Re: Stars behind the Sun - revisited

Path	csiph.com!au2pb.net!feeder.erje.net!us.feeder.erje.net!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!newsswitch.lcs.mit.edu!nntp.TheWorld.com!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From	moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
Newsgroups	sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics
Subject	Re: Stars behind the Sun - revisited
Date	Tue, 24 Nov 2015 18:22:26 +0000 (UTC)
Organization	The World : www.TheWorld.com : Since 1989
Lines	17
Message-ID	<n329t2$fi9$1@pcls7.std.com> (permalink)
References	<n2vjlb$vik$1@speranza.aioe.org> <n30kt0$2hn$1@pcls7.std.com> <6168335.Tf2vzv7CMB@PointedEars.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host	shell01.theworld.com
X-Trace	pcls7.std.com 1448389346 15945 192.74.137.71 (24 Nov 2015 18:22:26 GMT)
X-Complaints-To	abuse@TheWorld.com
NNTP-Posting-Date	Tue, 24 Nov 2015 18:22:26 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent	nn/6.6.5
Xref	csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:370803 sci.physics:535084

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw

Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> writes:

>Michael Moroney wrote:

>> No need for highly accurate time.  Just take a good photo of the star near
>> the limb of the sun which includes other nearby stars not near the limb.
>> Compare the photo to one of the same stars taken six months earlier (or
>> later).

>Why six months?

At the time of the eclipse, those stars are normally not visible as they
are above the horizon during the day.

Six months later/earlier is when those stars will be clearly visible at
night.  You actually can get away with less time, just as long as that
particular group of stars/constellation rises/hasn't set at night.

Thread

Stars behind the Sun - revisited Walter Ilinois <walin@wej98j5q.org> - 2015-11-23 17:50 +0000
  Stars behind the Sun - revisited HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2015-11-23 10:07 -0800
    Re: Stars behind the Sun - revisited benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-24 00:05 -0500
  Re: Stars behind the Sun - revisited Walter Ilinois <walin@wej98j5q.org> - 2015-11-23 21:51 +0000
  Re: Stars behind the Sun - revisited moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-11-24 03:17 +0000
    Re: Stars behind the Sun - revisited kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-11-24 01:49 -0500
    Re: Stars behind the Sun - revisited Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-11-24 11:59 +0000
      Re: Stars behind the Sun - revisited moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-11-24 18:22 +0000
        Re: Stars behind the Sun - revisited Jack Monaco <jacksh@umbertopal.org> - 2015-11-24 21:04 +0000
          Re: Stars behind the Sun - revisited Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-11-24 22:08 +0000
            Re: Stars behind the Sun - revisited Jack Monaco <jacksh@umbertopal.org> - 2015-11-24 22:42 +0000
              Re: Stars behind the Sun - revisited Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-11-24 22:57 +0000
                Re: Stars behind the Sun - revisited Jack Monaco <jacksh@umbBertopal.org> - 2015-11-24 23:19 +0000
                Re: Stars behind the Sun - revisited Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-11-25 00:04 +0000
                Re: Stars behind the Sun - revisited Jack Monaco <jacksh@umbBertopal.org> - 2015-11-25 17:25 +0000
        Re: Stars behind the Sun - revisited Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-11-24 22:17 +0000

csiph-web