Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #563291

Re: does anybody remember

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw

On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 01:19:41 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler  
Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>
> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
> DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey),
> socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in
> <news:op.yehcb1cotm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first
> into the wood chipper again:
>
>> On Thu, 17 Mar 2016 12:16:22 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood
>> Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
>
>>> Time to Wee hours bleating again, Spankard? LOL
>
>>>> On Thu, 17 Mar 2016 00:29:35 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote  
>>>> Wrangler
>
>>> <crickets> LOL!
>>> <crickets> LOL!
>>>
>>> See 9 lines below, ClueTard. LOL
>>>
>>> Wrong. I posted a completely correct 170 volt peak L-N sinusoid, from
>>> which I derived the completely correct 120 volt RMS L-N sinusoid, from
>>> which I derived the completely correct 208 volt RMS L-L sinusoid, with
>>> proper phase shift. You're just mad because you're too stupid to ever
>>> do that, DildoRider. LOL
>>>
>>> Certainly not with your kooky sinewave subtraction equation. Remember,
>>> you're the moron who has claimed:
>>>
>>> 1) You derived a higher RMS voltage than the peak voltage the RMS
>>> voltage was derived from.
>>>
>>> 2) You k'lamed a *doubling* of voltage as a resultant of all three
>>> phases of 3-phase AC, akin to shorting all three phases together.
>>>
>>> 3) You k'lamed a result of 0 volts as a resultant of two phases of
>>> 3-phase AC.
>>>
>>> 4) You demonstrated your inability to grasp why two phases *summed*
>>> gave a sinewave of the same voltage but phase shifted 60 degrees from
>>> each of the tributary sinewaves, such that the resultant is 180
>>> degrees phase from the remaining third phase.
>>>
>>> 5) You demonstrated your inability to grasp why all three phases of
>>> 3-phase AC *summed* together gives a result of 0 volts.
>>>
>>> 6) You k'lamed you were feeding 240 volts to the *primary* of a
>>> *substation* transformer, deriving 120 volts from the *primary* side,
>>> then feeding that 240 volts to a 120/208 volt electrical feed... you
>>> even went so far as to justify it with your kooky math, showing you
>>> were deriving 208 volts from 240 volts. Then you backpedaled and
>>> k'lamed you were instead feeding the primary with a voltage of "12
>>> kVA" (DildoRider's blather), proving you don't know the difference
>>> between voltage and apparent power.
>>>
>>> And you still don't know what a gable is. 150 IQ? LOL
>>>
>>> SPNAK!
>>>
>>> No, you got the *correct* result in that graph, DildoRider. The first
>>> time you've ever been right about anything. 150 IQ? LOL
>>>
>>> You moron, do you *still* not understand vector summation? Holy fuck,
>>> how retarded are you?
>>>
>>> The resultant of two phases of 3-phase AC must only be a sinewave of
>>> same frequency and amplitude as the two tributaries, phase-shifted to
>>> be 60 degrees off from and in between the two tributaries and 180
>>> degrees from the remaining third leg. If you're getting any other
>>> result, your kooky equation is *wrong*, DildoRider.
>>>
>>> Backpedal harder, Lying Spankard. LOL
>>>
>>> Piling reading comprehension problems on top of backpedaling,
>>> DildoRider? Why are you such a moron? LOL
>>>
>>> Bwahahaaa! You moron. Your kooky sinewave subtraction equation has
>>> your brain so twisted in knots you're making a fool of yourself. LOL
>>>
>>> The resultant of two phases of 3-phase AC must only be a sinewave of
>>> same frequency and amplitude as the two tributaries, phase-shifted to
>>> be 60 degrees off from and in between the two tributaries and 180
>>> degrees from the remaining third leg. If you're getting any other
>>> result, your kooky equation is *wrong*, DildoRider.
>>>
>>> Translation:
>>> "Please, oh please, oh please, FNVWe, let me in on that secret that
>>> every scientist and engineer since 1748 has known and used. I'm far
>>> too stoooopid to Google for it, and far too stoooopid to ever properly
>>> use it, so please baby-step me through it using monosyllabic words."
>>>
>>> Moronism noted. 150 IQ? LOL
>>>
>>> It might have to do with the fact that you're a mathematical moron.
>>> LOL
>>>
>>> The resultant of two phases of 3-phase AC must only be a sinewave of
>>> same frequency and amplitude as the two tributaries, phase-shifted to
>>> be 60 degrees off from and in between the two tributaries and 180
>>> degrees from the remaining third leg. If you're getting any other
>>> result, your kooky equation is *wrong*, DildoRider.
>>>
>>> Thus the resultant of the three phases of 3-phase AC must only be 0
>>> volts, as you can easily ascertain with a simple Google search...
>>> oh... wait... you're too stoooopid to use Google. LOL
>>>
>>> Your kooky equation *didn't* "work correctly", DildoRider. Try it
>>> again, and this time, try not to make yourself look like a fucking
>>> moron. LOL
>>>
>>> I did graph it, you moron. That you don't even know why that result
>>> *must* be, otherwise your kooky equation is *wrong*, is part and
>>> parcel of your retardation. LOL
>>>
>>> Bwahahaaa! DildoRider denies that the resultant of the three phases of
>>> 3-phase AC is always 0, hence 3-phase AC represents a full circle
>>> represented in sinusoid.
>>>
>>> Holy shit, DildoRider... if you get any dumber they're gonna have to
>>> jump-start your brain. LOL
>>>
>>> No, they're not. You're just a mathematical moron. LOL
>>>
>>> No, they don't. You're just a mathematical moron. LOL
>>>
>>> No, they don't. You're just a mathematical moron. LOL
>>>
>>> For DC, Moron. For AC, superposition dictates that vector *summation*
>>> must be used.
>>>
>>> Except your bad sinewaves are as fucked up as your kooky sinewave
>>> subtraction equation, which is fucked up as your broken brain,
>>> DildoRider. LOL
>>>
>>> Your math is horribly broken, DildoRider. That's *why* you're Robert
>>> Michael Wolfe the Mathematical Moron. LOL
>>>
>>> Except a simple Google search will prove you wrong. You're simply too
>>> stupid to do that Google search, so instead you spew Man-Goo,
>>> Spaghetti Code and Bad Sinewaves. Because you're Robert Michael Wolfe
>>> the Mathematical Moron. LOL
>>>
>>> Bwahahaaaa! So wrong that the word "wrong" is the wrong word to
>>> describe how wrong it is, DildoRider. You can't even get the phase
>>> shift *or* the resultant voltage correct. You moron. LOL
>>>
>>> Says the backpedaling bleatfarting bad sinewave-spamming mathematical
>>> moron. LOL
>
> And that's a big ol' whomping <crickets> SPNAK! on Robert Michael
> Wolfe the Mathematical Moron. LOL
>
>>> <http://i.imgur.com/t0sO6xh.png>
>
>> BWAHAHAHAA!
>>
>> k0oky k'lames that a voltmeter between phase legs of 3-phase will  
>> produce
>> 170 volts!!
>
> Bwahahahaaa! DildoRider demonstrates that he *still* can't figure out
> vector summation. He k'lames the resultant of 3-phases of 3-phase AC
> *doubles* the voltage! He derives a higher RMS voltage than the peak
> voltage it's derived from! He k'lames "kVA" denotes voltage! What a
> moron! LOL

http://i.imgur.com/xTldIjM.png

>
>>> Blue - Phase 1 (170 volts, 0 degrees), Tributary 1
>>> Orange - Phase 2 (170 volts, 120 degrees), Tributary 2
>>> Purple - Phase 3 (170 volts, 240 degrees)
>>> Green - Resultant (170 volts, 60 degrees)
>>> Red - Resultant (170 volts, 60 degrees)
>>>
>>> You'll note the red/green sinewave and the purple sinewave are 180
>>> degrees out of phase, exactly as they should be. Thus the resultant of
>>> the red/green sinewave and the purple sinewave will give a correct
>>> result of 0.
>
>> dude.  a voltmeter across 2 phases of 3-phase doesn't read 170 volts.   
>> if
>> it does, then it's probably because you installed your own service.  i
>> hope you didn't charge yourself a lot for that.
>
> Still having trouble grasping vector summation, are you, DildoRider?
> Why are you such a fucking moron?

i understand that you keep getting the wrong answers and pretending that  
you aren't.

http://i.imgur.com/xTldIjM.png

>
> What is the resultant of all 3 phases of 3-phase AC, DildoRider. Go
> on, *prove* yourself a mathematical moron. Again. LOL
>
>> the number you are looking for is sqrt(3)*170, g0ober.
>>
>> i guess your euler equations are horribly broken after all.
>>
>> ho-hum.
>
> Except they're not. The Euler sinewave summation equation has been in
> use by scientists and engineers since 1748, whereas your kooky
> sinewave subtraction equation has been in use for 3 months by only one
> thoroughly confused kooktard. LOL
>
>>> You'll further note that both the red and green sinewaves are at the
>>> same phase angle despite having the two phases interchanged in the
>>> equation (green - 0 degrees first, 120 degrees second; red - 120
>>> degrees first, 0 degrees second). Whereas in your kooky equation
>>> moving the tributaries in your equation gives different results.
>>>
>>> Why are you too stoooopid to find that Euler sinewave summation
>>> equation, DildoRider?
>
>> because i don't need it.  the correct math produces correct results,  
>> much
>> like correct phasor math does.
>>
>> http://i.imgur.com/4itzDIY.png
>>
>> notice how you're the one backpedaling, swapping summation for
>> subtraction, and hiding equations, bleaty.
>
> Awwww, look at the kooktard project. You haven't gotten one single
> thing right *except* when you summed two sinewaves, you fecking nong.
> It's been three long months that you've been demonstrating that you're
> Robert Michael Wolfe the Mathematical Moron, and you don't seem to be
> gaining clue... you're stupidity appears to be perpetual. LOL
>
>>> Why are you far too stoooopid to figure out
>>> vector summation, DildoRider?
>
>> that's not what it says on my transcript right beside all of my physics
>> and engineering courses.
>
> And yet you can't figure out vector summation to save your life. 150
> IQ? LOL
>
>>> You're a mathematical moron improperly using a kooky sinewave
>>> subtraction equation which gives you an improper result.
>
>> what if the result was to make you bleat for 3 months and counting?
>
> The result is Robert Michael Wolfe the Mathematical Moron,
> backpedaling from his fuckups such as:
>
> 1) You derived a higher RMS voltage than the peak voltage the RMS
> voltage was derived from.
>
> 2) You k'lamed a *doubling* of voltage as a resultant of all three
> phases of 3-phase AC, akin to shorting all three phases together.
>
> 3) You k'lamed a result of 0 volts when deriving the difference
> between any two phases of 3-phase AC.
>
> 4) You demonstrated your inability to grasp why two phases *summed*
> gave a sinewave of the same voltage but phase shifted 60 degrees from
> each of the tributary sinewaves, such that the resultant is 180
> degrees phase from the remaining third phase.
>
> 5) You demonstrated your inability to grasp why all three phases of
> 3-phase AC *summed* together gives a result of 0 volts.
>
> 6) You k'lamed you were feeding 240 volts to the *primary* of a
> *substation* transformer, deriving 120 volts from the *primary* side,
> then feeding that 240 volts to a 120/208 volt electrical feed... you
> even went so far as to justify it with your kooky math, showing you
> were deriving 208 volts from 240 volts. Then you backpedaled and
> k'lamed you were instead feeding the primary with a voltage of "12
> kVA" (DildoRider's blather), proving you don't know the difference
> between voltage and apparent power.
>
> And you still don't know what a gable is. 150 IQ? LOL
>
>> :)
>
> Moronic tard-grin noted, DildoRider. LOL
>
>>> SPNAK!
>>>
>>> You spent that time sucking dicks in a back alley, apparently. LOL
>
>> your daydream fantasies are noted.
>
> Your reality is noted. LOL
>
>>> Bwahahahaaa! Now calculate the resultant of that resultant as the
>>> first tributary and the remaining third phase as the second tributary,
>>> DildoRider. Go on, *prove* yourself a mathematical moron.
>>>
>>> Mathematical Moron. LOL
>>>
>>> Wrong. The correct Euler sinewave summation equation has been used by
>>> scientists and engineers since 1748, whereas your kooky sinewave
>>> subtraction equation has only been in use for three months by only one
>>> thoroughly confused kooktard. LOL
>>>
>>> You mean the Euler sinewave summation equation, in use by scientists
>>> and engineers since 1748? You yet again admit you're too stupid to
>>> Google for it, and far too stupid to ever properly use it, despite
>>> having been *given* the equation. Twice. LOL
>>>
>>> <https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=Euler+sinewave+summation+equation>
>
>> is that how *you* found out about it?  LOL
>
> Translation:
> "I still can't find it. I'm Robert Michael Wolfe the Mathematical
> Moron. You'll have to give me more clues than that to find that
> well-known and widely-used equation that's been around 260+ years.
> Remember, I'm retarded. Not 150 IQ." LOL
>
>>> LOL!
>>>
>>> Already demonstrated, DildoRider. The 170 volt peak L-N, the 120 volt
>>> RMS L-N which acted as tributary for the 208 volt RMS L-L, properly
>>> graphed with the correct phase shift and amplitude. You can't
>>> demonstrate that, because you're Robert Michael Wolfe the Mathematical
>>> Moron. LOL
>>>
>>> Both. 50 IQ? LOL
>
> Fag. LOL
> Idiot. LOL
> Moron. LOL
> Tranny. LOL
> Libtard. LOL
> Crackhead. LOL
> GableTard. LOL
> DildoRider. LOL
> Bad Musician. LOL
> Stick Figure. LOL
> Terrible Liar. LOL
> Obsessed Retard. LOL
> Sinewave Spammer. LOL
> Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
> Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
> Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
> Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
> Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
> Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
> Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In Usenet History. LOL
>


-- 
"sines, sines, everywhere there's sines
blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind"
http://imgur.com/a/yMFsu

-

FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID:  
<3dcad3dd0a0d39727506717506883c26@dizum.com>

">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics
>> equations unlike fakey the supposed know-it-all:
>>  phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x)
>> phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi)
>>  voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in time:
>> 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) = 240*sin(2*pi*60*x)

Wrong, as has already been proven. What does it say below, you fecking  
*moron*?

"The _sum_ E(θ) ≡ E(a) + E(b) can be written thusly:""

it says that you don't even know how to correctly apply mathematics to  
real-world AC electricity, snickerTurds.  it says that you're in denial  
about the inversion of your AC legs.

http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-10/single-phase-power-systems/
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/02170.png
"To mathematically calculate voltage between “hot” wires, we must subtract  
voltages, because their polarity marks show them to be opposed to each  
other:"
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/12112.png

http://www.samlexamerica.com/support/documents/WhitePaper-120240VACSingleSplitPhaseandMultiWireBranchCircuits.pdf

on page 2:

** NOTE: The phase of Hot Leg 2 (Phase B) is in the
  opposite direction - i.e., 180° apart from the phase
  of Hot Leg L1 (Phase A)

*COUGH*
SPNAK!!

-

i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in ASCII  
art if you ask nicely.</GROUCHO MARX>
see: Message-ID: <4ba4a50aaaebc7fb8a348293c5cf9f13@dizum.com>

-

snickerTurds can't seem to refute the following:

- begin snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --
/*
HOW TO RUN: download arbitrary precision libraries from:

http://www.hvks.com/Numerical/arbitrary_precision.html

place those files in a directory and save this file as  
snickerSinewaveStew.cpp inside that same directory.

compiles with:

gcc -Wall -I. precisioncore.cpp snickerSinewaveStew.cpp -lstdc++

run with:

./a.out

enjoy the LULZ ;)

*/
#include <fprecision.h>
#include <iostream.h>

using namespace std;

int main(){

   //float_precision MIN=float_precision(0);
   //float_precision MAX=float_precision(0);

   float_precision STEP=float_precision(.0001);
   float_precision t=float_precision(0);    // time variable
   float_precision sum=float_precision(0);  // sum of SnickerTurd's  
ridiculous sinewave mess
   float_precision snickerPrediction=float_precision(2550.25);  //  
snickerTurd's erroneous k0oK-k'lame Sum
   float_precision PI;
   PI =_float_table(_PI,25);

   // this while loop will run forever, but snickers doesn't understand why
   while(sum < snickerPrediction){

     // fakey's Sinewave Stew(TM) see: MID:  
<db672705e57e4932eba3632562e0a941@dizum.com>
     sum = (float_precision(150) * float_precision(  
sin(float_precision(120)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +  
(float_precision(20.25) * float_precision(  
sin(float_precision(33)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +  
(float_precision(1400)* float_precision(  
sin(float_precision(150)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +(float_precision(20)*  
float_precision(sin(float_precision(5013)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +  
(float_precision(600)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(13)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)))  
+  
(float_precision(360)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(1209)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)));

     // perhaps show a few values larger than +2300 to educate teh  
snickerTurds
     if(sum>float_precision(2300)){
       cout << "t=" << t << " sum=" << sum << std::endl;
     }
     t = t+STEP;
   }
/*

Message-ID: <c8523e6d9c31e3282bbe581fa525a2a8@dizum.com>
"Oh, yeah... it's 2550.25 volts... so why does your graph not even
reach 2500 volts, given that eventually all the sinewaves will
constructively interfere (ie: *add* to each other) to *sum* to 2550.25
volts?"

Fakey, it doesn't reach 2500 volts because the summation of your sinewaves  
never reaches that.  They never reach their max values at the same time.   
That's how stupid you are.

Message-ID: <731d08dcc702b9a8a13077ffc201e91f@dizum.com>
"I most certainly *did* prove otherwise. It can't even arrive at the
correct sinewave summation voltage of 2550.25 volts"

Fakey, you only *proved* that you are too inept to graph the equations and  
notice a few things about the interactions of their frequencies when  
summed.

the next line of code is never executed, but snickers DEFINITELY can't  
figure out why it isn't and instead has a bunch of lame excuses while  
still having not produced a value for t where the sum=2550.25, as he has  
k0okily proklamed in many usenet messages that are archived FOREVER.

*/
   cout << "snickerTurds was right! the sum is " << sum << " at time t=" <<  
t <<endl;
}
- end snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --

-

Fakey irrationally demands a theme song to foam to:
"all I really want your pathetic pwned ass to do is write me a classic  
rock song as tribute to your Usenet Lord and Master..."  
<f4f9193fa7d28b760a9de681e61427e7@dizum.com>

-

Somewhere Abouts Round Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:25:03 -0500, Friendly  
Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

<snicker>

Fag. LOL
Idiot. LOL
Moron. LOL
Tranny. LOL
Libtard. LOL
Crackhead. LOL
GableTard. LOL
DildoRider. LOL
Bad Musician. LOL
Stick Figure. LOL
Terrible Liar. LOL
Sinewave Spammer. LOL
Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL

<the band strikes up a rousing version of "on top of old smokey">

on top of old snick-ers, all covered with Fag. LOL
is where my usenet lord and mas-ter
can go straight to hell*

*hell doesn't exist.  hope everybody is having a productive evening.

-

http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg

http://cafepress.com/kooktown

http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg

-

If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers  
containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to  
yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints  
to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful  
information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public.  :)

if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you  
downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try:  
http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2

-

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop
The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as  
it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects  
or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it  
presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written,  
Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework  
before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason  
many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating  
opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd

-

Coming soon!  To a newsgroup near you!:

$ perl fakeyBot.pl
FakeyBot>       I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you,  
look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassing  
bile from behind an anonymous dizum account?  <snicker>
You>    Robert Michael Wolfe
FakeyBot>       Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-toed  
boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks,  
Robert. <snicker>
Robert> you talk about cocks a lot.
FakeyBot>       Oh, I talk about sex a lot?
Robert> gay sex, mostly...
FakeyBot>       Fag!

(just as useful as the original!)

-

snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n  
friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message  
<b5e7da79a455d0c9227b1b50e25e7ea1@dizum.com>:
"That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the
largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to
the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users were  
using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then we  
figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers  
while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using  
process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden  
service. It's not rocket science.

_The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum how  
I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can  
get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my  
distinct impression was that the "anonymity
research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to
trade CP._  (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a  
kiddie pr0n network.)

That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation
Onymous was just icing on the cake."

-

Golden Killfile, June 2005
KOTM, November 2006
Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007
Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006
Busted Urinal Award, April 2007
Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008
Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007
AUK Mascot, September 2007
Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2016

 

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: does anybody remember Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-17 17:16 +0100
  Re: does anybody remember "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-17 13:32 -0400
    Re: does anybody remember Dewydd Hrodland <dewdhr@wisecommodities.org> - 2016-03-17 18:08 +0000
    Re: does anybody remember Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-18 06:19 +0100
      Re: does anybody remember "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-18 01:32 -0400
        Re: does anybody remember Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-18 17:24 +0100
  Re: does anybody remember Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-18 04:43 +0800
    Re: does anybody remember "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-18 00:35 -0400
    Re: does anybody remember Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-18 05:39 +0100
      Re: does anybody remember Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-19 01:13 +0800
        Re: does anybody remember Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-19 05:36 +0100
          Re: does anybody remember Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-19 17:31 +0800
            Re: does anybody remember Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-19 17:59 +0100
              Re: does anybody remember Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-20 00:33 -0600
              Re: does anybody remember Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-21 02:50 +0800
                Re: does anybody remember Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-20 11:59 -0700
                Re: does anybody remember snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-20 20:29 +0000
                Re: does anybody remember Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-20 13:45 -0700
                Re: does anybody remember vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-03-21 17:43 +0000
                Re: does anybody remember Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-20 21:35 +0100
            Re: does anybody remember Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-19 11:33 -0700

csiph-web