Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #527604
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.conspiracy, sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai |
| Date | 2015-10-23 05:22 +0000 |
| Organization | The World : www.TheWorld.com : Since 1989 |
| Message-ID | <n0cg6c$its$1@pcls7.std.com> (permalink) |
| References | (6 earlier) <n4cf2b94nvptfskmqucojfg0hj84m7hrsp@4ax.com> <MPG.3091ff07d414690498c366@news.giganews.com> <n0aqm2$7aa$1@dont-email.me> <RKadncshkoEC0bTLnZ2dnUU7-cGdnZ2d@giganews.com> <n0bkin$iaq$1@dont-email.me> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
"Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> writes: >Ask anyone who's done a bellyflop off a diving board how "soft" water is. Yup. Just ask the World Trade Center towers how "soft" those aluminum water balloons (kerosene balloons) are when they come at you at 540 mph. >Every action produces and equal and opposite reaction. >So if you hit something at "XXX" miles per hour,....it hits back at "XXX" >miles per hour. So if someone fires a gun at a person, the bullets will just bounce right off? Just like in a Superman cartoon? >Anyone haunting an astronomy group should know basic Neutonian physics. That's right. Multiply the mass of the jets by their high speed of hundreds of miles of hours and you have a hell of a lot of momentum... and you know what Newton said about momentum... Multiply that large mass by the SQUARE of that speed, now you have a hell of a lot of ENERGY to break things.... You're right about Newton. Newton always wins...so the towers lose... > PS and buildings don't just fall at free fall speed on >> their own or fall at near free fall speed with fires only. >> >> And even NIST can not explain why the Twin Towers really came down or >> left a pile of rubble with one wall standing much much higher than the >> other walls when it was supposed to be a straight down "collapse." >> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg >> >> Rocky >What was more interesting was the TOWER of central columns that remained. >Fell straight down through itself,....when logic would have expected it to >tilt over and fall to the side. >9/11 WTC pulverized (with CERN antimatter weapon?) in 10 sec. Bethlehem >steel column turns into dust >https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pdrL19oqhmg >I dare any of these DWEEBunkers to explain THAT
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-19 13:52 -0500
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-19 19:53 +0000
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai Shoe-Chucker 2 <georgewk10@yahoo.com> - 2015-10-19 15:57 -0700
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-20 01:01 +0000
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-20 02:56 +0000
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-19 19:53 -0400
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-19 20:22 -0400
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-20 00:58 +0000
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-20 02:58 +0000
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-20 03:56 -0500
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-20 10:01 -0400
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-20 20:41 -0500
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-21 09:30 -0400
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-21 09:18 -0500
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-21 10:59 -0400
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-21 16:16 +0000
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-21 13:25 -0400
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-22 04:13 -0500
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-22 10:06 -0400
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-22 15:42 -0500
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-22 19:07 -0500
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-22 21:34 -0400
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-23 04:29 -0500
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-23 08:45 -0400
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-23 18:44 -0500
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-21 11:35 -0400
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-21 20:59 -0400
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-22 04:13 -0500
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-22 10:11 -0400
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-22 15:51 -0500
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-22 17:33 -0400
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-22 23:20 -0400
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-23 05:15 -0400
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-23 10:29 -0400
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-23 15:38 +0000
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-23 18:44 -0500
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-24 01:57 +0000
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-23 05:22 +0000
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-23 11:05 -0500
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-23 16:18 -0400
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-10-23 23:49 +0100
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-23 19:35 -0400
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-23 18:44 -0500
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-24 10:42 -0500
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-10-24 17:26 +0100
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-25 00:41 +0000
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-24 21:23 -0500
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-25 04:28 -0500
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-25 06:35 -0500
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-25 14:00 +0000
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-25 11:54 -0500
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-25 19:06 +0000
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-25 14:47 -0500
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-26 01:00 +0000
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-25 20:52 -0500
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-26 17:37 +0000
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-26 15:37 -0500
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-26 23:24 +0000
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-27 15:50 -0500
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-28 15:19 +0000
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-10-28 08:32 -0700
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-10-28 09:28 -0700
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-10-28 10:04 -0700
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-29 04:07 -0500
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-23 15:43 -0400
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-22 23:19 -0400
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-23 04:29 -0500
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-23 10:32 -0400
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-22 21:47 -0400
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-22 04:13 -0500
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-22 21:39 -0400
csiph-web