Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #678487 > unrolled thread
| Started by | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-03-27 07:50 -0400 |
| Last post | 2018-03-29 19:41 +1100 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 73 — 13 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-03-27 07:50 -0400
Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-03-27 08:15 -0400
Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-03-27 18:32 -0400
Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-03-27 23:40 +0100
Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-03-27 23:28 +0000
Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-03-27 20:07 -0400
Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-03-27 18:17 -0600
Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-03-27 21:43 -0400
Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-03-27 20:15 -0600
Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-03-28 04:47 +0000
Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-03-28 00:19 -0600
Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-03-28 07:53 +0000
Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-03-28 05:41 -0600
Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-03-28 04:46 +0000
Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-03-28 07:23 -0400
Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-03-28 09:55 -0500
Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-03-28 09:22 -0600
Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-03-28 12:52 -0400
Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-03-28 12:57 -0500
Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-03-29 06:19 +0000
Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-03-29 08:36 -0500
Last 30 days, there were about 36 "people" (nyms) worth reading here. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-03-29 09:18 -0700
Re: Last 30 days, there were about 36 "people" (nyms) worth reading here. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-03-29 11:33 -0500
Just use the server, with no UserName/PassWord specified. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-03-29 10:03 -0700
Re: Just use the server, with no UserName/PassWord specified. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-03-29 14:21 -0400
Thunderbird is wonderful -if- you know how to configure it. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-03-29 12:46 -0700
Re: Thunderbird is wonderful -if- you know how to configure it. "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-03-29 14:33 -0700
Re: Last 30 days, there were about 36 "people" (nyms) worth reading here. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-03-29 14:06 -0400
Re: Seeing your stuff doesn't mean I care about it. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-03-29 17:57 -0400
Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-03-29 07:37 -0600
Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-03-29 10:04 -0400
Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-03-29 08:11 -0600
Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-03-29 11:17 -0500
Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-03-30 09:04 +1100
Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-03-29 19:30 -0400
Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-03-30 16:51 +1100
Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-03-27 07:07 -0600
Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-03-27 18:36 -0400
Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-03-27 16:40 -0600
Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-03-27 19:39 -0400
Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-03-27 17:46 -0600
Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-03-28 10:53 -0500
Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-03-28 09:00 -0700
Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-03-28 11:38 -0600
Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-03-28 10:41 -0700
Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-03-28 11:58 -0600
Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-03-28 11:38 -0600
Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-03-27 16:41 -0700
Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-03-27 17:47 -0600
Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-03-27 17:00 -0700
Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-03-27 18:07 -0600
Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-03-27 17:26 -0700
Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-03-27 18:40 -0600
Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-03-27 17:45 -0700
Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-03-27 22:12 -0400
Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-03-27 09:38 -0500
Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-03-27 10:22 -0700
Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-03-27 13:25 -0500
Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-03-27 15:28 -0700
Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-03-27 20:20 -0500
Suppose everyone believed transgender blacks were an insurance risk. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-03-28 08:07 -0700
Re: Suppose everyone believed transgender blacks were an insurance risk. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-03-28 08:10 -0700
Re: Suppose everyone believed transgender blacks were an insurance risk. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-03-28 09:20 -0600
Re: Suppose everyone believed transgender blacks were an insurance risk. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-03-28 12:55 -0400
Re: Suppose everyone believed transgender blacks were an insurance risk. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-03-28 10:00 -0700
Re: Suppose everyone believed transgender blacks were an insurance risk. Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-03-29 10:08 -0700
Re: Less Freedom. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-03-29 14:23 -0400
Re: Less Freedom. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-03-29 15:28 -0500
Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-03-27 18:32 -0400
Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-03-28 06:14 -0700
Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-03-28 09:56 -0500
Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-03-29 10:06 -0700
Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-03-29 19:41 +1100
Page 2 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 Next page →
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-29 08:36 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <p9iq5a$115g$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #678878 |
On 3/29/2018 1:19 AM, Nadegda wrote: > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Wed, 28 Mar 2018 12:57:34 -0500, Sergio wrote: > >> On 3/28/2018 11:52 AM, kensi wrote: >>> On 3/28/2018 10:55 AM, Sergio wrote: >>>> On 3/27/2018 11:46 PM, Nadegda wrote: >>> [snip] >>>> so quit posting in sci.physics >>> >>> Why don't you stop hiding behind your keyboard and monitor and make >>> her? >> >> wow, you snip off the last part of others posts just like Nads does. > > She snips parts she's not replying to, like usenet etiquette suggests we > should do. wrong, she snips off what she dosent agree with. > >> ao, why are you posting in sci.physics ? > > Do posts about radiative heat transfer mechanisms not belong there? That > would be ... surprising. you don't post about heat transfer at all, you are clean up troll crew for kensi pupa. > >> this is not alt.climatechange or alt.glowballworming > > Neither of which exist, according to my newsserver's listings at least. you can post there anyway, it is ok. > >> is your troll newsgroup gone dead ? looking for volume ? try >> facebook. > > Why, so she can be advertised to and then her personal information sold to > Cambridge Analytica to be used in an attempt to elect another one like > Trump? Facebook worked with, shared user personal data, your data, with Obama to get elected in 2012 https://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/facebook-data-scandal-trump-election-obama-2012/ The campaign boasted that more than a million people downloaded the app, which, given an average friend-list size of 190, means that as many as 190 million had at least some of their Facebook data vacuumed up by the Obama campaign — without their knowledge or consent. > > You must be a special kind of stupid if you think she'll accept that as a > substitute for usenet. whoa! usenet is dead, or didnt you get the message?, and you and she ARE stupid. go find out how many different people actually post here in the last month. 1,000s ? 100's ? 16. nobody is listening to you cupcake.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-29 09:18 -0700 |
| Subject | Last 30 days, there were about 36 "people" (nyms) worth reading here. |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@Mar.29--9.18am.Seattle.2018> |
| In reply to | #678886 |
> Facebook gave your "personal" info to the Obama 2012 campaign.
> Usenet is dead; how many people actually posted here, last month ?
> 1,000s ? 100's ? 16.
Last 30 days, there were about 36 "people" (nyms) worth reading here;
165, if you count the 49 people I plonked and the 80 "Shifties".
You (Sergio) post over 9 times/Day; 205 last 3 Weeks.
You use ThunderBird on Win7; "Aioe.ORG" is your (crappy) server.
You posted to:
Sci.Physics, Talk.Politics.Guns, Alt.Checkmate,
Sci.Physics.Relativity, Alt.Astronomy, Rec.Food.Cooking,
Alt.Fan.Cyberchicken
Your "Subject:" lines:
Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank)
solutions manual to Fundamentals of Database Systems
Why Do Vorticces Exist in the Atmosphere ?
Arctic wintertime sea ice extent is among lowest on record
It's 50 years since climate change was first seen.
Potato Production and Climate Change
Jeff-Relf.Me/Phy_Regs.HTM
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-29 11:33 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Last 30 days, there were about 36 "people" (nyms) worth reading here. |
| Message-ID | <p9j4i2$1m67$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #678912 |
On 3/29/2018 11:18 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: >> Facebook gave your "personal" info to the Obama 2012 campaign. >> Usenet is dead; how many people actually posted here, last month ? >> 1,000s ? 100's ? 16. > > Last 30 days, there were about 36 "people" (nyms) worth reading here; > 165, if you count the 49 people I plonked and the 80 "Shifties". yep 36 regulars, so most all of the newsgroups are quite small now. I think Windows has been cut off its interfaces with news servers, perhaps Thunderbird too, . I got aioe on, but cant get eternal-september nor news server.net, no place to sign in, it is not offered user name and password form for sending to a server.... (thunderbird) > > You (Sergio) post over 9 times/Day; 205 last 3 Weeks. > You use ThunderBird on Win7; "Aioe.ORG" is your (crappy) server. > You posted to: > > Sci.Physics, Talk.Politics.Guns, Alt.Checkmate, > Sci.Physics.Relativity, Alt.Astronomy, Rec.Food.Cooking, > Alt.Fan.Cyberchicken I dont post to Rec.Food.Cooking, Alt.Fan.Cyberchicken, or Sci.Physics.Relativity, perhaps somebody added on newsgroups, aioe only likes 3 groups or less..... > > Your "Subject:" lines: > > Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank) > solutions manual to Fundamentals of Database Systems > Why Do Vorticces Exist in the Atmosphere ? > Arctic wintertime sea ice extent is among lowest on record > It's 50 years since climate change was first seen. > Potato Production and Climate Change > > Jeff-Relf.Me/Phy_Regs.HTM > hi, do you know of some other free anon posting news servers ? OR near free ?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-29 10:03 -0700 |
| Subject | Just use the server, with no UserName/PassWord specified. |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@Mar.29--10.03am.Seattle.2018> |
| In reply to | #678915 |
> > Last 30 days, there were about 36 "people" (nyms) worth reading here;
> > 165, if you count the 49 people I plonked and the 80 "Shifties".
>
> yep 36 regulars, so most all of the newsgroups are quite small now.
There are plenty of people here, for me; I like the quiet.
> I think Windows has dropped support for news servers,
> perhaps Thunderbird too.
No, Usenet is -Well- supported here, on my Win10 box.
> I can't use eternal-september nor news server.net;
> no place to sign in (thunderbird)
Just use the server, with no UserName/PassWord specified;
like FireFox, ThunderBird will prompt you for it;
also, it asks you if you want ThunderBird to remember it.
ThunderBird and FireFox are ultra similar;
learn how to configure one, and you know how to configure the other.
> I don't post to Rec.Food.Cooking, Alt.Fan.Cyberchicken,
Yes, you do, when you CrossPost.
> AIOE only likes 3 groups or less.....
Yes, AIOE is a real peice of shit, like that.
> do you know of some other free anon posting news servers ?
> OR near free ?
Unless you enjoy -Random- lags ( when will the post show up ? ),
Do NOT use a binary server to read Usenet.
For that, use INN servers; to wit:
News5.Open-News-Network.ORG:119
News2.Open-News-Network.ORG:119
News6.Open-News-Network.ORG:119
News.Individual.NET:119
"Individual.NET" is 10 Euros per year.
"OpenNews" is cost free ( News5, News2 and News6 are best ).
Register at: Open-News-Network.ORG/register
Must translate from German; if Captcha fails, F5 refresh.
Do NOT post using an INN server, they'll ban you !
For that, use a binary server; to wit:
News.US.Usenet-News.NET:119 or usNews.BlockNews.NET:119
They won't censor you; they don't even keep the "Path:" line,
so you can't be identified. Their archive is over 15 years deep.
$5 buys you 11 gigs, enough for several life times.
If one is down ( -very- unlikely ), use the other one.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-29 14:21 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Just use the server, with no UserName/PassWord specified. |
| Message-ID | <a9avC.98368$vs1.95683@fx44.iad> |
| In reply to | #678929 |
On 3/29/2018 1:03 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: >>> Last 30 days, there were about 36 "people" (nyms) worth reading here; >>> 165, if you count the 49 people I plonked and the 80 "Shifties". >> >> yep 36 regulars, so most all of the newsgroups are quite small now. > > There are plenty of people here, for me; I like the quiet. Best when you have nothing worthwhile to say. >> I think Windows has dropped support for news servers, >> perhaps Thunderbird too. > > No, Usenet is -Well- supported here, on my Win10 box. No it isn't. You have to run something else like Thunderbird to access like I do. >> I can't use eternal-september nor news server.net; >> no place to sign in (thunderbird) Never tried those, But I can say Thunderbird won't let me sign into Teranews (which I paid for) and Teranews won't answer any emails about the problem. So I had to close my account which didn't close of course, but at least I'm not still paying. Thunderbird sucks. Part of the conspiracy to trash USENET I think. > Just use the server, with no UserName/PassWord specified; > like FireFox, ThunderBird will prompt you for it; > also, it asks you if you want ThunderBird to remember it. > > ThunderBird and FireFox are ultra similar; > learn how to configure one, and you know how to configure the other. > >> I don't post to Rec.Food.Cooking, Alt.Fan.Cyberchicken, > > Yes, you do, when you CrossPost. True and I usually never change crossposts. Although some trolls will set reply into some dumpster and you have to watch for that. >> AIOE only likes 3 groups or less..... > > Yes, AIOE is a real peice of shit, like that. > >> do you know of some other free anon posting news servers ? >> OR near free ? > > Unless you enjoy -Random- lags ( when will the post show up ? ), > Do NOT use a binary server to read Usenet. > For that, use INN servers; to wit: > > News5.Open-News-Network.ORG:119 > News2.Open-News-Network.ORG:119 > News6.Open-News-Network.ORG:119 > News.Individual.NET:119 > > "Individual.NET" is 10 Euros per year. > "OpenNews" is cost free ( News5, News2 and News6 are best ). > Register at: Open-News-Network.ORG/register > Must translate from German; if Captcha fails, F5 refresh. > > Do NOT post using an INN server, they'll ban you ! > For that, use a binary server; to wit: > > News.US.Usenet-News.NET:119 or usNews.BlockNews.NET:119 > > They won't censor you; they don't even keep the "Path:" line, > so you can't be identified. Their archive is over 15 years deep. > $5 buys you 11 gigs, enough for several life times. > If one is down ( -very- unlikely ), use the other one. > Good STuff, Rolf!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-29 12:46 -0700 |
| Subject | Thunderbird is wonderful -if- you know how to configure it. |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@Mar.29--0.46pm.Seattle.2018> |
| In reply to | #678969 |
> > No, Usenet is -Well- supported here, on my Win10 box. > > No it isn't. You have to run something else, > like Thunderbird, to access, like I do. Many years have pasted since I last launched ThunderBird. I recommend it to others, because they can't use what I do, "Jeff-Relf.Me/X.ZIP". > Thunderbird sucks. Part of the conspiracy to trash USENET I think. Thunderbird is wonderful -if- you know how to configure it; it's hard to do ( and do well ). I know how, of course, even though I don't use it. > > > I don't post to Rec.Food.Cooking, Alt.Fan.Cyberchicken, > > > > Yes, you do, when you CrossPost. > > True and I usually never change crossposts. > Although some trolls will set reply into some dumpster > and you have to watch for that. My newsreader automatically ignores ReDirects. > > "OpenNews" is cost free ( News5, News2 and News6 are best ). > > Register at: Open-News-Network.ORG/register > > Must translate from German; if Captcha fails, F5 refresh. > > > > News.US.Usenet-News.NET:119 or usNews.BlockNews.NET:119 > > > > They won't censor you; they don't even keep the "Path:" line, > > so you can't be identified. Their archive is over 15 years deep. > > $5 buys you 11 gigs, enough for several life times. > > Good Stuff, Rolf! Thanks.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-29 14:33 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Thunderbird is wonderful -if- you know how to configure it. |
| Message-ID | <e386ab6d-747f-489b-98e1-be925388d07d@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #679022 |
On Thursday, March 29, 2018 at 12:46:28 PM UTC-7, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: > > > No, Usenet is -Well- supported here, on my Win10 box. > > > > No it isn't. You have to run something else, > > like Thunderbird, to access, like I do. > > Many years have pasted since I last launched ThunderBird. > I recommend it to others, because they can't use what I do, > "Jeff-Relf.Me/X.ZIP". > > > Thunderbird sucks. Part of the conspiracy to trash USENET I think. > > Thunderbird is wonderful -if- you know how to configure it; > it's hard to do ( and do well ). > I know how, of course, even though I don't use it. > > > > > I don't post to Rec.Food.Cooking, Alt.Fan.Cyberchicken, > > > > > > Yes, you do, when you CrossPost. > > > > True and I usually never change crossposts. > > Although some trolls will set reply into some dumpster > > and you have to watch for that. > > My newsreader automatically ignores ReDirects. > > > > "OpenNews" is cost free ( News5, News2 and News6 are best ). > > > Register at: Open-News-Network.ORG/register > > > Must translate from German; if Captcha fails, F5 refresh. > > > > > > News.US.Usenet-News.NET:119 or usNews.BlockNews.NET:119 > > > > > > They won't censor you; they don't even keep the "Path:" line, > > > so you can't be identified. Their archive is over 15 years deep. > > > $5 buys you 11 gigs, enough for several life times. > > > > Good Stuff, Rolf! > > Thanks. GOPer Mafia finaly get the picture of Earth's higher temp.WOW They control the US press,but the truth won in the end. Still Trump wants P.E.to burn more cheap coal.Not hard to figure.GOPer motto "Life is cheap,but a buck is a buck.Kill off the pour and save on tax.Ooops GOPer Mafia never ever paid a penny in tax Trump has no books.Bert
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-29 14:06 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Last 30 days, there were about 36 "people" (nyms) worth reading here. |
| Message-ID | <fW9vC.95739$mD2.28959@fx33.iad> |
| In reply to | #678915 |
On 3/29/2018 12:33 PM, Sergio wrote: > On 3/29/2018 11:18 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: >>> Facebook gave your "personal" info to the Obama 2012 campaign. >>> Usenet is dead; how many people actually posted here, last month ? >>> 1,000s ? 100's ? 16. >> >> Last 30 days, there were about 36 "people" (nyms) worth reading here; >> 165, if you count the 49 people I plonked and the 80 "Shifties". > > yep 36 regulars, so most all of the newsgroups are quite small now. > I think Windows has been cut off its interfaces with news servers, > perhaps Thunderbird too, . > > I got aioe on, but cant get eternal-september nor news server.net, > no place to sign in, it is not offered user name and password form for > sending to a server.... (thunderbird) > > >> >> You (Sergio) post over 9 times/Day; 205 last 3 Weeks. >> You use ThunderBird on Win7; "Aioe.ORG" is your (crappy) server. >> You posted to: >> >> Sci.Physics, Talk.Politics.Guns, Alt.Checkmate, >> Sci.Physics.Relativity, Alt.Astronomy, Rec.Food.Cooking, >> Alt.Fan.Cyberchicken > > I dont post to Rec.Food.Cooking, Alt.Fan.Cyberchicken, or > Sci.Physics.Relativity, perhaps somebody added on newsgroups, aioe only > likes 3 groups or less..... > >> >> Your "Subject:" lines: >> >> Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank) >> solutions manual to Fundamentals of Database Systems >> Why Do Vorticces Exist in the Atmosphere ? >> Arctic wintertime sea ice extent is among lowest on record >> It's 50 years since climate change was first seen. >> Potato Production and Climate Change >> >> Jeff-Relf.Me/Phy_Regs.HTM >> > > hi, do you know of some other free anon posting news servers ? > OR near free ? > Well I'm mot part of the 36 because Rolf has me "plonked" as not worth reading. His loss. He's still an idiot. Government "collusion" with ISPs and other large digital outfits has pretty much eliminated USENET as a last bastion of free speech. As Kensi/NADS Will explain, in socialism EVERYTHING especially free expression needs to be "regulated". Hence the effort to force everyone into facebook, Twitter, Google etc. where all expression can be controlled and "regulated". You'd think this would have libs screaming bloody murder, but they love it. Trimming comments they don't agree with or getting in the face of someone with an opinion they don't like and shouting them down is how they operate now. You knew that once the ACLU refused to recognize the Second Amendment that soon the First Amendment would not be far behind. As McCain and Romney have told us, it's a brave new era where facts, proof and your opinion no longer matter. "kensi"/Nads will tell you what to believe. OK?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-29 17:57 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Seeing your stuff doesn't mean I care about it. |
| Message-ID | <ojdvC.63516$177.36677@fx41.iad> |
| In reply to | #678961 |
On 3/29/2018 3:30 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: >> Relf has me "plonked" as not worth reading. His loss. He's still an idiot. > > I see your replies to me, Ben Jacoby, 5 levels deep; > and I see others quoting you; otherwise, I don't. > Seeing your stuff doesn't mean I care about it. > > I already said it, basementdweller: Your loss.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-29 07:37 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <tuqpbdhegmh9fqetei1gcv1nnqidu8lm78@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #678878 |
On Thu, 29 Mar 2018 06:19:46 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >> is your troll newsgroup gone dead ? looking for volume ? try >> facebook. > >Why, so she can be advertised to and then her personal information sold to >Cambridge Analytica to be used in an attempt to elect another one like >Trump? You had to work hard to figure some way to keep your hate Trump obsession going. No collusion. -- MAUKGA
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-29 10:04 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <p9irpa$143c$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #678887 |
On 3/29/2018 9:37 AM, Skeeter wrote: > On Thu, 29 Mar 2018 06:19:46 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda > <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: > >>> is your troll newsgroup gone dead ? looking for volume ? try >>> facebook. >> >> Why, so she can be advertised to and then her personal information sold to >> Cambridge Analytica to be used in an attempt to elect another one like >> Trump? > > You had to work hard to figure some way to keep your hate Trump > obsession going. > > No collus<SPANK!> Weren't you paying attention? Nadegda posted a couple of links last night. Collusion between the Trump campaign team and Russian spies has indeed been proved: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/special-counsel-manafort-gates-worked-with- russian-intelligence-agent/ http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/court-filings-show-associate-manafort-gates-allegedly-ties/story?id=54078674 -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-29 08:11 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <f0tpbdt1k1jg2tojl956fs7p54fgf12l7k@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #678894 |
On Thu, 29 Mar 2018 10:04:27 -0400, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >On 3/29/2018 9:37 AM, Skeeter wrote: >> On Thu, 29 Mar 2018 06:19:46 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda >> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >> >>>> is your troll newsgroup gone dead ? looking for volume ? try >>>> facebook. >>> >>> Why, so she can be advertised to and then her personal information sold to >>> Cambridge Analytica to be used in an attempt to elect another one like >>> Trump? >> >> You had to work hard to figure some way to keep your hate Trump >> obsession going. >> >> No collus<SPANK!> > >Weren't you paying attention? Nadegda posted a couple of links last >night. Collusion between the Trump campaign team and Russian spies has >indeed been proved: > >https://www.cbsnews.com/news/special-counsel-manafort-gates-worked-with- >russian-intelligence-agent/ > >http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/court-filings-show-associate-manafort-gates-allegedly-ties/story?id=54078674 I see every bodys name but Trumps. -- MAUKGA
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-29 11:17 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <p9j3ip$1job$3@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #678895 |
On 3/29/2018 9:11 AM, Skeeter wrote: > On Thu, 29 Mar 2018 10:04:27 -0400, kensi > <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: > >> On 3/29/2018 9:37 AM, Skeeter wrote: >>> On Thu, 29 Mar 2018 06:19:46 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda >>> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>>> is your troll newsgroup gone dead ? looking for volume ? try >>>>> facebook. >>>> >>>> Why, so she can be advertised to and then her personal information sold to >>>> Cambridge Analytica to be used in an attempt to elect another one like >>>> Trump? >>> >>> You had to work hard to figure some way to keep your hate Trump >>> obsession going. >>> >>> No collus<SPANK!> >> >> Weren't you paying attention? Nadegda posted a couple of links last >> night. Collusion between the Trump campaign team and Russian spies has >> indeed been proved: >> >> https://www.cbsnews.com/news/special-counsel-manafort-gates-worked-with- >> russian-intelligence-agent/ >> >> http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/court-filings-show-associate-manafort-gates-allegedly-ties/story?id=54078674 > > > I see every bodys name but Trumps. > Obama colluded with Facebook to get elected in 2012, paid them millions, FB sold anybody your information. lesson,=> collude with Facebook or Google, not far off ineffective Russia.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-30 09:04 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <fi566uFrnbU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #678592 |
On 28/03/2018 11:07 AM, benj wrote: > On 3/27/2018 7:28 PM, Nadegda wrote: >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >> On Tue, 27 Mar 2018 23:40:43 +0100, Sn!pe wrote: >> >>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>> >>>> On 3/27/2018 8:15 AM, Wally W. wrote: >>>>> On Tue, 27 Mar 2018 07:50:07 -0400, kensi wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers: >>>>>> >>>>>> <https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/climate-change-goes-firmly- >>>>>> >> in-the-loss-column-for-insurers/> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Do you post *anything* upbeat? >>>>> >>>>> >>>> Does "she" ever post anything that is true? >>> >>> No, HTH >> >> It took a while, but now we have you on the record making a firm >> statement >> that amounts to clinate change denial. > > Nonsense. Absolute lie. Lefties never do honesty. As I have said here > MANY times, the ONE principle that absolutely EVERYONE in science agrees > upon is "the certainty of change". It is you kooktards who think that > you can stop the planet and keep change from happening. That makes YOU > the 'science denier". > >> Which in turn pins down your politics as right-wing, something you've >> also >> tried to maintain deniability about. > > Right-wing schmite-wing. You are drooling again. What you accused me of > was being a Trump supporter. This is FAR from the case. Blowhard sales > types are not my favorite people though higher up than leftist commies > like yourself. Didn't you get the memo about the fall of your utopian > USSR? Your system is totally discredited by the largest social > experiment in history. No wonder only North Korea and Democrats are the > only ones left refusing to accept the data. > >> There's no bigger coward than one who will not go clearly on the >> record as >> believing what they believe, because it happens to be unpopular. > > I not only go on record I CONSISTENTLY back up my views with peer > reviewed science that I regularly post in response to "kensi's" cut and > paste journalist propaganda. **Liar. You NEVER post anything resembling science to any question or comment I make. Not once, not ever. Neither YOU nor "kensi" EVER respond to any > of it, **Pot, kettle, black, you lying sack of shit. You cannot put forward a cogent argument when I question you. You just scurry away. Like you will when you see this post. instead simply resorting to immature name-calling and repeating > your lies over an over. As Sergio has pointed out, there has never been > ONE equation coming out of you or your sock, "kensi". And that makes you > a fraud. **Actually, it is YOU who is the fraud. Not only do you fail to respond, but you fail to admit when you have been shown to be wrong. -- Trevor Wilson www.rageaudio.com.au
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-29 19:30 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <8GevC.43135$Fg4.8079@fx23.iad> |
| In reply to | #679065 |
On 3/29/2018 6:04 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: > On 28/03/2018 11:07 AM, benj wrote: >> On 3/27/2018 7:28 PM, Nadegda wrote: >>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >>> On Tue, 27 Mar 2018 23:40:43 +0100, Sn!pe wrote: >>> >>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 3/27/2018 8:15 AM, Wally W. wrote: >>>>>> On Tue, 27 Mar 2018 07:50:07 -0400, kensi wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> <https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/climate-change-goes-firmly- >>>>>>> >>> in-the-loss-column-for-insurers/> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Do you post *anything* upbeat? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> Does "she" ever post anything that is true? >>>> >>>> No, HTH >>> >>> It took a while, but now we have you on the record making a firm >>> statement >>> that amounts to clinate change denial. >> >> Nonsense. Absolute lie. Lefties never do honesty. As I have said here >> MANY times, the ONE principle that absolutely EVERYONE in science >> agrees upon is "the certainty of change". It is you kooktards who >> think that you can stop the planet and keep change from happening. >> That makes YOU the 'science denier". >> >>> Which in turn pins down your politics as right-wing, something you've >>> also >>> tried to maintain deniability about. >> >> Right-wing schmite-wing. You are drooling again. What you accused me >> of was being a Trump supporter. This is FAR from the case. Blowhard >> sales types are not my favorite people though higher up than leftist >> commies like yourself. Didn't you get the memo about the fall of your >> utopian USSR? Your system is totally discredited by the largest social >> experiment in history. No wonder only North Korea and Democrats are >> the only ones left refusing to accept the data. >> >>> There's no bigger coward than one who will not go clearly on the >>> record as >>> believing what they believe, because it happens to be unpopular. >> >> I not only go on record I CONSISTENTLY back up my views with peer >> reviewed science that I regularly post in response to "kensi's" cut >> and paste journalist propaganda. > > **Liar. You NEVER post anything resembling science to any question or > comment I make. Not once, not ever. The liar is YOU. Like al lefty Libs you don't do truth but DO do alling other people names and slandering them to further you political scams. The ends justifies the means, right? And now you have shown that you and "kensi"/Nads are all part of the same big scamming family! You are as ready to lie for them as you are to lie for yourself. Here is a REPOST of GISS data I have posted many times? Any idea what GISS data is? Do you know who Dr. Hansen the godfather of global warming is? Do you recognize HIS data? Do you notice that from 1940 - 1970 these data showed Temperature going DOWN while CO2 went up? And you have the absolute balls to say this proves that CO2 "causes" warming? How ignorant are you anyway. Why don't you show how much science you know down in Oz and explain how radiative forcing made this happen? You are all liars criminals and scammers trying to set up a fake tax to steal trillions of dollars. Shame on YOU. > Neither YOU nor "kensi" EVER respond to any >> of it, > > > **Pot, kettle, black, you lying sack of shit. You cannot put forward a > cogent argument when I question you. You just scurry away. Like you will > when you see this post. Liar. You simple babble on with your propaganda when I present you with scientific data and then (see above) you lie and say I never did. Take it easy on the drugs man, your fantasies are really getting strong. > instead simply resorting to immature name-calling and repeating >> your lies over an over. As Sergio has pointed out, there has never >> been ONE equation coming out of you or your sock, "kensi". And that >> makes you a fraud. > > **Actually, it is YOU who is the fraud. Not only do you fail to respond, > but you fail to admit when you have been shown to be wrong. You have not shown any of the science I CONSTANTLY present as wrong. YOU simply lie and name-call and repeat your fear-mongering propaganda over and over. It's propaganda 101. Nothing new. Nothing of value either. So start with discussing how CO2 radiative forcing is adding energy yet temperatures are going down. This is a real "causality" trick! We'll wait right here for your answer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-30 16:51 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <fi61k6F67mjU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #679082 |
On 30/03/2018 10:30 AM, benj wrote: > On 3/29/2018 6:04 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >> On 28/03/2018 11:07 AM, benj wrote: >>> On 3/27/2018 7:28 PM, Nadegda wrote: >>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>> melt! >>>> On Tue, 27 Mar 2018 23:40:43 +0100, Sn!pe wrote: >>>> >>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 3/27/2018 8:15 AM, Wally W. wrote: >>>>>>> On Tue, 27 Mar 2018 07:50:07 -0400, kensi wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> <https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/climate-change-goes-firmly- >>>>>>>> >>>> in-the-loss-column-for-insurers/> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Do you post *anything* upbeat? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> Does "she" ever post anything that is true? >>>>> >>>>> No, HTH >>>> >>>> It took a while, but now we have you on the record making a firm >>>> statement >>>> that amounts to clinate change denial. >>> >>> Nonsense. Absolute lie. Lefties never do honesty. As I have said here >>> MANY times, the ONE principle that absolutely EVERYONE in science >>> agrees upon is "the certainty of change". It is you kooktards who >>> think that you can stop the planet and keep change from happening. >>> That makes YOU the 'science denier". >>> >>>> Which in turn pins down your politics as right-wing, something >>>> you've also >>>> tried to maintain deniability about. >>> >>> Right-wing schmite-wing. You are drooling again. What you accused me >>> of was being a Trump supporter. This is FAR from the case. Blowhard >>> sales types are not my favorite people though higher up than leftist >>> commies like yourself. Didn't you get the memo about the fall of your >>> utopian USSR? Your system is totally discredited by the largest >>> social experiment in history. No wonder only North Korea and >>> Democrats are the only ones left refusing to accept the data. >>> >>>> There's no bigger coward than one who will not go clearly on the >>>> record as >>>> believing what they believe, because it happens to be unpopular. >>> >>> I not only go on record I CONSISTENTLY back up my views with peer >>> reviewed science that I regularly post in response to "kensi's" cut >>> and paste journalist propaganda. >> >> **Liar. You NEVER post anything resembling science to any question or >> comment I make. Not once, not ever. > > The liar is YOU. **LOL. Let's see. Like al lefty Libs you don't do truth but DO do alling > other people names and slandering them to further you political scams. > The ends justifies the means, right? And now you have shown that you and > "kensi"/Nads are all part of the same big scamming family! You are as > ready to lie for them as you are to lie for yourself. > > Here is a REPOST of GISS data I have posted many times? **NO repost. As usual, you lying sack of shit. Any idea what > GISS data is? **I know EXACTLY what it is. I also know what cherry-picked data is. Do you? Do you know who Dr. Hansen the godfather of global warming > is? **The so-called 'Godfather' of global warming was Joseph Fourier. After him, came Svante Arrhenius. Both men set the tone for global warming research way back in the NINETEENTH century! Which is information you would know, if you took the time to study the science. Do you recognize HIS data? **Well, since you failed (yet again) to present any data, no. Like I said: You NEVER present anything resembling science to back you idiotic claims. SOP. Do you notice that from 1940 - 1970 > these data showed Temperature going DOWN while CO2 went up? **Yes. And that has been explained to you in exquisite detail many, many times previously. Do you ever pay attention? It is due to aerosol pollution, caused by industry and motor vehicles. You may care to note (but you probably won't) that temperatures began to rise when governments around the world got serious about reducing aerosol pollution. Here's some science that you won't bother reading (nor understand): https://www.ucsusa.org/global-warming/science-and-impacts/science/aerosols-and-global-warming-faq.html#.Wr3OO39x1pg And you have > the absolute balls to say this proves that CO2 "causes" warming? **Idiot. The science is undeniable. How > ignorant are you anyway. **I assume that was a question. I am clearly a whole lot less ignorant that you. Why don't you show how much science you know > down in Oz and explain how radiative forcing made this happen? **Certainly. CO2 is resonant at a couple of infra-red frequencies. When infra-red (IR) hits those CO2 molecules, it causes them to vibrate (accumulate kinetic energy). More IR = more kinetic energy. The CO2 molecules are agitated sufficiently to transfer some of their energy to nearby molecules of atmospheric gases (nitrogen, oxygen, et al), thus raising the energy level of the entire system. Most critically, CO2 acts at night, when IR energy is re-radiated from the Earth's surface, thus nighttime temperatures are raised. > > You are all liars criminals and scammers trying to set up a fake tax to > steal trillions of dollars. Shame on YOU. **I am not trying to set up any kind of tax. > >> Neither YOU nor "kensi" EVER respond to any >>> of it, >> >> >> **Pot, kettle, black, you lying sack of shit. You cannot put forward a >> cogent argument when I question you. You just scurry away. Like you >> will when you see this post. > > Liar. **You keep saying that, but you have failed to respond to my previous posts in this area. That make YOU the lying cunt. Not me. You simple babble on with your propaganda when I present you with > scientific data and then (see above) you lie and say I never did. **You failed to supply ANY scientific data. That makes YOU the lying cunt. Take > it easy on the drugs man, your fantasies are really getting strong. **Let me remind you: _I_ am not the one who failed to supply the data. You are. > >> instead simply resorting to immature name-calling and repeating >>> your lies over an over. As Sergio has pointed out, there has never >>> been ONE equation coming out of you or your sock, "kensi". And that >>> makes you a fraud. >> >> **Actually, it is YOU who is the fraud. Not only do you fail to >> respond, but you fail to admit when you have been shown to be wrong. > > You have not shown any of the science I CONSTANTLY present as wrong. **Lying does not make you correct. It just makes you a liar. YOU > simply lie and name-call and repeat your fear-mongering propaganda over > and over. It's propaganda 101. Nothing new. Nothing of value either. > > So start with discussing how CO2 radiative forcing is adding energy yet > temperatures are going down. This is a real "causality" trick! **Huh? Prove that temperatures are going down. > > We'll wait right here for your answer. **Telling a lie, then asking ME to prove your lie is not going to happen. -- Trevor Wilson www.rageaudio.com.au
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-27 07:07 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <aggkbd1s252vpodjuki9k5emf0h514d4b0@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #678487 |
On Tue, 27 Mar 2018 07:50:07 -0400, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers: > >https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/climate-change-goes-firmly-in-the-loss-column-for-insurers/ It snowed here last night.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-27 18:36 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <AHzuC.162860$Rp1.158924@fx37.iad> |
| In reply to | #678493 |
On 3/27/2018 9:07 AM, Skeeter wrote: > On Tue, 27 Mar 2018 07:50:07 -0400, kensi > <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: > >> Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers: >> >> https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/climate-change-goes-firmly-in-the-loss-column-for-insurers/ > > > It snowed here last night. > Obviously due to global warming. Hey, didn't "kensi" tell you about the (fake) records for ice at the North Pole caused by global warming? I'm sure she can cut and paste it again. (A Ph.D. is proof you are competent to do some things!)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-27 16:40 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <d0ilbd1uvnmt14c57kg7qttos2fh7njtqm@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #678573 |
On Tue, 27 Mar 2018 18:36:11 -0400, benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >On 3/27/2018 9:07 AM, Skeeter wrote: >> On Tue, 27 Mar 2018 07:50:07 -0400, kensi >> <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >> >>> Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers: >>> >>> https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/climate-change-goes-firmly-in-the-loss-column-for-insurers/ >> >> >> It snowed here last night. >> >Obviously due to global warming. > >Hey, didn't "kensi" tell you about the (fake) records for ice at the >North Pole caused by global warming? I'm sure she can cut and paste it >again. (A Ph.D. is proof you are competent to do some things!) I am starting to believe her, my pet penguin is feeling under the weather. -- MAUKGA
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-27 19:39 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mDAuC.108815$mG5.73505@fx36.iad> |
| In reply to | #678575 |
On 3/27/2018 6:40 PM, Skeeter wrote: > On Tue, 27 Mar 2018 18:36:11 -0400, benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: > >> On 3/27/2018 9:07 AM, Skeeter wrote: >>> On Tue, 27 Mar 2018 07:50:07 -0400, kensi >>> <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>> Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers: >>>> >>>> https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/climate-change-goes-firmly-in-the-loss-column-for-insurers/ >>> >>> >>> It snowed here last night. >>> >> Obviously due to global warming. >> >> Hey, didn't "kensi" tell you about the (fake) records for ice at the >> North Pole caused by global warming? I'm sure she can cut and paste it >> again. (A Ph.D. is proof you are competent to do some things!) > > I am starting to believe her, my pet penguin is feeling under the > weather. > Not only are penguins a species endangered by climate change which makes keeping one a felony, but also the keeping of animals as "pets" is clearly nothing more than animal slavery! You have been duly reported to PETA and you can expect a visit to "save" these animals.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web