Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #535230
| From | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Stars behind the Sun - revisited |
| Followup-To | sci.physics.relativity |
| Date | 2015-11-24 22:57 +0000 |
| Organization | PointedEars Software (PES) |
| Message-ID | <2006776.YXsKoEMY6k@PointedEars.de> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <6168335.Tf2vzv7CMB@PointedEars.de> <n329t2$fi9$1@pcls7.std.com> <n32jcv$4r5$1@speranza.aioe.org> <28974228.Wlf8NalAPV@PointedEars.de> <n32p4f$kcj$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
Followups directed to: sci.physics.relativity
The nym-shifting troll posted as “Jack Monaco”: > Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote: >> The nym-shifting troll posted as “Jack Monaco”: >>> Michael Moroney wrote: >>>> Six months later/earlier is when those stars will be clearly visible >>>> at night >>> Three months will suffice. >> In general, no. > > Even one month would be pretty okay, depending on the brightness and the > atmospheric condition. […] One month might be OK. Three months would certainly not, as the pertinent stars would either not be visible in the night sky or they would only be visible shortly before or after dawn/sunset – non-ideal observation conditions. > Just draw a tangent bordering the dark hemisphere, > pointedhead. One more proof on your halfengineering concern. Once again you have no clue what you are talking about. All you can do is throwing insults, although not very imaginative ones. PointedEars -- Q: Why is electricity so dangerous? A: It doesn't conduct itself. (from: WolframAlpha)
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Stars behind the Sun - revisited Walter Ilinois <walin@wej98j5q.org> - 2015-11-23 17:50 +0000
Stars behind the Sun - revisited HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2015-11-23 10:07 -0800
Re: Stars behind the Sun - revisited benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-24 00:05 -0500
Re: Stars behind the Sun - revisited Walter Ilinois <walin@wej98j5q.org> - 2015-11-23 21:51 +0000
Re: Stars behind the Sun - revisited moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-11-24 03:17 +0000
Re: Stars behind the Sun - revisited kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-11-24 01:49 -0500
Re: Stars behind the Sun - revisited Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-11-24 11:59 +0000
Re: Stars behind the Sun - revisited moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-11-24 18:22 +0000
Re: Stars behind the Sun - revisited Jack Monaco <jacksh@umbertopal.org> - 2015-11-24 21:04 +0000
Re: Stars behind the Sun - revisited Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-11-24 22:08 +0000
Re: Stars behind the Sun - revisited Jack Monaco <jacksh@umbertopal.org> - 2015-11-24 22:42 +0000
Re: Stars behind the Sun - revisited Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-11-24 22:57 +0000
Re: Stars behind the Sun - revisited Jack Monaco <jacksh@umbBertopal.org> - 2015-11-24 23:19 +0000
Re: Stars behind the Sun - revisited Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-11-25 00:04 +0000
Re: Stars behind the Sun - revisited Jack Monaco <jacksh@umbBertopal.org> - 2015-11-25 17:25 +0000
Re: Stars behind the Sun - revisited Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-11-24 22:17 +0000
csiph-web