Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #534324

Re: Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO

From moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
Newsgroups alt.conspiracy, sci.physics
Subject Re: Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO
Date 2015-11-21 02:49 +0000
Organization The World : www.TheWorld.com : Since 1989
Message-ID <n2om46$56g$1@pcls7.std.com> (permalink)
References (1 earlier) <n2crkq$c87$1@pcls7.std.com> <rL6dnZGRW9YSatTLnZ2dnUU7-RednZ2d@giganews.com> <n2flef$d5g$2@pcls7.std.com> <n2idee$5i9$1@pcls7.std.com> <qsSdnSsqFpaWP9LLnZ2dnUU7-emdnZ2d@giganews.com>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:

>"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message 
>news:n2idee$5i9$1@pcls7.std.com...

>>>It's your kookclaim, you prove it can't be detected.  BTW the NYC area is
>>>very quiet seismically.  A 3.0 earthquake is big news in the Northeast
>>>(Californians just laugh), a 1kT nuke would produce about a 5.0.
>>
>> BTW it made the news on several Massachusetts TV stations that there was a
>> 1.5 magnitude earthquake yesterday.  1.5!  That's how seismically quiet
>> the Northeast US usually is (there have been exceptions).  Maybe someone
>> lit a cherry bomb.

>Funny that 150 kt nuke only makes about a 5.5 quake and you claim a 1kt nuke 
>should make about a 5?  I know the Richter Scale is logarithmic but 150 
>times stronger should not equal 10% difference.  DUH

You're right, kooktard (for once!). A 150kT bomb would be about a 6.67,
not a 5.5.  A 1kT is about 5.22 not a 5.0.

http://www.convertalot.com/earthquake_power__calculator.html

Now, tell us how to hide a 5.22 magnitude earthquake.

>And you have yet to prove that any part of Flight 93 was found at 
>Shanksville, PA

Asked and answered.

>9/11 was a total farce.  If the Twin Towers collapsed to the ground before 
>they were vaporized then why do the remains of the Twin Towers have so much 
>surviving at the very bottom of them?

You mean that huge pile of debris in your blast3.jpeg picture (with the
kookscribbles added)?  That huge pile of debris disproves "vaporization",
of course.  As do 108,342 truckloads of wrecked World Trade Center hauled
out (that's three BILLION pounds!).

>And then why it is so easy to use 3D software to duplicate what the jets in 
>Nuke York City did from their complete disappearance into a building to 
>their disappearance of a wing only.  <G>

You never did explain how those alleged CGIs got into thousands and
thousands of eyeballs, and hundreds or thousands of video cameras
throughout Manhattan, the rest of NYC and New Jersey.  Also, why are so
many kookvids using fake evidence to make it look like bad CGIs?  First
there's the forged video clip with the crane, and now there's that kookvid
where they lie (as they do in all kookvids), saying a foreground building
is in the background, to make it look like a CGI mistake?

Any video game designer can make CGI videos of planes crashing, but how
will he get them into thousands of eyeballs and cameras?  Answer that.

Doesn't matter, your "Duck Test" proof was a magnificant proof that there
were no CGIs on 9/11.   Keep up the good work!!  Are you almost done with
your "all kooksites are lies" Duck Test proof?

Back to sci.physics | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-15 21:31 -0600
  Re: Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-11-16 08:07 +0100
    Re: Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-16 04:50 -0600
      Re: Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO Shoe-Chucker 2 <georgewk10@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-16 10:01 -0800
        Re: Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO Shoe-Chucker 2 <georgewk10@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-16 14:10 -0800
          Re: Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-16 17:02 -0600
            Re: Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-11-16 20:48 -0500
              Re: Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-17 09:46 -0600
                Re: Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-11-17 16:27 +0000
                Re: Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-11-17 15:06 -0500
                Re: Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-17 15:38 -0600
                Re: Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-11-18 02:00 +0000
                Re: Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO Shoe-Chucker 2 <georgewk10@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-18 07:36 -0800
                Re: Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-11-19 04:12 -0600
                Re: Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-20 08:38 -0600
                Re: Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-11-20 18:22 +0000
                Re: Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-20 15:43 -0600
                Re: Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-11-21 09:53 +0000
      Re: Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-11-17 05:19 +0100
        Re: Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-17 09:26 -0600
          Re: Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-11-17 21:17 +0100
            Re: Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-17 15:20 -0600
              Re: Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-11-21 06:11 +0100
  Re: Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-11-16 15:10 +0000
    Re: Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-16 09:35 -0600
      Re: Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-11-17 16:42 +0000
        Re: Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-11-18 17:44 +0000
          Re: Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-20 16:41 -0600
            Re: Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-11-21 02:49 +0000
  Re: Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO Shoe-Chucker 2 <georgewk10@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-16 11:52 -0800
    Re: Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-16 14:09 -0600

csiph-web