Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #560938 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-03-09 13:53 -0800 |
| Last post | 2016-03-16 14:46 -0500 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 555 — 33 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-03-09 13:53 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-10 17:02 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-03-11 01:25 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-11 11:36 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-12 07:38 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-03-13 09:57 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Earle Jones27 <earle.jones@comcast.net> - 2016-03-13 11:32 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-14 16:33 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-03-14 14:42 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-15 07:00 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-15 12:07 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-16 14:46 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-16 17:23 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-17 12:32 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-17 16:30 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-18 15:46 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-19 04:14 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-19 08:10 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-19 17:21 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-20 09:47 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-20 11:06 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-20 15:49 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-20 23:28 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-21 17:35 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-22 04:12 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-22 07:02 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-22 20:49 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-23 07:01 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-23 18:20 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-24 08:16 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-24 18:17 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-24 15:57 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-25 19:09 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-26 12:08 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-26 19:36 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Virgil <VIRGIL@VIRGIL.com> - 2016-03-26 13:50 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-28 16:20 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-29 22:39 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-30 11:15 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-30 18:11 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-31 07:03 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-31 17:45 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-31 15:16 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-01 20:59 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-04-01 16:13 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-01 16:23 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-01 16:22 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-01 23:21 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-02 07:35 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-02 19:38 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-03 08:30 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-03 23:46 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-04 13:19 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-05 00:54 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-05 07:40 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-04-05 17:16 +0200
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Dreamer In Colore <dreamerincolore@hotmail.com> - 2016-04-05 13:50 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-05 19:23 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Dreamer In Colore <dreamerincolore@hotmail.com> - 2016-04-05 15:40 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-04-05 15:35 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-06 11:31 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-06 20:11 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-07 11:56 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-04-05 15:25 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-06 11:30 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-06 20:16 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-07 11:58 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-08 17:25 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-04-08 13:01 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-08 13:47 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-09 18:52 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-04-09 15:06 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-10 08:53 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-10 08:47 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-10 16:06 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-10 14:18 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-10 23:45 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-11 16:19 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-12 19:15 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-04-12 14:52 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-13 08:11 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-13 16:26 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-13 14:30 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-13 20:19 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-14 11:25 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-14 23:07 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-08 13:45 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-09 18:54 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-10 08:54 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-05 19:11 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-06 11:32 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-06 20:19 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Virgil <VIRGIL@VIRGIL.com> - 2016-04-06 14:46 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-06 23:44 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-07 12:03 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-08 17:33 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-07 11:59 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-08 17:28 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-08 13:47 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-09 18:56 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-10 08:55 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-06 11:27 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-06 20:24 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-07 12:04 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-08 17:36 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-08 13:48 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-09 18:58 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-10 08:56 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-10 16:13 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-10 14:19 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-10 23:51 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-11 16:20 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-12 19:25 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-13 08:18 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-13 16:37 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-13 14:35 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? MattB <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2016-04-13 12:37 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-13 20:33 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-04-13 16:02 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-04-14 05:03 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-04-14 08:38 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-14 11:35 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-14 23:09 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-14 11:33 -0500
Re: (Christian) Insanity has benefits. benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-04-16 04:52 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-14 11:32 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-14 23:13 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-14 11:29 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-14 23:15 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-13 20:30 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-14 11:38 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-14 23:20 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-05 18:44 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-03-24 15:53 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-27 04:16 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2016-03-27 04:15 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-28 04:01 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2016-03-28 13:59 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-28 16:23 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2016-03-28 16:57 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-29 14:17 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-28 18:47 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2016-03-28 16:56 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-29 04:40 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-29 14:18 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-30 04:58 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-30 11:19 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-31 03:41 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-31 07:04 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-31 17:11 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-01 16:24 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-01 23:25 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-02 07:36 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-02 10:59 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-03 08:34 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-03 17:10 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-04 13:21 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-05 00:50 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-05 08:31 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Dreamer In Colore <dreamerincolore@hotmail.com> - 2016-04-05 13:52 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-06 11:33 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-06 19:47 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-07 12:05 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-08 17:19 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-08 13:49 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Mitchell Holman <noemail@comcast.net> - 2016-04-08 16:28 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-09 07:53 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-09 19:10 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-10 08:57 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-05 18:41 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-03 17:17 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-04 13:23 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-04 15:17 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-05 08:33 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-05 18:39 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-06 11:34 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-06 19:37 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-07 12:07 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-08 17:15 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-08 13:49 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-09 19:06 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-10 08:58 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-10 16:19 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-10 14:20 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-11 00:05 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-11 16:22 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-12 19:32 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-13 08:29 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-13 16:43 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-13 14:36 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-13 20:36 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-04-10 22:01 +0200
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-05 15:09 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-06 11:35 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-06 19:39 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-06 19:40 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-07 04:51 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-07 12:08 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-08 04:14 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-08 13:50 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-09 04:49 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-09 08:29 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-10 05:32 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-09 07:54 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-10 05:34 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-10 08:59 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-10 15:01 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-10 14:29 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-11 05:17 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-11 16:27 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-11 18:42 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-12 07:45 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Kaptain Krunch <pilgrim2@polypen.com> - 2016-04-14 13:22 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? GordonD <g.davie@btinternet.com> - 2016-04-06 15:25 +0100
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-06 11:36 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-09 07:57 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Chrysi Cat <chrysicat@gmail.com> - 2016-04-09 14:33 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-10 09:20 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-28 16:23 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Chrysi Cat <chrysicat@gmail.com> - 2016-03-28 16:22 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-29 14:21 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? GordonD <g.davie@btinternet.com> - 2016-04-06 15:26 +0100
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-06 11:36 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-28 18:50 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2016-03-28 17:02 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-29 04:43 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-28 16:22 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-28 16:21 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-28 18:52 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-29 14:22 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-30 05:02 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-30 11:25 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2016-03-30 09:50 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-31 07:11 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-31 03:47 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-31 07:12 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-31 17:26 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-31 17:26 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-31 15:22 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-01 20:46 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-04-01 15:55 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-01 16:32 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-01 16:30 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-01 23:17 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-02 07:38 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-02 19:32 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-03 08:37 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-03 17:07 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-04 13:24 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-05 00:46 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-05 00:07 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-05 00:23 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-09 16:54 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-05 08:34 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-05 18:35 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-08 17:11 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-08 13:51 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-09 19:02 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-10 09:26 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Ted Street <ted.smasher@gmail.com> - 2016-04-10 14:38 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-10 14:39 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-31 17:30 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-31 17:17 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-01 16:32 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-01 23:27 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2016-04-02 04:25 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-02 07:39 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-02 11:03 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2016-04-02 09:48 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-02 16:14 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-02 23:16 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-04-02 21:43 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Apollo <nowhere@def.com> - 2016-04-02 22:17 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-04-03 00:09 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Virgil <VIRGIL@VIRGIL.com> - 2016-04-02 23:30 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-04-03 00:45 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-04-02 23:39 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Apollo <nowhere@def.com> - 2016-04-03 03:01 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-03 08:40 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-03 17:00 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-03 08:38 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-03 17:18 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-02 07:38 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-02 11:06 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-03 08:40 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-03 17:19 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-04 13:24 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-04 15:20 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-05 08:35 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-05 15:11 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-06 11:37 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-07 04:54 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-07 12:09 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-08 04:16 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-08 13:51 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-09 04:50 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-09 07:58 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-10 05:35 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-10 09:27 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-10 15:02 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-10 14:40 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-11 05:19 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-11 16:28 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-11 18:43 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-12 07:49 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-13 10:23 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-13 14:37 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)" <seawasp@sgeinc.invalid.com> - 2016-04-13 16:25 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Kaptain Krunch <pilgrim2@polypen.com> - 2016-04-13 17:15 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-04-14 05:09 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2016-04-14 11:42 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Kaptain Krunch <pilgrim2@polypen.com> - 2016-04-14 15:58 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2016-04-21 15:30 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)" <seawasp@sgeinc.invalid.com> - 2016-04-14 12:41 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Brian M. Scott" <b.scott@csuohio.edu> - 2016-04-14 13:55 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Kaptain Krunch <pilgrim2@polypen.com> - 2016-04-14 15:53 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-14 23:34 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2016-04-21 15:58 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Kaptain Krunch <pilgrim2@polypen.com> - 2016-04-14 15:46 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)" <seawasp@sgeinc.invalid.com> - 2016-04-15 09:50 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Kaptain Krunch <pilgrim2@polypen.com> - 2016-04-17 12:12 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-17 17:57 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2016-04-21 15:47 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? David DeLaney <daviddelaney@earthlink.net> - 2016-04-21 15:51 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2016-04-21 17:16 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)" <seawasp@sgeinc.invalid.com> - 2016-04-21 22:19 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2016-04-24 12:53 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)" <seawasp@sgeinc.invalid.com> - 2016-04-24 13:54 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? David DeLaney <daviddelaney@earthlink.net> - 2016-04-24 13:32 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Apollyon <adravirgo@gmail.com> - 2016-04-24 13:15 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-24 23:06 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-25 08:26 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-25 09:47 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-26 14:42 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-27 15:59 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-27 14:47 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-27 18:47 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-27 18:57 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-28 03:34 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-28 15:05 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-04-28 11:53 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-28 10:59 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Virgil <VIRGIL@VIRGIL.com> - 2016-04-28 14:32 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-28 19:07 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-29 12:25 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-29 16:37 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2016-04-28 19:48 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-29 13:23 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? SPQR <SPQR@SPQR.org> - 2016-04-29 14:45 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-30 09:06 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-28 11:16 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Wisely Non-Theist <aaa@bbb.ccc> - 2016-04-28 14:30 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-28 13:54 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-28 14:22 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Wisely Non-Theist <aaa@bbb.ccc> - 2016-04-28 16:12 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2016-04-28 19:41 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-28 21:35 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Wisely Non-Theist <aaa@bbb.ccc> - 2016-04-28 23:51 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Virgil <VIRGIL@VIRGIL.com> - 2016-04-28 16:05 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-28 19:13 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-28 19:10 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-28 14:00 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-28 19:17 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2016-04-28 19:36 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-29 03:39 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2016-04-29 00:45 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-29 15:11 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-29 13:18 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-29 12:31 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Virgil <VIRGIL@VIRGIL.com> - 2016-04-29 14:36 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-01 13:11 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-01 13:15 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-29 15:04 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-26 16:46 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? bilgat@m.nu - 2016-04-28 08:18 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-28 11:25 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-28 11:27 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Virgil <VIRGIL@VIRGIL.com> - 2016-04-28 11:39 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-29 13:24 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Apollyon <adravirgo@gmail.com> - 2016-04-29 11:28 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Virgil <VIRGIL@VIRGIL.com> - 2016-04-29 14:40 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-30 09:11 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-30 17:06 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-01 09:56 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-01 16:01 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-03 12:48 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Wisely Non-Theist <aaa@bbb.ccc> - 2016-05-03 11:55 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-04 15:59 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-03 23:04 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-04 16:00 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-05 19:50 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-07 07:45 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-05-07 16:15 +0200
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-07 14:39 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-08 00:25 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-07 17:33 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-07 17:02 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-11 14:02 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-12 00:31 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-12 08:22 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-12 18:50 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-13 17:20 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-14 02:27 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-15 16:05 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-16 22:14 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-17 06:38 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Mitchell Holman <noemail@comcast.net> - 2016-05-17 07:12 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-17 23:21 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-05-18 03:30 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-18 11:26 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-18 12:46 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-18 16:03 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-18 17:22 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-18 21:34 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-20 11:59 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-20 17:59 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-21 07:41 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-21 18:44 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-05-22 07:55 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-22 10:34 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-22 10:34 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-22 17:12 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-23 15:47 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-23 22:43 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-18 16:01 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-18 17:27 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-18 21:35 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-20 12:00 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-20 18:00 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Wisely Non-Theist <aaa@bbb.ccc> - 2016-05-18 16:01 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-18 17:29 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-18 14:12 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Virgil <VIRGIL@VIRGIL.com> - 2016-05-18 16:08 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-18 18:40 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-19 16:33 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-19 17:34 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-19 16:21 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-18 03:45 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-18 14:13 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-18 16:05 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-19 16:34 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-20 00:59 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-18 12:49 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-18 16:06 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-20 11:57 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-20 18:01 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-19 16:35 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-20 01:00 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-20 12:15 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-20 18:02 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-21 07:42 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-21 18:45 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-05-22 07:58 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-22 10:35 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-22 10:35 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-22 17:14 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-23 15:48 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-23 22:45 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-18 15:44 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-18 14:08 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-18 16:08 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-05-18 15:38 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-19 16:37 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-19 16:36 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-20 01:02 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Wisely Non-Theist <aaa@bbb.ccc> - 2016-05-18 15:57 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-19 16:37 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-17 16:39 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-08 00:21 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-30 17:05 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-01 09:57 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-01 16:00 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-03 12:48 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-03 22:59 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-04 16:01 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? orobos287@gmail.com - 2016-05-05 07:16 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-05 19:43 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-07 07:46 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-08 00:19 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-05-07 18:06 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-08 16:42 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-08 11:22 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-09 01:09 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-05-09 13:41 +1000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-05-09 05:02 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-05-08 17:15 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-11 14:08 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-12 00:23 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-12 08:24 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-12 18:44 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-13 17:21 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-14 02:19 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-15 16:18 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-16 22:08 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-17 06:42 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-17 16:31 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-18 14:15 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-19 19:44 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-11 14:07 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-12 00:27 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-12 08:25 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-12 18:47 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-13 17:23 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-14 02:23 +0000
(no, he doesnÂ’t) (yes, he does) BANG BANG The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-14 11:29 -0700
(no, he doesnÂ’t) (yes, he does) BANG BANG The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-14 11:43 -0700
Santa The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-14 11:51 -0700
Re: Santa The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-14 13:29 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-15 16:16 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-16 22:11 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-17 06:40 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-17 16:35 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-17 15:17 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-18 15:41 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-18 15:57 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-18 14:14 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-18 15:59 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-19 16:38 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-20 01:03 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-20 12:16 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-20 18:02 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-21 07:43 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-18 14:14 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-19 19:46 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-19 16:38 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-20 00:37 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-20 12:18 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-21 17:47 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-22 10:36 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-14 03:29 -0400
Atheist have fishy eyes. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-14 10:45 -0700
Re: Atheist have fishy eyes. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-14 10:58 -0700
Re: Atheists have eyes. Virgil <VIRGIL@VIRGIL.com> - 2016-05-14 12:55 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-15 16:17 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-15 19:00 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-16 13:23 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-17 02:43 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-17 06:41 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? JimmyJohn <Non@Jtheist.net> - 2016-05-01 10:14 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-28 19:18 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-13 18:39 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? MattB <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2016-04-13 21:07 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-13 21:22 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-14 12:01 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? MattB <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2016-04-14 12:16 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-14 12:52 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-14 23:26 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-14 12:49 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? MattB <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2016-04-14 12:12 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-14 11:50 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-14 23:39 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-14 05:15 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-03-15 10:00 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-15 11:19 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-16 14:46 -0500
Page 6 of 28 — ← Prev page 1 … 4 5 [6] 7 8 … 28 Next page →
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-10 08:55 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <0pmkgb1sqr14v07t4rr494deios0km4ia8@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #569257 |
On Sat, 9 Apr 2016 18:56:33 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >On Fri, 08 Apr 2016 13:47:50 -0500, duke wrote: > >> On Fri, 8 Apr 2016 17:28:30 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >> >>>On Thu, 07 Apr 2016 11:59:24 -0500, duke wrote: >>> >>>> On Wed, 6 Apr 2016 20:19:28 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Wed, 06 Apr 2016 11:32:22 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, 5 Apr 2016 19:11:51 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On Tue, 05 Apr 2016 17:16:52 +0200, Alex W. wrote: >>>>> >>>>><snip> >>>>> >>>>>>>> More proof, if it were needed, that you have no understanding of >>>>>>>> the scientific method. >>>>>> >>>>>>>Ball-on-a-string boy's lack of understanding is not confined to the >>>>>>>scientific method. It's far more general than that. >>>>>> >>>>>> Hey dummy smiler - demonstrate to me the rotation vectors on the >>>>>> ball's circumference. >>>>> >>>>>No need for that, moron earl. Logic clearly shows that it's rotating. >>>> >>>> Not without rotations vectors. A ball on a string has NO rotation >>>> vectors. >>> >>>Your stupid assertions are not evidence. >> >> Neither are yours. > >My experiments are. Great, then demonstrate the rotation vectors on a ball on a string. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-06 11:27 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <q4eagbhp1nm95jkvogtddn25su3pbl56ke@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #568043 |
On Tue, 5 Apr 2016 17:16:52 +0200, "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: >On 05/04/2016 14:40, duke wrote: >> On Tue, 5 Apr 2016 00:54:06 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >> >>> On Mon, 04 Apr 2016 13:19:25 -0500, duke wrote: >>> >>>> On Sun, 3 Apr 2016 23:46:29 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Sun, 03 Apr 2016 08:30:04 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Sat, 2 Apr 2016 19:38:32 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Sat, 02 Apr 2016 07:35:56 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Fri, 1 Apr 2016 23:21:54 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Fri, 01 Apr 2016 16:22:58 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 1 Apr 2016 20:59:47 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 15:16:44 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 17:45:25 +0000 (UTC), Smiler >>>>>>>>>>>> <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 07:03:19 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 18:11:16 +0000 (UTC), Smiler >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> <snip> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So where is it, liar Earl? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I already gave it to you. But you still don't get it. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> You have given no evidence that your claimed 'verge' exists, >>>>>>>>>>>>> liar. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> That's exactly right. You're the one that says there is no >>>>>>>>>>>> verge, >>>>>>>>>>>> so you must see the evidence to declare no verge. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I need no evidence to not believe your stupid unevidenced claims. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Your damnation comes in your inability to support your own beliefs >>>>>>>>>> with evidence. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> What beliefs would they be, Earl? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> That there is NO God. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> That isn't my belief, moron. >>>>>> >>>>>>> I know that there are some claimed gods. As I don't believe in any of >>>>>>> them, I remain an atheist. >>>>>> >>>>>> Actually, that only makes you an agnostic. You can't offer support >>>>>> for their being NO God. Hence you are no atheist. >>>>> >>>>> Only in your demented excuse for a mind. >>>> >>>> Agnostic smiler - sounds musical. >>> >>> Like you, it sounds stupid and is a lie. >> >> Well, you're definitely no atheist. That's an impossibility as there is exactly >> zero (0) evidence to support that there is NO God. > >More proof, if it were needed, that you have no understanding of the >scientific method. Science is on the verge of almost being able to prove the existence of God. >Science does not depend on positive evidence. ALL evidence is of equal >value -- including negative. When a scientist looks for something and >cannot find any trace or hint of it, then that is as important and >indicative as any positive evidence. And God willing the universe into existence will be rock solid revelation. Science would LOVE to come up with that one. >Having looked for evidence of any supernatural deity for centuries, >having looked high and low, having used the best available techniques >and the most cunning tests and experiments our clever brains were able >to devise, we have found precisely ... nothing. Zip, nada, bupkis. >That is good, hard, solid evidence. Where did the universe come from? Welcome to God. > the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Smiler <smiler@jo.king> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-06 20:24 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ne3r9o$1u5f$4@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #568307 |
On Wed, 06 Apr 2016 11:27:59 -0500, duke wrote: > On Tue, 5 Apr 2016 17:16:52 +0200, "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > >>On 05/04/2016 14:40, duke wrote: >>> On Tue, 5 Apr 2016 00:54:06 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On Mon, 04 Apr 2016 13:19:25 -0500, duke wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Sun, 3 Apr 2016 23:46:29 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Sun, 03 Apr 2016 08:30:04 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Sat, 2 Apr 2016 19:38:32 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Sat, 02 Apr 2016 07:35:56 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Fri, 1 Apr 2016 23:21:54 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 01 Apr 2016 16:22:58 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 1 Apr 2016 20:59:47 +0000 (UTC), Smiler >>>>>>>>>>> <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 15:16:44 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 17:45:25 +0000 (UTC), Smiler >>>>>>>>>>>>> <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 07:03:19 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 18:11:16 +0000 (UTC), Smiler >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> <snip> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So where is it, liar Earl? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I already gave it to you. But you still don't get it. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> You have given no evidence that your claimed 'verge' >>>>>>>>>>>>>> exists, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> liar. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> That's exactly right. You're the one that says there is no >>>>>>>>>>>>> verge, >>>>>>>>>>>>> so you must see the evidence to declare no verge. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I need no evidence to not believe your stupid unevidenced >>>>>>>>>>>> claims. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Your damnation comes in your inability to support your own >>>>>>>>>>> beliefs with evidence. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> What beliefs would they be, Earl? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> That there is NO God. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> That isn't my belief, moron. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I know that there are some claimed gods. As I don't believe in >>>>>>>> any of them, I remain an atheist. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Actually, that only makes you an agnostic. You can't offer >>>>>>> support for their being NO God. Hence you are no atheist. >>>>>> >>>>>> Only in your demented excuse for a mind. >>>>> >>>>> Agnostic smiler - sounds musical. >>>> >>>> Like you, it sounds stupid and is a lie. >>> >>> Well, you're definitely no atheist. That's an impossibility as there >>> is exactly zero (0) evidence to support that there is NO God. >> >>More proof, if it were needed, that you have no understanding of the >>scientific method. > > Science is on the verge of almost being able to prove the existence of > God. Your stupid assertions are NOT evidence. >>Science does not depend on positive evidence. ALL evidence is of equal >>value -- including negative. When a scientist looks for something and >>cannot find any trace or hint of it, then that is as important and >>indicative as any positive evidence. > > And God willing the universe into existence will be rock solid > revelation. Science would LOVE to come up with that one. Science is not interested in your demented beliefs. >>Having looked for evidence of any supernatural deity for centuries, >>having looked high and low, having used the best available techniques >>and the most cunning tests and experiments our clever brains were able >>to devise, we have found precisely ... nothing. Zip, nada, bupkis. That >>is good, hard, solid evidence. > > Where did the universe come from? A singularity. > Welcome to God. You're quite welcome to your supposed god character. > ***** > "Paedophilia is the most perfect form of Prayer." > Pope Paul VI ***** -- Smiler, The godless one. aa #2279 Gods are all tailored to order. They are made to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-07 12:04 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <mn4dgbp4r7nt2cclreg667uq68k7rmrpiv@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #568390 |
On Wed, 6 Apr 2016 20:24:24 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >On Wed, 06 Apr 2016 11:27:59 -0500, duke wrote: > >> On Tue, 5 Apr 2016 17:16:52 +0200, "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: >> >>>On 05/04/2016 14:40, duke wrote: >>>> On Tue, 5 Apr 2016 00:54:06 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Mon, 04 Apr 2016 13:19:25 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Sun, 3 Apr 2016 23:46:29 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Sun, 03 Apr 2016 08:30:04 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Sat, 2 Apr 2016 19:38:32 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Sat, 02 Apr 2016 07:35:56 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 1 Apr 2016 23:21:54 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 01 Apr 2016 16:22:58 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 1 Apr 2016 20:59:47 +0000 (UTC), Smiler >>>>>>>>>>>> <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 15:16:44 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 17:45:25 +0000 (UTC), Smiler >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 07:03:19 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 18:11:16 +0000 (UTC), Smiler >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> <snip> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So where is it, liar Earl? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I already gave it to you. But you still don't get it. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You have given no evidence that your claimed 'verge' >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exists, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> liar. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's exactly right. You're the one that says there is no >>>>>>>>>>>>>> verge, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> so you must see the evidence to declare no verge. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I need no evidence to not believe your stupid unevidenced >>>>>>>>>>>>> claims. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Your damnation comes in your inability to support your own >>>>>>>>>>>> beliefs with evidence. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> What beliefs would they be, Earl? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> That there is NO God. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> That isn't my belief, moron. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I know that there are some claimed gods. As I don't believe in >>>>>>>>> any of them, I remain an atheist. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Actually, that only makes you an agnostic. You can't offer >>>>>>>> support for their being NO God. Hence you are no atheist. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Only in your demented excuse for a mind. >>>>>> >>>>>> Agnostic smiler - sounds musical. >>>>> >>>>> Like you, it sounds stupid and is a lie. >>>> >>>> Well, you're definitely no atheist. That's an impossibility as there >>>> is exactly zero (0) evidence to support that there is NO God. >>> >>>More proof, if it were needed, that you have no understanding of the >>>scientific method. >> >> Science is on the verge of almost being able to prove the existence of >> God. > >Your stupid assertions are NOT evidence. You can't hide from the creation of the universe. All you can do is suggest alternatives to the method God used in creation. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Smiler <smiler@jo.king> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-08 17:36 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ne8q6n$c21$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #568606 |
On Thu, 07 Apr 2016 12:04:43 -0500, duke wrote: > On Wed, 6 Apr 2016 20:24:24 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: > >>On Wed, 06 Apr 2016 11:27:59 -0500, duke wrote: <snip> >>> Science is on the verge of almost being able to prove the existence of >>> God. >> >>Your stupid assertions are NOT evidence. > > You can't hide from the creation of the universe. All you can do is > suggest alternatives to the method God used in creation. That would be the supposed creation for which you have no evidence. > ***** > "Telling lies is the most perfect form of Prayer." > Pope Paul VI ***** -- Smiler, The godless one. aa #2279 Gods are all tailored to order. They are made to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-08 13:48 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <u6vfgbt074r0ua92i2i6mo0e41nbngjq55@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #568995 |
On Fri, 8 Apr 2016 17:36:23 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >On Thu, 07 Apr 2016 12:04:43 -0500, duke wrote: > >> On Wed, 6 Apr 2016 20:24:24 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >> >>>On Wed, 06 Apr 2016 11:27:59 -0500, duke wrote: > ><snip> > >>>> Science is on the verge of almost being able to prove the existence of >>>> God. >>> >>>Your stupid assertions are NOT evidence. >> >> You can't hide from the creation of the universe. All you can do is >> suggest alternatives to the method God used in creation. > >That would be the supposed creation for which you have no evidence. We're here, aren't we. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Smiler <smiler@jo.king> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-09 18:58 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nebjco$1dsa$4@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #569032 |
On Fri, 08 Apr 2016 13:48:16 -0500, duke wrote: > On Fri, 8 Apr 2016 17:36:23 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: > >>On Thu, 07 Apr 2016 12:04:43 -0500, duke wrote: >> >>> On Wed, 6 Apr 2016 20:24:24 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>> wrote: >>> >>>>On Wed, 06 Apr 2016 11:27:59 -0500, duke wrote: >> >><snip> >> >>>>> Science is on the verge of almost being able to prove the existence >>>>> of God. >>>> >>>>Your stupid assertions are NOT evidence. >>> >>> You can't hide from the creation of the universe. All you can do is >>> suggest alternatives to the method God used in creation. >> >>That would be the supposed creation for which you have no evidence. > > We're here, aren't we. Due to evolution, not a supposed creation. > ***** > "Paedophilia is the most perfect form of Prayer." > Pope Paul VI ***** -- Smiler, The godless one. aa #2279 Gods are all tailored to order. They are made to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-10 08:56 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <2smkgbdakpkjq6n28njunc35qf6cau8bc2@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #569258 |
On Sat, 9 Apr 2016 18:58:32 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >On Fri, 08 Apr 2016 13:48:16 -0500, duke wrote: > >> On Fri, 8 Apr 2016 17:36:23 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >> >>>On Thu, 07 Apr 2016 12:04:43 -0500, duke wrote: >>> >>>> On Wed, 6 Apr 2016 20:24:24 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Wed, 06 Apr 2016 11:27:59 -0500, duke wrote: >>> >>><snip> >>> >>>>>> Science is on the verge of almost being able to prove the existence >>>>>> of God. >>>>> >>>>>Your stupid assertions are NOT evidence. >>>> >>>> You can't hide from the creation of the universe. All you can do is >>>> suggest alternatives to the method God used in creation. >>> >>>That would be the supposed creation for which you have no evidence. >> >> We're here, aren't we. > >Due to evolution, not a supposed creation. If there was nothing, how could there be evolution? the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Smiler <smiler@jo.king> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-10 16:13 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nedu3f$1eng$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #569432 |
On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 08:56:49 -0500, duke wrote: > On Sat, 9 Apr 2016 18:58:32 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: > >>On Fri, 08 Apr 2016 13:48:16 -0500, duke wrote: >> >>> On Fri, 8 Apr 2016 17:36:23 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>> wrote: >>> >>>>On Thu, 07 Apr 2016 12:04:43 -0500, duke wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Wed, 6 Apr 2016 20:24:24 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On Wed, 06 Apr 2016 11:27:59 -0500, duke wrote: >>>> >>>><snip> >>>> >>>>>>> Science is on the verge of almost being able to prove the >>>>>>> existence of God. >>>>>> >>>>>>Your stupid assertions are NOT evidence. >>>>> >>>>> You can't hide from the creation of the universe. All you can do is >>>>> suggest alternatives to the method God used in creation. >>>> >>>>That would be the supposed creation for which you have no evidence. >>> >>> We're here, aren't we. >> >>Due to evolution, not a supposed creation. > > If there was nothing, how could there be evolution? Who said that there was nothing, liar? > ***** > "Paedophilia is the most perfect form of Prayer." > Pope Paul VI ***** -- Smiler, The godless one. aa #2279 Gods are all tailored to order. They are made to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-10 14:19 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <un9lgbpoam4dgkfeihpkna21ed1c107v5q@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #569458 |
On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 16:13:35 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 08:56:49 -0500, duke wrote: > >> On Sat, 9 Apr 2016 18:58:32 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >> >>>On Fri, 08 Apr 2016 13:48:16 -0500, duke wrote: >>> >>>> On Fri, 8 Apr 2016 17:36:23 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Thu, 07 Apr 2016 12:04:43 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, 6 Apr 2016 20:24:24 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On Wed, 06 Apr 2016 11:27:59 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>> >>>>><snip> >>>>> >>>>>>>> Science is on the verge of almost being able to prove the >>>>>>>> existence of God. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Your stupid assertions are NOT evidence. >>>>>> >>>>>> You can't hide from the creation of the universe. All you can do is >>>>>> suggest alternatives to the method God used in creation. >>>>> >>>>>That would be the supposed creation for which you have no evidence. >>>> >>>> We're here, aren't we. >>> >>>Due to evolution, not a supposed creation. >> >> If there was nothing, how could there be evolution? > >Who said that there was nothing, liar? All the astrophysicists of the world. You're still between a rock and a rock. All they can debate is how God did it as his will. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Smiler <smiler@jo.king> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-10 23:51 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <neeoum$pnh$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #569506 |
On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 14:19:24 -0500, duke wrote: > On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 16:13:35 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: > >>On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 08:56:49 -0500, duke wrote: >> >>> On Sat, 9 Apr 2016 18:58:32 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>> wrote: >>> >>>>On Fri, 08 Apr 2016 13:48:16 -0500, duke wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Fri, 8 Apr 2016 17:36:23 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On Thu, 07 Apr 2016 12:04:43 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, 6 Apr 2016 20:24:24 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>On Wed, 06 Apr 2016 11:27:59 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>><snip> >>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Science is on the verge of almost being able to prove the >>>>>>>>> existence of God. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Your stupid assertions are NOT evidence. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You can't hide from the creation of the universe. All you can do >>>>>>> is suggest alternatives to the method God used in creation. >>>>>> >>>>>>That would be the supposed creation for which you have no evidence. >>>>> >>>>> We're here, aren't we. >>>> >>>>Due to evolution, not a supposed creation. >>> >>> If there was nothing, how could there be evolution? >> >>Who said that there was nothing, liar? > > All the astrophysicists of the world. Cite one who said there was nothing, liar earl. > You're still between a rock and a rock. That would be the rock from under which you crawled. > All they can debate is how God did it as his will. No genuine astrophysicist claims your supposed god did anything, liar earl. > ***** > "Telling lies is the most perfect form of Prayer." > Pope Paul VI ***** -- Smiler, The godless one. aa #2279 Gods are all tailored to order. They are made to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-11 16:20 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <o65ogblv9jfaijv7h63oq534fglqd4auml@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #569566 |
On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 23:51:50 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 14:19:24 -0500, duke wrote: > >> On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 16:13:35 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >> >>>On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 08:56:49 -0500, duke wrote: >>> >>>> On Sat, 9 Apr 2016 18:58:32 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Fri, 08 Apr 2016 13:48:16 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, 8 Apr 2016 17:36:23 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On Thu, 07 Apr 2016 12:04:43 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Wed, 6 Apr 2016 20:24:24 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>On Wed, 06 Apr 2016 11:27:59 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>><snip> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Science is on the verge of almost being able to prove the >>>>>>>>>> existence of God. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>Your stupid assertions are NOT evidence. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You can't hide from the creation of the universe. All you can do >>>>>>>> is suggest alternatives to the method God used in creation. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>That would be the supposed creation for which you have no evidence. >>>>>> >>>>>> We're here, aren't we. >>>>> >>>>>Due to evolution, not a supposed creation. >>>> >>>> If there was nothing, how could there be evolution? >>> >>>Who said that there was nothing, liar? >> >> All the astrophysicists of the world. > >Cite one who said there was nothing, liar earl. They all do. You just lack the scientific knowledge to understand. >> You're still between a rock and a rock. >That would be the rock from under which you crawled. >> All they can debate is how God did it as his will. >No genuine astrophysicist claims your supposed god did anything, liar earl. Your problem is to grapple with why they think that God did it. > >> ***** >> "Telling lies is the most perfect form of Prayer." >> Pope Paul VI ***** the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Smiler <smiler@jo.king> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-12 19:25 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <neji3a$ph9$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #569810 |
On Mon, 11 Apr 2016 16:20:29 -0500, duke wrote: > On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 23:51:50 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: > >>On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 14:19:24 -0500, duke wrote: >> >>> On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 16:13:35 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>> wrote: >>> >>>>On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 08:56:49 -0500, duke wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Sat, 9 Apr 2016 18:58:32 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On Fri, 08 Apr 2016 13:48:16 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, 8 Apr 2016 17:36:23 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>On Thu, 07 Apr 2016 12:04:43 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Wed, 6 Apr 2016 20:24:24 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>On Wed, 06 Apr 2016 11:27:59 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>><snip> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Science is on the verge of almost being able to prove the >>>>>>>>>>> existence of God. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>Your stupid assertions are NOT evidence. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> You can't hide from the creation of the universe. All you can >>>>>>>>> do is suggest alternatives to the method God used in creation. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>That would be the supposed creation for which you have no >>>>>>>>evidence. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> We're here, aren't we. >>>>>> >>>>>>Due to evolution, not a supposed creation. >>>>> >>>>> If there was nothing, how could there be evolution? >>>> >>>>Who said that there was nothing, liar? >>> >>> All the astrophysicists of the world. >> >>Cite one who said there was nothing, liar earl. > > They all do. No cite, your unevidenced assertions are rejected. > You just lack the scientific knowledge to understand. Your lack of scientific understanding is well known, ball-on-a-string boi. >>> You're still between a rock and a rock. >>That would be the rock from under which you crawled. >>> All they can debate is how God did it as his will. > >>No genuine astrophysicist claims your supposed god did anything, liar >>earl. > > Your problem is to grapple with why they think that God did it. More unevideced assertions that can safely be ignored. >>> ***** >>> "Telling lies is the most perfect form of Prayer." >>> Pope Paul VI ***** -- Smiler, The godless one. aa #2279 Gods are all tailored to order. They are made to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-13 08:18 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <9ehsgbp1a3b2d8eu282bkabfvbhqvq6g5f@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #569957 |
On Tue, 12 Apr 2016 19:25:30 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >On Mon, 11 Apr 2016 16:20:29 -0500, duke wrote: > >> On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 23:51:50 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >> >>>On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 14:19:24 -0500, duke wrote: >>> >>>> On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 16:13:35 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 08:56:49 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Sat, 9 Apr 2016 18:58:32 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On Fri, 08 Apr 2016 13:48:16 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Fri, 8 Apr 2016 17:36:23 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>On Thu, 07 Apr 2016 12:04:43 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 6 Apr 2016 20:24:24 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>On Wed, 06 Apr 2016 11:27:59 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>><snip> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Science is on the verge of almost being able to prove the >>>>>>>>>>>> existence of God. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>Your stupid assertions are NOT evidence. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> You can't hide from the creation of the universe. All you can >>>>>>>>>> do is suggest alternatives to the method God used in creation. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>That would be the supposed creation for which you have no >>>>>>>>>evidence. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> We're here, aren't we. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Due to evolution, not a supposed creation. >>>>>> >>>>>> If there was nothing, how could there be evolution? >>>>> >>>>>Who said that there was nothing, liar? >>>> >>>> All the astrophysicists of the world. >>> >>>Cite one who said there was nothing, liar earl. >> >> They all do. > >No cite, your unevidenced assertions are rejected. Expansion of the universe required a starting point. The two options are: 1. God willed the starting point into existence and it expanded. 2. The point always existed, but how? And if it always existed, why did it suddenly start to expand when it did and not before or later? Either way, you are faced with the hand of God at work. >> You just lack the scientific knowledge to understand. >Your lack of scientific understanding is well known, ball-on-a-string boi. Show me the rotation vectors on the ball. >>>> You're still between a rock and a rock. >>>That would be the rock from under which you crawled. >>>> All they can debate is how God did it as his will. >> >>>No genuine astrophysicist claims your supposed god did anything, liar >>>earl. >> Your problem is to grapple with why they think that God did it. >More unevideced assertions that can safely be ignored. Ignore truth all you wish. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Smiler <smiler@jo.king> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-13 16:37 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nelsk7$8hj$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #570134 |
On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 08:18:59 -0500, duke wrote: > On Tue, 12 Apr 2016 19:25:30 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: > >>On Mon, 11 Apr 2016 16:20:29 -0500, duke wrote: >> >>> On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 23:51:50 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>> wrote: >>> >>>>On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 14:19:24 -0500, duke wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 16:13:35 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 08:56:49 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Sat, 9 Apr 2016 18:58:32 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>On Fri, 08 Apr 2016 13:48:16 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Fri, 8 Apr 2016 17:36:23 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>On Thu, 07 Apr 2016 12:04:43 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 6 Apr 2016 20:24:24 +0000 (UTC), Smiler >>>>>>>>>>> <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>On Wed, 06 Apr 2016 11:27:59 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>><snip> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Science is on the verge of almost being able to prove the >>>>>>>>>>>>> existence of God. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>Your stupid assertions are NOT evidence. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> You can't hide from the creation of the universe. All you can >>>>>>>>>>> do is suggest alternatives to the method God used in creation. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>That would be the supposed creation for which you have no >>>>>>>>>>evidence. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> We're here, aren't we. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Due to evolution, not a supposed creation. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> If there was nothing, how could there be evolution? >>>>>> >>>>>>Who said that there was nothing, liar? >>>>> >>>>> All the astrophysicists of the world. >>>> >>>>Cite one who said there was nothing, liar earl. >>> >>> They all do. >> >>No cite, your unevidenced assertions are rejected. > > Expansion of the universe required a starting point. The two options > are: 1. God willed the starting point into existence and it expanded. > 2. The point always existed, but how? If your supposed god always existed, then why not the the universe? > And if it always existed, why > did it suddenly start to expand when it did and not before or later? And if your supposed god always existed, then why did it decide to create the universe when it did and not before or later? > Either way, you are faced with the hand of God at work. That would be the supposed god for which you have no evidence. >>> You just lack the scientific knowledge to understand. >>Your lack of scientific understanding is well known, ball-on-a-string >>boi. > > Show me the rotation vectors on the ball. > >>>>> You're still between a rock and a rock. >>>>That would be the rock from under which you crawled. >>>>> All they can debate is how God did it as his will. >>> >>>>No genuine astrophysicist claims your supposed god did anything, liar >>>>earl. > >>> Your problem is to grapple with why they think that God did it. >>More unevidenced assertions that can safely be ignored. > > Ignore truth all you wish. When you get round to presenting the truth, I won't ignore it, liar earl. > ***** > "Telling lies is the most perfect form of Prayer." > Pope Paul VI ***** -- Smiler, The godless one. aa #2279 Gods are all tailored to order. They are made to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-13 14:35 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <hj7tgb1voqt9k6chpun2sk583lm95t9hui@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #570170 |
On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 16:37:27 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 08:18:59 -0500, duke wrote: > >> On Tue, 12 Apr 2016 19:25:30 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >> >>>On Mon, 11 Apr 2016 16:20:29 -0500, duke wrote: >>> >>>> On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 23:51:50 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 14:19:24 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 16:13:35 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 08:56:49 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Sat, 9 Apr 2016 18:58:32 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>On Fri, 08 Apr 2016 13:48:16 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 8 Apr 2016 17:36:23 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>On Thu, 07 Apr 2016 12:04:43 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 6 Apr 2016 20:24:24 +0000 (UTC), Smiler >>>>>>>>>>>> <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>On Wed, 06 Apr 2016 11:27:59 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>><snip> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Science is on the verge of almost being able to prove the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> existence of God. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>Your stupid assertions are NOT evidence. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> You can't hide from the creation of the universe. All you can >>>>>>>>>>>> do is suggest alternatives to the method God used in creation. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>That would be the supposed creation for which you have no >>>>>>>>>>>evidence. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> We're here, aren't we. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>Due to evolution, not a supposed creation. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> If there was nothing, how could there be evolution? >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Who said that there was nothing, liar? >>>>>> >>>>>> All the astrophysicists of the world. >>>>> >>>>>Cite one who said there was nothing, liar earl. >>>> >>>> They all do. >>> >>>No cite, your unevidenced assertions are rejected. >> >> Expansion of the universe required a starting point. The two options >> are: 1. God willed the starting point into existence and it expanded. >> 2. The point always existed, but how? > >If your supposed god always existed, then why not the the universe? God is neither material nor energy. But, then again, no man can address the origin of God. It is not for us to know. But we can compute the beginning of all things not God. >> And if it always existed, why >> did it suddenly start to expand when it did and not before or later? >And if your supposed god always existed, then why did it decide to create >the universe when it did and not before or later? We don't know. >> Either way, you are faced with the hand of God at work. >That would be the supposed god for which you have no evidence. Why do you pretend I have no evidence when I do. Just because you are afraid to admit it is not my problem >>>> You just lack the scientific knowledge to understand. >>>Your lack of scientific understanding is well known, ball-on-a-string >>>boi. >> >> Show me the rotation vectors on the ball. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | MattB <trdell12345@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-13 12:37 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <iv7tgbhk1stfe99492h84e3k84f3aoprhk@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #570225 |
On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 14:35:39 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: >On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 16:37:27 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: > >>On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 08:18:59 -0500, duke wrote: >> >>> On Tue, 12 Apr 2016 19:25:30 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >>> >>>>On Mon, 11 Apr 2016 16:20:29 -0500, duke wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 23:51:50 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 14:19:24 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 16:13:35 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 08:56:49 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Sat, 9 Apr 2016 18:58:32 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>On Fri, 08 Apr 2016 13:48:16 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 8 Apr 2016 17:36:23 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>On Thu, 07 Apr 2016 12:04:43 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 6 Apr 2016 20:24:24 +0000 (UTC), Smiler >>>>>>>>>>>>> <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Wed, 06 Apr 2016 11:27:59 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>><snip> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Science is on the verge of almost being able to prove the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> existence of God. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>Your stupid assertions are NOT evidence. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> You can't hide from the creation of the universe. All you can >>>>>>>>>>>>> do is suggest alternatives to the method God used in creation. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>That would be the supposed creation for which you have no >>>>>>>>>>>>evidence. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> We're here, aren't we. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>Due to evolution, not a supposed creation. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> If there was nothing, how could there be evolution? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Who said that there was nothing, liar? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> All the astrophysicists of the world. >>>>>> >>>>>>Cite one who said there was nothing, liar earl. >>>>> >>>>> They all do. >>>> >>>>No cite, your unevidenced assertions are rejected. >>> >>> Expansion of the universe required a starting point. The two options >>> are: 1. God willed the starting point into existence and it expanded. >>> 2. The point always existed, but how? >> >>If your supposed god always existed, then why not the the universe? > >God is neither material nor energy. But, then again, no man can address the >origin of God. It is not for us to know. But we can compute the beginning of >all things not God. > >>> And if it always existed, why >>> did it suddenly start to expand when it did and not before or later? > >>And if your supposed god always existed, then why did it decide to create >>the universe when it did and not before or later? > >We don't know. > >>> Either way, you are faced with the hand of God at work. >>That would be the supposed god for which you have no evidence. > >Why do you pretend I have no evidence when I do. Just because you are afraid to >admit it is not my problem Can you supply this evidence? > >>>>> You just lack the scientific knowledge to understand. >>>>Your lack of scientific understanding is well known, ball-on-a-string >>>>boi. >>> >>> Show me the rotation vectors on the ball. > >the dukester, American-American > >***** >"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." >Pope Paul VI >*****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Smiler <smiler@jo.king> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-13 20:33 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nemaeo$100n$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #570228 |
On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 12:37:50 -0700, MattB wrote: > On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 14:35:39 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: > >>On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 16:37:27 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >> >>>On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 08:18:59 -0500, duke wrote: <snip> >>>> Either way, you are faced with the hand of God at work. >>> >>>That would be the supposed god for which you have no evidence. >> >>Why do you pretend I have no evidence when I do. Just because you are >>afraid to admit it is not my problem > > Can you supply this evidence? No he can't. All he has are stupid unevidenced beliefs. -- Smiler, The godless one. aa #2279 Gods are all tailored to order. They are made to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-13 16:02 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <5dctgbt9qg8ejgcfbt8iqqpm9epjh3j3ci@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #570259 |
On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 20:33:28 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 12:37:50 -0700, MattB wrote: > >> On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 14:35:39 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: >> >>>On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 16:37:27 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >>> >>>>On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 08:18:59 -0500, duke wrote: > ><snip> > >>>>> Either way, you are faced with the hand of God at work. >>>> >>>>That would be the supposed god for which you have no evidence. >>> >>>Why do you pretend I have no evidence when I do. Just because you are >>>afraid to admit it is not my problem > Does the proven serially lying hypocrite imagine the commandment about not bearing false witness, doesn't apply to him? It's a good thing the hell the moron threatens us with, is a figment of his deluded imagination. If he really were the good Christian he imagines he is, he would be terrified of going there himself, and this fear would prevent his lying about and to us, >> Can you supply this evidence? If the proven serial liar had any, he would have provided it. >No he can't. All he has are stupid unevidenced beliefs. Religion has made him even more mentally ill than when he returned to it after whatever he did that he was so ashamed of that he went back to it for "forgiveness" - instead of asking those to whom he did it. His church is the last place he should have gone to for the therapy and counseling he obviously needed. Look what it's turned him into.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-14 05:03 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <hlwdjsd2-198F1D.05032114042016@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #570275 |
In article <5dctgbt9qg8ejgcfbt8iqqpm9epjh3j3ci@4ax.com>, Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> wrote: > On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 20:33:28 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> > wrote: > > >On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 12:37:50 -0700, MattB wrote: > > > >> On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 14:35:39 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: > >> > >>>On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 16:37:27 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: > >>> > >>>>On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 08:18:59 -0500, duke wrote: > > > ><snip> > > > >>>>> Either way, you are faced with the hand of God at work. > >>>> > >>>>That would be the supposed god for which you have no evidence. > >>> > >>>Why do you pretend I have no evidence when I do. Just because you are > >>>afraid to admit it is not my problem > > > Does the proven serially lying hypocrite imagine the commandment about > not bearing false witness, doesn't apply to him? > > It's a good thing the hell the moron threatens us with, is a figment > of his deluded imagination. > > If he really were the good Christian he imagines he is, he would be > terrified of going there himself, and this fear would prevent his > lying about and to us, He thinks narking us out will gain him some slack. Poor deluded fool can't even be honest to himself. -- JD "If ANYONE will not welcome you or listen to your words, LEAVE that home or town and shake the dust off your feet." Matthew 10:14
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 6 of 28 — ← Prev page 1 … 4 5 [6] 7 8 … 28 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web