Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.astronomy > #272978

Re: 911review caught in super big lies

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
> 
> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message 
> news:4bv9ac-vs7.ln1@mail.specsol.com...
>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>
>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message
>>> news:hij9ac-ju3.ln1@mail.specsol.com...
>>
>>>> When a nuclear device explodes, it creates a unique seismic signature
>>>> that can be detected anywhere on the planet.
>>>>
>>>> There were no nuclear seismic signatures detected on 9/11 but the
>>>> collapse of the two towers was detected.
>>>>
>>>> This alone is enough to disprove any nuclear devices were used on 9/11.
>>>
>>> But only if it were true.  The facts is we were flat out lied to about 
>>> what
>>> happened at the Pentagon and those lies cast a doubt on everything the 
>>> media
>>> tried to tell us about 9/11.
>>
>> There are thousands and thousands of seismographs around the world, many
>> of which are on the Internet in real time, kook.
>>
>> The media has nothing to do with the lack of any seismic signatures of
>> a nuclear explosion, kook.
> 
> Too bad the ground shaking at Ground Zero throws those readings out and the 
> fact that two 110 story buildings should have caused a bigger than 2.3 on 
> the Richter scale also tells us something fishy happened.  <G>

You really are quite insane, kook.

There are literally thousands of seismographs directly connected to the
Internet providing data in real time, kook.

None of them showed any nuclear explosions, kook.

The facts are some airliners were hijacked.

Two of them crashed into the World Trade Center towers, starting fires
which weakened the central support columns and the buildings collapesed
almost 2 hours later.

One of them crashed into the Pentagon causing a partial collapse of the
western side and one of them crashed into a field in Pennsylvania.

Everything else is kook babble.

That there were nuclear exposives involved is kook babble.

That there is missing rubble is kook babble.

That there has ever been a nuclear building demolition is kook babble.

That part of the buildings were vaporized is kook babble.

That part of a building was left standing proves there were nuclear
devices is kook babble.

That there was an EMP is kook babble.

That nuclear devices could be detonated underground and yet were not
seen by every seismograph in the world is kook babble.

That a failed US Government project that ended in 1973 has anything
to do with what happened is kook babble.

That the scene was radioactive is kook babble.

That there is any simularity between New York and either Hiroshima
or Nagasaki is kook babble.

That the area was called ground zero proves the event was nuclear
is kook babble.

That a nuclear bomb can be buried for decades without maintenance 
and still be expected to work is kook babble.

That non-government entities can obtain not one, but multiple nuclear
bombs is kook babble.

That there were not thousands of eyewitnesses who heard and saw the
airplanes hit the towers is kook babble.

That all the video was CGI is kook babble.

That the exterior walls were designed to deflect airplanes is kook babble.

That the exterior walls were anything other than supports for the
windows is kook babble.

That two of the aircraft landed somewhere else is kook babble.

That a shotgun works anything like an underground nuclear explosion
is kook babble.

There is nothing in an airplane that transmits the flight number to
ATC and saying the transponder does that is kook babble.

Saying a missile of any kind hit the Pentagon is kook babble.

When a nuclear device explodes, it creates a unique seismic signature
that can be detected anywhere on the planet.

There were no nuclear seismic signatures detected on 9/11 but the 
collapse of the two towers was detected.

This alone is enough to disprove any nuclear devices were used on 9/11.

Capitalizing things that shouldn't be capitalized is kook babble.


<snip remaining kook babble>


-- 
Jim Pennino

Back to alt.astronomy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: 911review caught in super big lies "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 09:29 -0500
  Re: 911review caught in super big lies gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-17 09:35 -0500
    Re: 911review caught in super big lies "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 10:03 -0500
      Re: 911review caught in super big lies gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-17 10:07 -0500
        Re: 911review caught in super big lies "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 10:16 -0500
          Re: 911review caught in super big lies gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-17 14:11 -0500
            Re: 911review caught in super big lies "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 14:32 -0500
              Re: 911review caught in super big lies gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-17 16:52 -0500
      Re: 911review caught in super big lies jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 17:51 +0000
        Re: 911review caught in super big lies "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 15:26 -0500
          Re: 911review caught in super big lies Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-17 21:33 +0100
          Re: 911review caught in super big lies jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 21:12 +0000
            Re: 911review caught in super big lies "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 16:26 -0500
              Re: 911review caught in super big lies gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-17 16:57 -0500
              Re: 911review caught in super big lies jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 23:04 +0000
          Re: 911review caught in super big lies gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-17 16:54 -0500
  Re: 911review caught in super big lies jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 17:50 +0000
    Re: 911review caught in super big lies "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 15:31 -0500
      Re: 911review caught in super big lies Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-17 21:35 +0100
        Re: 911review caught in super big lies "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 15:42 -0500
          Re: 911review caught in super big lies gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-17 16:58 -0500
          Re: 911review caught in super big lies Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-17 23:24 +0100
            Re: 911review caught in super big lies "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 17:38 -0500
              Re: 911review caught in super big lies Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-18 00:34 +0100

csiph-web