Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #534970

Re: Stars behind the Sun - revisited

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

The nymshifting troll <walin@wej98j5q.org> writes:

>I came to realize that the "Stars behind the Sun" gedanken, wannabe 
>empirical observation, is a fake. And here is how I know it. 

>However, to say that a particular star, or constellation of stars, are to 
>be found behind the Sun, at a very precise location and very precise 
>instant of time, is aberration. Having no accurate time disponible, those 
>stars are to be randomly positioned, behind the Sun as well as outside the 
>corona.

>Putting it simpler, a picture showing some stars outside the Sun's corona 
>under a Solar Eclipse, cannot possibly serves as Proof, having no Time 
>Instances associated with it. Period. Here is where my theory of Divergent 
>Matter enters into the picture. More about it latter on.

No need for highly accurate time.  Just take a good photo of the star near
the limb of the sun which includes other nearby stars not near the limb.  
Compare the photo to one of the same stars taken six months earlier (or
later). Is one of the stars of that constellation out of place in the
eclipse photo?  The one near the sun's limb?  By how much?  Does that
number agree with relativity (or Newtonian mechanics)?

Ideally the stars involved (esp. the one near the limb of the sun should
be well-known stars, not an obscure background star, but we don't get to
pick and choose, I guess.

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Stars behind the Sun - revisited Walter Ilinois <walin@wej98j5q.org> - 2015-11-23 17:50 +0000
  Stars behind the Sun - revisited HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2015-11-23 10:07 -0800
    Re: Stars behind the Sun - revisited benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-24 00:05 -0500
  Re: Stars behind the Sun - revisited Walter Ilinois <walin@wej98j5q.org> - 2015-11-23 21:51 +0000
  Re: Stars behind the Sun - revisited moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-11-24 03:17 +0000
    Re: Stars behind the Sun - revisited kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-11-24 01:49 -0500
    Re: Stars behind the Sun - revisited Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-11-24 11:59 +0000
      Re: Stars behind the Sun - revisited moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-11-24 18:22 +0000
        Re: Stars behind the Sun - revisited Jack Monaco <jacksh@umbertopal.org> - 2015-11-24 21:04 +0000
          Re: Stars behind the Sun - revisited Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-11-24 22:08 +0000
            Re: Stars behind the Sun - revisited Jack Monaco <jacksh@umbertopal.org> - 2015-11-24 22:42 +0000
              Re: Stars behind the Sun - revisited Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-11-24 22:57 +0000
                Re: Stars behind the Sun - revisited Jack Monaco <jacksh@umbBertopal.org> - 2015-11-24 23:19 +0000
                Re: Stars behind the Sun - revisited Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-11-25 00:04 +0000
                Re: Stars behind the Sun - revisited Jack Monaco <jacksh@umbBertopal.org> - 2015-11-25 17:25 +0000
        Re: Stars behind the Sun - revisited Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-11-24 22:17 +0000

csiph-web