Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #560938 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-03-09 13:53 -0800 |
| Last post | 2016-03-16 14:46 -0500 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 555 — 33 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-03-09 13:53 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-10 17:02 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-03-11 01:25 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-11 11:36 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-12 07:38 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-03-13 09:57 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Earle Jones27 <earle.jones@comcast.net> - 2016-03-13 11:32 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-14 16:33 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-03-14 14:42 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-15 07:00 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-15 12:07 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-16 14:46 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-16 17:23 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-17 12:32 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-17 16:30 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-18 15:46 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-19 04:14 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-19 08:10 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-19 17:21 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-20 09:47 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-20 11:06 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-20 15:49 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-20 23:28 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-21 17:35 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-22 04:12 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-22 07:02 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-22 20:49 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-23 07:01 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-23 18:20 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-24 08:16 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-24 18:17 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-24 15:57 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-25 19:09 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-26 12:08 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-26 19:36 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Virgil <VIRGIL@VIRGIL.com> - 2016-03-26 13:50 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-28 16:20 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-29 22:39 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-30 11:15 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-30 18:11 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-31 07:03 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-31 17:45 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-31 15:16 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-01 20:59 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-04-01 16:13 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-01 16:23 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-01 16:22 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-01 23:21 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-02 07:35 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-02 19:38 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-03 08:30 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-03 23:46 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-04 13:19 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-05 00:54 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-05 07:40 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-04-05 17:16 +0200
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Dreamer In Colore <dreamerincolore@hotmail.com> - 2016-04-05 13:50 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-05 19:23 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Dreamer In Colore <dreamerincolore@hotmail.com> - 2016-04-05 15:40 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-04-05 15:35 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-06 11:31 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-06 20:11 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-07 11:56 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-04-05 15:25 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-06 11:30 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-06 20:16 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-07 11:58 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-08 17:25 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-04-08 13:01 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-08 13:47 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-09 18:52 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-04-09 15:06 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-10 08:53 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-10 08:47 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-10 16:06 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-10 14:18 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-10 23:45 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-11 16:19 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-12 19:15 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-04-12 14:52 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-13 08:11 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-13 16:26 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-13 14:30 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-13 20:19 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-14 11:25 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-14 23:07 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-08 13:45 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-09 18:54 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-10 08:54 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-05 19:11 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-06 11:32 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-06 20:19 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Virgil <VIRGIL@VIRGIL.com> - 2016-04-06 14:46 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-06 23:44 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-07 12:03 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-08 17:33 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-07 11:59 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-08 17:28 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-08 13:47 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-09 18:56 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-10 08:55 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-06 11:27 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-06 20:24 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-07 12:04 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-08 17:36 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-08 13:48 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-09 18:58 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-10 08:56 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-10 16:13 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-10 14:19 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-10 23:51 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-11 16:20 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-12 19:25 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-13 08:18 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-13 16:37 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-13 14:35 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? MattB <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2016-04-13 12:37 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-13 20:33 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-04-13 16:02 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-04-14 05:03 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-04-14 08:38 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-14 11:35 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-14 23:09 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-14 11:33 -0500
Re: (Christian) Insanity has benefits. benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-04-16 04:52 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-14 11:32 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-14 23:13 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-14 11:29 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-14 23:15 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-13 20:30 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-14 11:38 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-14 23:20 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-05 18:44 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-03-24 15:53 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-27 04:16 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2016-03-27 04:15 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-28 04:01 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2016-03-28 13:59 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-28 16:23 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2016-03-28 16:57 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-29 14:17 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-28 18:47 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2016-03-28 16:56 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-29 04:40 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-29 14:18 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-30 04:58 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-30 11:19 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-31 03:41 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-31 07:04 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-31 17:11 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-01 16:24 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-01 23:25 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-02 07:36 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-02 10:59 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-03 08:34 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-03 17:10 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-04 13:21 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-05 00:50 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-05 08:31 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Dreamer In Colore <dreamerincolore@hotmail.com> - 2016-04-05 13:52 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-06 11:33 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-06 19:47 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-07 12:05 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-08 17:19 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-08 13:49 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Mitchell Holman <noemail@comcast.net> - 2016-04-08 16:28 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-09 07:53 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-09 19:10 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-10 08:57 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-05 18:41 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-03 17:17 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-04 13:23 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-04 15:17 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-05 08:33 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-05 18:39 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-06 11:34 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-06 19:37 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-07 12:07 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-08 17:15 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-08 13:49 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-09 19:06 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-10 08:58 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-10 16:19 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-10 14:20 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-11 00:05 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-11 16:22 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-12 19:32 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-13 08:29 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-13 16:43 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-13 14:36 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-13 20:36 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-04-10 22:01 +0200
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-05 15:09 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-06 11:35 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-06 19:39 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-06 19:40 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-07 04:51 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-07 12:08 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-08 04:14 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-08 13:50 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-09 04:49 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-09 08:29 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-10 05:32 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-09 07:54 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-10 05:34 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-10 08:59 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-10 15:01 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-10 14:29 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-11 05:17 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-11 16:27 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-11 18:42 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-12 07:45 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Kaptain Krunch <pilgrim2@polypen.com> - 2016-04-14 13:22 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? GordonD <g.davie@btinternet.com> - 2016-04-06 15:25 +0100
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-06 11:36 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-09 07:57 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Chrysi Cat <chrysicat@gmail.com> - 2016-04-09 14:33 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-10 09:20 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-28 16:23 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Chrysi Cat <chrysicat@gmail.com> - 2016-03-28 16:22 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-29 14:21 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? GordonD <g.davie@btinternet.com> - 2016-04-06 15:26 +0100
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-06 11:36 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-28 18:50 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2016-03-28 17:02 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-29 04:43 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-28 16:22 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-28 16:21 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-28 18:52 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-29 14:22 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-30 05:02 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-30 11:25 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2016-03-30 09:50 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-31 07:11 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-31 03:47 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-31 07:12 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-31 17:26 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-31 17:26 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-31 15:22 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-01 20:46 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-04-01 15:55 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-01 16:32 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-01 16:30 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-01 23:17 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-02 07:38 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-02 19:32 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-03 08:37 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-03 17:07 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-04 13:24 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-05 00:46 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-05 00:07 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-05 00:23 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-09 16:54 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-05 08:34 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-05 18:35 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-08 17:11 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-08 13:51 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-09 19:02 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-10 09:26 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Ted Street <ted.smasher@gmail.com> - 2016-04-10 14:38 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-10 14:39 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-31 17:30 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-31 17:17 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-01 16:32 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-01 23:27 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2016-04-02 04:25 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-02 07:39 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-02 11:03 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2016-04-02 09:48 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-02 16:14 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-02 23:16 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-04-02 21:43 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Apollo <nowhere@def.com> - 2016-04-02 22:17 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-04-03 00:09 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Virgil <VIRGIL@VIRGIL.com> - 2016-04-02 23:30 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-04-03 00:45 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-04-02 23:39 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Apollo <nowhere@def.com> - 2016-04-03 03:01 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-03 08:40 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-03 17:00 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-03 08:38 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-03 17:18 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-02 07:38 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-02 11:06 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-03 08:40 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-03 17:19 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-04 13:24 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-04 15:20 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-05 08:35 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-05 15:11 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-06 11:37 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-07 04:54 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-07 12:09 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-08 04:16 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-08 13:51 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-09 04:50 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-09 07:58 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-10 05:35 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-10 09:27 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-10 15:02 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-10 14:40 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-11 05:19 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-11 16:28 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-11 18:43 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-12 07:49 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-13 10:23 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-13 14:37 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)" <seawasp@sgeinc.invalid.com> - 2016-04-13 16:25 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Kaptain Krunch <pilgrim2@polypen.com> - 2016-04-13 17:15 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-04-14 05:09 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2016-04-14 11:42 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Kaptain Krunch <pilgrim2@polypen.com> - 2016-04-14 15:58 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2016-04-21 15:30 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)" <seawasp@sgeinc.invalid.com> - 2016-04-14 12:41 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Brian M. Scott" <b.scott@csuohio.edu> - 2016-04-14 13:55 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Kaptain Krunch <pilgrim2@polypen.com> - 2016-04-14 15:53 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-14 23:34 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2016-04-21 15:58 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Kaptain Krunch <pilgrim2@polypen.com> - 2016-04-14 15:46 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)" <seawasp@sgeinc.invalid.com> - 2016-04-15 09:50 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Kaptain Krunch <pilgrim2@polypen.com> - 2016-04-17 12:12 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-17 17:57 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2016-04-21 15:47 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? David DeLaney <daviddelaney@earthlink.net> - 2016-04-21 15:51 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2016-04-21 17:16 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)" <seawasp@sgeinc.invalid.com> - 2016-04-21 22:19 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2016-04-24 12:53 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)" <seawasp@sgeinc.invalid.com> - 2016-04-24 13:54 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? David DeLaney <daviddelaney@earthlink.net> - 2016-04-24 13:32 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Apollyon <adravirgo@gmail.com> - 2016-04-24 13:15 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-24 23:06 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-25 08:26 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-25 09:47 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-26 14:42 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-27 15:59 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-27 14:47 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-27 18:47 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-27 18:57 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-28 03:34 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-28 15:05 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-04-28 11:53 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-28 10:59 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Virgil <VIRGIL@VIRGIL.com> - 2016-04-28 14:32 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-28 19:07 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-29 12:25 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-29 16:37 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2016-04-28 19:48 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-29 13:23 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? SPQR <SPQR@SPQR.org> - 2016-04-29 14:45 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-30 09:06 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-28 11:16 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Wisely Non-Theist <aaa@bbb.ccc> - 2016-04-28 14:30 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-28 13:54 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-28 14:22 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Wisely Non-Theist <aaa@bbb.ccc> - 2016-04-28 16:12 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2016-04-28 19:41 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-28 21:35 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Wisely Non-Theist <aaa@bbb.ccc> - 2016-04-28 23:51 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Virgil <VIRGIL@VIRGIL.com> - 2016-04-28 16:05 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-28 19:13 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-28 19:10 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-28 14:00 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-28 19:17 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2016-04-28 19:36 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-29 03:39 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2016-04-29 00:45 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-29 15:11 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-29 13:18 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-29 12:31 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Virgil <VIRGIL@VIRGIL.com> - 2016-04-29 14:36 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-01 13:11 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-01 13:15 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-29 15:04 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-26 16:46 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? bilgat@m.nu - 2016-04-28 08:18 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-28 11:25 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-28 11:27 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Virgil <VIRGIL@VIRGIL.com> - 2016-04-28 11:39 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-29 13:24 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Apollyon <adravirgo@gmail.com> - 2016-04-29 11:28 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Virgil <VIRGIL@VIRGIL.com> - 2016-04-29 14:40 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-30 09:11 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-30 17:06 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-01 09:56 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-01 16:01 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-03 12:48 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Wisely Non-Theist <aaa@bbb.ccc> - 2016-05-03 11:55 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-04 15:59 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-03 23:04 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-04 16:00 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-05 19:50 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-07 07:45 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-05-07 16:15 +0200
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-07 14:39 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-08 00:25 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-07 17:33 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-07 17:02 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-11 14:02 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-12 00:31 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-12 08:22 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-12 18:50 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-13 17:20 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-14 02:27 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-15 16:05 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-16 22:14 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-17 06:38 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Mitchell Holman <noemail@comcast.net> - 2016-05-17 07:12 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-17 23:21 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-05-18 03:30 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-18 11:26 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-18 12:46 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-18 16:03 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-18 17:22 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-18 21:34 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-20 11:59 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-20 17:59 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-21 07:41 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-21 18:44 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-05-22 07:55 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-22 10:34 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-22 10:34 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-22 17:12 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-23 15:47 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-23 22:43 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-18 16:01 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-18 17:27 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-18 21:35 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-20 12:00 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-20 18:00 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Wisely Non-Theist <aaa@bbb.ccc> - 2016-05-18 16:01 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-18 17:29 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-18 14:12 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Virgil <VIRGIL@VIRGIL.com> - 2016-05-18 16:08 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-18 18:40 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-19 16:33 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-19 17:34 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-19 16:21 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-18 03:45 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-18 14:13 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-18 16:05 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-19 16:34 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-20 00:59 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-18 12:49 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-18 16:06 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-20 11:57 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-20 18:01 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-19 16:35 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-20 01:00 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-20 12:15 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-20 18:02 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-21 07:42 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-21 18:45 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-05-22 07:58 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-22 10:35 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-22 10:35 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-22 17:14 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-23 15:48 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-23 22:45 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-18 15:44 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-18 14:08 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-18 16:08 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-05-18 15:38 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-19 16:37 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-19 16:36 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-20 01:02 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Wisely Non-Theist <aaa@bbb.ccc> - 2016-05-18 15:57 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-19 16:37 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-17 16:39 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-08 00:21 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-30 17:05 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-01 09:57 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-01 16:00 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-03 12:48 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-03 22:59 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-04 16:01 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? orobos287@gmail.com - 2016-05-05 07:16 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-05 19:43 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-07 07:46 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-08 00:19 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-05-07 18:06 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-08 16:42 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-08 11:22 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-09 01:09 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-05-09 13:41 +1000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-05-09 05:02 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-05-08 17:15 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-11 14:08 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-12 00:23 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-12 08:24 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-12 18:44 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-13 17:21 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-14 02:19 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-15 16:18 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-16 22:08 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-17 06:42 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-17 16:31 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-18 14:15 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-19 19:44 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-11 14:07 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-12 00:27 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-12 08:25 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-12 18:47 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-13 17:23 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-14 02:23 +0000
(no, he doesnÂ’t) (yes, he does) BANG BANG The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-14 11:29 -0700
(no, he doesnÂ’t) (yes, he does) BANG BANG The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-14 11:43 -0700
Santa The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-14 11:51 -0700
Re: Santa The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-14 13:29 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-15 16:16 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-16 22:11 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-17 06:40 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-17 16:35 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-17 15:17 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-18 15:41 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-18 15:57 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-18 14:14 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-18 15:59 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-19 16:38 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-20 01:03 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-20 12:16 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-20 18:02 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-21 07:43 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-18 14:14 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-19 19:46 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-19 16:38 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-20 00:37 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-20 12:18 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-21 17:47 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-22 10:36 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-14 03:29 -0400
Atheist have fishy eyes. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-14 10:45 -0700
Re: Atheist have fishy eyes. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-14 10:58 -0700
Re: Atheists have eyes. Virgil <VIRGIL@VIRGIL.com> - 2016-05-14 12:55 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-15 16:17 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-15 19:00 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-16 13:23 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-17 02:43 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-17 06:41 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? JimmyJohn <Non@Jtheist.net> - 2016-05-01 10:14 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-28 19:18 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-13 18:39 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? MattB <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2016-04-13 21:07 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-13 21:22 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-14 12:01 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? MattB <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2016-04-14 12:16 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-14 12:52 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-14 23:26 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-14 12:49 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? MattB <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2016-04-14 12:12 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-14 11:50 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-14 23:39 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-14 05:15 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-03-15 10:00 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-15 11:19 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-16 14:46 -0500
Page 7 of 28 — ← Prev page 1 … 5 6 [7] 8 9 … 28 Next page →
| From | Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-14 08:38 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <297vgbtll7j7e3ldo5figl3289if3vshd3@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #570391 |
On Thu, 14 Apr 2016 05:03:21 -0700, Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote: >In article <5dctgbt9qg8ejgcfbt8iqqpm9epjh3j3ci@4ax.com>, > Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> wrote: > >> On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 20:33:28 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >> wrote: >> >> >On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 12:37:50 -0700, MattB wrote: >> > >> >> On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 14:35:39 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: >> >> >> >>>On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 16:37:27 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >> >>> >> >>>>On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 08:18:59 -0500, duke wrote: >> > >> ><snip> >> > >> >>>>> Either way, you are faced with the hand of God at work. >> >>>> >> >>>>That would be the supposed god for which you have no evidence. >> >>> >> >>>Why do you pretend I have no evidence when I do. Just because you are >> >>>afraid to admit it is not my problem >> > >> Does the proven serially lying hypocrite imagine the commandment about >> not bearing false witness, doesn't apply to him? >> >> It's a good thing the hell the moron threatens us with, is a figment >> of his deluded imagination. >> >> If he really were the good Christian he imagines he is, he would be >> terrified of going there himself, and this fear would prevent his >> lying about and to us, > > >He thinks narking us out will gain him some slack. Poor deluded fool >can't even be honest to himself. Is he capable of thinking?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-14 11:35 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <sjhvgbhsbhano9hdpan7jpjcrukrjhbntt@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #570400 |
On Thu, 14 Apr 2016 08:38:04 -0500, Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> wrote: >On Thu, 14 Apr 2016 05:03:21 -0700, Jeanne Douglas ><hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote: > >>In article <5dctgbt9qg8ejgcfbt8iqqpm9epjh3j3ci@4ax.com>, >> Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> wrote: >> >>> On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 20:33:28 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>> wrote: >>> >>> >On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 12:37:50 -0700, MattB wrote: >>> > >>> >> On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 14:35:39 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: >>> >> >>> >>>On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 16:37:27 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>>On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 08:18:59 -0500, duke wrote: >>> > >>> ><snip> >>> > >>> >>>>> Either way, you are faced with the hand of God at work. >>> >>>> >>> >>>>That would be the supposed god for which you have no evidence. >>> >>> >>> >>>Why do you pretend I have no evidence when I do. Just because you are >>> >>>afraid to admit it is not my problem >>> > >>> Does the proven serially lying hypocrite imagine the commandment about >>> not bearing false witness, doesn't apply to him? >>> >>> It's a good thing the hell the moron threatens us with, is a figment >>> of his deluded imagination. >>> >>> If he really were the good Christian he imagines he is, he would be >>> terrified of going there himself, and this fear would prevent his >>> lying about and to us, >> >> >>He thinks narking us out will gain him some slack. Poor deluded fool >>can't even be honest to himself. > >Is he capable of thinking? Of course. My superior intelligence is what nails you every day. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Smiler <smiler@jo.king> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-14 23:09 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nep7ul$ct2$3@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #570443 |
On Thu, 14 Apr 2016 11:35:14 -0500, duke wrote: > On Thu, 14 Apr 2016 08:38:04 -0500, Christopher A. Lee > <c.lee@fairpoint.net> > wrote: > >>On Thu, 14 Apr 2016 05:03:21 -0700, Jeanne Douglas >><hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote: >> >>>In article <5dctgbt9qg8ejgcfbt8iqqpm9epjh3j3ci@4ax.com>, >>> Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> wrote: >>> >>>> On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 20:33:28 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> >On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 12:37:50 -0700, MattB wrote: >>>> > >>>> >> On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 14:35:39 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> >>>> >> wrote: >>>> >> >>>> >>>On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 16:37:27 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>> >>>wrote: >>>> >>> >>>> >>>>On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 08:18:59 -0500, duke wrote: >>>> > >>>> ><snip> >>>> > >>>> >>>>> Either way, you are faced with the hand of God at work. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>That would be the supposed god for which you have no evidence. >>>> >>> >>>> >>>Why do you pretend I have no evidence when I do. Just because you >>>> >>>are afraid to admit it is not my problem >>>> > >>>> Does the proven serially lying hypocrite imagine the commandment >>>> about not bearing false witness, doesn't apply to him? >>>> >>>> It's a good thing the hell the moron threatens us with, is a figment >>>> of his deluded imagination. >>>> >>>> If he really were the good Christian he imagines he is, he would be >>>> terrified of going there himself, and this fear would prevent his >>>> lying about and to us, >>> >>> >>>He thinks narking us out will gain him some slack. Poor deluded fool >>>can't even be honest to himself. >> >>Is he capable of thinking? > > Of course. My superior intelligence is what nails you every day. More evidence for the Dunning-Kruger effect. > ***** > "Idiocy is the most perfect form of Prayer." > Pope Paul VI ***** -- Smiler, The godless one. aa #2279 Gods are all tailored to order. They are made to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-14 11:33 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <dihvgb1ismjlop27vinn689ln55p80is2g@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #570391 |
On Thu, 14 Apr 2016 05:03:21 -0700, Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote: >In article <5dctgbt9qg8ejgcfbt8iqqpm9epjh3j3ci@4ax.com>, > Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> wrote: > >> On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 20:33:28 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >> wrote: >> >> >On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 12:37:50 -0700, MattB wrote: >> > >> >> On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 14:35:39 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: >> >> >> >>>On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 16:37:27 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >> >>> >> >>>>On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 08:18:59 -0500, duke wrote: >> > >> ><snip> >> > >> >>>>> Either way, you are faced with the hand of God at work. >> >>>> >> >>>>That would be the supposed god for which you have no evidence. >> >>> >> >>>Why do you pretend I have no evidence when I do. Just because you are >> >>>afraid to admit it is not my problem >> > >> Does the proven serially lying hypocrite imagine the commandment about >> not bearing false witness, doesn't apply to him? >> >> It's a good thing the hell the moron threatens us with, is a figment >> of his deluded imagination. >> >> If he really were the good Christian he imagines he is, he would be >> terrified of going there himself, and this fear would prevent his >> lying about and to us, >He thinks narking us out will gain him some slack. Poor deluded fool >can't even be honest to himself. How do you "nark" someone, jdyke? the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <nobodyxx@gmail> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-16 04:52 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: (Christian) Insanity has benefits. |
| Message-ID | <5711fd3c$0$9229$c3e8da3$5d8fb80f@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #570391 |
On 04/16/2016 04:11 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: > > > (Christian) Insanity has benefits. > > SemiRandom breeding leads to SemiRandom killing; > that's how nature/evolution works. > > Subconsciously, humanity defines "Life" as: > > That program, running in our heads, telling us to breathe, drink, etc. Life not robotic enough for you, Rolf? Just wait around a while, I'm sure soon you will be quite happy.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-14 11:32 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <mbhvgb9v2o7bg73cg998eal2tc3av5b4b1@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #570275 |
On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 16:02:02 -0500, Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> wrote: >On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 20:33:28 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >wrote: > >>On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 12:37:50 -0700, MattB wrote: >> >>> On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 14:35:39 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: >>> >>>>On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 16:37:27 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 08:18:59 -0500, duke wrote: >> >><snip> >> >>>>>> Either way, you are faced with the hand of God at work. >>>>> >>>>>That would be the supposed god for which you have no evidence. >>>> >>>>Why do you pretend I have no evidence when I do. Just because you are >>>>afraid to admit it is not my problem >> >Does the proven serially lying hypocrite imagine the commandment about >not bearing false witness, doesn't apply to him? Of course not. That's why I alway tell the truth. >It's a good thing the hell the moron threatens us with, is a figment >of his deluded imagination. I don't see it, but God well stated it's somehting you have to face eventually. > >If he really were the good Christian he imagines he is, he would be >terrified of going there himself, and this fear would prevent his >lying about and to us, I am terrified, and so I don't lie to you. Never have, don't now, never will. Got it - heeheehee. > >>> Can you supply this evidence? > >If the proven serial liar had any, he would have provided it. Done. >>No he can't. All he has are stupid unevidenced beliefs. > >Religion has made him even more mentally ill than when he returned to >it after whatever he did that he was so ashamed of that he went back >to it for "forgiveness" - instead of asking those to whom he did it. Say what??? Heeheehee. > >His church is the last place he should have gone to for the therapy >and counseling he obviously needed. >Look what it's turned him into. And I thank the Lord God for helping me back. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Smiler <smiler@jo.king> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-14 23:13 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nep86j$ct2$4@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #570441 |
On Thu, 14 Apr 2016 11:32:57 -0500, duke wrote: > On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 16:02:02 -0500, Christopher A. Lee > <c.lee@fairpoint.net> wrote: > >>On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 20:33:28 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >> >>>On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 12:37:50 -0700, MattB wrote: >>> >>>> On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 14:35:39 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 16:37:27 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 08:18:59 -0500, duke wrote: >>> >>><snip> >>> >>>>>>> Either way, you are faced with the hand of God at work. >>>>>> >>>>>>That would be the supposed god for which you have no evidence. >>>>> >>>>>Why do you pretend I have no evidence when I do. Just because you >>>>>are afraid to admit it is not my problem >>> >>Does the proven serially lying hypocrite imagine the commandment about >>not bearing false witness, doesn't apply to him? > > Of course not. That's why I alway tell the truth. > >>It's a good thing the hell the moron threatens us with, is a figment of >>his deluded imagination. > > I don't see it, but God well stated it's somehting you have to face > eventually. >> >>If he really were the good Christian he imagines he is, he would be >>terrified of going there himself, and this fear would prevent his lying >>about and to us, > > I am terrified, and so I don't lie to you. Never have, don't now, never > will. Got it - heeheehee. >> >>>> Can you supply this evidence? >> >>If the proven serial liar had any, he would have provided it. > > Done. Liar. >>>No he can't. All he has are stupid unevidenced beliefs. >> >>Religion has made him even more mentally ill than when he returned to it >>after whatever he did that he was so ashamed of that he went back to it >>for "forgiveness" - instead of asking those to whom he did it. > > Say what??? Heeheehee. Your hysterical laughter at your own stupidity shows your mental illness. >>His church is the last place he should have gone to for the therapy and >>counseling he obviously needed. > >>Look what it's turned him into. > > And I thank the Lord God for helping me back. Yep. Back to insanity. > ***** > "Stupidity is the most perfect form of Prayer." > Pope Paul VI ***** -- Smiler, The godless one. aa #2279 Gods are all tailored to order. They are made to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-14 11:29 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <r7hvgbdk6velr9sn2eeg4n1actvm69fn50@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #570259 |
On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 20:33:28 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 12:37:50 -0700, MattB wrote: > >> On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 14:35:39 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: >> >>>On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 16:37:27 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >>> >>>>On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 08:18:59 -0500, duke wrote: > ><snip> > >>>>> Either way, you are faced with the hand of God at work. >>>> >>>>That would be the supposed god for which you have no evidence. >>> >>>Why do you pretend I have no evidence when I do. Just because you are >>>afraid to admit it is not my problem >> >> Can you supply this evidence? > >No he can't. All he has are stupid unevidenced beliefs. I even went so far as to present the science that one day might prove the existence of God. But, quite frankly, it's takes some intelligence to get it. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Smiler <smiler@jo.king> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-14 23:15 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nep8ai$ct2$5@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #570438 |
On Thu, 14 Apr 2016 11:29:18 -0500, duke wrote: > On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 20:33:28 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: > >>On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 12:37:50 -0700, MattB wrote: >> >>> On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 14:35:39 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: >>> >>>>On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 16:37:27 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 08:18:59 -0500, duke wrote: >> >><snip> >> >>>>>> Either way, you are faced with the hand of God at work. >>>>> >>>>>That would be the supposed god for which you have no evidence. >>>> >>>>Why do you pretend I have no evidence when I do. Just because you are >>>>afraid to admit it is not my problem >>> >>> Can you supply this evidence? >> >>No he can't. All he has are stupid unevidenced beliefs. > > I even went so far as to present the science that one day might prove > the existence of God. Pigs might fly. > But, quite frankly, it's takes some intelligence to get it. To get that it's nonsense. > ***** > "Paedophilia is the most perfect form of Prayer." > Pope Paul VI ***** -- Smiler, The godless one. aa #2279 Gods are all tailored to order. They are made to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Smiler <smiler@jo.king> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-13 20:30 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nema88$100n$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #570225 |
On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 14:35:39 -0500, duke wrote: > On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 16:37:27 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: > >>On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 08:18:59 -0500, duke wrote: >> >>> On Tue, 12 Apr 2016 19:25:30 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>> wrote: >>> >>>>On Mon, 11 Apr 2016 16:20:29 -0500, duke wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 23:51:50 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 14:19:24 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 16:13:35 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 08:56:49 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Sat, 9 Apr 2016 18:58:32 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>On Fri, 08 Apr 2016 13:48:16 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 8 Apr 2016 17:36:23 +0000 (UTC), Smiler >>>>>>>>>>> <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>On Thu, 07 Apr 2016 12:04:43 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 6 Apr 2016 20:24:24 +0000 (UTC), Smiler >>>>>>>>>>>>> <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Wed, 06 Apr 2016 11:27:59 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>><snip> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Science is on the verge of almost being able to prove the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> existence of God. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>Your stupid assertions are NOT evidence. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> You can't hide from the creation of the universe. All you >>>>>>>>>>>>> can do is suggest alternatives to the method God used in >>>>>>>>>>>>> creation. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>That would be the supposed creation for which you have no >>>>>>>>>>>>evidence. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> We're here, aren't we. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>Due to evolution, not a supposed creation. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> If there was nothing, how could there be evolution? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Who said that there was nothing, liar? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> All the astrophysicists of the world. >>>>>> >>>>>>Cite one who said there was nothing, liar earl. >>>>> >>>>> They all do. >>>> >>>>No cite, your unevidenced assertions are rejected. >>> >>> Expansion of the universe required a starting point. The two options >>> are: 1. God willed the starting point into existence and it expanded. >>> 2. The point always existed, but how? >> >>If your supposed god always existed, then why not the the universe? > > God is neither material nor energy. Then it cannot exist. Q.E.D. > But, then again, no man can address the origin of God. The origin of your supposed god character is when a group of ancient ignoramuses decided to make it up. > It is not for us to know. But we can compute the > beginning of all things not God. Because, unlike your supposed god character, they can be shown to exist. >>> And if it always existed, why did it suddenly start to expand when it >>> did and not before or later? > >>And if your supposed god always existed, then why did it decide to >>create the universe when it did and not before or later? > > We don't know. Just as we don't know (yet) how the universe existed before the big bang and why it happened when it did. >>> Either way, you are faced with the hand of God at work. >>That would be the supposed god for which you have no evidence. > > Why do you pretend I have no evidence when I do. Because you cannot show one shred of evidence. All you have are stupid unevidenced beliefs. > Just because you are afraid to admit it is not my problem Your problem is that, either you are afraid to show it, or you have none. Which is it, liar earl? > ***** > "Telling lies about having evidence the most perfect form of Prayer." > Pope Paul VI ***** -- Smiler, The godless one. aa #2279 Gods are all tailored to order. They are made to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-14 11:38 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <omhvgbdv5sj3miidvonmlu5l3qv70613ne@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #570256 |
On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 20:30:00 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 14:35:39 -0500, duke wrote: > >> On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 16:37:27 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >> >>>On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 08:18:59 -0500, duke wrote: >>> >>>> On Tue, 12 Apr 2016 19:25:30 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Mon, 11 Apr 2016 16:20:29 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 23:51:50 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 14:19:24 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 16:13:35 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 08:56:49 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 9 Apr 2016 18:58:32 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>On Fri, 08 Apr 2016 13:48:16 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 8 Apr 2016 17:36:23 +0000 (UTC), Smiler >>>>>>>>>>>> <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>On Thu, 07 Apr 2016 12:04:43 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 6 Apr 2016 20:24:24 +0000 (UTC), Smiler >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Wed, 06 Apr 2016 11:27:59 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>><snip> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Science is on the verge of almost being able to prove the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> existence of God. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Your stupid assertions are NOT evidence. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> You can't hide from the creation of the universe. All you >>>>>>>>>>>>>> can do is suggest alternatives to the method God used in >>>>>>>>>>>>>> creation. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>That would be the supposed creation for which you have no >>>>>>>>>>>>>evidence. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> We're here, aren't we. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>Due to evolution, not a supposed creation. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> If there was nothing, how could there be evolution? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>Who said that there was nothing, liar? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> All the astrophysicists of the world. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Cite one who said there was nothing, liar earl. >>>>>> >>>>>> They all do. >>>>> >>>>>No cite, your unevidenced assertions are rejected. >>>> >>>> Expansion of the universe required a starting point. The two options >>>> are: 1. God willed the starting point into existence and it expanded. >>>> 2. The point always existed, but how? >>> >>>If your supposed god always existed, then why not the the universe? >> >> God is neither material nor energy. > >Then it cannot exist. >Q.E.D. Spirit. Q.E.D. >> But, then again, no man can address the origin of God. >The origin of your supposed god character is when a group of ancient >ignoramuses decided to make it up. God was here 13.7 billion years before them. > >> It is not for us to know. But we can compute the >> beginning of all things not God. > >Because, unlike your supposed god character, they can be shown to exist. But it took God's existence to will all other "stuff of the universe" into existence. >>>> And if it always existed, why did it suddenly start to expand when it >>>> did and not before or later? >> >>>And if your supposed god always existed, then why did it decide to >>>create the universe when it did and not before or later? >> >> We don't know. >Just as we don't know (yet) how the universe existed before the big bang >and why it happened when it did. It didn't exist before. That's the whole point. > >>>> Either way, you are faced with the hand of God at work. >>>That would be the supposed god for which you have no evidence. >> >> Why do you pretend I have no evidence when I do. >Because you cannot show one shred of evidence. All you have are stupid >unevidenced beliefs. You're too intellectually challenged to see my answer. >> Just because you are afraid to admit it is not my problem > >Your problem is that, either you are afraid to show it, or you have none. >Which is it, liar earl? You're lying. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Smiler <smiler@jo.king> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-14 23:20 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nep8jp$ct2$6@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #570444 |
On Thu, 14 Apr 2016 11:38:53 -0500, duke wrote: > On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 20:30:00 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: > >>On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 14:35:39 -0500, duke wrote: >> >>> On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 16:37:27 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>> wrote: >>> >>>>On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 08:18:59 -0500, duke wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Tue, 12 Apr 2016 19:25:30 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On Mon, 11 Apr 2016 16:20:29 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 23:51:50 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 14:19:24 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 16:13:35 +0000 (UTC), Smiler >>>>>>>>> <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 08:56:49 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 9 Apr 2016 18:58:32 +0000 (UTC), Smiler >>>>>>>>>>> <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>On Fri, 08 Apr 2016 13:48:16 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 8 Apr 2016 17:36:23 +0000 (UTC), Smiler >>>>>>>>>>>>> <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Thu, 07 Apr 2016 12:04:43 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 6 Apr 2016 20:24:24 +0000 (UTC), Smiler >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Wed, 06 Apr 2016 11:27:59 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>><snip> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Science is on the verge of almost being able to prove >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the existence of God. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Your stupid assertions are NOT evidence. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You can't hide from the creation of the universe. All you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can do is suggest alternatives to the method God used in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> creation. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>That would be the supposed creation for which you have no >>>>>>>>>>>>>>evidence. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> We're here, aren't we. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>Due to evolution, not a supposed creation. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> If there was nothing, how could there be evolution? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>Who said that there was nothing, liar? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> All the astrophysicists of the world. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Cite one who said there was nothing, liar earl. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> They all do. >>>>>> >>>>>>No cite, your unevidenced assertions are rejected. >>>>> >>>>> Expansion of the universe required a starting point. The two >>>>> options are: 1. God willed the starting point into existence and it >>>>> expanded. >>>>> 2. The point always existed, but how? >>>> >>>>If your supposed god always existed, then why not the the universe? >>> >>> God is neither material nor energy. >> >>Then it cannot exist. >>Q.E.D. > > Spirit. Q.E.D. Spirits only come in bottles. >>> But, then again, no man can address the origin of God. >>The origin of your supposed god character is when a group of ancient >>ignoramuses decided to make it up. > > God was here 13.7 billion years before them. Show your evidence for that stupid assertion. >>> It is not for us to know. But we can compute the beginning of all >>> things not God. >> >>Because, unlike your supposed god character, they can be shown to exist. > > But it took God's existence to will all other "stuff of the universe" > into existence. Show your evidence for that stupid assertion. >>>>> And if it always existed, why did it suddenly start to expand when >>>>> it did and not before or later? >>> >>>>And if your supposed god always existed, then why did it decide to >>>>create the universe when it did and not before or later? >>> >>> We don't know. > >>Just as we don't know (yet) how the universe existed before the big bang >>and why it happened when it did. > > It didn't exist before. That's the whole point. Show your evidence for that stupid assertion. >>>>> Either way, you are faced with the hand of God at work. >>>>That would be the supposed god for which you have no evidence. >>> >>> Why do you pretend I have no evidence when I do. > >>Because you cannot show one shred of evidence. All you have are stupid >>unevidenced beliefs. > > You're too intellectually challenged to see my answer. Ad homs are not refutation. >>> Just because you are afraid to admit it is not my problem >> >>Your problem is that, either you are afraid to show it, or you have >>none. >>Which is it, liar earl? > > You're lying. Which is it, liar earl? > ***** > "Telling lies about evidence is the most perfect form of Prayer." > Pope Paul VI ***** -- Smiler, The godless one. aa #2279 Gods are all tailored to order. They are made to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Smiler <smiler@jo.king> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-05 18:44 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ne112m$svn$5@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #568023 |
On Tue, 05 Apr 2016 07:40:56 -0500, duke wrote: > On Tue, 5 Apr 2016 00:54:06 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: > >>On Mon, 04 Apr 2016 13:19:25 -0500, duke wrote: >> >>> On Sun, 3 Apr 2016 23:46:29 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>> wrote: >>> >>>>On Sun, 03 Apr 2016 08:30:04 -0500, duke wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Sat, 2 Apr 2016 19:38:32 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On Sat, 02 Apr 2016 07:35:56 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, 1 Apr 2016 23:21:54 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>On Fri, 01 Apr 2016 16:22:58 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Fri, 1 Apr 2016 20:59:47 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 15:16:44 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 17:45:25 +0000 (UTC), Smiler >>>>>>>>>>> <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 07:03:19 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 18:11:16 +0000 (UTC), Smiler >>>>>>>>>>>>> <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>><snip> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>So where is it, liar Earl? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I already gave it to you. But you still don't get it. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>You have given no evidence that your claimed 'verge' exists, >>>>>>>>>>>>liar. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> That's exactly right. You're the one that says there is no >>>>>>>>>>> verge, >>>>>>>>>>> so you must see the evidence to declare no verge. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>I need no evidence to not believe your stupid unevidenced >>>>>>>>>>claims. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Your damnation comes in your inability to support your own >>>>>>>>> beliefs with evidence. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>What beliefs would they be, Earl? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> That there is NO God. >>>>>> >>>>>>That isn't my belief, moron. >>>>> >>>>>>I know that there are some claimed gods. As I don't believe in any >>>>>>of them, I remain an atheist. >>>>> >>>>> Actually, that only makes you an agnostic. You can't offer support >>>>> for their being NO God. Hence you are no atheist. >>>> >>>>Only in your demented excuse for a mind. >>> >>> Agnostic smiler - sounds musical. >> >>Like you, it sounds stupid and is a lie. > > Well, you're definitely no atheist. Only in your deluded imagination. > That's an impossibility as there is > exactly zero (0) evidence to support that there is NO God. I don't claim that there are no gods, liar. I just don't believe in any of them. As such, I remain an atheist. > ***** > "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." > Pope Paul VI ***** -- Smiler, The godless one. aa #2279 Gods are all tailored to order. They are made to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-24 15:53 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <hlwdjsd2-388874.15532324032016@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #565209 |
In article <nd1b0j$1esp$1@gioia.aioe.org>, Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: > On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 08:16:16 -0500, duke wrote: > > > On Wed, 23 Mar 2016 18:20:27 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: > > > >>On Wed, 23 Mar 2016 07:01:15 -0500, duke wrote: > >> > >>> On Tue, 22 Mar 2016 20:49:45 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>>>On Tue, 22 Mar 2016 07:02:18 -0500, duke wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> On Tue, 22 Mar 2016 04:12:54 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> > >>>>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>><snip> > >>>> > >>>>>>Actually you are the one trying to convert everyone else to your > >>>>>>way of thinking. I am trying to prevent this. > >>>>> > >>>>> Stupid people turn a blind eye to God in creation. > >>>> > >>>>That would be the supposed god and the supposed creation for which you > >>>>have no evidence. > >>> > >>> Waste of time. > >> > >>Yes you are. > >>Strange how you theists run away when the magic word 'evidence' is > >>mentioned, isn't it? > > > > I've given you my evidence for the existence of God. All you've given us is evidence of your complete and total credulity. > You have never given ANY evidence, liar. All you have given are your > unevidenced beliefs. > > > You have NEVER been able to tell me why there is NO God. > > Because I know that some claimed gods exist. > > > You lose, I win. > > Only in your very deluded imagination. -- JD "If ANYONE will not welcome you or listen to your words, LEAVE that home or town and shake the dust off your feet." Matthew 10:14
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-27 04:16 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <3l5ffbpncofvr6u2ldrekl05h93827cnqn@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #564430 |
On Tue, 22 Mar 2016 07:02:18 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in alt.atheism with message-id <91d2fbticnfnemi1ce7fv5lal0gkha1tsa@4ax.com> wrote: >On Tue, 22 Mar 2016 04:12:54 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >>On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 17:35:30 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>alt.atheism with message-id >><hot0fbd49homa46mv4kbr7lskhg8jjb0jr@4ax.com> wrote: >> >>>On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 23:28:29 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>> >>>>On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 15:49:34 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>><h43uebdj0cguak1b6d7k2qkt951mmpj1ph@4ax.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 11:06:55 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 09:47:16 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>><ktdtebhigcouf67kjb1r6gvcmlsv5tqksm@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 17:21:54 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 08:10:27 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>><vrjqebtdrjmu6k5k4teh4mpj66c43enneo@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 04:14:08 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 15:46:37 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>>>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>>>><28qoeblpa1e3g9qp510o3a1pen8quh5l66@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>On Thu, 17 Mar 2016 16:30:18 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>On Thu, 17 Mar 2016 12:32:32 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>>>>>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>>>>>><fgqleb11rc9utrrsou7tp97oqt6bunql6u@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 17:23:13 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 14:46:11 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>>>>>>>><evdjebpvou1lrjtqjlr1nq162kt7e8cq8r@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 12:07:51 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 07:00:38 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><qaufeb13a3ukno23m0kaqkt8k3k9dv3nqq@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Mon, 14 Mar 2016 14:42:31 -0700, Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On 2016-03-14 2:33 PM, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 13 Mar 2016 09:57:33 -0700, Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2016-03-12 5:38 AM, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 11 Mar 2016 01:25:34 -0800, Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2016-03-10 3:02 PM, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 9 Mar 2016 13:53:01 -0800, Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2016-03-05 8:38 AM, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 29 Feb 2016 19:15:54 +0800, "Mr. Man-wai Chang" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/29/2016 12:08 PM, The Starmaker wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> God is not in the highest dimension....He is in the lowest dimension. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> God is creator of all things. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the dukester, American-American >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Which tribe is that? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> American. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Right. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Which tribe of American? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> American. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So which tribe? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :-) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> American. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>So... ...Cherokee? Souix? Hopi? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>American. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>The answer is obvious - Idiot American. A vast and far-reaching >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>tribe. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>What tribe are you from? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>None. I don't live on a tribal level of social development. My >>>>>>>>>>>>>>society is far more complex and developed than a mere tribe. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>I'm American. In fact, I'm an American-American. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>That doesn't prevent you from being an idiot. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>God is real and will judge you at the moment you die basis the way you lived in >>>>>>>>>>>the flesh. Be forewarned. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>Why do you keep repeating those empty threats? You know I have no use >>>>>>>>>>at all for your superstition and it means less than nothing to me. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>I'm not making the threat. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Of course you are. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Can't. Only God will see to that. >>>>>> >>>>>>You are the one making all the noise. >>>>> >>>>>But I'm only telling you what God said about your future. >>>> >>>>No, you are telling me what your superstition says. >>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>> God is notifying you of your options in eternal >>>>>>>>>judgment. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Nonsense. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Hey, your funeral. If you think you can get away with it, that's your choice. >>>>> >>>>>>It's your superstition. I think nothing about it. >>>>> >>>>>Yet you will still feel the pain of the flames for your decision to follow the >>>>>diseased path you chose. >>>>> >>>> >>>>According to your superstition, which means nothing to me. >>> >>>No, you're trying to shove your own superstition at me. >>> >>Actually you are the one trying to convert everyone else to your way >>of thinking. I am trying to prevent this. > >Stupid people turn a blind eye to God in creation. > According you your superstition, which is meaningless to the vast majority. -- Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass. Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government guaranteed above average income for every person. Every illegal alien is a criminal. No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. Deportation upon identification as the only option. If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly before you run into me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-27 04:15 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <charlie-gordon1492-B37634.04155727032016@88-209-239-213.giganet.hu> |
| In reply to | #565888 |
In article <3l5ffbpncofvr6u2ldrekl05h93827cnqn@4ax.com>, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >>Actually you are the one trying to convert everyone else to your way > >>of thinking. I am trying to prevent this. > > > >Stupid people turn a blind eye to God in creation. > > > > According you your superstition, which is meaningless to the vast > majority. I hate to raise ugly reality here, but the vast majority believe in some kind of divinity and its agency in creating this planet if not the entire universe. Any particular creation story, even the Big Bang, are not believed by any majority, though often large minorities. -- Any one who has common sense will remember that the bewilderments of the eye are of two kinds, and arise from two causes, either from coming out of the light or from going into the light, which is true of the mind's eye, quite as much as of the bodily eye.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-28 04:01 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <81phfbp2t90v6tq9219qhb1si33qg8i15e@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #565896 |
On Sun, 27 Mar 2016 04:15:57 -0700, je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> in alt.atheism with message-id <charlie-gordon1492-B37634.04155727032016@88-209-239-213.giganet.hu> wrote: >In article <3l5ffbpncofvr6u2ldrekl05h93827cnqn@4ax.com>, > Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >> >>Actually you are the one trying to convert everyone else to your way >> >>of thinking. I am trying to prevent this. >> > >> >Stupid people turn a blind eye to God in creation. >> > >> >> According you your superstition, which is meaningless to the vast >> majority. > >I hate to raise ugly reality here, but the vast majority believe in some kind of >divinity and its agency in creating this planet if not the entire universe. Any >particular creation story, even the Big Bang, are not believed by any majority, >though often large minorities. True, but a huge number of such believers are ready, willing, and able to kill over what to an outsider is a trivial and insignificant variation between two or more particular cults. -- Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass. Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government guaranteed above average income for every person. Every illegal alien is a criminal. No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. Deportation upon identification as the only option. If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly before you run into me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-28 13:59 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <charlie-gordon1492-4523F6.13594328032016@88-209-239-213.giganet.hu> |
| In reply to | #566114 |
In article <81phfbp2t90v6tq9219qhb1si33qg8i15e@4ax.com>, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > On Sun, 27 Mar 2016 04:15:57 -0700, je suis charly > <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> in alt.atheism with message-id > <charlie-gordon1492-B37634.04155727032016@88-209-239-213.giganet.hu> > wrote: > > >In article <3l5ffbpncofvr6u2ldrekl05h93827cnqn@4ax.com>, > > Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > > > >> >>Actually you are the one trying to convert everyone else to your way > >> >>of thinking. I am trying to prevent this. > >> > > >> >Stupid people turn a blind eye to God in creation. > >> > > >> > >> According you your superstition, which is meaningless to the vast > >> majority. > > > >I hate to raise ugly reality here, but the vast majority believe in some > >kind of > >divinity and its agency in creating this planet if not the entire universe. > >Any > >particular creation story, even the Big Bang, are not believed by any > >majority, > >though often large minorities. > > True, but a huge number of such believers are ready, willing, and able > to kill over what to an outsider is a trivial and insignificant > variation between two or more particular cults. > Every illegal alien is a criminal. > No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. > Deportation upon identification as the only option. And to which cult is your allegiance? -- Any one who has common sense will remember that the bewilderments of the eye are of two kinds, and arise from two causes, either from coming out of the light or from going into the light, which is true of the mind's eye, quite as much as of the bodily eye.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-28 16:23 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <568jfbhijl93664q92s40uicrodpaa884e@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #566291 |
On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 13:59:43 -0700, je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> wrote: >In article <81phfbp2t90v6tq9219qhb1si33qg8i15e@4ax.com>, > Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >> On Sun, 27 Mar 2016 04:15:57 -0700, je suis charly >> <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> in alt.atheism with message-id >> <charlie-gordon1492-B37634.04155727032016@88-209-239-213.giganet.hu> >> wrote: >> >> >In article <3l5ffbpncofvr6u2ldrekl05h93827cnqn@4ax.com>, >> > Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >> > >> >> >>Actually you are the one trying to convert everyone else to your way >> >> >>of thinking. I am trying to prevent this. >> >> > >> >> >Stupid people turn a blind eye to God in creation. >> >> > >> >> >> >> According you your superstition, which is meaningless to the vast >> >> majority. >> > >> >I hate to raise ugly reality here, but the vast majority believe in some >> >kind of >> >divinity and its agency in creating this planet if not the entire universe. >> >Any >> >particular creation story, even the Big Bang, are not believed by any >> >majority, >> >though often large minorities. >> >> True, but a huge number of such believers are ready, willing, and able >> to kill over what to an outsider is a trivial and insignificant >> variation between two or more particular cults. > >> Every illegal alien is a criminal. >> No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. >> Deportation upon identification as the only option. > >And to which cult is your allegiance? The cult of no ability to reason. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-28 16:57 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <charlie-gordon1492-59889A.16571828032016@88-209-239-213.giganet.hu> |
| In reply to | #566306 |
In article <568jfbhijl93664q92s40uicrodpaa884e@4ax.com>, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: > On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 13:59:43 -0700, je suis charly > <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> > wrote: > > >In article <81phfbp2t90v6tq9219qhb1si33qg8i15e@4ax.com>, > > Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > > > >> On Sun, 27 Mar 2016 04:15:57 -0700, je suis charly > >> <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> in alt.atheism with message-id > >> <charlie-gordon1492-B37634.04155727032016@88-209-239-213.giganet.hu> > >> wrote: > >> > >> >In article <3l5ffbpncofvr6u2ldrekl05h93827cnqn@4ax.com>, > >> > Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >> > > >> >> >>Actually you are the one trying to convert everyone else to your way > >> >> >>of thinking. I am trying to prevent this. > >> >> > > >> >> >Stupid people turn a blind eye to God in creation. > >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> According you your superstition, which is meaningless to the vast > >> >> majority. > >> > > >> >I hate to raise ugly reality here, but the vast majority believe in some > >> >kind of > >> >divinity and its agency in creating this planet if not the entire > >> >universe. > >> >Any > >> >particular creation story, even the Big Bang, are not believed by any > >> >majority, > >> >though often large minorities. > >> > >> True, but a huge number of such believers are ready, willing, and able > >> to kill over what to an outsider is a trivial and insignificant > >> variation between two or more particular cults. > > > >> Every illegal alien is a criminal. > >> No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. > >> Deportation upon identification as the only option. > > > >And to which cult is your allegiance? > > The cult of no ability to reason. So you are in the same cult. -- Any one who has common sense will remember that the bewilderments of the eye are of two kinds, and arise from two causes, either from coming out of the light or from going into the light, which is true of the mind's eye, quite as much as of the bodily eye.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 7 of 28 — ← Prev page 1 … 5 6 [7] 8 9 … 28 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web