Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #514650 > unrolled thread

Re: 911review caught in super big lies

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: 911review caught in super big lies "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 09:29 -0500
    Re: 911review caught in super big lies gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-17 09:35 -0500
      Re: 911review caught in super big lies "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 10:03 -0500
        Re: 911review caught in super big lies gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-17 10:07 -0500
          Re: 911review caught in super big lies "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 10:16 -0500
            Re: 911review caught in super big lies gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-17 14:11 -0500
              Re: 911review caught in super big lies "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 14:32 -0500
                Re: 911review caught in super big lies "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 16:42 -0500
                Re: 911review caught in super big lies gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-17 16:52 -0500
            Re: 911review caught in super big lies "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 16:42 -0500
        Re: 911review caught in super big lies jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 17:51 +0000
          Re: 911review caught in super big lies "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 15:26 -0500
            Re: 911review caught in super big lies Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-17 21:33 +0100
            Re: 911review caught in super big lies jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 21:12 +0000
              Re: 911review caught in super big lies "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 16:26 -0500
                Re: 911review caught in super big lies gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-17 16:57 -0500
                Re: 911review caught in super big lies jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 23:04 +0000
            Re: 911review caught in super big lies gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-17 16:54 -0500
    Re: 911review caught in super big lies jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 17:50 +0000
      Re: 911review caught in super big lies "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 15:31 -0500
        Re: 911review caught in super big lies Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-17 21:35 +0100
          Re: 911review caught in super big lies "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 15:42 -0500
            Re: 911review caught in super big lies gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-17 16:58 -0500
            Re: 911review caught in super big lies Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-17 23:24 +0100
              Re: 911review caught in super big lies "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 17:38 -0500
                Re: 911review caught in super big lies Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-18 00:34 +0100
    Re: 911review caught in super big lies noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 11:44 -0700

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

#514650 — Re: 911review caught in super big lies

bump

I've been looking at a bunch of lies on the 911review website and this page
probably has the biggest lies of all.
http://911review.com/errors/wtc/seismic.html

The page states:
10:28:23 North Tower starts to crumble
10:28:31 rubble starts to hit the ground (start of big signal)
10:28:36 the heaviest rubble hits the ground (peak of big signal)
10:28:39 most heavy rubble has reached the ground (end of big signal)

============================

But it lies about two things.

The ground really started shaking 12 seconds before a Tower was vaporized by
an underground nuke at the exact same time people started running for their
lives and that time which was 12 seconds prior to the vaporization of the
North Tower was also recorded as an EMP on WCBS Channel 2 in Nuke York City.

And if "most heavy rubble" had ever reached the ground why are there no
photos of "most heavy rubble" on the ground?  <G>

All I see in the following photo is buildings that were vaporized by an
underground nuke and the underground nuke left "Surviving Corners" just like
underground nukes buried under another building could or would leave.
><http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg><

Rocky 

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#514653

On 8/17/2015 9:29 AM, Rocky wrote:



    b a l o n i e



(go get a haircut, and a real job)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#514657

"gilber34" <invalid@invalid.com> wrote in message 
news:mqsrgt$fmg$3@speranza.aioe.org...
> On 8/17/2015 9:29 AM, Rocky wrote:
>
>
>
>    b a l o n i e

And your supporting argument is what?  Oh that's right you are an idiot.

----- OP below -----------------------------------------------

I've been looking at a bunch of lies on the 911review website and this page
probably has the biggest lies of all.
http://911review.com/errors/wtc/seismic.html

The page states:
10:28:23 North Tower starts to crumble
10:28:31 rubble starts to hit the ground (start of big signal)
10:28:36 the heaviest rubble hits the ground (peak of big signal)
10:28:39 most heavy rubble has reached the ground (end of big signal)

============================

But it lies about two things.

The ground really started shaking 12 seconds before a Tower was vaporized by
an underground nuke at the exact same time people started running for their
lives and that time which was 12 seconds prior to the vaporization of the
North Tower was also recorded as an EMP on WCBS Channel 2 in Nuke York City.

And if "most heavy rubble" had ever reached the ground why are there no
photos of "most heavy rubble" on the ground?  <G>

All I see in the following photo is buildings that were vaporized by an
underground nuke and the underground nuke left "Surviving Corners" just like
underground nukes buried under another building could or would leave.
><http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg><

Rocky

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#514661

On 8/17/2015 10:03 AM, Rocky wrote:
> "gilber34" <invalid@invalid.com> wrote in message
> news:mqsrgt$fmg$3@speranza.aioe.org...
>> On 8/17/2015 9:29 AM, Rocky wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>     b a l o n i e
>
> And your supporting argument is what?


Nukes are radioactive, and exploding nukes cause miles and miles of 
radiation contammination.

And 9-11 had NO radiation.


so you nuke theory is crap. Got it ?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#514665

"gilber34" <invalid@invalid.com> wrote in message 
news:mqstcm$k8m$1@speranza.aioe.org...
> On 8/17/2015 10:03 AM, Rocky wrote:
>> "gilber34" <invalid@invalid.com> wrote in message
>> news:mqsrgt$fmg$3@speranza.aioe.org...
>>> On 8/17/2015 9:29 AM, Rocky wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>     b a l o n i e
>>
>> And your supporting argument is what?
>
>
> Nukes are radioactive, and exploding nukes cause miles and miles of 
> radiation contammination.
>
> And 9-11 had NO radiation.

To sort out your lies from the truth in a court of law they have to look at 
everything including evidence that proves the TTs were nuked.  See:
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg

Rocky

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#514776

On 8/17/2015 10:16 AM, Rocky wrote:
> "gilber34" <invalid@invalid.com> wrote in message
> news:mqstcm$k8m$1@speranza.aioe.org...
>> On 8/17/2015 10:03 AM, Rocky wrote:
>>> "gilber34" <invalid@invalid.com> wrote in message
>>> news:mqsrgt$fmg$3@speranza.aioe.org...
>>>> On 8/17/2015 9:29 AM, Rocky wrote:
>>>>

>>>>
>>>>      b a l o n i e
>>>
>>> And your supporting argument is what?
>>
>>
>> Nukes are radioactive, and exploding nukes cause miles and miles of
>> radiation contammination.

>> And 9-11 had NO radiation.
>
> To sort out your lies from the truth in a court of law they have to look at
> everything including evidence that proves the TTs were nuked.

no they were not.  NO radioactivity at all.  NONE, nada, zip...

Go to your room.     You bad boy!  You Liar!

NO RADIOACTIVITY AT ALL -- NO RADIOACTIVITY AT ALL
--__________%%%%%%*************--------- NONE !!
NO RADIOACTIVITY AT ALL -- NO RADIOACTIVITY AT ALL
--__________%%%%%%*************--------- NONE !!

          Go to your room. You bad boy!


NO RADIOACTIVITY AT ALL -- NO RADIOACTIVITY AT ALL
--__________%%%%%%*************--------- NONE !!


NO RADIOACTIVITY AT ALL -- NO RADIOACTIVITY AT ALL
--__________%%%%%%*************--------- NONE !!
NO RADIOACTIVITY AT ALL -- NO RADIOACTIVITY AT ALL
--__________%%%%%%*************--------- NONE !!

           Go to your room. You bad boy!


NO RADIOACTIVITY AT ALL -- NO RADIOACTIVITY AT ALL
--__________%%%%%%*************--------- NONE !!


O RADIOACTIVITY AT ALL -- NO RADIOACTIVITY AT ALL
--__________%%%%%%*************--------- NONE !!
NO RADIOACTIVITY AT ALL -- NO RADIOACTIVITY AT ALL
--__________%%%%%%*************--------- NONE !!

Go to your room. You bad boy!


NO RADIOACTIVITY AT ALL -- NO RADIOACTIVITY AT ALL
--__________%%%%%%*************--------- NONE !!


NO RADIOACTIVITY AT ALL -- NO RADIOACTIVITY AT ALL
--__________%%%%%%*************--------- NONE !!
NO RADIOACTIVITY AT ALL -- NO RADIOACTIVITY AT ALL
--__________%%%%%%*************--------- NONE !!

Go to your room. You bad boy!


NO RADIOACTIVITY AT ALL -- NO RADIOACTIVITY AT ALL
--__________%%%%%%*************--------- NONE !!


O RADIOACTIVITY AT ALL -- NO RADIOACTIVITY AT ALL
--__________%%%%%%*************--------- NONE !!
NO RADIOACTIVITY AT ALL -- NO RADIOACTIVITY AT ALL
--__________%%%%%%*************--------- NONE !!

Go to your room. You bad boy!


NO RADIOACTIVITY AT ALL -- NO RADIOACTIVITY AT ALL
--__________%%%%%%*************--------- NONE !!


NO RADIOACTIVITY AT ALL -- NO RADIOACTIVITY AT ALL
--__________%%%%%%*************--------- NONE !!
NO RADIOACTIVITY AT ALL -- NO RADIOACTIVITY AT ALL
--__________%%%%%%*************--------- NONE !!

Go to your room. You bad boy!


NO RADIOACTIVITY AT ALL -- NO RADIOACTIVITY AT ALL
--__________%%%%%%*************--------- NONE !!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#514788

"gilber34" <invalid@invalid.com> wrote in message 
news:mqtbkv$mci$1@speranza.aioe.org...
> On 8/17/2015 10:16 AM, Rocky wrote:
>> "gilber34" <invalid@invalid.com> wrote in message
>> news:mqstcm$k8m$1@speranza.aioe.org...
>>> On 8/17/2015 10:03 AM, Rocky wrote:
>>>> "gilber34" <invalid@invalid.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:mqsrgt$fmg$3@speranza.aioe.org...
>>>>> On 8/17/2015 9:29 AM, Rocky wrote:
>>>>>
>
>>>>>
>>>>>      b a l o n i e
>>>>
>>>> And your supporting argument is what?
>>>
>>>
>>> Nukes are radioactive, and exploding nukes cause miles and miles of
>>> radiation contammination.
>
>>> And 9-11 had NO radiation.
>>
>> To sort out your lies from the truth in a court of law they have to look 
>> at
>> everything including evidence that proves the TTs were nuked.
>
> no they were not.  NO radioactivity at all.  NONE, nada, zip...

And if that bs came from the exact same place that told the world a 757 
crashed into the Pentagon you know that is complete and utter bullshit.
><http://dictionary.reverso.net/english-definition/complete%20and%20utter%20bullshit><

Behind the Smoke Curtain - 2nd Edition (2015)
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VXBk8JqwFlw

Rocky 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#514864

On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 14:32:36 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:

>>"gilber34" <invalid@invalid.com> wrote in message 
>news:mqtbkv$mci$1@speranza.aioe.org...
>> On 8/17/2015 10:16 AM, Rocky wrote:
>>> "gilber34" <invalid@invalid.com> wrote in message
>>> news:mqstcm$k8m$1@speranza.aioe.org...
>>>> On 8/17/2015 10:03 AM, Rocky wrote:
>>>>> "gilber34" <invalid@invalid.com> wrote in message
>>>>> news:mqsrgt$fmg$3@speranza.aioe.org...
>>>>>> On 8/17/2015 9:29 AM, Rocky wrote:
>>>>>>
>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>      b a l o n i e
>>>>>
>>>>> And your supporting argument is what?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Nukes are radioactive, and exploding nukes cause miles and miles of
>>>> radiation contammination.
>>
>>>> And 9-11 had NO radiation.
>>>
>>> To sort out your lies from the truth in a court of law they have to look 
>>> at everything including evidence that proves the TTs were nuked.
>>
>> no they were not.  NO radioactivity at all.  NONE, nada, zip...
>
>And if that bs came from the exact same place that told the world a 757 
>crashed into the Pentagon you know that is complete and utter bullshit.
>><http://dictionary.reverso.net/english-definition/complete%20and%20utter%20bullshit><
>

     But a 757 did hit the Pentagon. There is ample evidence of this
truth.

>Behind the Smoke Curtain - 2nd Edition (2015)
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VXBk8JqwFlw
>

     I wish I had nothing to do all day but watch k00k videos. [Not
so] Sadly, I have a career and family.

-- 
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#514877

On 8/17/2015 2:32 PM, Rocky wrote:

>>>>>>
>>

>>>>>>       b a l o n i e
>>>>>
>>>>> And your supporting argument is what?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Nukes are radioactive, and exploding nukes cause miles and miles of
>>>> radiation contammination.

>>>> And 9-11 had NO radiation.
>>>
>>> To sort out your lies from the truth in a court of law they have to look
>>> at
>>> everything including evidence that proves the TTs were nuked.
>>
>> no they were not.  NO radioactivity at all.  NONE, nada, zip...
>
> And if that bs came from the exact same place that told the world a 757
> crashed into the Pentagon you know that is complete and utter bullshit.

dont change the subject, fibber.  you are caught!   and the 757 was 
FILMED by cameras crashing into the pentagon.

you believe anything, you sucker.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#514863

On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 10:16:55 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:

>"gilber34" <invalid@invalid.com> wrote in message 
>news:mqstcm$k8m$1@speranza.aioe.org...
>> On 8/17/2015 10:03 AM, Rocky wrote:
>>> "gilber34" <invalid@invalid.com> wrote in message
>>> news:mqsrgt$fmg$3@speranza.aioe.org...
>>>> On 8/17/2015 9:29 AM, Rocky wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>     b a l o n i e
>>>
>>> And your supporting argument is what?
>>
>>
>> Nukes are radioactive, and exploding nukes cause miles and miles of 
>> radiation contammination.
>>
>> And 9-11 had NO radiation.
>
>To sort out your lies from the truth in a court of law they have to look at 
>everything including evidence that proves the TTs were nuked.  See:
> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
>

     But they weren't nuked, so there can be no evidence that they
were. Your link above PROVES it was a collapse.

-- 
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#514747

In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
> 
> "gilber34" <invalid@invalid.com> wrote in message 
> news:mqsrgt$fmg$3@speranza.aioe.org...
>> On 8/17/2015 9:29 AM, Rocky wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>    b a l o n i e
> 
> And your supporting argument is what?  Oh that's right you are an idiot.

The supporting arguement is the following facts:

When a nuclear device explodes, it creates a unique seismic signature
that can be detected anywhere on the planet.

There were no nuclear seismic signatures detected on 9/11 but the 
collapse of the two towers was detected.

This alone is enough to disprove any nuclear devices were used on 9/11.

<snip remaining kook babble>


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#514810

<jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message 
news:hij9ac-ju3.ln1@mail.specsol.com...
> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>
>> "gilber34" <invalid@invalid.com> wrote in message
>> news:mqsrgt$fmg$3@speranza.aioe.org...
>>> On 8/17/2015 9:29 AM, Rocky wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>    b a l o n i e
>>
>> And your supporting argument is what?  Oh that's right you are an idiot.
>
> The supporting arguement is the following facts:
>
> When a nuclear device explodes, it creates a unique seismic signature
> that can be detected anywhere on the planet.
>
> There were no nuclear seismic signatures detected on 9/11 but the
> collapse of the two towers was detected.
>
> This alone is enough to disprove any nuclear devices were used on 9/11.

But only if it were true.  The facts is we were flat out lied to about what 
happened at the Pentagon and those lies cast a doubt on everything the media 
tried to tell us about 9/11.

Look at just some of the crap we were force fed about the Pentagon:

Behind the Smoke Curtain - 2nd Edition (2015)
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VXBk8JqwFlw

And don't forget the biggest lie.  People claim that the reason there was no 
scrap metal on the yard of the Pentagon was the wings of a 757 folded up 
just like the wings on a bird and tucked itself neatly into the Pentagon 
where it burned up in a fire that couldn't even burn desk.  <G>

Rocky 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#514813

On 17/08/2015 21:26, Rocky wrote:
> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message
> news:hij9ac-ju3.ln1@mail.specsol.com...
>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> "gilber34" <invalid@invalid.com> wrote in message
>>> news:mqsrgt$fmg$3@speranza.aioe.org...
>>>> On 8/17/2015 9:29 AM, Rocky wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>     b a l o n i e
>>>
>>> And your supporting argument is what?  Oh that's right you are an idiot.
>>
>> The supporting arguement is the following facts:
>>
>> When a nuclear device explodes, it creates a unique seismic signature
>> that can be detected anywhere on the planet.
>>
>> There were no nuclear seismic signatures detected on 9/11 but the
>> collapse of the two towers was detected.
>>
>> This alone is enough to disprove any nuclear devices were used on 9/11.
>
> But only if it were true.

Do you believe it to be true, was seismic signatures detected during 911?

> The facts is we were flat out lied to about what
> happened at the Pentagon and those lies cast a doubt on everything the media
> tried to tell us about 9/11.
>
> Look at just some of the crap we were force fed about the Pentagon:
>
> Behind the Smoke Curtain - 2nd Edition (2015)
>   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VXBk8JqwFlw
>
> And don't forget the biggest lie.  People claim that the reason there was no
> scrap metal on the yard of the Pentagon was the wings of a 757 folded up
> just like the wings on a bird and tucked itself neatly into the Pentagon
> where it burned up in a fire that couldn't even burn desk.  <G>
>
> Rocky
>
>


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#514838

In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
 
> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message 
> news:hij9ac-ju3.ln1@mail.specsol.com...

>> When a nuclear device explodes, it creates a unique seismic signature
>> that can be detected anywhere on the planet.
>>
>> There were no nuclear seismic signatures detected on 9/11 but the
>> collapse of the two towers was detected.
>>
>> This alone is enough to disprove any nuclear devices were used on 9/11.
> 
> But only if it were true.  The facts is we were flat out lied to about what 
> happened at the Pentagon and those lies cast a doubt on everything the media 
> tried to tell us about 9/11.

There are thousands and thousands of seismographs around the world, many
of which are on the Internet in real time, kook.

The media has nothing to do with the lack of any seismic signatures of
a nuclear explosion, kook.

<snip remaining kook babble>

-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#514843

<jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message 
news:4bv9ac-vs7.ln1@mail.specsol.com...
> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>
>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message
>> news:hij9ac-ju3.ln1@mail.specsol.com...
>
>>> When a nuclear device explodes, it creates a unique seismic signature
>>> that can be detected anywhere on the planet.
>>>
>>> There were no nuclear seismic signatures detected on 9/11 but the
>>> collapse of the two towers was detected.
>>>
>>> This alone is enough to disprove any nuclear devices were used on 9/11.
>>
>> But only if it were true.  The facts is we were flat out lied to about 
>> what
>> happened at the Pentagon and those lies cast a doubt on everything the 
>> media
>> tried to tell us about 9/11.
>
> There are thousands and thousands of seismographs around the world, many
> of which are on the Internet in real time, kook.
>
> The media has nothing to do with the lack of any seismic signatures of
> a nuclear explosion, kook.

Too bad the ground shaking at Ground Zero throws those readings out and the 
fact that two 110 story buildings should have caused a bigger than 2.3 on 
the Richter scale also tells us something fishy happened.  <G>

That fishy is that the TTs were nuked in front of the world and being as 
dumb as most people on this NG are they never even bothered to question the 
missing piles of debris.  <G>
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg

Rocky 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#514882

which are on the Internet in real time, kook.
>>
>> The media has nothing to do with the lack of any seismic signatures of
>> a nuclear explosion, kook.
>
> Too bad the ground shaking at Ground Zero throws those readings out and the
> fact that two 110 story buildings should have caused a bigger than 2.3 on
> the Richter scale also tells us something fishy happened.  <G>

you pulled "2.3" out of your ass?   fishy? you are fishy.


>
> That fishy is that the TTs were nuked


wrong, no NO RADIATION DUMBASS,

are you retarded ?

  or did your mama drop you on your head a few dozen times when you a 
baby ?  intentionally.


.........NO RADIATION..............

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#514919

In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
> 
> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message 
> news:4bv9ac-vs7.ln1@mail.specsol.com...
>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>
>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message
>>> news:hij9ac-ju3.ln1@mail.specsol.com...
>>
>>>> When a nuclear device explodes, it creates a unique seismic signature
>>>> that can be detected anywhere on the planet.
>>>>
>>>> There were no nuclear seismic signatures detected on 9/11 but the
>>>> collapse of the two towers was detected.
>>>>
>>>> This alone is enough to disprove any nuclear devices were used on 9/11.
>>>
>>> But only if it were true.  The facts is we were flat out lied to about 
>>> what
>>> happened at the Pentagon and those lies cast a doubt on everything the 
>>> media
>>> tried to tell us about 9/11.
>>
>> There are thousands and thousands of seismographs around the world, many
>> of which are on the Internet in real time, kook.
>>
>> The media has nothing to do with the lack of any seismic signatures of
>> a nuclear explosion, kook.
> 
> Too bad the ground shaking at Ground Zero throws those readings out and the 
> fact that two 110 story buildings should have caused a bigger than 2.3 on 
> the Richter scale also tells us something fishy happened.  <G>

You really are quite insane, kook.

There are literally thousands of seismographs directly connected to the
Internet providing data in real time, kook.

None of them showed any nuclear explosions, kook.

The facts are some airliners were hijacked.

Two of them crashed into the World Trade Center towers, starting fires
which weakened the central support columns and the buildings collapesed
almost 2 hours later.

One of them crashed into the Pentagon causing a partial collapse of the
western side and one of them crashed into a field in Pennsylvania.

Everything else is kook babble.

That there were nuclear exposives involved is kook babble.

That there is missing rubble is kook babble.

That there has ever been a nuclear building demolition is kook babble.

That part of the buildings were vaporized is kook babble.

That part of a building was left standing proves there were nuclear
devices is kook babble.

That there was an EMP is kook babble.

That nuclear devices could be detonated underground and yet were not
seen by every seismograph in the world is kook babble.

That a failed US Government project that ended in 1973 has anything
to do with what happened is kook babble.

That the scene was radioactive is kook babble.

That there is any simularity between New York and either Hiroshima
or Nagasaki is kook babble.

That the area was called ground zero proves the event was nuclear
is kook babble.

That a nuclear bomb can be buried for decades without maintenance 
and still be expected to work is kook babble.

That non-government entities can obtain not one, but multiple nuclear
bombs is kook babble.

That there were not thousands of eyewitnesses who heard and saw the
airplanes hit the towers is kook babble.

That all the video was CGI is kook babble.

That the exterior walls were designed to deflect airplanes is kook babble.

That the exterior walls were anything other than supports for the
windows is kook babble.

That two of the aircraft landed somewhere else is kook babble.

That a shotgun works anything like an underground nuclear explosion
is kook babble.

There is nothing in an airplane that transmits the flight number to
ATC and saying the transponder does that is kook babble.

Saying a missile of any kind hit the Pentagon is kook babble.

When a nuclear device explodes, it creates a unique seismic signature
that can be detected anywhere on the planet.

There were no nuclear seismic signatures detected on 9/11 but the 
collapse of the two towers was detected.

This alone is enough to disprove any nuclear devices were used on 9/11.

Capitalizing things that shouldn't be capitalized is kook babble.


<snip remaining kook babble>


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#514879

O
> But only if it were true.  The facts is we were flat out lied to about what
> happened at the Pentagon and those lies cast a doubt on everything the media
> tried to tell us about 9/11.
>
> Look at just some of the crap we were force fed about the Pentagon:
>
> Behind the Smoke Curtain - 2nd Edition (2015)
>   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VXBk8JqwFlw
>
> And don't forget the biggest lie.  People claim that the reason there was no
> scrap metal on the yard of the Pentagon

there was, a bent up airplane outside.


> was the wings of a 757 folded up
> just like the wings on a bird and tucked itself neatly into the Pentagon
> where it burned up in a fire that couldn't even burn desk.  <G>

lies, it burnt up 3 floors of the pentagon.

>
> Rocky

Rocky, you dumbass, why are you spending time floundering about in this 
mess of obvious bullshit ?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#514746

In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
> bump
> 
> I've been looking at a bunch of lies on the 911review website and this page
> probably has the biggest lies of all.
> http://911review.com/errors/wtc/seismic.html
> 
> The page states:
> 10:28:23 North Tower starts to crumble
> 10:28:31 rubble starts to hit the ground (start of big signal)
> 10:28:36 the heaviest rubble hits the ground (peak of big signal)
> 10:28:39 most heavy rubble has reached the ground (end of big signal)
> 
> ============================
> 
> But it lies about two things.
> 
> The ground really started shaking 12 seconds before a Tower was vaporized by
> an underground nuke at the exact same time people started running for their
> lives and that time which was 12 seconds prior to the vaporization of the
> North Tower was also recorded as an EMP on WCBS Channel 2 in Nuke York City.

When a nuclear device explodes, it creates a unique seismic signature
that can be detected anywhere on the planet.

There were no nuclear seismic signatures detected on 9/11 but the 
collapse of the two towers was detected.

This alone is enough to disprove any nuclear devices were used on 9/11.

<snip remaining kook babble>


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#514812

<jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message 
news:dgj9ac-ju3.ln1@mail.specsol.com...
> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>> bump
>>
>> I've been looking at a bunch of lies on the 911review website and this 
>> page
>> probably has the biggest lies of all.
>> http://911review.com/errors/wtc/seismic.html
>>
>> The page states:
>> 10:28:23 North Tower starts to crumble
>> 10:28:31 rubble starts to hit the ground (start of big signal)
>> 10:28:36 the heaviest rubble hits the ground (peak of big signal)
>> 10:28:39 most heavy rubble has reached the ground (end of big signal)
>>
>> ============================
>>
>> But it lies about two things.
>>
>> The ground really started shaking 12 seconds before a Tower was vaporized 
>> by
>> an underground nuke at the exact same time people started running for 
>> their
>> lives and that time which was 12 seconds prior to the vaporization of the
>> North Tower was also recorded as an EMP on WCBS Channel 2 in Nuke York 
>> City.
>
> When a nuclear device explodes, it creates a unique seismic signature
> that can be detected anywhere on the planet.
>
> There were no nuclear seismic signatures detected on 9/11 but the
> collapse of the two towers was detected.
>
> This alone is enough to disprove any nuclear devices were used on 9/11.

Too bad there is more evidence to prove that is bullshit than you are 
willing to accept.

And if you want see another place the media has fed us complete and utter 
bullshit see:

Behind the Smoke Curtain - 2nd Edition (2015)
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VXBk8JqwFlw

Rocky

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web