Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.usenet.kooks > #653096
| Newsgroups | alt.usenet.kooks |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: does anybody remember |
| References | (2 earlier) <op.yec4wnqltm21m2@benson.localhost> <1mk7k9t.18zzzpbvojgtpN%snipeco.2@gmail.com> <9f3d33fc4b52b05aee9f87981b37d46d@dizum.com> <op.yefm0sv8tm21m2@benson.localhost> <c7ab5b1bfea0324ab3613f319485445c@dizum.com> |
| Date | 2016-03-17 02:33 -0400 |
| From | "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> |
| Organization | AUKTard Polizia |
| Message-ID | <op.yeghuppntm21m2@benson.localhost> (permalink) |
On Thu, 17 Mar 2016 00:29:35 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>
> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
> DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey),
> socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in
> <news:op.yefm0sv8tm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first
> into the wood chipper again:
>
>> On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 13:06:25 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood
>> Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
>
>>> Tr!pe the Hypoxic ChickenFucker (aka g8dgc, aka Steve Hall), in
>>> <news:1mk7k9t.18zzzpbvojgtpN%snipeco.2@gmail.com> squawked as he
>>> pulled it to poultry porn:
>
>>>> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
>>>> DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey),
>>>> socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1 drooled:
>
>>>>> i remember learning to subtract potentials in order to get a voltage
>>>>> potential result.
>
>>> Vector summation of AC is *still* kicking your retarded ass,
>>> DildoRider? 150 IQ? LOL
>>>
>>> You still haven't figured out how to calculate the combined slope of
>>> two lines of different slope, huh. Here, give this a try... a line of
>>> 60 degrees, and a line of -60 degrees.
>>>
>>> Now, according to your kooky subtraction equation, you'll get:
>>> 60 - (-60) = 120 degrees
>>> (-60) - 60 = -120 degrees = 240 degrees
>>>
>>> According to DildoRider, the *direction* and *slope* of a vector can
>>> change merely by changing its position in his kooky equation.
>>>
>>> Now, I'm sure you'll try to weasel, so let's do it again:
>>> 60 - (-60) = 60 - 300 = -240 = 120 degrees
>>> (-60) - 60 = 300 - 60 = 240 degrees
>>>
>>> According to DildoRider, the *direction* and *slope* of a vector can
>>> change merely by changing its position in his kooky equation.
>>>
>>> And _both_ of the results from your kooky equation are *wrong*. LOL
>>>
>>> In actuality, the correct answer is:
>>> 60 + (-60) = 0 degrees
>>> (-60) + 60 = 0 degrees
>
>>> From this simple demonstration, one can see that
>>> DildoRider is a mathematical moron. LOL
>>>
>>> SPNAK!
>
> <crickets> LOL!
>
>>>>> that was also some time ago.
>
>>>> Hence the term "Potential Difference".
>>>> I wonder what Snickerturd knows about "Back EMF".
>
>>> Yes, for DC. For 3-phase AC with a phase difference between two legs,
>>> one cannot use subtraction of the two waveforms,
>
>> you might want to, as it will give you the correct answer.
>
> Here's what DildoRider considers "correct answers":
>
> 1) You derived a higher RMS voltage than the peak voltage the RMS
> voltage was derived from.
>
> 2) You k'lamed a *doubling* of voltage as a result of all three phases
> of 3-phase AC, akin to shorting all three phases together.
>
> 3) You k'lamed a result of 0 volts when deriving the difference
> between any two phases of 3-phase AC.
>
> 4) You demonstrated your inability to grasp why two phases *summed*
> gave a sinewave of the same voltage but phase shifted 60 degrees from
> each of the tributary sinewaves, such that the resultant is 180
> degrees phase from the remaining third phase.
>
> 5) You demonstrated your inability to grasp why all three phases of
> 3-phase AC *summed* together gives a result of 0 volts.
>
> 6) You k'lamed you were feeding 240 volts to the *primary* of a
> *substation* transformer, deriving 120 volts from the *primary* side,
> then feeding that 240 volts to a 120/208 volt electrical feed... you
> even went so far as to justify it with your kooky math, showing you
> were deriving 208 volts from 240 volts. Then you backpedaled and
> k'lamed you were instead feeding the primary with a voltage of "12
> kVA" (DildoRider's blather), proving you don't know the difference
> between voltage and apparent power.
>
> And you still don't know what a gable is. 150 IQ? LOL
>
>>> as DildoRider showed it leads to 0 volts,
MID?
>>> rather than a waveform
>>> that is the same amplitude as the tributaries but phase-shifted 60
>>> degrees,
>
>> wrong, cluetard.
>
> Awww, look at DildoRider backpedal away from his fuckup. LOL
>
> Message-ID: <6ee0e01f28cc48d89d70260de47457b4@dizum.com>
> ====================================================
>>> As a result of your being too stupid to figure out vector summation,
>>> you k'lamed that adding two phases of 3-phase AC resulted in 0 volts.
>>> LOL!
>
>> adding it sure does equal a big fat zero, just like adding the functions
>> representing opposite polarity legs of 120/240 service.
>
> Bwahahahaaa! Mathematical Moron strikes again.
> ====================================================
>
> Remember, DildoRider? Even LunkHead explained it to you, whereupon you
> embarked upon the fastest backpedal ever recorded in Usenet history...
> you're still backpedaling now. LOL
>
> So whereas you're not getting correct results whether you use plus
> signs or minus signs in your kooky equation, I've plotted 170 volt
> peak L-N voltage, derived 120 volt RMS
no you didn't. you posted the wrong fucking thing and proved you don't
understand what RMS is.
> L-N from that, then derived 208
> volt RMS L-L from that, all with the correct phase shift. That's
> something you find yourself utterly unable to do, because you're a
> mathematical moron.
with what equation?
>
> SPNAK!
>
> Then you bleated that you couldn't understand why you were getting a
> resultant of the same amplitude, but phase-shifted 60 degrees in
> between each tributary and 180 degrees from the third phase:
>
> DildoRider blathered:
> Message-ID: <87ebab570e8ead5f3b1bd9fcd93c2a77@dizum.com>
> ====================================================
>> so why how come phase A minus phase B produces a graph
>> of the proper 208V 60Hz sine wave and summation produces
>> a nonsensical sum that is the inverse of phase C
>
> Because you're a mathematical moron using the wrong equation,
> DildoRider.
> ====================================================
>
> DildoRider blathered again:
> Message-ID: <87ebab570e8ead5f3b1bd9fcd93c2a77@dizum.com>
> ====================================================
> how come when i add two 120 degree phase-separated 60Hz 120V sine
> waves i just get another 60Hz 120V sine wave:
>
> http://i.imgur.com/nO3iCEd.png
yep. wrong.
>
> ....but if I subtract them i get an expected correct 208V 60Hz sine
> wave, fakey?
>
> http://i.imgur.com/OPEeEJJ.png
> ====================================================
now it's correct.
clearly if it were incorrect you'd have said so here.
>
> Then you launched into your bleating about your disbelief that the
> resultant of all three phases of 3-phase AC resulted in 0 volts,
i wasn't in disbelief.
> making a k'lame that it instead *doubled* the voltage... because you
> are, after all, Robert Michael Wolfe the Mathematical Moron. LOL
how can something double to zero? LOL
> And now you're backpedaling even faster, denying that you were ever so
> stoooopid as to have fucked up that badly. For the rest of us, we
> expected it... you are, after all, Robert Michael Wolfe the
> Mathematical Moron. LOL
>
> SPNAK!
>
>> http://i.imgur.com/ILFlzNw.png
>
> Translation:
> "Damn it! FNVWe is right, I'm a mathematical moron. <backpedal>
> <backpedal> <backpedal> <backpedal>"
>
> <snicker>
>
>>> equally offset between the two tributaries and 180 degrees
>>> phase from the remaining third phase.
>
>> which is what i plotted.
>
> Sane person:
> When you find yourself stuck in a hole, stop digging.
http://i.imgur.com/OPEeEJJ.png
>
> DildoRider:
> When trapped in a lie hole, don't stop digging... lie *harder*.
why does phase A minus phase B of a 3-phase installation produce the
correct resultant waveform?
http://i.imgur.com/OPEeEJJ.png
(FREE KLOO: saying: "it doesn't" doesn't prove anything)
all you have to do is show me a single instance of someone graphing the
resultant sine waves using euler summation, you don't even have to do it
(since we know you can't).
why is that so hard for you to figure out, k0oky?
>
> LOL
nervous laughter noted.
>
>> note that the voltage "magically" produces the correct summation to 208
>> volts.
>
> Bwahahahaaaaa! And even after he's had clue forcefully imparted to his
> lumpy skull, DildoRider doesn't get it.
why do my calculations automatically take care of the fact that the two
120 degree phase shifted 120V@60Hz waves can only produce 208V peak?
what's going on there, k0oky?
why did my calculations work correctly for not only split-phase and
3-phase but ALSO your mishmosh of 6 random sinewaves that you
embarrassingly proclaimed would eventually sum to 2550.25? (of course you
were wrong. you used YOUR broken method of summing sine waves which you
are screaming at us "IT'S CORRECT!!! IT'S CORRECT!!!! 2550.25!!!!" for 3
months now)
> The resultant of two phases of 3-phase AC must only be a sinewave of
> same frequency and amplitude as the two tributaries, phase-shifted to
> be 60 degrees off from and in between the two tributaries and 180
> degrees from the remaining third leg.
so why don't you graph that and actually prove your k'lame instead of
k0okily proclaiming it and showing no ability to understand what you've
just written?
PS: you're wrong. even the phasor math that your (once thought to be)
idiot-proof "vector sums" are derived from prove you wrong about your "180
degrees from the third leg" stab in the dark.
try again.
> If you're getting any other
> result, your kooky equation is *wrong*, DildoRider.
and yet, somehow, the results i'm getting are correct.
and they agree with the known phasor math.
and they make you look like a complete idiot.
1) voltages between conductors are measured using subtraction.
2) graphing the phase-shifted sine waves and the resultant voltage
differences over time using mathematics produce correctly phased resultant
sine waves or else mathematics is broken.
3) mathematics isn't broken.
4) you have been unable in 3 months to prove me incorrect, whereas you are
proven incorrect by multiple people every time you utter some nonsense
about things you have no experience with outside of google-diving and
maybe a high-school textbook years ago.
>
> SPNAK!
>
>> fakey, why does my subtraction equation give the correct answer?
>
> It doesn't. You're just a mathematical moron. LOL
it does.
http://i.imgur.com/4itzDIY.png
and you're saying it isn't correct for 3 months because you're just a
mathematical moron.
>
>> here's the sum:
>>
>> http://i.imgur.com/gfm2vfV.png
>>
>> it appears exactly wrong as your graph would have looked if you weren't
>> using the same subtraction equations to calculate your "euler summation"
>> sham.
>
> Bwahahahaaa! DildoRider take his kooky sinewave subtraction equation,
> changes the minus signs to plus signs, stupidly believes he's now
> using the proper Euler sinewave summation equation, and blathers out
> more mathematical moronity.
plot your equation.
> You'll never grasp vector summation of sinusoids, DildoRider. You're
> simply too stupid to do so.
...except i learned phasors very early on in my engineering coursework.
> SPNAK!
>
>>> According to you, Tr!pey old bird buggerer, the "Potential Difference"
>>> between two 120 volt RMS phases would be 240 volts.
>
>> only if the plots of their representative sine waves are 180 degrees out
>> of phase, but you said 120 degrees, so when you subtract the sine waves
>> there is not a point where they both peak at 120v simultaneously.
>
> And yet, even knowing that, you've blathered that the voltage
> difference between two phases of a 3-phase system is 0 volts.
no it isn't. it's clearly 208v.
see:
http://i.imgur.com/4itzDIY.png
> Because
> you're Robert Michael Wolfe the Mathematical Moron.
i wonder how many times you'll get away with saying that before someone
hammers it through your thick neanderthal skull that i've been posting
correct math this whole time.
you only posted a graph which you're afraid to show us the equations that
you plotted.
what was the link to that, again?
>
> SPNAK!
>
>>> Do get right on
>>> providing that kooky math to prove your contention, or admit you are
>>> wrong.
>
>> you should get right on sharing the equations that you graphed that you
>> klame are correct while howling about the same exact equations being
>> wrong
>> when anybody but you graphs them.
>
> You mean the Euler sinewave summation equation, in use by scientists
> and engineers since 1748, DildoRider? Are you admitting you're too
> stupid to Google for it, or too stupid to understand how to use it?
you're too stupid to demonstrate it.
>
> Both? 150 IQ? LOL
>
> Fag. LOL
> Idiot. LOL
> Moron. LOL
> Tranny. LOL
> Libtard. LOL
> Crackhead. LOL
> GableTard. LOL
> DildoRider. LOL
> Bad Musician. LOL
> Stick Figure. LOL
> Terrible Liar. LOL
> Obsessed Retard. LOL
> Sinewave Spammer. LOL
> Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
> Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
> Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
> Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
> Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
> Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
> Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In Usenet History. LOL
>
--
"sines, sines, everywhere there's sines
blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind"
http://imgur.com/a/yMFsu
-
FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID:
<3dcad3dd0a0d39727506717506883c26@dizum.com>
">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics
>> equations unlike fakey the supposed know-it-all:
>> phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x)
>> phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi)
>> voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in time:
>> 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) = 240*sin(2*pi*60*x)
Wrong, as has already been proven. What does it say below, you fecking
*moron*?
"The _sum_ E(θ) ≡ E(a) + E(b) can be written thusly:""
it says that you don't even know how to correctly apply mathematics to
real-world AC electricity, snickerTurds. it says that you're in denial
about the inversion of your AC legs.
http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-10/single-phase-power-systems/
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/02170.png
"To mathematically calculate voltage between “hot” wires, we must subtract
voltages, because their polarity marks show them to be opposed to each
other:"
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/12112.png
http://www.samlexamerica.com/support/documents/WhitePaper-120240VACSingleSplitPhaseandMultiWireBranchCircuits.pdf
on page 2:
** NOTE: The phase of Hot Leg 2 (Phase B) is in the
opposite direction - i.e., 180° apart from the phase
of Hot Leg L1 (Phase A)
*COUGH*
SPNAK!!
-
i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in ASCII
art if you ask nicely.</GROUCHO MARX>
see: Message-ID: <4ba4a50aaaebc7fb8a348293c5cf9f13@dizum.com>
-
snickerTurds can't seem to refute the following:
- begin snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --
/*
HOW TO RUN: download arbitrary precision libraries from:
http://www.hvks.com/Numerical/arbitrary_precision.html
place those files in a directory and save this file as
snickerSinewaveStew.cpp inside that same directory.
compiles with:
gcc -Wall -I. precisioncore.cpp snickerSinewaveStew.cpp -lstdc++
run with:
./a.out
enjoy the LULZ ;)
*/
#include <fprecision.h>
#include <iostream.h>
using namespace std;
int main(){
//float_precision MIN=float_precision(0);
//float_precision MAX=float_precision(0);
float_precision STEP=float_precision(.0001);
float_precision t=float_precision(0); // time variable
float_precision sum=float_precision(0); // sum of SnickerTurd's
ridiculous sinewave mess
float_precision snickerPrediction=float_precision(2550.25); //
snickerTurd's erroneous k0oK-k'lame Sum
float_precision PI;
PI =_float_table(_PI,25);
// this while loop will run forever, but snickers doesn't understand why
while(sum < snickerPrediction){
// fakey's Sinewave Stew(TM) see: MID:
<db672705e57e4932eba3632562e0a941@dizum.com>
sum = (float_precision(150) * float_precision(
sin(float_precision(120)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(20.25) * float_precision(
sin(float_precision(33)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(1400)* float_precision(
sin(float_precision(150)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +(float_precision(20)*
float_precision(sin(float_precision(5013)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(600)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(13)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)))
+
(float_precision(360)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(1209)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)));
// perhaps show a few values larger than +2300 to educate teh
snickerTurds
if(sum>float_precision(2300)){
cout << "t=" << t << " sum=" << sum << std::endl;
}
t = t+STEP;
}
/*
Message-ID: <c8523e6d9c31e3282bbe581fa525a2a8@dizum.com>
"Oh, yeah... it's 2550.25 volts... so why does your graph not even
reach 2500 volts, given that eventually all the sinewaves will
constructively interfere (ie: *add* to each other) to *sum* to 2550.25
volts?"
Fakey, it doesn't reach 2500 volts because the summation of your sinewaves
never reaches that. They never reach their max values at the same time.
That's how stupid you are.
Message-ID: <731d08dcc702b9a8a13077ffc201e91f@dizum.com>
"I most certainly *did* prove otherwise. It can't even arrive at the
correct sinewave summation voltage of 2550.25 volts"
Fakey, you only *proved* that you are too inept to graph the equations and
notice a few things about the interactions of their frequencies when
summed.
the next line of code is never executed, but snickers DEFINITELY can't
figure out why it isn't and instead has a bunch of lame excuses while
still having not produced a value for t where the sum=2550.25, as he has
k0okily proklamed in many usenet messages that are archived FOREVER.
*/
cout << "snickerTurds was right! the sum is " << sum << " at time t=" <<
t <<endl;
}
- end snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --
-
Fakey irrationally demands a theme song to foam to:
"all I really want your pathetic pwned ass to do is write me a classic
rock song as tribute to your Usenet Lord and Master..."
<f4f9193fa7d28b760a9de681e61427e7@dizum.com>
-
Somewhere Abouts Round Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:25:03 -0500, Friendly
Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
<snicker>
Fag. LOL
Idiot. LOL
Moron. LOL
Tranny. LOL
Libtard. LOL
Crackhead. LOL
GableTard. LOL
DildoRider. LOL
Bad Musician. LOL
Stick Figure. LOL
Terrible Liar. LOL
Sinewave Spammer. LOL
Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL
<the band strikes up a rousing version of "on top of old smokey">
on top of old snick-ers, all covered with Fag. LOL
is where my usenet lord and mas-ter
can go straight to hell*
*hell doesn't exist. hope everybody is having a productive evening.
-
http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg
http://cafepress.com/kooktown
http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg
-
If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers
containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to
yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints
to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful
information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public. :)
if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you
downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try:
http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2
-
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop
The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as
it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects
or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it
presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written,
Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework
before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason
many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating
opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd
-
Coming soon! To a newsgroup near you!:
$ perl fakeyBot.pl
FakeyBot> I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you,
look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassing
bile from behind an anonymous dizum account? <snicker>
You> Robert Michael Wolfe
FakeyBot> Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-toed
boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks,
Robert. <snicker>
Robert> you talk about cocks a lot.
FakeyBot> Oh, I talk about sex a lot?
Robert> gay sex, mostly...
FakeyBot> Fag!
(just as useful as the original!)
-
snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n
friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message
<b5e7da79a455d0c9227b1b50e25e7ea1@dizum.com>:
"That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the
largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to
the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users were
using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then we
figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers
while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using
process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden
service. It's not rocket science.
_The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum how
I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can
get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my
distinct impression was that the "anonymity
research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to
trade CP._ (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a
kiddie pr0n network.)
That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation
Onymous was just icing on the cake."
-
Golden Killfile, June 2005
KOTM, November 2006
Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007
Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006
Busted Urinal Award, April 2007
Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008
Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007
AUK Mascot, September 2007
Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2016
Back to alt.usenet.kooks | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
does anybody remember "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-15 05:27 -0400
Re: does anybody remember Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-15 03:39 -0700
Re: does anybody remember "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-15 07:01 -0400
Re: does anybody remember snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe aka g8dgc) - 2016-03-16 14:31 +0000
Re: does anybody remember Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-16 18:06 +0100
Re: does anybody remember "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-16 15:14 -0400
Re: does anybody remember Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-17 04:52 +0100
Re: does anybody remember "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-17 01:09 -0400
Re: does anybody remember Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-17 17:39 +0100
Re: does anybody remember "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-17 13:33 -0400
Re: does anybody remember "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-16 15:27 -0400
Re: does anybody remember Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-17 05:29 +0100
Re: does anybody remember "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-17 02:33 -0400
Re: does anybody remember Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-17 17:16 +0100
Re: does anybody remember "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-17 13:32 -0400
Re: does anybody remember Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-18 06:19 +0100
Re: does anybody remember "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-18 01:32 -0400
Re: does anybody remember Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-18 17:24 +0100
Re: does anybody remember Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-18 04:43 +0800
Re: does anybody remember "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-18 00:35 -0400
Re: does anybody remember Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-18 05:39 +0100
Re: does anybody remember binky feel good <julianfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 22:01 -0700
Re: does anybody remember Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-18 17:19 +0100
Re: does anybody remember Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-19 01:13 +0800
Re: does anybody remember Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-19 05:36 +0100
Re: does anybody remember Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-19 17:31 +0800
Re: does anybody remember Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-19 17:59 +0100
Re: does anybody remember Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-20 00:33 -0600
Re: does anybody remember Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-21 02:50 +0800
Re: does anybody remember Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-20 11:59 -0700
Re: does anybody remember snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-20 20:29 +0000
Re: does anybody remember Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-20 13:45 -0700
Re: does anybody remember vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-03-21 17:43 +0000
Re: does anybody remember Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-20 21:35 +0100
Re: does anybody remember Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-19 11:33 -0700
Re: does anybody remember binky feel good <waldbyfjulian@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-16 21:08 -0700
Re: does anybody remember "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-17 01:15 -0400
Re: does anybody remember Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-17 08:12 +0100
Re: does anybody remember Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-18 05:02 +0800
Re: does anybody remember Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-17 14:24 -0700
Re: does anybody remember snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-17 22:48 +0000
Re: does anybody remember "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 15:50 -0700
Re: does anybody remember snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-17 22:55 +0000
Re: does anybody remember "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 15:58 -0700
Re: does anybody remember snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-18 08:12 +0000
Re: does anybody remember Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-17 16:22 -0700
Re: does anybody remember "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 16:36 -0700
Re: does anybody remember Catalina <Catalina@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-17 19:10 -0500
Re: does anybody remember "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 17:48 -0700
Re: does anybody remember Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-17 18:48 -0700
Re: does anybody remember Catalina <Catalina@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-17 21:28 -0500
Re: does anybody remember Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-18 06:14 +0100
Re: does anybody remember Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-18 06:04 +0100
Re: does anybody remember Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-19 01:13 +0800
Re: does anybody remember Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-19 05:09 +0100
Re: does anybody remember Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-19 17:34 +0800
Re: does anybody remember Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-19 18:39 +0100
csiph-web