Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #528389
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.conspiracy, sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai |
| Date | 2015-10-26 23:24 +0000 |
| Organization | The World : www.TheWorld.com : Since 1989 |
| Message-ID | <n0mcns$hca$1@pcls7.std.com> (permalink) |
| References | (21 earlier) <gdudnZjqsbCor7DLnZ2dnUU7-VudnZ2d@giganews.com> <n0jtvt$eeo$1@pcls7.std.com> <ZqidnZRgNpMQGrDLnZ2dnUU7-audnZ2d@giganews.com> <n0lodc$1u5$1@pcls7.std.com> <w6-dncgijof2ErPLnZ2dnUU7-KednZ2d@giganews.com> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >news:n0lodc$1u5$1@pcls7.std.com... >> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >> >>>"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >>>news:n0jtvt$eeo$1@pcls7.std.com... >>>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >>>> >>>>>Too bad you can't offer one photo to prove anything crashed at >>>>>Pranksville >>>>>or Shanksville, PA. >>>> >>>> Plenty of photos available. Just look. >> >>>ROTFLMAO because all I found was a site titled "Hunt the Boeing II >>>Shanksville edition!" See: >> >> You have to search some place like Google, not whatever "kOOksites only" >> server you're using. >> >>>> You have yet to provide any evidence of your kookclaims such as Flight >>>> 93 >>>> landing in Cleveland or whatever. Just handwaving. >It obviously "Obviously". Evidence of a false authority, begging the question, circular reasoning or assuming facts without evidence argument. > had to land somewhere so people could rattle off their scripted >phone calls since they couldn't do that airborne. DUH ...and the answer is: Assuming facts without evidence argument. You would have to prove your kookclaim that "people rattled off scripted phone calls" first. Which you can't, of course. >>>Well, it had to land somewhere since it didn't land at Shankville which >>>can >>>now be called Pranksville. >> >> So you don't have any evidence that it landed in Cleveland, or anywhere >> else. On the other hand, a big smoking crater with 95% of a 757 in it >> is evidence that it crashed (not landed!) in Shanksville. >PHOTOS PHOTOS PHOTOS. Yes, you can provide photos to prove your kookclaim that Flight 93 landed in Cleveland, if you think doing so actually proves that. But real proof, not kooksites. >And do not forget Google Earth can be used to prove that crator was there >before the big lie about Flight 93 crashed there was started. Evidence? (Google Earth URL) >> If you weren't lying, you'd have some evidence, wouldn't you? >ROTFLMAO because all I have to do it put the link you pulled out back in. K00ksites are not evidence. They are only the opinions of yet another kooktard. >> And of course, if it did land safely, where are the passengers and crew? >> (Here comes more handwaving, Rocky will kookclaim they're chained to a >> wall, upside down, in a cave below Guatanamo Bay, or some such kooktarded >> crap) >Wait a second. What makes you think there were real people on jets that >never crashed? Did you fail to look up VicSims again? I'll bet you did. Because their loved ones kissed the passengers goodbye at the security gate, there was plenty of evidence they actually boarded the planes, plenty of evidence the planes did in fact take off, and last but not least, their bodies or DNA was found at the crash sites. >>>> Nobody is interested in your 4 hour kookvids full of lies (which you >>>> yourself proved!) >> >>>And yet you can't state how? >> >> Nobody is going to watch your 4 hour kookvids full of lies. >ROTFLMAO because NIST didn't even try to explain why so much of the Twin Don't change the subject. We're discussing how kookvids are full of lies. >>>> They recovered 95% of that plane, mostly from inside. >> >>>inside? inside what? inside the hanger where they put the Boeing for >>>people on it to make their very last phone calls? >> >> You know where I mean. Oh, where are _those_ passengers and crew? >> Are they in the same cave as Flight 93's passengers? >What passengers and crew? Flight 77 and Flight 11 never even departed on >9/11/01. Evidence?
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-19 13:52 -0500
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-19 19:53 +0000
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai Shoe-Chucker 2 <georgewk10@yahoo.com> - 2015-10-19 15:57 -0700
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-20 01:01 +0000
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-20 02:56 +0000
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-19 19:53 -0400
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-19 20:22 -0400
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-20 00:58 +0000
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-20 02:58 +0000
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-20 03:56 -0500
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-20 10:01 -0400
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-20 20:41 -0500
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-21 09:30 -0400
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-21 09:18 -0500
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-21 10:59 -0400
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-21 16:16 +0000
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-21 13:25 -0400
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-22 04:13 -0500
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-22 10:06 -0400
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-22 15:42 -0500
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-22 19:07 -0500
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-22 21:34 -0400
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-23 04:29 -0500
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-23 08:45 -0400
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-23 18:44 -0500
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-21 11:35 -0400
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-21 20:59 -0400
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-22 04:13 -0500
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-22 10:11 -0400
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-22 15:51 -0500
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-22 17:33 -0400
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-22 23:20 -0400
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-23 05:15 -0400
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-23 10:29 -0400
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-23 15:38 +0000
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-23 18:44 -0500
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-24 01:57 +0000
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-23 05:22 +0000
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-23 11:05 -0500
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-23 16:18 -0400
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-10-23 23:49 +0100
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-23 19:35 -0400
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-23 18:44 -0500
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-24 10:42 -0500
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-10-24 17:26 +0100
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-25 00:41 +0000
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-24 21:23 -0500
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-25 04:28 -0500
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-25 06:35 -0500
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-25 14:00 +0000
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-25 11:54 -0500
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-25 19:06 +0000
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-25 14:47 -0500
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-26 01:00 +0000
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-25 20:52 -0500
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-26 17:37 +0000
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-26 15:37 -0500
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-26 23:24 +0000
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-27 15:50 -0500
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-28 15:19 +0000
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-10-28 08:32 -0700
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-10-28 09:28 -0700
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-10-28 10:04 -0700
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-29 04:07 -0500
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-23 15:43 -0400
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-22 23:19 -0400
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-23 04:29 -0500
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-23 10:32 -0400
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-22 21:47 -0400
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-22 04:13 -0500
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-22 21:39 -0400
csiph-web