' _[/home/scott]_(scott@LINUX)_ $ set | grep VERSION BASH_VERSION='4.3.11(1)-release' -- -v "Sorry John, sorry, better try it again..." -Frank Zappa
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-10 23:15 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <n1tq50$gbl$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #531891 |
vallor wrote: > On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 13:21:53 +0100, Peter Köhlmann wrote: > >> Ezekiel wrote: >> >> >>> >>> "Peter K�hlmann" <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote in message >>> news:n1sd6e$pat$1@dont-email.me... >>>> GreyCloud wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 11/09/15 13:46, Peter K�hlmann wrote: >>>>>> GreyCloud wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 11/09/15 11:05, Fabian Russell wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> As I mentioned, spaces in filenames will choke ANY command parser >>>>>>>> (unless quoted or escaped). >>>>>>> >>>>>>> But not on OS X. More FUD on your part, troll. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> LOL!!! >>>>>> >>>>>> Idiot. They will need special attention on OSX as on every other OS >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> You are the only idiot, along with Fabian, that doesn't know shit >>>>> about the cli parser. On OS X it does work, in case you haven't >>>>> noticed, Koldtard. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> Idiotic dimbulb. You are dumber than a Hadron. A typical Snit >>>> >>>> Try this (on OSX cli) >>>> >>>> touch this will be 5 files.txt >>>> >>>> Now do >>>> >>>> touch 'this will be 1 file.txt' >>>> >>>> Then look up your files >>>> >>>> Come back to us when you have absorbed your shock, you incompetent >>>> Snit >>>> >>>> >>> What's the point of this thread? Spaces in a filename (or *any* >>> command-line arg) don't "choke" any command line parser. The command >>> line parser behaves exactly as it should and follows the syntax rules >>> exactly as designed. >> >> Right, it does. >> Just as it also does on windows and linux >> >>> Any command line arg (not just filenames) with a space needs to be >>> quoted. >>> This is how it's always been and always will be. Nothing is broken and >>> nothing is choking. Things are working exactly as they're supposed to >>> work. >> >> Did I claim anything to the contrary? >> >>> Needing to add quotes around args with spaces doesn't mean something is >>> broken or choking. Those are simply the command line grammar rules. >>> Similar to grammar rules that exist in SQL, programming languages, etc. >> >> Learn to read. >> >> My post was to the cretinous claims of a dimbulb calling itself >> "GreyCloud" >> >> He actually is stupid enough to claim that OSX cli parser is "smart" >> enough to recognize this all by itself. > > He's a clown. The "OSX cli parser" is just bash. > > _[/Users/scott]_(scott@OSX)_ > $ set | grep VERSION > BASH_VERSION='3.2.53(1)-release' > > _[/home/scott]_(scott@LINUX)_ > $ set | grep VERSION > BASH_VERSION='4.3.11(1)-release' > > He certainly is a very deluded clown. He does not even know that OSX cli is just a very standard bash console. And he is stupid enough to claim that OSX does not share the problems (which are present on all OS) with blanks in filenames. They are not difficult to overcome (usually), but can be a PITA if you generate filenames like that with regular expressions
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-10 16:38 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <FeidnaG65-SUHd_LnZ2dnUU7-WWdnZ2d@bresnan.com> |
| In reply to | #531898 |
On 11/10/15 15:15, Peter Köhlmann wrote: > vallor wrote: > >> On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 13:21:53 +0100, Peter Köhlmann wrote: >> >>> Ezekiel wrote: >>> >>> >>>> >>>> "Peter K�hlmann"<peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote in message >>>> news:n1sd6e$pat$1@dont-email.me... >>>>> GreyCloud wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 11/09/15 13:46, Peter K�hlmann wrote: >>>>>>> GreyCloud wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 11/09/15 11:05, Fabian Russell wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> As I mentioned, spaces in filenames will choke ANY command parser >>>>>>>>> (unless quoted or escaped). >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> But not on OS X. More FUD on your part, troll. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> LOL!!! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Idiot. They will need special attention on OSX as on every other OS >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> You are the only idiot, along with Fabian, that doesn't know shit >>>>>> about the cli parser. On OS X it does work, in case you haven't >>>>>> noticed, Koldtard. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> Idiotic dimbulb. You are dumber than a Hadron. A typical Snit >>>>> >>>>> Try this (on OSX cli) >>>>> >>>>> touch this will be 5 files.txt >>>>> >>>>> Now do >>>>> >>>>> touch 'this will be 1 file.txt' >>>>> >>>>> Then look up your files >>>>> >>>>> Come back to us when you have absorbed your shock, you incompetent >>>>> Snit >>>>> >>>>> >>>> What's the point of this thread? Spaces in a filename (or *any* >>>> command-line arg) don't "choke" any command line parser. The command >>>> line parser behaves exactly as it should and follows the syntax rules >>>> exactly as designed. >>> >>> Right, it does. >>> Just as it also does on windows and linux >>> >>>> Any command line arg (not just filenames) with a space needs to be >>>> quoted. >>>> This is how it's always been and always will be. Nothing is broken and >>>> nothing is choking. Things are working exactly as they're supposed to >>>> work. >>> >>> Did I claim anything to the contrary? >>> >>>> Needing to add quotes around args with spaces doesn't mean something is >>>> broken or choking. Those are simply the command line grammar rules. >>>> Similar to grammar rules that exist in SQL, programming languages, etc. >>> >>> Learn to read. >>> >>> My post was to the cretinous claims of a dimbulb calling itself >>> "GreyCloud" >>> >>> He actually is stupid enough to claim that OSX cli parser is "smart" >>> enough to recognize this all by itself. >> >> He's a clown. The "OSX cli parser" is just bash. >> >> _[/Users/scott]_(scott@OSX)_ >> $ set | grep VERSION >> BASH_VERSION='3.2.53(1)-release' >> >> _[/home/scott]_(scott@LINUX)_ >> $ set | grep VERSION >> BASH_VERSION='4.3.11(1)-release' >> >> > > He certainly is a very deluded clown. He does not even know that OSX cli is > just a very standard bash console. > And he is stupid enough to claim that OSX does not share the problems (which > are present on all OS) with blanks in filenames. They are not difficult to > overcome (usually), but can be a PITA if you generate filenames like that > with regular expressions Both of you linux liars are deluded and go on your own prejudices. Right, Koldtard? LOL!!! You nuts are totally delusional and lie a lot. -- My problem is that I don't have enough middle fingers.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-11 00:45 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <n1tvff$7k9$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #531933 |
GreyCloud wrote: > On 11/10/15 15:15, Peter Köhlmann wrote: >> vallor wrote: >> >>> On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 13:21:53 +0100, Peter Köhlmann wrote: >>> >>>> Ezekiel wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> "Peter K�hlmann"<peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote in message >>>>> news:n1sd6e$pat$1@dont-email.me... >>>>>> GreyCloud wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 11/09/15 13:46, Peter K�hlmann wrote: >>>>>>>> GreyCloud wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 11/09/15 11:05, Fabian Russell wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> As I mentioned, spaces in filenames will choke ANY command parser >>>>>>>>>> (unless quoted or escaped). >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> But not on OS X. More FUD on your part, troll. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> LOL!!! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Idiot. They will need special attention on OSX as on every other OS >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> You are the only idiot, along with Fabian, that doesn't know shit >>>>>>> about the cli parser. On OS X it does work, in case you haven't >>>>>>> noticed, Koldtard. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> Idiotic dimbulb. You are dumber than a Hadron. A typical Snit >>>>>> >>>>>> Try this (on OSX cli) >>>>>> >>>>>> touch this will be 5 files.txt >>>>>> >>>>>> Now do >>>>>> >>>>>> touch 'this will be 1 file.txt' >>>>>> >>>>>> Then look up your files >>>>>> >>>>>> Come back to us when you have absorbed your shock, you incompetent >>>>>> Snit >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> What's the point of this thread? Spaces in a filename (or *any* >>>>> command-line arg) don't "choke" any command line parser. The command >>>>> line parser behaves exactly as it should and follows the syntax rules >>>>> exactly as designed. >>>> >>>> Right, it does. >>>> Just as it also does on windows and linux >>>> >>>>> Any command line arg (not just filenames) with a space needs to be >>>>> quoted. >>>>> This is how it's always been and always will be. Nothing is broken and >>>>> nothing is choking. Things are working exactly as they're supposed to >>>>> work. >>>> >>>> Did I claim anything to the contrary? >>>> >>>>> Needing to add quotes around args with spaces doesn't mean something >>>>> is broken or choking. Those are simply the command line grammar rules. >>>>> Similar to grammar rules that exist in SQL, programming languages, >>>>> etc. >>>> >>>> Learn to read. >>>> >>>> My post was to the cretinous claims of a dimbulb calling itself >>>> "GreyCloud" >>>> >>>> He actually is stupid enough to claim that OSX cli parser is "smart" >>>> enough to recognize this all by itself. >>> >>> He's a clown. The "OSX cli parser" is just bash. >>> >>> _[/Users/scott]_(scott@OSX)_ >>> $ set | grep VERSION >>> BASH_VERSION='3.2.53(1)-release' >>> >>> _[/home/scott]_(scott@LINUX)_ >>> $ set | grep VERSION >>> BASH_VERSION='4.3.11(1)-release' >>> >>> >> >> He certainly is a very deluded clown. He does not even know that OSX cli >> is just a very standard bash console. >> And he is stupid enough to claim that OSX does not share the problems >> (which are present on all OS) with blanks in filenames. They are not >> difficult to overcome (usually), but can be a PITA if you generate >> filenames like that with regular expressions > > Both of you linux liars are deluded and go on your own prejudices. > Right, Koldtard? > > LOL!!! You nuts are totally delusional and lie a lot. > Good that you had so many "arguments" for your posts You might as well called yourself "Hadron" or "Snit"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-11 14:15 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <m8WdnWrLYfmbLd7LnZ2dnUU7-bWdnZ2d@bresnan.com> |
| In reply to | #531937 |
On 11/10/15 16:45, Peter Köhlmann wrote: > GreyCloud wrote: > >> On 11/10/15 15:15, Peter Köhlmann wrote: >>> vallor wrote: >>> >>>> On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 13:21:53 +0100, Peter Köhlmann wrote: >>>> >>>>> Ezekiel wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> "Peter K�hlmann"<peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote in message >>>>>> news:n1sd6e$pat$1@dont-email.me... >>>>>>> GreyCloud wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 11/09/15 13:46, Peter K�hlmann wrote: >>>>>>>>> GreyCloud wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 11/09/15 11:05, Fabian Russell wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> As I mentioned, spaces in filenames will choke ANY command parser >>>>>>>>>>> (unless quoted or escaped). >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> But not on OS X. More FUD on your part, troll. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> LOL!!! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Idiot. They will need special attention on OSX as on every other OS >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You are the only idiot, along with Fabian, that doesn't know shit >>>>>>>> about the cli parser. On OS X it does work, in case you haven't >>>>>>>> noticed, Koldtard. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Idiotic dimbulb. You are dumber than a Hadron. A typical Snit >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Try this (on OSX cli) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> touch this will be 5 files.txt >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Now do >>>>>>> >>>>>>> touch 'this will be 1 file.txt' >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Then look up your files >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Come back to us when you have absorbed your shock, you incompetent >>>>>>> Snit >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> What's the point of this thread? Spaces in a filename (or *any* >>>>>> command-line arg) don't "choke" any command line parser. The command >>>>>> line parser behaves exactly as it should and follows the syntax rules >>>>>> exactly as designed. >>>>> >>>>> Right, it does. >>>>> Just as it also does on windows and linux >>>>> >>>>>> Any command line arg (not just filenames) with a space needs to be >>>>>> quoted. >>>>>> This is how it's always been and always will be. Nothing is broken and >>>>>> nothing is choking. Things are working exactly as they're supposed to >>>>>> work. >>>>> >>>>> Did I claim anything to the contrary? >>>>> >>>>>> Needing to add quotes around args with spaces doesn't mean something >>>>>> is broken or choking. Those are simply the command line grammar rules. >>>>>> Similar to grammar rules that exist in SQL, programming languages, >>>>>> etc. >>>>> >>>>> Learn to read. >>>>> >>>>> My post was to the cretinous claims of a dimbulb calling itself >>>>> "GreyCloud" >>>>> >>>>> He actually is stupid enough to claim that OSX cli parser is "smart" >>>>> enough to recognize this all by itself. >>>> >>>> He's a clown. The "OSX cli parser" is just bash. >>>> >>>> _[/Users/scott]_(scott@OSX)_ >>>> $ set | grep VERSION >>>> BASH_VERSION='3.2.53(1)-release' >>>> >>>> _[/home/scott]_(scott@LINUX)_ >>>> $ set | grep VERSION >>>> BASH_VERSION='4.3.11(1)-release' >>>> >>>> >>> >>> He certainly is a very deluded clown. He does not even know that OSX cli >>> is just a very standard bash console. >>> And he is stupid enough to claim that OSX does not share the problems >>> (which are present on all OS) with blanks in filenames. They are not >>> difficult to overcome (usually), but can be a PITA if you generate >>> filenames like that with regular expressions >> >> Both of you linux liars are deluded and go on your own prejudices. >> Right, Koldtard? >> >> LOL!!! You nuts are totally delusional and lie a lot. >> > > Good that you had so many "arguments" for your posts I trimmed them down so that you would understand it better. Most of the time you have your head so far up your ass that no one could possibly see your viewpoint. > > You might as well called yourself "Hadron" or "Snit" > And as usual, you can call yourself Idiot, which you do quite often. -- My problem is that I don't have enough middle fingers.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-10 18:10 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D267E383.6383C%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #531898 |
On 11/10/15, 3:15 PM, in article n1tq50$gbl$1@dont-email.me, "Peter Köhlmann" <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote: >>> My post was to the cretinous claims of a dimbulb calling itself >>> "GreyCloud" >>> >>> He actually is stupid enough to claim that OSX cli parser is "smart" >>> enough to recognize this all by itself. >> >> He's a clown. The "OSX cli parser" is just bash. >> >> _[/Users/scott]_(scott@OSX)_ >> $ set | grep VERSION >> BASH_VERSION='3.2.53(1)-release' >> >> _[/home/scott]_(scott@LINUX)_ >> $ set | grep VERSION >> BASH_VERSION='4.3.11(1)-release' >> >> > > He certainly is a very deluded clown. He does not even know that OSX cli is > just a very standard bash console. > And he is stupid enough to claim that OSX does not share the problems (which > are present on all OS) with blanks in filenames. Blanks? OS X handles *spaces* just fine... but what is a blank? > They are not difficult to > overcome (usually), but can be a PITA if you generate filenames like that > with regular expressions -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-11 10:05 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <n1v092$rno$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #531967 |
The lying imbecile Snit Michael Glasser babbled: > On 11/10/15, 3:15 PM, in article n1tq50$gbl$1@dont-email.me, "Peter > Köhlmann" <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote: > >>>> My post was to the cretinous claims of a dimbulb calling itself >>>> "GreyCloud" >>>> >>>> He actually is stupid enough to claim that OSX cli parser is "smart" >>>> enough to recognize this all by itself. >>> >>> He's a clown. The "OSX cli parser" is just bash. >>> >>> _[/Users/scott]_(scott@OSX)_ >>> $ set | grep VERSION >>> BASH_VERSION='3.2.53(1)-release' >>> >>> _[/home/scott]_(scott@LINUX)_ >>> $ set | grep VERSION >>> BASH_VERSION='4.3.11(1)-release' >>> >>> >> >> He certainly is a very deluded clown. He does not even know that OSX cli >> is just a very standard bash console. >> And he is stupid enough to claim that OSX does not share the problems >> (which are present on all OS) with blanks in filenames. > > Blanks? OS X handles *spaces* just fine... but what is a blank? So you are a IT "specialist", knowing everything. According to your claims. You know linux better than linux users, you know windows better than actual windows users, and your OSX knowledge is (maybe) only surpassed by the OSX developers And you know jack shit about naming conventions in IT Yes, that figures... >> They are not difficult to >> overcome (usually), but can be a PITA if you generate filenames like that >> with regular expressions > > >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-11 11:20 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <120588989468933414.683506usenet-gallopinginsanity.com@news.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #532040 |
Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote: > The lying imbecile Snit Michael Glasser babbled: > >> On 11/10/15, 3:15 PM, in article n1tq50$gbl$1@dont-email.me, "Peter >> Köhlmann" <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote: >> >>>>> My post was to the cretinous claims of a dimbulb calling itself >>>>> "GreyCloud" >>>>> >>>>> He actually is stupid enough to claim that OSX cli parser is "smart" >>>>> enough to recognize this all by itself. >>>> >>>> He's a clown. The "OSX cli parser" is just bash. >>>> >>>> _[/Users/scott]_(scott@OSX)_ >>>> $ set | grep VERSION >>>> BASH_VERSION='3.2.53(1)-release' >>>> >>>> _[/home/scott]_(scott@LINUX)_ >>>> $ set | grep VERSION >>>> BASH_VERSION='4.3.11(1)-release' >>>> >>>> >>> >>> He certainly is a very deluded clown. He does not even know that OSX cli >>> is just a very standard bash console. >>> And he is stupid enough to claim that OSX does not share the problems >>> (which are present on all OS) with blanks in filenames. >> >> Blanks? OS X handles *spaces* just fine... but what is a blank? > > So you are a IT "specialist", knowing everything. According to your claims. > You know linux better than linux users, That is your claim - I never said it. So YOU describe me as knowing Linux better than (other) Linux users. > you know windows better than actual > windows users, Again: your claim, not mine. > and your OSX knowledge is (maybe) only surpassed by the OSX > developers Again: your claim, not mine.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-11 13:27 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <n1vc2d$514$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #532046 |
The lying imbecile Snit Michael Glasser babbled: > Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote: >> The lying imbecile Snit Michael Glasser babbled: >> >>> On 11/10/15, 3:15 PM, in article n1tq50$gbl$1@dont-email.me, "Peter >>> Köhlmann" <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote: >>> >>>>>> My post was to the cretinous claims of a dimbulb calling itself >>>>>> "GreyCloud" >>>>>> >>>>>> He actually is stupid enough to claim that OSX cli parser is "smart" >>>>>> enough to recognize this all by itself. >>>>> >>>>> He's a clown. The "OSX cli parser" is just bash. >>>>> >>>>> _[/Users/scott]_(scott@OSX)_ >>>>> $ set | grep VERSION >>>>> BASH_VERSION='3.2.53(1)-release' >>>>> >>>>> _[/home/scott]_(scott@LINUX)_ >>>>> $ set | grep VERSION >>>>> BASH_VERSION='4.3.11(1)-release' >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> He certainly is a very deluded clown. He does not even know that OSX >>>> cli is just a very standard bash console. >>>> And he is stupid enough to claim that OSX does not share the problems >>>> (which are present on all OS) with blanks in filenames. >>> >>> Blanks? OS X handles *spaces* just fine... but what is a blank? >> >> So you are a IT "specialist", knowing everything. According to your >> claims. You know linux better than linux users, > > That is your claim - I never said it. So YOU describe me as knowing Linux > better than (other) Linux users. No. I describe you as the imbecile you really are. You think that you are clever and know more than most people. In reality you are just simply a deluded dimbulb >> you know windows better than actual >> windows users, > > Again: your claim, not mine. > >> and your OSX knowledge is (maybe) only surpassed by the OSX >> developers > > Again: your claim, not mine.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-12 10:36 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D26A1C1A.63A0C%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #532051 |
On 11/11/15, 5:27 AM, in article n1vc2d$514$1@dont-email.me, "Peter
Köhlmann" <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote:
> The lying imbecile Snit Michael Glasser babbled:
>
>> Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote:
>>> The lying imbecile Snit Michael Glasser babbled:
>>>
>>>> On 11/10/15, 3:15 PM, in article n1tq50$gbl$1@dont-email.me, "Peter
>>>> Köhlmann" <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>> My post was to the cretinous claims of a dimbulb calling itself
>>>>>>> "GreyCloud"
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> He actually is stupid enough to claim that OSX cli parser is "smart"
>>>>>>> enough to recognize this all by itself.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> He's a clown. The "OSX cli parser" is just bash.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _[/Users/scott]_(scott@OSX)_
>>>>>> $ set | grep VERSION
>>>>>> BASH_VERSION='3.2.53(1)-release'
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _[/home/scott]_(scott@LINUX)_
>>>>>> $ set | grep VERSION
>>>>>> BASH_VERSION='4.3.11(1)-release'
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> He certainly is a very deluded clown. He does not even know that OSX
>>>>> cli is just a very standard bash console.
>>>>> And he is stupid enough to claim that OSX does not share the problems
>>>>> (which are present on all OS) with blanks in filenames.
>>>>
>>>> Blanks? OS X handles *spaces* just fine... but what is a blank?
>>>
>>> So you are a IT "specialist", knowing everything. According to your
>>> claims. You know linux better than linux users,
>>
>> That is your claim - I never said it. So YOU describe me as knowing Linux
>> better than (other) Linux users.
>
> No. I describe you as the imbecile you really are.
These are the phrases YOU described me with:
Peter Köhlmann, referring to Snit:
-----
You know linux better than linux users, you know windows better
than actual windows users, and your OSX knowledge is (maybe) only
surpassed by the OSX developers
-----
Yes, you falsely attributed these ideas to me, but the reality is these are
your ideas and your ideas alone. I did not suggest, hint, say, or imply
these were true in any way.
It shows how YOU think of me.
> You think that you are clever and know more than most people.
Again: this is YOUR view of me. You put me down because it is clear to YOU I
know more than YOU.
> In reality you are just simply a deluded dimbulb
And yet you describe me this way:
Peter Köhlmann, referring to Snit:
-----
You know linux better than linux users, you know windows better
than actual windows users, and your OSX knowledge is (maybe) only
surpassed by the OSX developers
-----
--
* OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI>
* Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
* OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-12 22:58 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <n231tj$po0$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #532345 |
The lying imbecile Snit Michael Glasser babbled: > On 11/11/15, 5:27 AM, in article n1vc2d$514$1@dont-email.me, "Peter > Köhlmann" <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote: > >> The lying imbecile Snit Michael Glasser babbled: >> >>> Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote: >>>> The lying imbecile Snit Michael Glasser babbled: >>>> >>>>> On 11/10/15, 3:15 PM, in article n1tq50$gbl$1@dont-email.me, "Peter >>>>> Köhlmann" <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>>> My post was to the cretinous claims of a dimbulb calling itself >>>>>>>> "GreyCloud" >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> He actually is stupid enough to claim that OSX cli parser is >>>>>>>> "smart" enough to recognize this all by itself. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> He's a clown. The "OSX cli parser" is just bash. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _[/Users/scott]_(scott@OSX)_ >>>>>>> $ set | grep VERSION >>>>>>> BASH_VERSION='3.2.53(1)-release' >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _[/home/scott]_(scott@LINUX)_ >>>>>>> $ set | grep VERSION >>>>>>> BASH_VERSION='4.3.11(1)-release' >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> He certainly is a very deluded clown. He does not even know that OSX >>>>>> cli is just a very standard bash console. >>>>>> And he is stupid enough to claim that OSX does not share the problems >>>>>> (which are present on all OS) with blanks in filenames. >>>>> >>>>> Blanks? OS X handles *spaces* just fine... but what is a blank? >>>> >>>> So you are a IT "specialist", knowing everything. According to your >>>> claims. You know linux better than linux users, >>> >>> That is your claim - I never said it. So YOU describe me as knowing >>> Linux >>> better than (other) Linux users. >> >> No. I describe you as the imbecile you really are. > > These are the phrases YOU described me with: > > Peter Köhlmann, referring to Snit: > ----- > You know linux better than linux users, you know windows better > than actual windows users, and your OSX knowledge is (maybe) only > surpassed by the OSX developers > ----- > > Yes, you falsely attributed these ideas to me, but the reality is these > are your ideas and your ideas alone. I did not suggest, hint, say, or > imply these were true in any way. > > It shows how YOU think of me. > >> You think that you are clever and know more than most people. > > Again: this is YOUR view of me. You put me down because it is clear to YOU > I know more than YOU. > >> In reality you are just simply a deluded dimbulb > > And yet you describe me this way: > > Peter Köhlmann, referring to Snit: > ----- > You know linux better than linux users, you know windows better > than actual windows users, and your OSX knowledge is (maybe) only > surpassed by the OSX developers > ----- > Idiot. I don't "describe" you that way. It is your own view of yourself. You are a retard who thinks of himself as a genius And that you are competely unable to understand simple sentences have you just proven beyond any doubt
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-12 15:15 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D26A5D8D.63AAC%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #532482 |
On 11/12/15, 2:58 PM, in article n231tj$po0$1@dont-email.me, "Peter
Köhlmann" <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote:
>> And yet you describe me this way:
>>
>> Peter Köhlmann, referring to Snit:
>> -----
>> You know linux better than linux users, you know windows better
>> than actual windows users, and your OSX knowledge is (maybe) only
>> surpassed by the OSX developers
>> -----
>>
>
> Idiot.
And that is how you repeatedly describe yourself. Sure. This is your
issue... you see yourself as that word you have made be synonymous with your
own name, and you work to tear down those you see as better than you. With
me, YOUR exact description was:
Peter Köhlmann, referring to Snit:
-----
You know linux better than linux users, you know windows better
than actual windows users, and your OSX knowledge is (maybe) only
surpassed by the OSX developers
-----
Sure, you falsely attributed your OWN ideas to me. No doubt. Not saying you
did not. But it is not a claim I ever made or even suggested or hinted was
true. It came fully from you.
> I don't "describe" you that way.
Those are your exact words. You can deny it all you wish, but those are YOUR
words.
> It is your own view of yourself.
Yet you cannot show me ever describing myself that way because I never have.
You are getting very defensive here!
> You are a retard who thinks of himself as a genius
See: you work to put me down to try to feel better about yourself. And you
do so again, below. Repeatedly you attack those you see as being your
betters.
> And that you are competely unable to understand simple sentences have you
> just proven beyond any doubt
--
* OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI>
* Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
* OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-11 06:15 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <n1v7up$lsg$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #531898 |
Peter Köhlmann wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > vallor wrote: >> >> He's a clown. The "OSX cli parser" is just bash. >> >> _[/Users/scott]_(scott@OSX)_ >> $ set | grep VERSION >> BASH_VERSION='3.2.53(1)-release' >> >> _[/home/scott]_(scott@LINUX)_ >> $ set | grep VERSION >> BASH_VERSION='4.3.11(1)-release' > > He certainly is a very deluded clown. He does not even know that OSX cli is > just a very standard bash console. > And he is stupid enough to claim that OSX does not share the problems (which > are present on all OS) with blanks in filenames. They are not difficult to > overcome (usually), but can be a PITA if you generate filenames like that > with regular expressions And more of a pain in the ass as you nest scripts. -- This life is yours. Some of it was given to you; the rest, you made yourself.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-10 16:37 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <Feidnaa65-RI4t_LnZ2dnUU7-WWdnZ2d@bresnan.com> |
| In reply to | #531891 |
On 11/10/15 15:01, vallor wrote: > On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 13:21:53 +0100, Peter Köhlmann wrote: > >> Ezekiel wrote: >> >> >>> >>> "Peter K�hlmann"<peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote in message >>> news:n1sd6e$pat$1@dont-email.me... >>>> GreyCloud wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 11/09/15 13:46, Peter K�hlmann wrote: >>>>>> GreyCloud wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 11/09/15 11:05, Fabian Russell wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> As I mentioned, spaces in filenames will choke ANY command parser >>>>>>>> (unless quoted or escaped). >>>>>>> >>>>>>> But not on OS X. More FUD on your part, troll. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> LOL!!! >>>>>> >>>>>> Idiot. They will need special attention on OSX as on every other OS >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> You are the only idiot, along with Fabian, that doesn't know shit >>>>> about the cli parser. On OS X it does work, in case you haven't >>>>> noticed, Koldtard. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> Idiotic dimbulb. You are dumber than a Hadron. A typical Snit >>>> >>>> Try this (on OSX cli) >>>> >>>> touch this will be 5 files.txt >>>> >>>> Now do >>>> >>>> touch 'this will be 1 file.txt' >>>> >>>> Then look up your files >>>> >>>> Come back to us when you have absorbed your shock, you incompetent >>>> Snit >>>> >>>> >>> What's the point of this thread? Spaces in a filename (or *any* >>> command-line arg) don't "choke" any command line parser. The command >>> line parser behaves exactly as it should and follows the syntax rules >>> exactly as designed. >> >> Right, it does. >> Just as it also does on windows and linux >> >>> Any command line arg (not just filenames) with a space needs to be >>> quoted. >>> This is how it's always been and always will be. Nothing is broken and >>> nothing is choking. Things are working exactly as they're supposed to >>> work. >> >> Did I claim anything to the contrary? >> >>> Needing to add quotes around args with spaces doesn't mean something is >>> broken or choking. Those are simply the command line grammar rules. >>> Similar to grammar rules that exist in SQL, programming languages, etc. >> >> Learn to read. >> >> My post was to the cretinous claims of a dimbulb calling itself >> "GreyCloud" >> >> He actually is stupid enough to claim that OSX cli parser is "smart" >> enough to recognize this all by itself. > > He's a clown. The "OSX cli parser" is just bash. > > _[/Users/scott]_(scott@OSX)_ > $ set | grep VERSION > BASH_VERSION='3.2.53(1)-release' > > _[/home/scott]_(scott@LINUX)_ > $ set | grep VERSION > BASH_VERSION='4.3.11(1)-release' > > Yet you just posted and validated my claim later on. Why is that? Or are you just trolling again as usual? -- My problem is that I don't have enough middle fingers.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-10 09:31 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D2676A09.636CD%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #531742 |
On 11/10/15, 4:52 AM, in article n1slmc$nld$1@dont-email.me, "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> wrote: > > "Peter K�hlmann" <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote in message > news:n1sd6e$pat$1@dont-email.me... >> GreyCloud wrote: >> >>> On 11/09/15 13:46, Peter K�hlmann wrote: >>>> GreyCloud wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 11/09/15 11:05, Fabian Russell wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> As I mentioned, spaces in filenames will choke ANY command parser >>>>>> (unless quoted or escaped). >>>>> >>>>> But not on OS X. More FUD on your part, troll. >>>>> >>>>> LOL!!! >>>> >>>> Idiot. They will need special attention on OSX as on every other OS >>>> >>> >>> You are the only idiot, along with Fabian, that doesn't know shit about >>> the cli parser. On OS X it does work, in case you haven't noticed, >>> Koldtard. >>> >> >> Idiotic dimbulb. You are dumber than a Hadron. A typical Snit >> >> Try this (on OSX cli) >> >> touch this will be 5 files.txt >> >> Now do >> >> touch 'this will be 1 file.txt' >> >> Then look up your files >> >> Come back to us when you have absorbed your shock, you incompetent Snit >> > > What's the point of this thread? Spaces in a filename (or *any* command-line > arg) don't "choke" any command line parser. The command line parser behaves > exactly as it should and follows the syntax rules exactly as designed. > > Any command line arg (not just filenames) with a space needs to be quoted. > This is how it's always been and always will be. Nothing is broken and > nothing is choking. Things are working exactly as they're supposed to work. > > Needing to add quotes around args with spaces doesn't mean something is > broken or choking. Those are simply the command line grammar rules. Similar > to grammar rules that exist in SQL, programming languages, etc. Whywouldanyonethinkspacesareofanyvalueatall?Theyarenotneededtohelpwithunders tandingwhenreading!JustasillymythpushedbyMacandWindowsusers!:) -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-10 13:55 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <3N2dnQ8nU44xxN_LnZ2dnUU7-c-dnZ2d@bresnan.com> |
| In reply to | #531742 |
On 11/10/15 04:52, Ezekiel wrote: > "Peter Köhlmann"<peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote in message > news:n1sd6e$pat$1@dont-email.me... >> GreyCloud wrote: >> >>> On 11/09/15 13:46, Peter Köhlmann wrote: >>>> GreyCloud wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 11/09/15 11:05, Fabian Russell wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> As I mentioned, spaces in filenames will choke ANY command parser >>>>>> (unless quoted or escaped). >>>>> >>>>> But not on OS X. More FUD on your part, troll. >>>>> >>>>> LOL!!! >>>> >>>> Idiot. They will need special attention on OSX as on every other OS >>>> >>> >>> You are the only idiot, along with Fabian, that doesn't know shit about >>> the cli parser. On OS X it does work, in case you haven't noticed, >>> Koldtard. >>> >> >> Idiotic dimbulb. You are dumber than a Hadron. A typical Snit >> >> Try this (on OSX cli) >> >> touch this will be 5 files.txt >> >> Now do >> >> touch 'this will be 1 file.txt' >> >> Then look up your files >> >> Come back to us when you have absorbed your shock, you incompetent Snit >> > > What's the point of this thread? Spaces in a filename (or *any* command-line > arg) don't "choke" any command line parser. The command line parser behaves > exactly as it should and follows the syntax rules exactly as designed. > > Any command line arg (not just filenames) with a space needs to be quoted. > This is how it's always been and always will be. Nothing is broken and > nothing is choking. Things are working exactly as they're supposed to work. > > Needing to add quotes around args with spaces doesn't mean something is > broken or choking. Those are simply the command line grammar rules. Similar > to grammar rules that exist in SQL, programming languages, etc. > That's what I've been trying to pound into these morons heads. They don't grok much in cola. Just troll. -- My problem is that I don't have enough middle fingers.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 12 of 15 — ← Prev page 1 … 10 11 [12] 13 14 15 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web