Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #535230

Re: Stars behind the Sun - revisited

From Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de>
Newsgroups sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics
Subject Re: Stars behind the Sun - revisited
Followup-To sci.physics.relativity
Date 2015-11-24 22:57 +0000
Organization PointedEars Software (PES)
Message-ID <2006776.YXsKoEMY6k@PointedEars.de> (permalink)
References (2 earlier) <6168335.Tf2vzv7CMB@PointedEars.de> <n329t2$fi9$1@pcls7.std.com> <n32jcv$4r5$1@speranza.aioe.org> <28974228.Wlf8NalAPV@PointedEars.de> <n32p4f$kcj$1@speranza.aioe.org>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Followups directed to: sci.physics.relativity

Show all headers | View raw


The nym-shifting troll posted as “Jack Monaco”:

> Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
>> The nym-shifting troll posted as “Jack Monaco”:
>>> Michael Moroney wrote:
>>>> Six months later/earlier is when those stars will be clearly visible
>>>> at night
>>> Three months will suffice.
>> In general, no.
> 
> Even one month would be pretty okay, depending on the brightness and the
> atmospheric condition.  […]

One month might be OK.  Three months would certainly not, as the pertinent 
stars would either not be visible in the night sky or they would only be 
visible shortly before or after dawn/sunset – non-ideal observation 
conditions.

> Just draw a tangent bordering the dark hemisphere, 
> pointedhead. One more proof on your halfengineering concern.

Once again you have no clue what you are talking about.  All you can do is 
throwing insults, although not very imaginative ones.


PointedEars
-- 
Q: Why is electricity so dangerous?  
A: It doesn't conduct itself.

(from: WolframAlpha)

Back to sci.physics | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Stars behind the Sun - revisited Walter Ilinois <walin@wej98j5q.org> - 2015-11-23 17:50 +0000
  Stars behind the Sun - revisited HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2015-11-23 10:07 -0800
    Re: Stars behind the Sun - revisited benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-24 00:05 -0500
  Re: Stars behind the Sun - revisited Walter Ilinois <walin@wej98j5q.org> - 2015-11-23 21:51 +0000
  Re: Stars behind the Sun - revisited moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-11-24 03:17 +0000
    Re: Stars behind the Sun - revisited kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-11-24 01:49 -0500
    Re: Stars behind the Sun - revisited Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-11-24 11:59 +0000
      Re: Stars behind the Sun - revisited moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-11-24 18:22 +0000
        Re: Stars behind the Sun - revisited Jack Monaco <jacksh@umbertopal.org> - 2015-11-24 21:04 +0000
          Re: Stars behind the Sun - revisited Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-11-24 22:08 +0000
            Re: Stars behind the Sun - revisited Jack Monaco <jacksh@umbertopal.org> - 2015-11-24 22:42 +0000
              Re: Stars behind the Sun - revisited Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-11-24 22:57 +0000
                Re: Stars behind the Sun - revisited Jack Monaco <jacksh@umbBertopal.org> - 2015-11-24 23:19 +0000
                Re: Stars behind the Sun - revisited Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-11-25 00:04 +0000
                Re: Stars behind the Sun - revisited Jack Monaco <jacksh@umbBertopal.org> - 2015-11-25 17:25 +0000
        Re: Stars behind the Sun - revisited Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-11-24 22:17 +0000

csiph-web