Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.usenet.kooks > #653142
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| References | (2 earlier) <1mk7k9t.18zzzpbvojgtpN%snipeco.2@gmail.com> <9f3d33fc4b52b05aee9f87981b37d46d@dizum.com> <op.yefm0sv8tm21m2@benson.localhost> <c7ab5b1bfea0324ab3613f319485445c@dizum.com> <op.yeghuppntm21m2@benson.localhost> |
| Subject | Re: does anybody remember |
| Message-ID | <304797b9015bacaee9efa3d708751352@dizum.com> (permalink) |
| Date | 2016-03-17 17:16 +0100 |
| Newsgroups | alt.usenet.kooks, sci.physics |
| Organization | dizum.com - The Internet Problem Provider |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in <news:op.yeghuppntm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again on Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 02:33:51 -0400: Wee hours bleating again, Spankard? LOL > On Thu, 17 Mar 2016 00:29:35 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler > Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: >>>> Vector summation of AC is *still* kicking your retarded ass, >>>> DildoRider? 150 IQ? LOL >>>> >>>> You still haven't figured out how to calculate the combined slope of >>>> two lines of different slope, huh. Here, give this a try... a line of >>>> 60 degrees, and a line of -60 degrees. >>>> >>>> Now, according to your kooky subtraction equation, you'll get: >>>> 60 - (-60) = 120 degrees >>>> (-60) - 60 = -120 degrees = 240 degrees >>>> >>>> According to DildoRider, the *direction* and *slope* of a vector can >>>> change merely by changing its position in his kooky equation. >>>> >>>> Now, I'm sure you'll try to weasel, so let's do it again: >>>> 60 - (-60) = 60 - 300 = -240 = 120 degrees >>>> (-60) - 60 = 300 - 60 = 240 degrees >>>> >>>> According to DildoRider, the *direction* and *slope* of a vector can >>>> change merely by changing its position in his kooky equation. >>>> >>>> And _both_ of the results from your kooky equation are *wrong*. LOL >>>> >>>> In actuality, the correct answer is: >>>> 60 + (-60) = 0 degrees >>>> (-60) + 60 = 0 degrees >>>> >>>> From this simple demonstration, one can see that >>>> DildoRider is a mathematical moron. LOL >>>> >>>> SPNAK! <crickets> LOL! >>>> Yes, for DC. For 3-phase AC with a phase difference between two legs, >>>> one cannot use subtraction of the two waveforms, >>> you might want to, as it will give you the correct answer. >> Here's what DildoRider considers "correct answers": >> >> 1) You derived a higher RMS voltage than the peak voltage the RMS >> voltage was derived from. >> >> 2) You k'lamed a *doubling* of voltage as a result of all three phases >> of 3-phase AC, akin to shorting all three phases together. >> >> 3) You k'lamed a result of 0 volts when deriving the difference >> between any two phases of 3-phase AC. >> >> 4) You demonstrated your inability to grasp why two phases *summed* >> gave a sinewave of the same voltage but phase shifted 60 degrees from >> each of the tributary sinewaves, such that the resultant is 180 >> degrees phase from the remaining third phase. >> >> 5) You demonstrated your inability to grasp why all three phases of >> 3-phase AC *summed* together gives a result of 0 volts. >> >> 6) You k'lamed you were feeding 240 volts to the *primary* of a >> *substation* transformer, deriving 120 volts from the *primary* side, >> then feeding that 240 volts to a 120/208 volt electrical feed... you >> even went so far as to justify it with your kooky math, showing you >> were deriving 208 volts from 240 volts. Then you backpedaled and >> k'lamed you were instead feeding the primary with a voltage of "12 >> kVA" (DildoRider's blather), proving you don't know the difference >> between voltage and apparent power. >> >> And you still don't know what a gable is. 150 IQ? LOL <crickets> LOL! >>>> as DildoRider showed it leads to 0 volts, > MID? See 9 lines below, ClueTard. LOL >>>> rather than a waveform that is the same amplitude as the >>>> tributaries but phase-shifted 60 degrees, >>> wrong, cluetard. >> Awww, look at DildoRider backpedal away from his fuckup. LOL >> >> Message-ID: <6ee0e01f28cc48d89d70260de47457b4@dizum.com> >> ==================================================== >> >> As a result of your being too stupid to figure out vector summation, >> >> you k'lamed that adding two phases of 3-phase AC resulted in 0 volts. >> >> LOL! >> >> > adding it sure does equal a big fat zero, just like adding the functions >> > representing opposite polarity legs of 120/240 service. >> >> Bwahahahaaa! Mathematical Moron strikes again. >> ==================================================== >> >> Remember, DildoRider? Even LunkHead explained it to you, whereupon you >> embarked upon the fastest backpedal ever recorded in Usenet history... >> you're still backpedaling now. LOL >> >> So whereas you're not getting correct results whether you use plus >> signs or minus signs in your kooky equation, I've plotted 170 volt >> peak L-N voltage, derived 120 volt RMS > no you didn't. you posted the wrong fucking thing and proved you don't > understand what RMS is. Wrong. I posted a completely correct 170 volt peak L-N sinusoid, from which I derived the completely correct 120 volt RMS L-N sinusoid, from which I derived the completely correct 208 volt RMS L-L sinusoid, with proper phase shift. You're just mad because you're too stupid to ever do that, DildoRider. LOL >> L-N from that, then derived 208 >> volt RMS L-L from that, all with the correct phase shift. That's >> something you find yourself utterly unable to do, because you're a >> mathematical moron. > with what equation? Certainly not with your kooky sinewave subtraction equation. Remember, you're the moron who has claimed: 1) You derived a higher RMS voltage than the peak voltage the RMS voltage was derived from. 2) You k'lamed a *doubling* of voltage as a resultant of all three phases of 3-phase AC, akin to shorting all three phases together. 3) You k'lamed a result of 0 volts as a resultant of two phases of 3-phase AC. 4) You demonstrated your inability to grasp why two phases *summed* gave a sinewave of the same voltage but phase shifted 60 degrees from each of the tributary sinewaves, such that the resultant is 180 degrees phase from the remaining third phase. 5) You demonstrated your inability to grasp why all three phases of 3-phase AC *summed* together gives a result of 0 volts. 6) You k'lamed you were feeding 240 volts to the *primary* of a *substation* transformer, deriving 120 volts from the *primary* side, then feeding that 240 volts to a 120/208 volt electrical feed... you even went so far as to justify it with your kooky math, showing you were deriving 208 volts from 240 volts. Then you backpedaled and k'lamed you were instead feeding the primary with a voltage of "12 kVA" (DildoRider's blather), proving you don't know the difference between voltage and apparent power. And you still don't know what a gable is. 150 IQ? LOL SPNAK! >> Then you bleated that you couldn't understand why you were getting a >> resultant of the same amplitude, but phase-shifted 60 degrees in >> between each tributary and 180 degrees from the third phase: >> >> DildoRider blathered: >> Message-ID: <87ebab570e8ead5f3b1bd9fcd93c2a77@dizum.com> >> ==================================================== >> > so why how come phase A minus phase B produces a graph >> > of the proper 208V 60Hz sine wave and summation produces >> > a nonsensical sum that is the inverse of phase C >> >> Because you're a mathematical moron using the wrong equation, >> DildoRider. >> ==================================================== >> >> DildoRider blathered again: >> Message-ID: <87ebab570e8ead5f3b1bd9fcd93c2a77@dizum.com> >> ==================================================== >> how come when i add two 120 degree phase-separated 60Hz 120V sine >> waves i just get another 60Hz 120V sine wave: >> >> http://i.imgur.com/nO3iCEd.png > yep. wrong. No, you got the *correct* result in that graph, DildoRider. The first time you've ever been right about anything. 150 IQ? LOL >> ....but if I subtract them i get an expected correct 208V 60Hz sine >> wave, fakey? >> >> http://i.imgur.com/OPEeEJJ.png >> ==================================================== > now it's correct. > > clearly if it were incorrect you'd have said so here. You moron, do you *still* not understand vector summation? Holy fuck, how retarded are you? The resultant of two phases of 3-phase AC must only be a sinewave of same frequency and amplitude as the two tributaries, phase-shifted to be 60 degrees off from and in between the two tributaries and 180 degrees from the remaining third leg. If you're getting any other result, your kooky equation is *wrong*, DildoRider. >> Then you launched into your bleating about your disbelief that the >> resultant of all three phases of 3-phase AC resulted in 0 volts, > i wasn't in disbelief. Backpedal harder, Lying Spankard. LOL >> making a k'lame that it instead *doubled* the voltage... because you >> are, after all, Robert Michael Wolfe the Mathematical Moron. LOL > how can something double to zero? LOL Piling reading comprehension problems on top of backpedaling, DildoRider? Why are you such a moron? LOL >> And now you're backpedaling even faster, denying that you were ever so >> stoooopid as to have fucked up that badly. For the rest of us, we >> expected it... you are, after all, Robert Michael Wolfe the >> Mathematical Moron. LOL >>> http://i.imgur.com/ILFlzNw.png >> Translation: >> "Damn it! FNVWe is right, I'm a mathematical moron. <backpedal> >> <backpedal> <backpedal> <backpedal>" >>>> equally offset between the two tributaries and 180 degrees >>>> phase from the remaining third phase. >>> which is what i plotted. >> Sane person: >> When you find yourself stuck in a hole, stop digging. > http://i.imgur.com/OPEeEJJ.png Bwahahaaa! You moron. Your kooky sinewave subtraction equation has your brain so twisted in knots you're making a fool of yourself. LOL >> DildoRider: >> When trapped in a lie hole, don't stop digging... lie *harder*. > why does phase A minus phase B of a 3-phase installation produce the > correct resultant waveform? > > http://i.imgur.com/OPEeEJJ.png Bwahahaaaaaa! Moron. The resultant of two phases of 3-phase AC must only be a sinewave of same frequency and amplitude as the two tributaries, phase-shifted to be 60 degrees off from and in between the two tributaries and 180 degrees from the remaining third leg. If you're getting any other result, your kooky equation is *wrong*, DildoRider. > (FREE KLOO: saying: "it doesn't" doesn't prove anything) > > all you have to do is show me a single instance of someone graphing the > resultant sine waves using euler summation, you don't even have to do it > (since we know you can't). Translation: "Please, oh please, oh please, FNVWe, let me in on that secret that every scientist and engineer since 1748 has known and used. I'm far too stoooopid to Google for it, and far too stoooopid to ever properly use it, so please baby-step me through it using monosyllabic words." > why is that so hard for you to figure out, k0oky? I have figured it out, DildoRider. You, quite obviously, have not. >> LOL > nervous laughter noted. Moronism noted. 150 IQ? LOL >>> note that the voltage "magically" produces the correct summation to 208 >>> volts. >> Bwahahahaaaaa! And even after he's had clue forcefully imparted to his >> lumpy skull, DildoRider doesn't get it. > why do my calculations automatically take care of the fact that the two > 120 degree phase shifted 120V@60Hz waves can only produce 208V peak? > what's going on there, k0oky? It might have to do with the fact that you're a mathematical moron. LOL The resultant of two phases of 3-phase AC must only be a sinewave of same frequency and amplitude as the two tributaries, phase-shifted to be 60 degrees off from and in between the two tributaries and 180 degrees from the remaining third leg. If you're getting any other result, your kooky equation is *wrong*, DildoRider. Thus the resultant of the three phases of 3-phase AC must only be 0 volts, as you can easily ascertain with a simple Google search... oh... wait... you're too stoooopid to use Google. LOL > why did my calculations work correctly for not only split-phase and > 3-phase but ALSO your mishmosh of 6 random sinewaves that you > embarrassingly proclaimed would eventually sum to 2550.25? (of course you > were wrong. you used YOUR broken method of summing sine waves which you > are screaming at us "IT'S CORRECT!!! IT'S CORRECT!!!! 2550.25!!!!" for 3 > months now) Your kooky equation *didn't* "work correctly", DildoRider. Try it again, and this time, try not to make yourself look like a fucking moron. LOL >> The resultant of two phases of 3-phase AC must only be a sinewave of >> same frequency and amplitude as the two tributaries, phase-shifted to >> be 60 degrees off from and in between the two tributaries and 180 >> degrees from the remaining third leg. > so why don't you graph that and actually prove your k'lame instead of > k0okily proclaiming it and showing no ability to understand what you've > just written? I did graph it, you moron. That you don't even know why that result *must* be, otherwise your kooky equation is *wrong*, is part and parcel of your retardation. LOL > PS: you're wrong. even the phasor math that your (once thought to be) > idiot-proof "vector sums" are derived from prove you wrong about your "180 > degrees from the third leg" stab in the dark. > > try again. Bwahahaaa! DildoRider denies that the resultant of the three phases of 3-phase AC is always 0, hence 3-phase AC represents a full circle represented in sinusoid. Holy shit, DildoRider... if you get any dumber they're gonna have to jump-start your brain. LOL >> If you're getting any other >> result, your kooky equation is *wrong*, DildoRider. > and yet, somehow, the results i'm getting are correct. No, they're not. You're just a mathematical moron. LOL > and they agree with the known phasor math. No, they don't. You're just a mathematical moron. LOL > and they make you look like a complete idiot. No, they don't. You're just a mathematical moron. LOL > 1) voltages between conductors are measured using subtraction. For DC, Moron. For AC, superposition dictates that vector *summation* must be used. > 2) graphing the phase-shifted sine waves and the resultant voltage > differences over time using mathematics produce correctly phased resultant > sine waves or else mathematics is broken. Except your bad sinewaves are as fucked up as your kooky sinewave subtraction equation, which is fucked up as your broken brain, DildoRider. LOL > 3) mathematics isn't broken. Your math is horribly broken, DildoRider. That's *why* you're Robert Michael Wolfe the Mathematical Moron. LOL > 4) you have been unable in 3 months to prove me incorrect, whereas you are > proven incorrect by multiple people every time you utter some nonsense > about things you have no experience with outside of google-diving and > maybe a high-school textbook years ago. Except a simple Google search will prove you wrong. You're simply too stupid to do that Google search, so instead you spew Man-Goo, Spaghetti Code and Bad Sinewaves. Because you're Robert Michael Wolfe the Mathematical Moron. LOL >>> fakey, why does my subtraction equation give the correct answer? >> It doesn't. You're just a mathematical moron. LOL > it does. > > http://i.imgur.com/4itzDIY.png Bwahahaaaa! So wrong that the word "wrong" is the wrong word to describe how wrong it is, DildoRider. You can't even get the phase shift *or* the resultant voltage correct. You moron. LOL > and you're saying it isn't correct for 3 months because you're just a > mathematical moron. Says the backpedaling bleatfarting bad sinewave-spamming mathematical moron. LOL >>> here's the sum: >>> >>> http://i.imgur.com/gfm2vfV.png >>> >>> it appears exactly wrong as your graph would have looked if you weren't >>> using the same subtraction equations to calculate your "euler summation" >>> sham. >> Bwahahahaaa! DildoRider take his kooky sinewave subtraction equation, >> changes the minus signs to plus signs, stupidly believes he's now >> using the proper Euler sinewave summation equation, and blathers out >> more mathematical moronity. > plot your equation. <http://i.imgur.com/t0sO6xh.png> Blue - Phase 1 (170 volts, 0 degrees), Tributary 1 Orange - Phase 2 (170 volts, 120 degrees), Tributary 2 Purple - Phase 3 (170 volts, 240 degrees) Green - Resultant (170 volts, 60 degrees) Red - Resultant (170 volts, 60 degrees) You'll note the red/green sinewave and the purple sinewave are 180 degrees out of phase, exactly as they should be. Thus the resultant of the red/green sinewave and the purple sinewave will give a correct result of 0. You'll further note that both the red and green sinewaves are at the same phase angle despite having the two phases interchanged in the equation (green - 0 degrees first, 120 degrees second; red - 120 degrees first, 0 degrees second). Whereas in your kooky equation moving the tributaries in your equation gives different results. Why are you too stoooopid to find that Euler sinewave summation equation, DildoRider? Why are you far too stoooopid to figure out vector summation, DildoRider? You're a mathematical moron improperly using a kooky sinewave subtraction equation which gives you an improper result. SPNAK! >> You'll never grasp vector summation of sinusoids, DildoRider. You're >> simply too stupid to do so. > ...except i learned phasors very early on in my engineering coursework. You spent that time sucking dicks in a back alley, apparently. LOL >>>> According to you, Tr!pey old bird buggerer, the "Potential Difference" >>>> between two 120 volt RMS phases would be 240 volts. >>> only if the plots of their representative sine waves are 180 degrees out >>> of phase, but you said 120 degrees, so when you subtract the sine waves >>> there is not a point where they both peak at 120v simultaneously. >> And yet, even knowing that, you've blathered that the voltage >> difference between two phases of a 3-phase system is 0 volts. > no it isn't. it's clearly 208v. Bwahahahaaa! Now calculate the resultant of that resultant as the first tributary and the remaining third phase as the second tributary, DildoRider. Go on, *prove* yourself a mathematical moron. > see: > > http://i.imgur.com/4itzDIY.png Mathematical Moron. LOL >> Because >> you're Robert Michael Wolfe the Mathematical Moron. > i wonder how many times you'll get away with saying that before someone > hammers it through your thick neanderthal skull that i've been posting > correct math this whole time. Wrong. The correct Euler sinewave summation equation has been used by scientists and engineers since 1748, whereas your kooky sinewave subtraction equation has only been in use for three months by only one thoroughly confused kooktard. LOL > you only posted a graph which you're afraid to show us the equations that > you plotted. You mean the Euler sinewave summation equation, in use by scientists and engineers since 1748? You yet again admit you're too stupid to Google for it, and far too stupid to ever properly use it, despite having been *given* the equation. Twice. LOL > what was the link to that, again? <https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=Euler+sinewave+summation+equation> LOL! >>>> Do get right on >>>> providing that kooky math to prove your contention, or admit you are >>>> wrong. >>> you should get right on sharing the equations that you graphed that you >>> klame are correct while howling about the same exact equations being >>> wrong when anybody but you graphs them. >> You mean the Euler sinewave summation equation, in use by scientists >> and engineers since 1748, DildoRider? Are you admitting you're too >> stupid to Google for it, or too stupid to understand how to use it? > you're too stupid to demonstrate it. Already demonstrated, DildoRider. The 170 volt peak L-N, the 120 volt RMS L-N which acted as tributary for the 208 volt RMS L-L, properly graphed with the correct phase shift and amplitude. You can't demonstrate that, because you're Robert Michael Wolfe the Mathematical Moron. LOL >> Both? 150 IQ? LOL Both. 50 IQ? LOL Fag. LOL Idiot. LOL Moron. LOL Tranny. LOL Libtard. LOL Crackhead. LOL GableTard. LOL DildoRider. LOL Bad Musician. LOL Stick Figure. LOL Terrible Liar. LOL Obsessed Retard. LOL Sinewave Spammer. LOL Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In Usenet History. LOL -- Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider, aka Teh Mop Jockey) 5907 Stanton Ave. Pittsburgh, PA (412) 853-6395 (412) 799-0532 (412) 665-8289 (412) 404-8757 DildoRider admits he's stoooopid: MID: <c65504c436778934b3e8a0fb022b7618@dizum.com> ================================================= >> it appears I've kicked your ass so hard it's >> damaged your brain, DildoRider. > then it appears that you like shooting fish in > barrels, intellectually lazy fuckhead that you are. Well, you've just admitted that intellectually kicking your ass is akin to shooting fish in a barrel... IOW, you've admitted that you're stoooopid. No un-ringing that bell. <snicker> ================================================= DildoRider admits he's "really stupid" (his words). LOL MID: <8a9faed11123abfaa1257fb33fb0c082@dizum.com> ================================================= > so what you're saying is that your targets for attack > have to be really stupid or else you can't manage? ================================================= DildoRider admits much more about himself: MID: <36c6802852caf4f712515dedb738e450@dizum.com> ================================================= "absolutely and completely retarded, insane, gay, ugly, smelly, toothless, dirt-poor, incontinent and possibly homeless" ================================================= This is a libtard's method of "winning", for fuck sake. 150 IQ? LOL
Back to alt.usenet.kooks | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
does anybody remember "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-15 05:27 -0400
Re: does anybody remember Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-15 03:39 -0700
Re: does anybody remember "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-15 07:01 -0400
Re: does anybody remember snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe aka g8dgc) - 2016-03-16 14:31 +0000
Re: does anybody remember Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-16 18:06 +0100
Re: does anybody remember "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-16 15:14 -0400
Re: does anybody remember Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-17 04:52 +0100
Re: does anybody remember "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-17 01:09 -0400
Re: does anybody remember Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-17 17:39 +0100
Re: does anybody remember "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-17 13:33 -0400
Re: does anybody remember "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-16 15:27 -0400
Re: does anybody remember Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-17 05:29 +0100
Re: does anybody remember "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-17 02:33 -0400
Re: does anybody remember Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-17 17:16 +0100
Re: does anybody remember "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-17 13:32 -0400
Re: does anybody remember Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-18 06:19 +0100
Re: does anybody remember "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-18 01:32 -0400
Re: does anybody remember Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-18 17:24 +0100
Re: does anybody remember Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-18 04:43 +0800
Re: does anybody remember "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-18 00:35 -0400
Re: does anybody remember Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-18 05:39 +0100
Re: does anybody remember binky feel good <julianfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 22:01 -0700
Re: does anybody remember Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-18 17:19 +0100
Re: does anybody remember Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-19 01:13 +0800
Re: does anybody remember Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-19 05:36 +0100
Re: does anybody remember Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-19 17:31 +0800
Re: does anybody remember Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-19 17:59 +0100
Re: does anybody remember Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-20 00:33 -0600
Re: does anybody remember Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-21 02:50 +0800
Re: does anybody remember Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-20 11:59 -0700
Re: does anybody remember snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-20 20:29 +0000
Re: does anybody remember Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-20 13:45 -0700
Re: does anybody remember vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-03-21 17:43 +0000
Re: does anybody remember Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-20 21:35 +0100
Re: does anybody remember Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-19 11:33 -0700
Re: does anybody remember binky feel good <waldbyfjulian@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-16 21:08 -0700
Re: does anybody remember "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-17 01:15 -0400
Re: does anybody remember Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-17 08:12 +0100
Re: does anybody remember Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-18 05:02 +0800
Re: does anybody remember Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-17 14:24 -0700
Re: does anybody remember snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-17 22:48 +0000
Re: does anybody remember "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 15:50 -0700
Re: does anybody remember snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-17 22:55 +0000
Re: does anybody remember "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 15:58 -0700
Re: does anybody remember snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-18 08:12 +0000
Re: does anybody remember Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-17 16:22 -0700
Re: does anybody remember "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 16:36 -0700
Re: does anybody remember Catalina <Catalina@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-17 19:10 -0500
Re: does anybody remember "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 17:48 -0700
Re: does anybody remember Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-17 18:48 -0700
Re: does anybody remember Catalina <Catalina@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-17 21:28 -0500
Re: does anybody remember Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-18 06:14 +0100
Re: does anybody remember Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-18 06:04 +0100
Re: does anybody remember Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-19 01:13 +0800
Re: does anybody remember Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-19 05:09 +0100
Re: does anybody remember Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-19 17:34 +0800
Re: does anybody remember Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-19 18:39 +0100
csiph-web