Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #563403

Re: does anybody remember

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey),
socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in
<news:op.yeh9obbftm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first
into the wood chipper again:

> On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 01:19:41 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood
> Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

>> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
>> DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey),
>> socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in
>> <news:op.yehcb1cotm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first
>> into the wood chipper again:

>>> On Thu, 17 Mar 2016 12:16:22 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood
>>> Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

>>>> Time to Wee hours bleating again, Spankard? LOL

>>>>> On Thu, 17 Mar 2016 00:29:35 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote  
>>>>> Wrangler

>>>> <crickets> LOL!
>>>> <crickets> LOL!
>>>>
>>>> See 9 lines below, ClueTard. LOL
>>>>
>>>> Wrong. I posted a completely correct 170 volt peak L-N sinusoid, from
>>>> which I derived the completely correct 120 volt RMS L-N sinusoid, from
>>>> which I derived the completely correct 208 volt RMS L-L sinusoid, with
>>>> proper phase shift. You're just mad because you're too stupid to ever
>>>> do that, DildoRider. LOL
>>>>
>>>> Certainly not with your kooky sinewave subtraction equation. Remember,
>>>> you're the moron who has claimed:
>>>>
>>>> 1) You derived a higher RMS voltage than the peak voltage the RMS
>>>> voltage was derived from.
>>>>
>>>> 2) You k'lamed a *doubling* of voltage as a resultant of all three
>>>> phases of 3-phase AC, akin to shorting all three phases together.
>>>>
>>>> 3) You k'lamed a result of 0 volts as a resultant of two phases of
>>>> 3-phase AC.
>>>>
>>>> 4) You demonstrated your inability to grasp why two phases *summed*
>>>> gave a sinewave of the same voltage but phase shifted 60 degrees from
>>>> each of the tributary sinewaves, such that the resultant is 180
>>>> degrees phase from the remaining third phase.
>>>>
>>>> 5) You demonstrated your inability to grasp why all three phases of
>>>> 3-phase AC *summed* together gives a result of 0 volts.
>>>>
>>>> 6) You k'lamed you were feeding 240 volts to the *primary* of a
>>>> *substation* transformer, deriving 120 volts from the *primary* side,
>>>> then feeding that 240 volts to a 120/208 volt electrical feed... you
>>>> even went so far as to justify it with your kooky math, showing you
>>>> were deriving 208 volts from 240 volts. Then you backpedaled and
>>>> k'lamed you were instead feeding the primary with a voltage of "12
>>>> kVA" (DildoRider's blather), proving you don't know the difference
>>>> between voltage and apparent power.
>>>>
>>>> And you still don't know what a gable is. 150 IQ? LOL
>>>>
>>>> SPNAK!
>>>>
>>>> No, you got the *correct* result in that graph, DildoRider. The first
>>>> time you've ever been right about anything. 150 IQ? LOL
>>>>
>>>> You moron, do you *still* not understand vector summation? Holy fuck,
>>>> how retarded are you?
>>>>
>>>> The resultant of two phases of 3-phase AC must only be a sinewave of
>>>> same frequency and amplitude as the two tributaries, phase-shifted to
>>>> be 60 degrees off from and in between the two tributaries and 180
>>>> degrees from the remaining third leg. If you're getting any other
>>>> result, your kooky equation is *wrong*, DildoRider.
>>>>
>>>> Backpedal harder, Lying Spankard. LOL
>>>>
>>>> Piling reading comprehension problems on top of backpedaling,
>>>> DildoRider? Why are you such a moron? LOL
>>>>
>>>> Bwahahaaa! You moron. Your kooky sinewave subtraction equation has
>>>> your brain so twisted in knots you're making a fool of yourself. LOL
>>>>
>>>> The resultant of two phases of 3-phase AC must only be a sinewave of
>>>> same frequency and amplitude as the two tributaries, phase-shifted to
>>>> be 60 degrees off from and in between the two tributaries and 180
>>>> degrees from the remaining third leg. If you're getting any other
>>>> result, your kooky equation is *wrong*, DildoRider.
>>>>
>>>> Translation:
>>>> "Please, oh please, oh please, FNVWe, let me in on that secret that
>>>> every scientist and engineer since 1748 has known and used. I'm far
>>>> too stoooopid to Google for it, and far too stoooopid to ever properly
>>>> use it, so please baby-step me through it using monosyllabic words."
>>>>
>>>> Moronism noted. 150 IQ? LOL
>>>>
>>>> It might have to do with the fact that you're a mathematical moron.
>>>> LOL
>>>>
>>>> The resultant of two phases of 3-phase AC must only be a sinewave of
>>>> same frequency and amplitude as the two tributaries, phase-shifted to
>>>> be 60 degrees off from and in between the two tributaries and 180
>>>> degrees from the remaining third leg. If you're getting any other
>>>> result, your kooky equation is *wrong*, DildoRider.
>>>>
>>>> Thus the resultant of the three phases of 3-phase AC must only be 0
>>>> volts, as you can easily ascertain with a simple Google search...
>>>> oh... wait... you're too stoooopid to use Google. LOL
>>>>
>>>> Your kooky equation *didn't* "work correctly", DildoRider. Try it
>>>> again, and this time, try not to make yourself look like a fucking
>>>> moron. LOL
>>>>
>>>> I did graph it, you moron. That you don't even know why that result
>>>> *must* be, otherwise your kooky equation is *wrong*, is part and
>>>> parcel of your retardation. LOL
>>>>
>>>> Bwahahaaa! DildoRider denies that the resultant of the three phases of
>>>> 3-phase AC is always 0, hence 3-phase AC represents a full circle
>>>> represented in sinusoid.
>>>>
>>>> Holy shit, DildoRider... if you get any dumber they're gonna have to
>>>> jump-start your brain. LOL
>>>>
>>>> No, they're not. You're just a mathematical moron. LOL
>>>>
>>>> No, they don't. You're just a mathematical moron. LOL
>>>>
>>>> No, they don't. You're just a mathematical moron. LOL
>>>>
>>>> For DC, Moron. For AC, superposition dictates that vector *summation*
>>>> must be used.
>>>>
>>>> Except your bad sinewaves are as fucked up as your kooky sinewave
>>>> subtraction equation, which is fucked up as your broken brain,
>>>> DildoRider. LOL
>>>>
>>>> Your math is horribly broken, DildoRider. That's *why* you're Robert
>>>> Michael Wolfe the Mathematical Moron. LOL
>>>>
>>>> Except a simple Google search will prove you wrong. You're simply too
>>>> stupid to do that Google search, so instead you spew Man-Goo,
>>>> Spaghetti Code and Bad Sinewaves. Because you're Robert Michael Wolfe
>>>> the Mathematical Moron. LOL
>>>>
>>>> Bwahahaaaa! So wrong that the word "wrong" is the wrong word to
>>>> describe how wrong it is, DildoRider. You can't even get the phase
>>>> shift *or* the resultant voltage correct. You moron. LOL
>>>>
>>>> Says the backpedaling bleatfarting bad sinewave-spamming mathematical
>>>> moron. LOL

>> And that's a big ol' whomping <crickets> SPNAK! on Robert Michael
>> Wolfe the Mathematical Moron. LOL

>>>> <http://i.imgur.com/t0sO6xh.png>

>>> BWAHAHAHAA!
>>>
>>> k0oky k'lames that a voltmeter between phase legs of 3-phase will  
>>> produce
>>> 170 volts!!

What's a "phase leg", DildoRider? Another of your kooky inventions
like your sinewave subtraction equation, the gables on *top* of your
roof or your clowncycles you have to pedal at 10,000 RPM to go 10 MPH?
LOL

>> Bwahahahaaa! DildoRider demonstrates that he *still* can't figure out
>> vector summation. He k'lames the resultant of 3-phases of 3-phase AC
>> *doubles* the voltage! He derives a higher RMS voltage than the peak
>> voltage it's derived from! He k'lames "kVA" denotes voltage! What a
>> moron! LOL

> http://i.imgur.com/xTldIjM.png

Bwahahahaaaa! DildoRider finally stumbles upon the correct result for
the second time, and he's *such* a fucking moron that not only does he
not understand *why* it's the correct result, he denies it's the
correct result! LOL!

Oh, you're *never* going to live this down, DildoRider. LOL!

Oh yeah, that's getting archived so you can't backpedal from your
stupidity, DildoRider. You are and you shall remain Robert Michael
Wolfe the Mathematical Mega-Moron for all time. LOL

<https://web.archive.org/web/20160318055836/http://imgur.com/xTldIjM>

>>>> Blue - Phase 1 (170 volts, 0 degrees), Tributary 1
>>>> Orange - Phase 2 (170 volts, 120 degrees), Tributary 2
>>>> Purple - Phase 3 (170 volts, 240 degrees)
>>>> Green - Resultant (170 volts, 60 degrees)
>>>> Red - Resultant (170 volts, 60 degrees)
>>>>
>>>> You'll note the red/green sinewave and the purple sinewave are 180
>>>> degrees out of phase, exactly as they should be. Thus the resultant of
>>>> the red/green sinewave and the purple sinewave will give a correct
>>>> result of 0.

>>> dude.  a voltmeter across 2 phases of 3-phase doesn't read 170 volts.   
>>> if it does, then it's probably because you installed your own service.  i
>>> hope you didn't charge yourself a lot for that.

>> Still having trouble grasping vector summation, are you, DildoRider?
>> Why are you such a fucking moron?

> i understand that you keep getting the wrong answers and pretending that  
> you aren't.

No, you're getting the wrong results with your kooky sinewave
subtraction equation and you're too fucking retarded to realize why.
150 IQ? LOL!

> http://i.imgur.com/xTldIjM.png

Your fuckup is noted and archived for all time, DildoRider. There's no
escaping your being a fucking moron now.

DildoRider copies his Usenet Lord and Master, gets the correct result,
but is so stoooopid he denies it's the correct result... expect more
bad sinewaves from the Mathematical Mega-Moron. LOL

<https://web.archive.org/web/20160318060618/http://i.imgur.com/xTldIjM.png>

<snicker>

>> What is the resultant of all 3 phases of 3-phase AC, DildoRider. Go
>> on, *prove* yourself a mathematical moron. Again. LOL

<crickets> LOL!

What's the matter, Mathematical Mega-Moron? You not quite ready to
prove you're the biggest fucking moron on the planet? LOL

Go on, use your kooky sinewave subtraction equation on that red/green
line and the purple line... it'll give you either -340 volts or 340
volts (dependent upon which position in your kooky equation you put
each tributary). Both results *wrong*.

The correct result is 0 volts, thus proving that your blather about
the resultant of the three phases of 3-phase AC being *double* the
amplitude of the tributaries is the mad blathering of Robert Michael
Wolfe the Mathematical Mega-Moron. LOL

SPNAK!

>>> the number you are looking for is sqrt(3)*170, g0ober.
>>>
>>> i guess your euler equations are horribly broken after all.
>>>
>>> ho-hum.

>> Except they're not. The Euler sinewave summation equation has been in
>> use by scientists and engineers since 1748, whereas your kooky
>> sinewave subtraction equation has been in use for 3 months by only one
>> thoroughly confused kooktard. LOL

<crickets> LOL!

>>>> You'll further note that both the red and green sinewaves are at the
>>>> same phase angle despite having the two phases interchanged in the
>>>> equation (green - 0 degrees first, 120 degrees second; red - 120
>>>> degrees first, 0 degrees second). Whereas in your kooky equation
>>>> moving the tributaries in your equation gives different results.
>>>>
>>>> Why are you too stoooopid to find that Euler sinewave summation
>>>> equation, DildoRider?

>>> because i don't need it.  the correct math produces correct results,  
>>> much like correct phasor math does.
>>>
>>> http://i.imgur.com/4itzDIY.png
>>>
>>> notice how you're the one backpedaling, swapping summation for
>>> subtraction, and hiding equations, bleaty.

>> Awwww, look at the kooktard project. You haven't gotten one single
>> thing right *except* when you summed two sinewaves, you fecking nong.
>> It's been three long months that you've been demonstrating that you're
>> Robert Michael Wolfe the Mathematical Moron, and you don't seem to be
>> gaining clue... you're stupidity appears to be perpetual. LOL

<crickets> LOL!

>>>> Why are you far too stoooopid to figure out
>>>> vector summation, DildoRider?

>>> that's not what it says on my transcript right beside all of my physics
>>> and engineering courses.

>> And yet you can't figure out vector summation to save your life. 150
>> IQ? LOL

<crickets> LOL!

>>>> You're a mathematical moron improperly using a kooky sinewave
>>>> subtraction equation which gives you an improper result.

>>> what if the result was to make you bleat for 3 months and counting?

>> The result is Robert Michael Wolfe the Mathematical Moron,
>> backpedaling from his fuckups such as:
>>
>> 1) You derived a higher RMS voltage than the peak voltage the RMS
>> voltage was derived from.
>>
>> 2) You k'lamed a *doubling* of voltage as a resultant of all three
>> phases of 3-phase AC, akin to shorting all three phases together.
>>
>> 3) You k'lamed a result of 0 volts when deriving the difference
>> between any two phases of 3-phase AC.
>>
>> 4) You demonstrated your inability to grasp why two phases *summed*
>> gave a sinewave of the same voltage but phase shifted 60 degrees from
>> each of the tributary sinewaves, such that the resultant is 180
>> degrees phase from the remaining third phase.
>>
>> 5) You demonstrated your inability to grasp why all three phases of
>> 3-phase AC *summed* together gives a result of 0 volts.
>>
>> 6) You k'lamed you were feeding 240 volts to the *primary* of a
>> *substation* transformer, deriving 120 volts from the *primary* side,
>> then feeding that 240 volts to a 120/208 volt electrical feed... you
>> even went so far as to justify it with your kooky math, showing you
>> were deriving 208 volts from 240 volts. Then you backpedaled and
>> k'lamed you were instead feeding the primary with a voltage of "12
>> kVA" (DildoRider's blather), proving you don't know the difference
>> between voltage and apparent power.
>>
>> And you still don't know what a gable is. 150 IQ? LOL

<crickets>

No more backpedaling away from your stupidity, DildoRider. You will
have your face rubbed in your moronism for the remainder of your
Usenet existence... and given that you look like you've got full-blown
AIDS, that shouldn't be long.

<snicker>

Fag. LOL
Idiot. LOL
Moron. LOL
Tranny. LOL
Libtard. LOL
Crackhead. LOL
GableTard. LOL
DildoRider. LOL
Bad Musician. LOL
Stick Figure. LOL
Terrible Liar. LOL
Obsessed Retard. LOL
Sinewave Spammer. LOL
Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In Usenet History. LOL

-- 

Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
DildoRider, aka Teh Mop Jockey)
5907 Stanton Ave.
Pittsburgh, PA
(412) 853-6395
(412) 799-0532
(412) 665-8289
(412) 404-8757

DildoRider admits he's stoooopid:
MID: <c65504c436778934b3e8a0fb022b7618@dizum.com>
=================================================
>> it appears I've kicked your ass so hard it's
>> damaged your brain, DildoRider.

> then it appears that you like shooting fish in
> barrels, intellectually lazy fuckhead that you are.

Well, you've just admitted that intellectually kicking your ass is
akin to shooting fish in a barrel... IOW, you've admitted that you're
stoooopid. No un-ringing that bell.

<snicker>
=================================================

DildoRider admits he's "really stupid" (his words). LOL
MID: <8a9faed11123abfaa1257fb33fb0c082@dizum.com>
=================================================
> so what you're saying is that your targets for attack
> have to be really stupid or else you can't manage?
=================================================

DildoRider admits much more about himself:
MID: <36c6802852caf4f712515dedb738e450@dizum.com>
=================================================
"absolutely and completely retarded, insane, gay, ugly, smelly,
toothless, dirt-poor, incontinent and possibly homeless"
=================================================

This is a libtard's method of "winning", for fuck sake.

150 IQ? LOL

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: does anybody remember Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-17 17:16 +0100
  Re: does anybody remember "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-17 13:32 -0400
    Re: does anybody remember Dewydd Hrodland <dewdhr@wisecommodities.org> - 2016-03-17 18:08 +0000
    Re: does anybody remember Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-18 06:19 +0100
      Re: does anybody remember "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-18 01:32 -0400
        Re: does anybody remember Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-18 17:24 +0100
  Re: does anybody remember Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-18 04:43 +0800
    Re: does anybody remember "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-18 00:35 -0400
    Re: does anybody remember Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-18 05:39 +0100
      Re: does anybody remember Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-19 01:13 +0800
        Re: does anybody remember Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-19 05:36 +0100
          Re: does anybody remember Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-19 17:31 +0800
            Re: does anybody remember Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-19 17:59 +0100
              Re: does anybody remember Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-20 00:33 -0600
              Re: does anybody remember Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-21 02:50 +0800
                Re: does anybody remember Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-20 11:59 -0700
                Re: does anybody remember snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-20 20:29 +0000
                Re: does anybody remember Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-20 13:45 -0700
                Re: does anybody remember vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-03-21 17:43 +0000
                Re: does anybody remember Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-20 21:35 +0100
            Re: does anybody remember Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-19 11:33 -0700

csiph-web