Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #533453 > unrolled thread

Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-15 21:31 -0600
    Re: Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-11-16 08:07 +0100
      Re: Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-16 04:50 -0600
        Re: Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO Shoe-Chucker 2 <georgewk10@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-16 10:01 -0800
          Re: Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO Shoe-Chucker 2 <georgewk10@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-16 14:10 -0800
            Re: Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-16 17:02 -0600
              Re: Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-11-16 20:48 -0500
                Re: Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-17 09:46 -0600
                  Re: Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-11-17 16:27 +0000
                    Re: Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-11-17 15:06 -0500
                    Re: Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-17 15:38 -0600
                      Re: Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-11-18 02:00 +0000
                      Re: Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO Shoe-Chucker 2 <georgewk10@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-18 07:36 -0800
                        Re: Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-11-19 04:12 -0600
                          Re: Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-20 08:38 -0600
                            Re: Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-11-20 18:22 +0000
                              Re: Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-20 15:43 -0600
                                Re: Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-11-21 09:53 +0000
        Re: Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-11-17 05:19 +0100
          Re: Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-17 09:26 -0600
            Re: Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-11-17 21:17 +0100
              Re: Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-17 15:20 -0600
                Re: Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-11-21 06:11 +0100
    Re: Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-11-16 15:10 +0000
      Re: Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-16 09:35 -0600
        Re: Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-11-17 16:42 +0000
          Re: Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-11-18 17:44 +0000
            Re: Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-20 16:41 -0600
              Re: Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-11-21 02:49 +0000
    Re: Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO Shoe-Chucker 2 <georgewk10@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-16 11:52 -0800
      Re: Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-16 14:09 -0600

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

#533824

Am 17.11.2015 16:26, schrieb Rocky:
..
>> "Surreal Pictures Inside WTC 6 Destroys 9/11 Cover Story For Ever !"
>>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a4FkO5ry1uo
>>
>> Quote.
>> "Building 6 was a 1/2 million sq ft building with its core missing on
>> september 11th 2001 , the interior of the building is missing , it was not
>> crushed or on fire ,no nano thermite , no mini nukes , or explosions the
>> walls are intact the basement is intact the only thing that stands out is
>> cardboard and wires have little to no damage ."
>>
>>
>> So: we have NO explosion, but an *implosion*.
>>
>> This is actually different and what see are remains from matter, which
>> simply manage to get missing.
>>
>> It is like 'being sucked into a black hole'.
>>
>> This pattern of destruction we see at all the buildings.
>>
>> TH
>
> There is a very easy explanation for WTC6.  ... see the entire story at: https://donaldfox.wordpress.com/2013/04/20/mystery-solved-the-wtc-was-nuked-on-911/
>
Quote:

  "The Temperature of the Pile

Temperatures at Ground Zero were 600 to 1,500 °F or even higher for 6 
months after 9/11. Firemen were fighting fires at Ground Zero for 99 
days after 9/11. AVRIS data showed that temperature in one spot was 
1,341 °F on 9/16/01. These high temperatures could be attributed to 
neutron bombs that were detonated underground in order to destroy the 
foundations of the Twin Towers. Some of the hotspots may have been 
unexploded nuclear fissile material reacting underground.
"

There is one problem:

"911- Intact paper fused with melted WTC steel "
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ruPK1EMY3k4

Paper seemed to be undisturbed by the event and was flying around in 
large quantities. Paper managed to stay readable, after being molten 
together with steel.

There is actually only one known phenomenon, where metal objects fuse 
together with wood (and similar materials) at low temperature:

the so called 'Hutchison Effect'.


"The Hutchison Effect - Iron Bar Warping and Fuming from Directed Energy 
(Laboratory Experiment) "

In this experiment there is a specific 'hum' audible. Such a hum is also 
audible on a few videos, that have been made on 9-11 on the WTC area 
prior to the collapse.

(Need to search for an example, so please wait..)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tnBdhsXl088


TH

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#533834

"Thomas Heger" <ttt_heg@web.de> wrote in message 
news:db1ga5Faf3uU1@mid.individual.net...
> Am 17.11.2015 16:26, schrieb Rocky:
> ..
>>> "Surreal Pictures Inside WTC 6 Destroys 9/11 Cover Story For Ever !"
>>>
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a4FkO5ry1uo
>>>
>>> Quote.
>>> "Building 6 was a 1/2 million sq ft building with its core missing on
>>> september 11th 2001 , the interior of the building is missing , it was 
>>> not
>>> crushed or on fire ,no nano thermite , no mini nukes , or explosions the
>>> walls are intact the basement is intact the only thing that stands out 
>>> is
>>> cardboard and wires have little to no damage ."
>>>
>>>
>>> So: we have NO explosion, but an *implosion*.
>>>
>>> This is actually different and what see are remains from matter, which
>>> simply manage to get missing.
>>>
>>> It is like 'being sucked into a black hole'.
>>>
>>> This pattern of destruction we see at all the buildings.
>>>
>>> TH
>>
>> There is a very easy explanation for WTC6.  ... see the entire story at: 
>> https://donaldfox.wordpress.com/2013/04/20/mystery-solved-the-wtc-was-nuked-on-911/
>>
> Quote:
>
>  "The Temperature of the Pile
>
> Temperatures at Ground Zero were 600 to 1,500 °F or even higher for 6 
> months after 9/11. Firemen were fighting fires at Ground Zero for 99 days 
> after 9/11. AVRIS data showed that temperature in one spot was 1,341 °F on 
> 9/16/01. These high temperatures could be attributed to neutron bombs that 
> were detonated underground in order to destroy the foundations of the Twin 
> Towers. Some of the hotspots may have been unexploded nuclear fissile 
> material reacting underground.
> "
>
> There is one problem:
>
> "911- Intact paper fused with melted WTC steel "
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ruPK1EMY3k4

That is a weird one and maybe the same person that told me about the MRR 
nukes also knows the answer to that.  But a quick guess makes me think 
something happened to the oxygen instead of the paper so the paper couldn' t 
burn.

> Paper seemed to be undisturbed by the event and was flying around in large 
> quantities. Paper managed to stay readable, after being molten together 
> with steel.
>
> There is actually only one known phenomenon, where metal objects fuse 
> together with wood (and similar materials) at low temperature:
>
> the so called 'Hutchison Effect'.
>
>
> "The Hutchison Effect - Iron Bar Warping and Fuming from Directed Energy 
> (Laboratory Experiment) "
>
> In this experiment there is a specific 'hum' audible. Such a hum is also 
> audible on a few videos, that have been made on 9-11 on the WTC area prior 
> to the collapse.

I have no doubt that a variety of different things were used on 9/11 and I 
also know they planted a few things like the downed light poles at the 
Pentagon, or the toasted cars at the WTC just to throw people off track.

> (Need to search for an example, so please wait..)
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tnBdhsXl088
>
>
> TH

Rocky 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#534332

Am 17.11.2015 22:20, schrieb Rocky:
> "Thomas Heger"<ttt_heg@web.de>  wrote in message
> news:db1ga5Faf3uU1@mid.individual.net...
>> Am 17.11.2015 16:26, schrieb Rocky:
>> ..
>>>> "Surreal Pictures Inside WTC 6 Destroys 9/11 Cover Story For Ever !"
>>>>
>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a4FkO5ry1uo
>>>>
>>>> Quote.
>>>> "Building 6 was a 1/2 million sq ft building with its core missing on
>>>> september 11th 2001 , the interior of the building is missing , it was
>>>> not
>>>> crushed or on fire ,no nano thermite , no mini nukes , or explosions the
>>>> walls are intact the basement is intact the only thing that stands out
>>>> is
>>>> cardboard and wires have little to no damage ."
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> So: we have NO explosion, but an *implosion*.
>>>>
>>>> This is actually different and what see are remains from matter, which
>>>> simply manage to get missing.
>>>>
>>>> It is like 'being sucked into a black hole'.
>>>>
>>>> This pattern of destruction we see at all the buildings.
>>>>
>>>> TH
>>>
>>> There is a very easy explanation for WTC6.  ... see the entire story at:
>>> https://donaldfox.wordpress.com/2013/04/20/mystery-solved-the-wtc-was-nuked-on-911/
>>>
>> Quote:
>>
>>   "The Temperature of the Pile
>>
>> Temperatures at Ground Zero were 600 to 1,500 °F or even higher for 6
>> months after 9/11. Firemen were fighting fires at Ground Zero for 99 days
>> after 9/11. AVRIS data showed that temperature in one spot was 1,341 °F on
>> 9/16/01. These high temperatures could be attributed to neutron bombs that
>> were detonated underground in order to destroy the foundations of the Twin
>> Towers. Some of the hotspots may have been unexploded nuclear fissile
>> material reacting underground.
>> "
>>
>> There is one problem:
>>
>> "911- Intact paper fused with melted WTC steel"
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ruPK1EMY3k4
>
> That is a weird one and maybe the same person that told me about the MRR
> nukes also knows the answer to that.  But a quick guess makes me think
> something happened to the oxygen instead of the paper so the paper couldn' t
> burn.


You could check it yourself: put inert gas (like N2 or CO2) in a jar 
with some paper and make this hot.

What I would expect: the paper would not burn, but get very black.

Also the ink would change colour or even evaporate.

So: readable paper requires temperatures of less then - say- 300 °C.

But (usually) steel melts at about 1600 °C.

So we need some other mechanism, which makes steel melt, without getting 
hot.

And there was something acting, which made this steel disappear.

The remaining steel was extremely curved and rusty, fused together and 
had holes like a sponge. Also fine powder and tiny balls of steel were 
found.

But most obscure: there was WAY to little steel remaining, overall.

So we need something VERY unusual and something very different from just 
dropping down from 400 meters.

The only known phenomena are:
- the so called 'Hutchison effect'
- the 'Philadelphia experiment'.

The second for this reason: a ship is a very large steel structure. In 
the 'Philadelphia experiment' this ship was allegedly 'teleported and 
appeared somewhere else.

In Philadelphia then something was missing: lots of steel.

>> Paper seemed to be undisturbed by the event and was flying around in large
>> quantities. Paper managed to stay readable, after being molten together
>> with steel.
>>
>> There is actually only one known phenomenon, where metal objects fuse
>> together with wood (and similar materials) at low temperature:
>>
>> the so called 'Hutchison Effect'.
>>
>>
>> "The Hutchison Effect - Iron Bar Warping and Fuming from Directed Energy
>> (Laboratory Experiment) "
>>
>> In this experiment there is a specific 'hum' audible. Such a hum is also
>> audible on a few videos, that have been made on 9-11 on the WTC area prior
>> to the collapse.
>
> I have no doubt that a variety of different things were used on 9/11 and I
> also know they planted a few things like the downed light poles at the
> Pentagon, or the toasted cars at the WTC just to throw people off track.


Well, maybe, maybe not.

But first things first, and that are the twin-towers.

TH

>> (Need to search for an example, so please wait..)
>>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tnBdhsXl088
>>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#533472

"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:

>Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO
> https://911justicehalifax.wordpress.com/nuclear-devices-used-at-wtc/ 

Since you already proved the title has to be a lie, is this website going
to be a part of your new proof that all kooksites are lies?  Is it going
to be a "Duck Test" proof?  I can't wait to see it!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#533474

"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message 
news:n2crkq$c87$1@pcls7.std.com...
> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:
>
>>Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO
>> https://911justicehalifax.wordpress.com/nuclear-devices-used-at-wtc/
>
> Since you already proved the title has to be a lie, is this website going
> to be a part of your new proof that all kooksites are lies?  Is it going
> to be a "Duck Test" proof?  I can't wait to see it!

ROTFLMAO because if you knew clean nukes or nearly 0 radiation nukes or MRR 
nukes were possible and how they work then you would also know the following 
is not the remains of a "global collapse."
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg

BTW I have noticed that neither you, NIST or the 9/11 Commission have been 
able to address why so much at the very bottom of the Twin Towers was not 
crushed by what was right above it.  <G>
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg

And if you think a 1kt bomb can be detected by a seismograph then prove it 
since I'll bet it was in an area where there isn't as much seismic noise as 
there is in Nuke York City.  BTW I've seen the seismic readings for Nuke 
York City and there was a lot of noise in them so maybe a 1kt nuke was 
detected and they brushed it off as noise.

Either way the following is clearly not the remains of a "global collapse" 
because nothing fell on the survivors or the nearly 8 floors high surviving 
corners.
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg

Rocky 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#533789

"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:

>ROTFLMAO because if you knew clean nukes or nearly 0 radiation nukes or MRR 
>nukes were possible and how they work then you would also know the following 
>is not the remains of a "global collapse."

You have the whole list of your "duck test" proof of no nukes, not just
mythical magic "zero radiation" nukes.  You'd have to deal with ALL of
your proofs, not just one.

>BTW I have noticed that neither you, NIST or the 9/11 Commission have been 
>able to address why so much at the very bottom of the Twin Towers was not 
>crushed by what was right above it.  <G>

I already showed you how the area below the towers was collapsed.  Most of
the rest of the underground area was not, just below the towers.

>And if you think a 1kt bomb can be detected by a seismograph then prove it 
>since I'll bet it was in an area where there isn't as much seismic noise as 
>there is in Nuke York City.

It's your kookclaim, you prove it can't be detected.  BTW the NYC area is
very quiet seismically.  A 3.0 earthquake is big news in the Northeast
(Californians just laugh), a 1kT nuke would produce about a 5.0.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#533965

moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) writes:

>>And if you think a 1kt bomb can be detected by a seismograph then prove it 
>>since I'll bet it was in an area where there isn't as much seismic noise as 
>>there is in Nuke York City.

>It's your kookclaim, you prove it can't be detected.  BTW the NYC area is
>very quiet seismically.  A 3.0 earthquake is big news in the Northeast
>(Californians just laugh), a 1kT nuke would produce about a 5.0.

BTW it made the news on several Massachusetts TV stations that there was a
1.5 magnitude earthquake yesterday.  1.5!  That's how seismically quiet
the Northeast US usually is (there have been exceptions).  Maybe someone
lit a cherry bomb.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#534274

"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message 
news:n2idee$5i9$1@pcls7.std.com...
> moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) writes:
>
>>>And if you think a 1kt bomb can be detected by a seismograph then prove 
>>>it
>>>since I'll bet it was in an area where there isn't as much seismic noise 
>>>as
>>>there is in Nuke York City.
>
>>It's your kookclaim, you prove it can't be detected.  BTW the NYC area is
>>very quiet seismically.  A 3.0 earthquake is big news in the Northeast
>>(Californians just laugh), a 1kT nuke would produce about a 5.0.
>
> BTW it made the news on several Massachusetts TV stations that there was a
> 1.5 magnitude earthquake yesterday.  1.5!  That's how seismically quiet
> the Northeast US usually is (there have been exceptions).  Maybe someone
> lit a cherry bomb.

Funny that 150 kt nuke only makes about a 5.5 quake and you claim a 1kt nuke 
should make about a 5?  I know the Richter Scale is logarithmic but 150 
times stronger should not equal 10% difference.  DUH

And you have yet to prove that any part of Flight 93 was found at 
Shanksville, PA or Pranksville, PA since no 757 crashed there as proven by 
the Media's own videos.   <G>

9/11 was a total farce.  If the Twin Towers collapsed to the ground before 
they were vaporized then why do the remains of the Twin Towers have so much 
surviving at the very bottom of them?  What we see in the following tells us 
the Twin Towers were vaporized before they made it to the ground.  See:
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg

And then why it is so easy to use 3D software to duplicate what the jets in 
Nuke York City did from their complete disappearance into a building to 
their disappearance of a wing only.  <G>

Rocky 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#534324

"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:

>"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message 
>news:n2idee$5i9$1@pcls7.std.com...

>>>It's your kookclaim, you prove it can't be detected.  BTW the NYC area is
>>>very quiet seismically.  A 3.0 earthquake is big news in the Northeast
>>>(Californians just laugh), a 1kT nuke would produce about a 5.0.
>>
>> BTW it made the news on several Massachusetts TV stations that there was a
>> 1.5 magnitude earthquake yesterday.  1.5!  That's how seismically quiet
>> the Northeast US usually is (there have been exceptions).  Maybe someone
>> lit a cherry bomb.

>Funny that 150 kt nuke only makes about a 5.5 quake and you claim a 1kt nuke 
>should make about a 5?  I know the Richter Scale is logarithmic but 150 
>times stronger should not equal 10% difference.  DUH

You're right, kooktard (for once!). A 150kT bomb would be about a 6.67,
not a 5.5.  A 1kT is about 5.22 not a 5.0.

http://www.convertalot.com/earthquake_power__calculator.html

Now, tell us how to hide a 5.22 magnitude earthquake.

>And you have yet to prove that any part of Flight 93 was found at 
>Shanksville, PA

Asked and answered.

>9/11 was a total farce.  If the Twin Towers collapsed to the ground before 
>they were vaporized then why do the remains of the Twin Towers have so much 
>surviving at the very bottom of them?

You mean that huge pile of debris in your blast3.jpeg picture (with the
kookscribbles added)?  That huge pile of debris disproves "vaporization",
of course.  As do 108,342 truckloads of wrecked World Trade Center hauled
out (that's three BILLION pounds!).

>And then why it is so easy to use 3D software to duplicate what the jets in 
>Nuke York City did from their complete disappearance into a building to 
>their disappearance of a wing only.  <G>

You never did explain how those alleged CGIs got into thousands and
thousands of eyeballs, and hundreds or thousands of video cameras
throughout Manhattan, the rest of NYC and New Jersey.  Also, why are so
many kookvids using fake evidence to make it look like bad CGIs?  First
there's the forged video clip with the crane, and now there's that kookvid
where they lie (as they do in all kookvids), saying a foreground building
is in the background, to make it look like a CGI mistake?

Any video game designer can make CGI videos of planes crashing, but how
will he get them into thousands of eyeballs and cameras?  Answer that.

Doesn't matter, your "Duck Test" proof was a magnificant proof that there
were no CGIs on 9/11.   Keep up the good work!!  Are you almost done with
your "all kooksites are lies" Duck Test proof?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#533581

In article <EPqdneQ_GdzR09TLnZ2dnUU7-a-dnZ2d@giganews.com>,
 "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:

> Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO
>  https://911justicehalifax.wordpress.com/nuclear-devices-used-at-wtc/ 

The Question of "Failures"- Deliberate or Incompetence?
http://www.911truth.org/

9 September 2011
By Kevin Fenton
BoilingFrogsPost.com

Although the story of the CIA's actions in the run-up to 9/11 is
complicated, at a fairly early point in any examination of them it
becomes clear the agency committed multiple failures, and that these
failures enabled the attacks to go forward. The key issue that remains
in dispute ten years on is whether these "failures" were deliberate or
simply the product of overwork and incompetence. Making an informed
judgment means taking the time to look at all the failures, put them
in order, and analyze what it all means.
-- 
Karma ; what a concept!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#533585

"Shoe-Chucker 2" <georgewk10@yahoo.com> wrote in message 
news:georgewk10-95508E.11524016112015@news.toast.net...
> In article <EPqdneQ_GdzR09TLnZ2dnUU7-a-dnZ2d@giganews.com>,
> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>
>> Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO
>>  https://911justicehalifax.wordpress.com/nuclear-devices-used-at-wtc/
>
> The Question of "Failures"- Deliberate or Incompetence?
> http://www.911truth.org/

That site is getting better but it still overlooks the fact that the remains 
of the Twin Towers can not be a "global collapse" or a "controlled 
demoltion"  but the North Tower had to be destroyed by something that could 
vaporize the close wall, leave 6 floors standing of Staircase B and leave 
8-10 floors standing of the outside wall.  And to this date the only thing I 
can see that could do that is a MRR nuke or two that were not made in 
America and buried deep underground.
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg


> 9 September 2011
> By Kevin Fenton
> BoilingFrogsPost.com
>
> Although the story of the CIA's actions in the run-up to 9/11 is
> complicated, at a fairly early point in any examination of them it
> becomes clear the agency committed multiple failures, and that these
> failures enabled the attacks to go forward. The key issue that remains
> in dispute ten years on is whether these "failures" were deliberate or
> simply the product of overwork and incompetence. Making an informed
> judgment means taking the time to look at all the failures, put them
> in order, and analyze what it all means.

Just like with the lies told by the EPA.  They would rather pay people off 
then explain why it was so important for them to lie to the first 
responders.

> -- 
> Karma ; what a concept!

After seeing all the bullshit with 9/11 I fully believe that ISIS is 
American made and our government needed ISIS to do what they wanted done.

And I still think it is funny that if ISIS is so bad why was Russia the 
first ones to put their foot down on them?

Also see:
 https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=paris+hoax

Rocky 

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web