Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #535010

Re: Stars behind the Sun - revisited

From Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de>
Newsgroups sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics
Subject Re: Stars behind the Sun - revisited
Followup-To sci.physics.relativity
Date 2015-11-24 11:59 +0000
Organization PointedEars Software (PES)
Message-ID <6168335.Tf2vzv7CMB@PointedEars.de> (permalink)
References <n2vjlb$vik$1@speranza.aioe.org> <n30kt0$2hn$1@pcls7.std.com>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Followups directed to: sci.physics.relativity

Show all headers | View raw


Michael Moroney wrote:

> The nymshifting troll <walin@wej98j5q.org> writes:
>>Putting it simpler, a picture showing some stars outside the Sun's corona
>>under a Solar Eclipse, cannot possibly serves as Proof, having no Time
>>Instances associated with it. Period. Here is where my theory of Divergent
>>Matter enters into the picture. More about it latter on.
> 
> No need for highly accurate time.  Just take a good photo of the star near
> the limb of the sun which includes other nearby stars not near the limb.
> Compare the photo to one of the same stars taken six months earlier (or
> later).

Why six months?


F'up2 .relativity

PointedEars
-- 
“Science is empirical: knowing the answer means nothing;
 testing your knowledge means everything.”
   —Dr. Lawrence M. Krauss, theoretical physicist,
    in “A Universe from Nothing” (2009)

Back to sci.physics | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Stars behind the Sun - revisited Walter Ilinois <walin@wej98j5q.org> - 2015-11-23 17:50 +0000
  Stars behind the Sun - revisited HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2015-11-23 10:07 -0800
    Re: Stars behind the Sun - revisited benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-24 00:05 -0500
  Re: Stars behind the Sun - revisited Walter Ilinois <walin@wej98j5q.org> - 2015-11-23 21:51 +0000
  Re: Stars behind the Sun - revisited moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-11-24 03:17 +0000
    Re: Stars behind the Sun - revisited kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-11-24 01:49 -0500
    Re: Stars behind the Sun - revisited Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-11-24 11:59 +0000
      Re: Stars behind the Sun - revisited moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-11-24 18:22 +0000
        Re: Stars behind the Sun - revisited Jack Monaco <jacksh@umbertopal.org> - 2015-11-24 21:04 +0000
          Re: Stars behind the Sun - revisited Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-11-24 22:08 +0000
            Re: Stars behind the Sun - revisited Jack Monaco <jacksh@umbertopal.org> - 2015-11-24 22:42 +0000
              Re: Stars behind the Sun - revisited Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-11-24 22:57 +0000
                Re: Stars behind the Sun - revisited Jack Monaco <jacksh@umbBertopal.org> - 2015-11-24 23:19 +0000
                Re: Stars behind the Sun - revisited Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-11-25 00:04 +0000
                Re: Stars behind the Sun - revisited Jack Monaco <jacksh@umbBertopal.org> - 2015-11-25 17:25 +0000
        Re: Stars behind the Sun - revisited Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-11-24 22:17 +0000

csiph-web