Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.astronomy > #272881

Re: 911review caught in super big lies

From jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Newsgroups alt.astronomy, alt.conspiracy, sci.physics
Subject Re: 911review caught in super big lies
Date 2015-08-17 17:51 +0000
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <hij9ac-ju3.ln1@mail.specsol.com> (permalink)
References <iuKdnUx4fqHMzDTJnZ2dnUU7-K2dnZ2d@giganews.com> <OfadnSw1V6uLbUzInZ2dnUU7-S-dnZ2d@giganews.com> <mqsrgt$fmg$3@speranza.aioe.org> <osadnaBa8qN-akzInZ2dnUU7-RmdnZ2d@giganews.com>

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
> 
> "gilber34" <invalid@invalid.com> wrote in message 
> news:mqsrgt$fmg$3@speranza.aioe.org...
>> On 8/17/2015 9:29 AM, Rocky wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>    b a l o n i e
> 
> And your supporting argument is what?  Oh that's right you are an idiot.

The supporting arguement is the following facts:

When a nuclear device explodes, it creates a unique seismic signature
that can be detected anywhere on the planet.

There were no nuclear seismic signatures detected on 9/11 but the 
collapse of the two towers was detected.

This alone is enough to disprove any nuclear devices were used on 9/11.

<snip remaining kook babble>


-- 
Jim Pennino

Back to alt.astronomy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: 911review caught in super big lies "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 09:29 -0500
  Re: 911review caught in super big lies gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-17 09:35 -0500
    Re: 911review caught in super big lies "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 10:03 -0500
      Re: 911review caught in super big lies gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-17 10:07 -0500
        Re: 911review caught in super big lies "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 10:16 -0500
          Re: 911review caught in super big lies gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-17 14:11 -0500
            Re: 911review caught in super big lies "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 14:32 -0500
              Re: 911review caught in super big lies gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-17 16:52 -0500
      Re: 911review caught in super big lies jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 17:51 +0000
        Re: 911review caught in super big lies "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 15:26 -0500
          Re: 911review caught in super big lies Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-17 21:33 +0100
          Re: 911review caught in super big lies jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 21:12 +0000
            Re: 911review caught in super big lies "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 16:26 -0500
              Re: 911review caught in super big lies gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-17 16:57 -0500
              Re: 911review caught in super big lies jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 23:04 +0000
          Re: 911review caught in super big lies gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-17 16:54 -0500
  Re: 911review caught in super big lies jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 17:50 +0000
    Re: 911review caught in super big lies "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 15:31 -0500
      Re: 911review caught in super big lies Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-17 21:35 +0100
        Re: 911review caught in super big lies "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 15:42 -0500
          Re: 911review caught in super big lies gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-17 16:58 -0500
          Re: 911review caught in super big lies Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-17 23:24 +0100
            Re: 911review caught in super big lies "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 17:38 -0500
              Re: 911review caught in super big lies Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-18 00:34 +0100

csiph-web