Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #514746

Re: 911review caught in super big lies

From jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Newsgroups alt.astronomy, alt.conspiracy, sci.physics
Subject Re: 911review caught in super big lies
Date 2015-08-17 17:50 +0000
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <dgj9ac-ju3.ln1@mail.specsol.com> (permalink)
References <iuKdnUx4fqHMzDTJnZ2dnUU7-K2dnZ2d@giganews.com> <OfadnSw1V6uLbUzInZ2dnUU7-S-dnZ2d@giganews.com>

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
> bump
> 
> I've been looking at a bunch of lies on the 911review website and this page
> probably has the biggest lies of all.
> http://911review.com/errors/wtc/seismic.html
> 
> The page states:
> 10:28:23 North Tower starts to crumble
> 10:28:31 rubble starts to hit the ground (start of big signal)
> 10:28:36 the heaviest rubble hits the ground (peak of big signal)
> 10:28:39 most heavy rubble has reached the ground (end of big signal)
> 
> ============================
> 
> But it lies about two things.
> 
> The ground really started shaking 12 seconds before a Tower was vaporized by
> an underground nuke at the exact same time people started running for their
> lives and that time which was 12 seconds prior to the vaporization of the
> North Tower was also recorded as an EMP on WCBS Channel 2 in Nuke York City.

When a nuclear device explodes, it creates a unique seismic signature
that can be detected anywhere on the planet.

There were no nuclear seismic signatures detected on 9/11 but the 
collapse of the two towers was detected.

This alone is enough to disprove any nuclear devices were used on 9/11.

<snip remaining kook babble>


-- 
Jim Pennino

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: 911review caught in super big lies "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 09:29 -0500
  Re: 911review caught in super big lies gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-17 09:35 -0500
    Re: 911review caught in super big lies "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 10:03 -0500
      Re: 911review caught in super big lies gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-17 10:07 -0500
        Re: 911review caught in super big lies "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 10:16 -0500
          Re: 911review caught in super big lies gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-17 14:11 -0500
            Re: 911review caught in super big lies "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 14:32 -0500
              Re: 911review caught in super big lies "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 16:42 -0500
              Re: 911review caught in super big lies gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-17 16:52 -0500
          Re: 911review caught in super big lies "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 16:42 -0500
      Re: 911review caught in super big lies jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 17:51 +0000
        Re: 911review caught in super big lies "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 15:26 -0500
          Re: 911review caught in super big lies Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-17 21:33 +0100
          Re: 911review caught in super big lies jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 21:12 +0000
            Re: 911review caught in super big lies "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 16:26 -0500
              Re: 911review caught in super big lies gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-17 16:57 -0500
              Re: 911review caught in super big lies jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 23:04 +0000
          Re: 911review caught in super big lies gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-17 16:54 -0500
  Re: 911review caught in super big lies jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 17:50 +0000
    Re: 911review caught in super big lies "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 15:31 -0500
      Re: 911review caught in super big lies Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-17 21:35 +0100
        Re: 911review caught in super big lies "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 15:42 -0500
          Re: 911review caught in super big lies gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-17 16:58 -0500
          Re: 911review caught in super big lies Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-17 23:24 +0100
            Re: 911review caught in super big lies "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 17:38 -0500
              Re: 911review caught in super big lies Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-18 00:34 +0100
  Re: 911review caught in super big lies noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 11:44 -0700

csiph-web