Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #526895 > unrolled thread

'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai

Started by"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net>
First post2015-10-19 13:52 -0500
Last post2015-10-22 21:39 -0400
Articles 20 on this page of 71 — 10 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics


Contents

   'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-19 13:52 -0500
    Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-19 19:53 +0000
      Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai Shoe-Chucker 2 <georgewk10@yahoo.com> - 2015-10-19 15:57 -0700
        Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-20 01:01 +0000
        Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-20 02:56 +0000
      Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-19 19:53 -0400
        Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-19 20:22 -0400
        Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-20 00:58 +0000
        Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-20 02:58 +0000
        Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-20 03:56 -0500
          Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-20 10:01 -0400
            Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-20 20:41 -0500
              Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-21 09:30 -0400
                Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-21 09:18 -0500
                  Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-21 10:59 -0400
                    Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-21 16:16 +0000
                      Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-21 13:25 -0400
                Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-22 04:13 -0500
                  Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-22 10:06 -0400
                    Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-22 15:42 -0500
                    Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-22 19:07 -0500
                      Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-22 21:34 -0400
                        Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-23 04:29 -0500
                          Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-23 08:45 -0400
                            Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-23 18:44 -0500
              Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-21 11:35 -0400
                Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-21 20:59 -0400
                  Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-22 04:13 -0500
                  Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-22 10:11 -0400
                    Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-22 15:51 -0500
                      Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-22 17:33 -0400
                        Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-22 23:20 -0400
                          Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-23 05:15 -0400
                            Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-23 10:29 -0400
                              Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-23 15:38 +0000
                                Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-23 18:44 -0500
                                  Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-24 01:57 +0000
                        Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-23 05:22 +0000
                          Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-23 11:05 -0500
                            Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-23 16:18 -0400
                              Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-10-23 23:49 +0100
                                Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-23 19:35 -0400
                                  Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-23 18:44 -0500
                                Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-24 10:42 -0500
                                  Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-10-24 17:26 +0100
                                  Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-25 00:41 +0000
                                    Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-24 21:23 -0500
                                    Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-25 04:28 -0500
                                    Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-25 06:35 -0500
                                      Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-25 14:00 +0000
                                        Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-25 11:54 -0500
                                          Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-25 19:06 +0000
                                            Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-25 14:47 -0500
                                              Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-26 01:00 +0000
                                                Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-25 20:52 -0500
                                                  Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-26 17:37 +0000
                                                    Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-26 15:37 -0500
                                                      Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-26 23:24 +0000
                                                    Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-27 15:50 -0500
                                                    Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-28 15:19 +0000
                                                      Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-10-28 08:32 -0700
                                                        Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-10-28 09:28 -0700
                                                          Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-10-28 10:04 -0700
                                                      Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-29 04:07 -0500
                        Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-23 15:43 -0400
                    Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-22 23:19 -0400
                      Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-23 04:29 -0500
                        Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-23 10:32 -0400
                  Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-22 21:47 -0400
                Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-22 04:13 -0500
                  Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-22 21:39 -0400

Page 2 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4  Next page →


#527554

From"K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com>
Date2015-10-22 19:07 -0500
Message-ID<cgui2b5rea2bndfvfoj6cacknb4vu0n1p5@4ax.com>
In reply to#527443
On Thu, 22 Oct 2015 10:06:12 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
wrote:

[...]

>>>>> ....And wait until you see what the TPP is going to bring you.
>>>>
>>>>     TPP?
>>>>
>>>>> But you go ahead and keep supporting the bankster run puppets, and
>>>>> see if you get anything out of it.
>>>>
>>>>     I'll stick with what I'm doing now. It's worked very well for me
>>>> to this point. There's no reason to believe it won't continue.
>>>
>>>
>>> I'm not really surprised you have no idea what  TPP is.
>>> .....It's not in your  prepared government scripts.
>>>
>>> And heaven forbid you have to actually THINK about something.
>>
>>     I note you couldn't tell me. Clearly it's something your
>> delusional mind made up.
>
>
>
>
>I shouldn't HAVE to tell you.

     Sarah told me since you lacked, and lack, the ability.

>That's the point.

     When you make up something, you should be the one who tells
people what it means.

>An EXPERT on EVERYTHING like you claim to be, should have been born with 
>that knowledge.

     I've made no such claim.
     What do you believe this lie of yours will gain you?

>
>Of course the government doesn't want people, or even politicians, 
>discussing  the secret TPP, before it's done signed and it's too late to 
>string up obama to stop it.

     The Tea Party isn't secret, stupid.

>So it's not something your talking head, mainstream news  even touches on.
>

     I've seen many news reports about the Tea Party.
     Would you like to try a different lie?

>Yet it will affect every part of your life, including the ability to post on 
>the internet, or even have access to.
>

     Unlikely. But do produce your evidence. Unless, of course, you're
simply offering more PROOF that you're mentally unstable.

>...Once you have to use your government approved ID to sign on or send a 
>message, so we can know where to find you.

     You'll never be able to find me, Bast. You can try, but your
posts prove you lack the intellect to succeed.

>Your days of being an anonymous idiot will be done, as they won't need you 
>anymore.

     I would first need to be an idiot, anonymous or otherwise, for
such days to be done. It's a sad commentary about you that you are
completely unable to understand this very simple premise.

-- 
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#527573

From"Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
Date2015-10-22 21:34 -0400
Message-ID<n0c2n8$qc9$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#527554

K Wills (Shill #3) wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Oct 2015 10:06:12 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
> wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>>>>>> ....And wait until you see what the TPP is going to bring you.
>>>>>
>>>>>     TPP?
>>>>>
>>>>>> But you go ahead and keep supporting the bankster run puppets, and
>>>>>> see if you get anything out of it.
>>>>>
>>>>>     I'll stick with what I'm doing now. It's worked very well for me
>>>>> to this point. There's no reason to believe it won't continue.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I'm not really surprised you have no idea what  TPP is.
>>>> .....It's not in your  prepared government scripts.
>>>>
>>>> And heaven forbid you have to actually THINK about something.
>>>
>>>     I note you couldn't tell me. Clearly it's something your
>>> delusional mind made up.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> I shouldn't HAVE to tell you.
>
>     Sarah told me since you lacked, and lack, the ability.
>
>> That's the point.
>
>     When you make up something, you should be the one who tells
> people what it means.
>
>> An EXPERT on EVERYTHING like you claim to be, should have been born
>> with that knowledge.
>
>     I've made no such claim.
>     What do you believe this lie of yours will gain you?
>
>>
>> Of course the government doesn't want people, or even politicians,
>> discussing  the secret TPP, before it's done signed and it's too late
>> to string up obama to stop it.
>
>     The Tea Party isn't secret, stupid.
>
>> So it's not something your talking head, mainstream news  even touches
>> on.
>>
>
>     I've seen many news reports about the Tea Party.
>     Would you like to try a different lie?
>
>> Yet it will affect every part of your life, including the ability to
>> post on the internet, or even have access to.
>>
>
>     Unlikely. But do produce your evidence. Unless, of course, you're
> simply offering more PROOF that you're mentally unstable.
>
>> ...Once you have to use your government approved ID to sign on or send
>> a message, so we can know where to find you.
>
>     You'll never be able to find me, Bast. You can try, but your
> posts prove you lack the intellect to succeed.
>
>> Your days of being an anonymous idiot will be done, as they won't need
>> you anymore.
>
>     I would first need to be an idiot, anonymous or otherwise






CONGRATULATIONS,.....On achieving your life goal. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#527621

From"K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com>
Date2015-10-23 04:29 -0500
Message-ID<qevj2b1saet8khrs230682jcnkqq4pk02o@4ax.com>
In reply to#527573
On Thu, 22 Oct 2015 21:34:33 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
wrote:

>K Wills (Shill #3) wrote:
>> On Thu, 22 Oct 2015 10:06:12 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
>> wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>>>> And heaven forbid you have to actually THINK about something.
>>>>
>>>>     I note you couldn't tell me. Clearly it's something your
>>>> delusional mind made up.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>I shouldn't HAVE to tell you.
>>
>>     Sarah told me since you lacked, and lack, the ability.
>>
>>>That's the point.
>>
>>     When you make up something, you should be the one who tells
>>people what it means.
>>
>>>An EXPERT on EVERYTHING like you claim to be, should have been born with 
>>>that knowledge.
>>
>>     I've made no such claim.
>>     What do you believe this lie of yours will gain you?
>>
>>>
>>>Of course the government doesn't want people, or even politicians, 
>>>discussing  the secret TPP, before it's done signed and it's too late to 
>>>string up obama to stop it.
>>
>>     The Tea Party isn't secret, stupid.
>>
>>>So it's not something your talking head, mainstream news  even touches on.
>>>
>>
>>     I've seen many news reports about the Tea Party.
>>     Would you like to try a different lie?
>>
>>>Yet it will affect every part of your life, including the ability to post on 
>>>the internet, or even have access to.
>>>
>>
>>     Unlikely. But do produce your evidence. Unless, of course, you're
>>simply offering more PROOF that you're mentally unstable.
>>
>>>...Once you have to use your government approved ID to sign on or send a 
>>>message, so we can know where to find you.
>>
>>     You'll never be able to find me, Bast. You can try, but your
>>posts prove you lack the intellect to succeed.
>>
>>>Your days of being an anonymous idiot will be done, as they won't need you 
>>>anymore.
>>
>>     I would first need to be an idiot, anonymous or otherwise, for
>>such days to be done. It's a sad commentary about you that you are
>>completely unable to understand this very simple premise.
>
>
>
>CONGRATULATIONS,.....On achieving your life goal. 

     I became a millionaire at age 22. You're a few decades late in
your congratulations.
     What does my financial state have to do with your delusions? I
honestly don't see the connection.

-- 
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#527630

From"Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
Date2015-10-23 08:45 -0400
Message-ID<n0da0p$ikd$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#527621

K Wills (Shill #3) wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Oct 2015 21:34:33 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
> wrote:
>
>> K Wills (Shill #3) wrote:
>>> On Thu, 22 Oct 2015 10:06:12 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>>>>> And heaven forbid you have to actually THINK about something.
>>>>>
>>>>>     I note you couldn't tell me. Clearly it's something your
>>>>> delusional mind made up.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I shouldn't HAVE to tell you.
>>>
>>>     Sarah told me since you lacked, and lack, the ability.
>>>
>>>> That's the point.
>>>
>>>     When you make up something, you should be the one who tells
>>> people what it means.
>>>
>>>> An EXPERT on EVERYTHING like you claim to be, should have been born
>>>> with that knowledge.
>>>
>>>     I've made no such claim.
>>>     What do you believe this lie of yours will gain you?
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Of course the government doesn't want people, or even politicians,
>>>> discussing  the secret TPP, before it's done signed and it's too
>>>> late to string up obama to stop it.
>>>
>>>     The Tea Party isn't secret, stupid.
>>>
>>>> So it's not something your talking head, mainstream news  even
>>>> touches on.
>>>>
>>>
>>>     I've seen many news reports about the Tea Party.
>>>     Would you like to try a different lie?
>>>
>>>> Yet it will affect every part of your life, including the ability to
>>>> post on the internet, or even have access to.
>>>>
>>>
>>>     Unlikely. But do produce your evidence. Unless, of course, you're
>>> simply offering more PROOF that you're mentally unstable.
>>>
>>>> ...Once you have to use your government approved ID to sign on or
>>>> send a message, so we can know where to find you.
>>>
>>>     You'll never be able to find me, Bast. You can try, but your
>>> posts prove you lack the intellect to succeed.
>>>
>>>> Your days of being an anonymous idiot will be done, as they won't
>>>> need you anymore.
>>>
>>>     I would first need to be an idiot, anonymous or otherwise, for
>>> such days to be done. It's a sad commentary about you that you are
>>> completely unable to understand this very simple premise.
>>
>>
>>
>> CONGRATULATIONS,.....On achieving your life goal.
>
>     I became a millionaire at age 22. You're a few decades late in
> your congratulations.
>     What does my financial state have to do with your delusions? I
> honestly don't see the connection.






Millionaire ?  My ass.

Look one post back in the thread.
The one I wrote,....that you have no power or ability to edit.
<LOL>

Your reality is a figment of your imagination.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#527771

From"K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com>
Date2015-10-23 18:44 -0500
Message-ID<pihl2bdb91bnghn51hav5a0vpse665ph90@4ax.com>
In reply to#527630
On Fri, 23 Oct 2015 08:45:13 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
wrote:
[...]

>>> CONGRATULATIONS,.....On achieving your life goal.
>>
>>     I became a millionaire at age 22. You're a few decades late in
>> your congratulations.
>>     What does my financial state have to do with your delusions? I
>> honestly don't see the connection.
>
>
>
>
>Millionaire ?  

     Yes.

>My ass.
>

     While there are those who find the obese desirable, I am not one
of them.

>Look one post back in the thread.
>The one I wrote,....that you have no power or ability to edit.
><LOL>

     If I want to edit, I can. You seem to mistake the lack of desire
with the lack of ability.

>
>Your reality is a figment of your imagination.

     Your use of projection is funny. Please continue.
     BTW, you didn't answer my question. What does my financial state
have to do with your delusions? I still don't see the connection.

-- 
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#527198

FromSarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net>
Date2015-10-21 11:35 -0400
Message-ID<n4cf2b94nvptfskmqucojfg0hj84m7hrsp@4ax.com>
In reply to#527157
On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 20:41:55 -0500, "K Wills (Shill #3)"
<compuelf@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 10:01:48 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
>wrote:
>
>>K Wills (Shill #3) wrote:
>>> On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 19:53:45 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>>>>> 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai
>>>>>>  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XYw3df-Nslk
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Of course the US doesn't care about winning a War on Terror because
>>>>>> they started it as proven by the lack of crash dynamics of the two
>>>>>> alleged jets in Nuke York City meaning they were just CGI and the
>>>>>> fact the following is not consistent with a Kerosene Collapse but it
>>>>>> is consistent with Nuclear Demolitions where people had to stay out
>>>>>> of the site for 2 days when the radiation was the highest.
>>>>>>  http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
>>>>>
>>>>> Incoherent babble of someone desperately in need of professional help.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The US government/bankster stoolies needed a new excuse to steal tax
>>>> dollars outright, get their central banks in control of the economies
>>>> of the countries they do not yet control.
>>>> What better cover than to claim BOOGY-MEN all over the worldd, that
>>>> can't be identified, and they can claim to fight in all the no central
>>>> bank countries
>>>>
>>>> Aren't you still afraid of boogy-men hijackers flying a plane into
>>>> another building like 9/11  ??????
>>>> So you let TSA gab your privates. Despite the fact that in all the
>>>> years TSA has been doing that, not one terrorist has been found.
>>>>
>>>> BOO !!!
>>>
>>>     Either you're doing an Oscar worthy performance of someone who is
>>> extremely delusional, or you are extremely delusional.
>>
>>
>>Nevermind the insults.
>
>     If you find the truth insulting, maybe you should take action to
>change the truth.
>
>>Actually prove me worng,....I dare you.
>
>     It befalls you to prove your claims correct. It does not befall
>me to prove them incorrect.

The illogical minds of Bast and the crazy Troofers.


>>....And wait until you see what the TPP is going to bring you.
>>
>
>     TPP?

To Bast the self-proclaimed dyke, TPP stands for Tea Party Patriots.
She/he has no a wide view of the world so everything for him/her must
be simple, simple, simple.

>>But you go ahead and keep supporting the bankster run puppets, and see if 
>>you get anything out of it. 
>>
>
>     I'll stick with what I'm doing now. It's worked very well for me
>to this point. There's no reason to believe it won't continue.

Yes siree.  :)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#527333

FromBDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com>
Date2015-10-21 20:59 -0400
Message-ID<MPG.3091ff07d414690498c366@news.giganews.com>
In reply to#527198
In article <n4cf2b94nvptfskmqucojfg0hj84m7hrsp@4ax.com>, 
ninety7gt@cox.net says...
> 
> On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 20:41:55 -0500, "K Wills (Shill #3)"
> <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> >On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 10:01:48 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
> >wrote:
> >
> >>K Wills (Shill #3) wrote:
> >>> On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 19:53:45 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> >>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
> >>>>>> 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai
> >>>>>>  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XYw3df-Nslk
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Of course the US doesn't care about winning a War on Terror because
> >>>>>> they started it as proven by the lack of crash dynamics of the two
> >>>>>> alleged jets in Nuke York City meaning they were just CGI and the
> >>>>>> fact the following is not consistent with a Kerosene Collapse but it
> >>>>>> is consistent with Nuclear Demolitions where people had to stay out
> >>>>>> of the site for 2 days when the radiation was the highest.
> >>>>>>  http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Incoherent babble of someone desperately in need of professional help.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> The US government/bankster stoolies needed a new excuse to steal tax
> >>>> dollars outright, get their central banks in control of the economies
> >>>> of the countries they do not yet control.
> >>>> What better cover than to claim BOOGY-MEN all over the worldd, that
> >>>> can't be identified, and they can claim to fight in all the no central
> >>>> bank countries
> >>>>
> >>>> Aren't you still afraid of boogy-men hijackers flying a plane into
> >>>> another building like 9/11  ??????
> >>>> So you let TSA gab your privates. Despite the fact that in all the
> >>>> years TSA has been doing that, not one terrorist has been found.
> >>>>
> >>>> BOO !!!
> >>>
> >>>     Either you're doing an Oscar worthy performance of someone who is
> >>> extremely delusional, or you are extremely delusional.
> >>
> >>
> >>Nevermind the insults.
> >
> >     If you find the truth insulting, maybe you should take action to
> >change the truth.
> >
> >>Actually prove me worng,....I dare you.
> >
> >     It befalls you to prove your claims correct. It does not befall
> >me to prove them incorrect.
> 
> The illogical minds of Bast and the crazy Troofers.
> 
> 
> >>....And wait until you see what the TPP is going to bring you.
> >>
> >
> >     TPP?
> 
> To Bast the self-proclaimed dyke, TPP stands for Tea Party Patriots.
> She/he has no a wide view of the world so everything for him/her must
> be simple, simple, simple.

She seems to think everyone who is an unbeliever in Troofery is a 
wingnut. Once again, as always, she's wrong.

> 
> >>But you go ahead and keep supporting the bankster run puppets, and see if 
> >>you get anything out of it. 

I guess she actually believes that we unbelievers are being paid to 
post. Once again, as always, she's wrong.

> >>
> >
> >     I'll stick with what I'm doing now. It's worked very well for me
> >to this point. There's no reason to believe it won't continue.
> 
> Yes siree.  :)

A toast to goofing on Troofers...

-- 
BDK: Head Government Shill, Psychotronic World Dominator. Master of 
Remote Viewing. Level 6 expert in kOOkStudies.
Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former 
Black Helicopter color consultant.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#527426

From"K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com>
Date2015-10-22 04:13 -0500
Message-ID<g5ah2b1n4fuu98as8sg31inctuigvfrgsi@4ax.com>
In reply to#527333
On Wed, 21 Oct 2015 20:59:37 -0400, BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com>
wrote:

[...]

>> >>....And wait until you see what the TPP is going to bring you.
>> >>
>> >
>> >     TPP?
>> 
>> To Bast the self-proclaimed dyke, TPP stands for Tea Party Patriots.
>> She/he has no a wide view of the world so everything for him/her must
>> be simple, simple, simple.
>
>She seems to think everyone who is an unbeliever in Troofery is a 
>wingnut. Once again, as always, she's wrong.
>
>> >>But you go ahead and keep supporting the bankster run puppets, and see if 
>> >>you get anything out of it. 
>
>I guess she actually believes that we unbelievers are being paid to 
>post. Once again, as always, she's wrong.
>

     If someone wishes to pay me for posting to Usenet, I'm open to
negotiations.

>> >     I'll stick with what I'm doing now. It's worked very well for me
>> >to this point. There's no reason to believe it won't continue.
>> 
>> Yes siree.  :)
>
>A toast to goofing on Troofers...

     A toast, to melba toast! :)

-- 
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#527444

From"Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
Date2015-10-22 10:11 -0400
Message-ID<n0aqm2$7aa$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#527333

BDK wrote:
> In article <n4cf2b94nvptfskmqucojfg0hj84m7hrsp@4ax.com>,
> ninety7gt@cox.net says...
>>
>> On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 20:41:55 -0500, "K Wills (Shill #3)"
>> <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 10:01:48 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> K Wills (Shill #3) wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 19:53:45 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai
>>>>>>>>  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XYw3df-Nslk
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Of course the US doesn't care about winning a War on Terror
>>>>>>>> because they started it as proven by the lack of crash dynamics
>>>>>>>> of the two alleged jets in Nuke York City meaning they were just
>>>>>>>> CGI and the fact the following is not consistent with a Kerosene
>>>>>>>> Collapse but it is consistent with Nuclear Demolitions where
>>>>>>>> people had to stay out of the site for 2 days when the radiation
>>>>>>>>  was the highest.
>>>>>>>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Incoherent babble of someone desperately in need of professional
>>>>>>> help.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The US government/bankster stoolies needed a new excuse to steal
>>>>>> tax dollars outright, get their central banks in control of the
>>>>>> economies of the countries they do not yet control.
>>>>>> What better cover than to claim BOOGY-MEN all over the worldd, that
>>>>>> can't be identified, and they can claim to fight in all the no
>>>>>> central bank countries
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Aren't you still afraid of boogy-men hijackers flying a plane into
>>>>>> another building like 9/11  ??????
>>>>>> So you let TSA gab your privates. Despite the fact that in all the
>>>>>> years TSA has been doing that, not one terrorist has been found.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> BOO !!!
>>>>>
>>>>>     Either you're doing an Oscar worthy performance of someone who
>>>>> is extremely delusional, or you are extremely delusional.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Nevermind the insults.
>>>
>>>     If you find the truth insulting, maybe you should take action to
>>> change the truth.
>>>
>>>> Actually prove me worng,....I dare you.
>>>
>>>     It befalls you to prove your claims correct. It does not befall
>>> me to prove them incorrect.
>>
>> The illogical minds of Bast and the crazy Troofers.
>>
>>
>>>> ....And wait until you see what the TPP is going to bring you.
>>>>
>>>
>>>     TPP?
>>
>> To Bast the self-proclaimed dyke, TPP stands for Tea Party Patriots.
>> She/he has no a wide view of the world so everything for him/her must
>> be simple, simple, simple.
>
> She seems to think everyone who is an unbeliever in Troofery is a
> wingnut. Once again, as always, she's wrong.
>
>>
>>>> But you go ahead and keep supporting the bankster run puppets, and
>>>> see if you get anything out of it.
>
> I guess she actually believes that we unbelievers are being paid to
> post.






Nope not at all.
Even the government wouldn't waste that money on you.

But it will be funny to see you being the first into the furnaces, when they 
decide you no longer serve any purpose

Just be real nice when they assign you to a nice warm room at the FEMA camp, 
and don't be concerned at all that the lock is only on the OUTSIDE of your 
room. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#527512

From"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net>
Date2015-10-22 15:51 -0500
Message-ID<RKadncshkoEC0bTLnZ2dnUU7-cGdnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#527444
"Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote in message 
news:n0aqm2$7aa$1@dont-email.me...
>
>
> BDK wrote:
>> In article <n4cf2b94nvptfskmqucojfg0hj84m7hrsp@4ax.com>,
>> ninety7gt@cox.net says...
>>>
>>> On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 20:41:55 -0500, "K Wills (Shill #3)"
>>> <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 10:01:48 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> K Wills (Shill #3) wrote:
>>>>>> On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 19:53:45 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai
>>>>>>>>>  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XYw3df-Nslk
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Of course the US doesn't care about winning a War on Terror
>>>>>>>>> because they started it as proven by the lack of crash dynamics
>>>>>>>>> of the two alleged jets in Nuke York City meaning they were just
>>>>>>>>> CGI and the fact the following is not consistent with a Kerosene
>>>>>>>>> Collapse but it is consistent with Nuclear Demolitions where
>>>>>>>>> people had to stay out of the site for 2 days when the radiation
>>>>>>>>>  was the highest.
>>>>>>>>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Incoherent babble of someone desperately in need of professional
>>>>>>>> help.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The US government/bankster stoolies needed a new excuse to steal
>>>>>>> tax dollars outright, get their central banks in control of the
>>>>>>> economies of the countries they do not yet control.
>>>>>>> What better cover than to claim BOOGY-MEN all over the worldd, that
>>>>>>> can't be identified, and they can claim to fight in all the no
>>>>>>> central bank countries
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Aren't you still afraid of boogy-men hijackers flying a plane into
>>>>>>> another building like 9/11  ??????
>>>>>>> So you let TSA gab your privates. Despite the fact that in all the
>>>>>>> years TSA has been doing that, not one terrorist has been found.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> BOO !!!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     Either you're doing an Oscar worthy performance of someone who
>>>>>> is extremely delusional, or you are extremely delusional.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Nevermind the insults.
>>>>
>>>>     If you find the truth insulting, maybe you should take action to
>>>> change the truth.
>>>>
>>>>> Actually prove me worng,....I dare you.
>>>>
>>>>     It befalls you to prove your claims correct. It does not befall
>>>> me to prove them incorrect.
>>>
>>> The illogical minds of Bast and the crazy Troofers.
>>>
>>>
>>>>> ....And wait until you see what the TPP is going to bring you.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>     TPP?
>>>
>>> To Bast the self-proclaimed dyke, TPP stands for Tea Party Patriots.
>>> She/he has no a wide view of the world so everything for him/her must
>>> be simple, simple, simple.
>>
>> She seems to think everyone who is an unbeliever in Troofery is a
>> wingnut. Once again, as always, she's wrong.
>>
>>>
>>>>> But you go ahead and keep supporting the bankster run puppets, and
>>>>> see if you get anything out of it.
>>
>> I guess she actually believes that we unbelievers are being paid to
>> post.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Nope not at all.
> Even the government wouldn't waste that money on you.
>
> But it will be funny to see you being the first into the furnaces, when 
> they decide you no longer serve any purpose
>
> Just be real nice when they assign you to a nice warm room at the FEMA 
> camp, and don't be concerned at all that the lock is only on the OUTSIDE 
> of your room.

It is so simple.  Jets don't just disappear into buildings or dirt as in 
Pranksville, PS and buildings don't just fall at free fall speed on their 
own or fall at near free fall speed with fires only.

And even NIST can not explain why the Twin Towers really came down or left a 
pile of rubble with one wall standing much much higher than the other walls 
when it was supposed to be a straight down "collapse."
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg

Rocky 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#527522

From"Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
Date2015-10-22 17:33 -0400
Message-ID<n0bkin$iaq$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#527512

Rocky wrote:
> "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote in message
> news:n0aqm2$7aa$1@dont-email.me...
>>
>>
>> BDK wrote:
>>> In article <n4cf2b94nvptfskmqucojfg0hj84m7hrsp@4ax.com>,
>>> ninety7gt@cox.net says...
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 20:41:55 -0500, "K Wills (Shill #3)"
>>>> <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 10:01:48 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> K Wills (Shill #3) wrote:
>>>>>>> On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 19:53:45 -0400, "Bast"
>>>>>>> <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai
>>>>>>>>>>  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XYw3df-Nslk
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Of course the US doesn't care about winning a War on Terror
>>>>>>>>>> because they started it as proven by the lack of crash dynamics
>>>>>>>>>> of the two alleged jets in Nuke York City meaning they were
>>>>>>>>>> just CGI and the fact the following is not consistent with a
>>>>>>>>>> Kerosene Collapse but it is consistent with Nuclear
>>>>>>>>>> Demolitions where people had to stay out of the site for 2
>>>>>>>>>>  days when the radiation was the highest.
>>>>>>>>>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Incoherent babble of someone desperately in need of professional
>>>>>>>>> help.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The US government/bankster stoolies needed a new excuse to steal
>>>>>>>> tax dollars outright, get their central banks in control of the
>>>>>>>> economies of the countries they do not yet control.
>>>>>>>> What better cover than to claim BOOGY-MEN all over the worldd,
>>>>>>>> that can't be identified, and they can claim to fight in all the
>>>>>>>> no central bank countries
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Aren't you still afraid of boogy-men hijackers flying a plane
>>>>>>>> into another building like 9/11  ??????
>>>>>>>> So you let TSA gab your privates. Despite the fact that in all
>>>>>>>> the years TSA has been doing that, not one terrorist has been
>>>>>>>> found. BOO !!!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     Either you're doing an Oscar worthy performance of someone who
>>>>>>> is extremely delusional, or you are extremely delusional.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Nevermind the insults.
>>>>>
>>>>>     If you find the truth insulting, maybe you should take action to
>>>>> change the truth.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Actually prove me worng,....I dare you.
>>>>>
>>>>>     It befalls you to prove your claims correct. It does not befall
>>>>> me to prove them incorrect.
>>>>
>>>> The illogical minds of Bast and the crazy Troofers.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>> ....And wait until you see what the TPP is going to bring you.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>     TPP?
>>>>
>>>> To Bast the self-proclaimed dyke, TPP stands for Tea Party Patriots.
>>>> She/he has no a wide view of the world so everything for him/her must
>>>> be simple, simple, simple.
>>>
>>> She seems to think everyone who is an unbeliever in Troofery is a
>>> wingnut. Once again, as always, she's wrong.
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>> But you go ahead and keep supporting the bankster run puppets, and
>>>>>> see if you get anything out of it.
>>>
>>> I guess she actually believes that we unbelievers are being paid to
>>> post.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Nope not at all.
>> Even the government wouldn't waste that money on you.
>>
>> But it will be funny to see you being the first into the furnaces, when
>> they decide you no longer serve any purpose
>>
>> Just be real nice when they assign you to a nice warm room at the FEMA
>> camp, and don't be concerned at all that the lock is only on the
>> OUTSIDE of your room.
>
> It is so simple.  Jets don't just disappear into buildings or dirt as in
> Pranksville,




Of course not.
Even hitting water at any speed would simply leave a mass of twisted and 
torn metal on the surface.

Ask anyone who's done a bellyflop off a diving board how "soft" water is.

Every action produces and equal and opposite reaction.
So if you hit something at "XXX" miles per hour,....it hits back at "XXX" 
miles per hour.
Anyone haunting an astronomy group should know basic Neutonian physics.









 PS and buildings don't just fall at free fall speed on
> their own or fall at near free fall speed with fires only.
>
> And even NIST can not explain why the Twin Towers really came down or
> left a pile of rubble with one wall standing much much higher than the
> other walls when it was supposed to be a straight down "collapse."
> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
>
> Rocky









What was more interesting was the TOWER of central columns that remained.
Fell straight down through itself,....when logic would have expected it to 
tilt over and fall to the side.

9/11 WTC pulverized (with CERN antimatter weapon?) in 10 sec. Bethlehem 
steel column turns into dust

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pdrL19oqhmg


I dare any of these DWEEBunkers to explain THAT


[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#527598

FromBDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com>
Date2015-10-22 23:20 -0400
Message-ID<MPG.3093719b6bb223b798c370@news.giganews.com>
In reply to#527522
In article <n0bkin$iaq$1@dont-email.me>, fakename@nomail.invalid says...
> 
> Rocky wrote:
> > "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote in message
> > news:n0aqm2$7aa$1@dont-email.me...
> >>
> >>
> >> BDK wrote:
> >>> In article <n4cf2b94nvptfskmqucojfg0hj84m7hrsp@4ax.com>,
> >>> ninety7gt@cox.net says...
> >>>>
> >>>> On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 20:41:55 -0500, "K Wills (Shill #3)"
> >>>> <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 10:01:48 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> K Wills (Shill #3) wrote:
> >>>>>>> On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 19:53:45 -0400, "Bast"
> >>>>>>> <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai
> >>>>>>>>>>  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XYw3df-Nslk
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Of course the US doesn't care about winning a War on Terror
> >>>>>>>>>> because they started it as proven by the lack of crash dynamics
> >>>>>>>>>> of the two alleged jets in Nuke York City meaning they were
> >>>>>>>>>> just CGI and the fact the following is not consistent with a
> >>>>>>>>>> Kerosene Collapse but it is consistent with Nuclear
> >>>>>>>>>> Demolitions where people had to stay out of the site for 2
> >>>>>>>>>>  days when the radiation was the highest.
> >>>>>>>>>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Incoherent babble of someone desperately in need of professional
> >>>>>>>>> help.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> The US government/bankster stoolies needed a new excuse to steal
> >>>>>>>> tax dollars outright, get their central banks in control of the
> >>>>>>>> economies of the countries they do not yet control.
> >>>>>>>> What better cover than to claim BOOGY-MEN all over the worldd,
> >>>>>>>> that can't be identified, and they can claim to fight in all the
> >>>>>>>> no central bank countries
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Aren't you still afraid of boogy-men hijackers flying a plane
> >>>>>>>> into another building like 9/11  ??????
> >>>>>>>> So you let TSA gab your privates. Despite the fact that in all
> >>>>>>>> the years TSA has been doing that, not one terrorist has been
> >>>>>>>> found. BOO !!!
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>     Either you're doing an Oscar worthy performance of someone who
> >>>>>>> is extremely delusional, or you are extremely delusional.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Nevermind the insults.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>     If you find the truth insulting, maybe you should take action to
> >>>>> change the truth.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Actually prove me worng,....I dare you.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>     It befalls you to prove your claims correct. It does not befall
> >>>>> me to prove them incorrect.
> >>>>
> >>>> The illogical minds of Bast and the crazy Troofers.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>> ....And wait until you see what the TPP is going to bring you.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>     TPP?
> >>>>
> >>>> To Bast the self-proclaimed dyke, TPP stands for Tea Party Patriots.
> >>>> She/he has no a wide view of the world so everything for him/her must
> >>>> be simple, simple, simple.
> >>>
> >>> She seems to think everyone who is an unbeliever in Troofery is a
> >>> wingnut. Once again, as always, she's wrong.
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>> But you go ahead and keep supporting the bankster run puppets, and
> >>>>>> see if you get anything out of it.
> >>>
> >>> I guess she actually believes that we unbelievers are being paid to
> >>> post.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Nope not at all.
> >> Even the government wouldn't waste that money on you.
> >>
> >> But it will be funny to see you being the first into the furnaces, when
> >> they decide you no longer serve any purpose
> >>
> >> Just be real nice when they assign you to a nice warm room at the FEMA
> >> camp, and don't be concerned at all that the lock is only on the
> >> OUTSIDE of your room.
> >
> > It is so simple.  Jets don't just disappear into buildings or dirt as in
> > Pranksville,
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Of course not.
> Even hitting water at any speed would simply leave a mass of twisted and 
> torn metal on the surface.
> 
> Ask anyone who's done a bellyflop off a diving board how "soft" water is.
> 
> Every action produces and equal and opposite reaction.
> So if you hit something at "XXX" miles per hour,....it hits back at "XXX" 
> miles per hour.
> Anyone haunting an astronomy group should know basic Neutonian physics.
> 
> 
> I dare say
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  PS and buildings don't just fall at free fall speed on
> > their own or fall at near free fall speed with fires only.
> >
> > And even NIST can not explain why the Twin Towers really came down or
> > left a pile of rubble with one wall standing much much higher than the
> > other walls when it was supposed to be a straight down "collapse."
> > http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
> >
> > Rocky
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> What was more interesting was the TOWER of central columns that remained.
> Fell straight down through itself,....when logic would have expected it to 
> tilt over and fall to the side.
> 
> 9/11 WTC pulverized (with CERN antimatter weapon?) in 10 sec. Bethlehem 
> steel column turns into dust
> 
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pdrL19oqhmg
> 
> 
> I dare any of these DWEEBunkers to explain THAT

I dare say you're as dumb as Lookey is. Antimatter weapon? WTF is wrong 
with you?

-- 
BDK: Head Government Shill, Psychotronic World Dominator. Master of 
Remote Viewing. Level 6 expert in kOOkStudies.
Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former 
Black Helicopter color consultant.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#527617

From"Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
Date2015-10-23 05:15 -0400
Message-ID<n0ctn4$5cr$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#527598

BDK wrote:
> In article <n0bkin$iaq$1@dont-email.me>, fakename@nomail.invalid says...
>>
>> Rocky wrote:
>>> "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote in message
>>> news:n0aqm2$7aa$1@dont-email.me...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> BDK wrote:
>>>>> In article <n4cf2b94nvptfskmqucojfg0hj84m7hrsp@4ax.com>,
>>>>> ninety7gt@cox.net says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 20:41:55 -0500, "K Wills (Shill #3)"
>>>>>> <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 10:01:48 -0400, "Bast"
>>>>>>> <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> K Wills (Shill #3) wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 19:53:45 -0400, "Bast"
>>>>>>>>> <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai
>>>>>>>>>>>>  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XYw3df-Nslk
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Of course the US doesn't care about winning a War on Terror
>>>>>>>>>>>> because they started it as proven by the lack of crash
>>>>>>>>>>>> dynamics of the two alleged jets in Nuke York City meaning
>>>>>>>>>>>> they were just CGI and the fact the following is not
>>>>>>>>>>>> consistent with a Kerosene Collapse but it is consistent
>>>>>>>>>>>> with Nuclear Demolitions where people had to stay out of the
>>>>>>>>>>>>  site for 2 days when the radiation was the highest.
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Incoherent babble of someone desperately in need of
>>>>>>>>>>> professional help.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The US government/bankster stoolies needed a new excuse to
>>>>>>>>>> steal tax dollars outright, get their central banks in control
>>>>>>>>>> of the economies of the countries they do not yet control.
>>>>>>>>>> What better cover than to claim BOOGY-MEN all over the worldd,
>>>>>>>>>> that can't be identified, and they can claim to fight in all
>>>>>>>>>> the no central bank countries
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Aren't you still afraid of boogy-men hijackers flying a plane
>>>>>>>>>> into another building like 9/11  ??????
>>>>>>>>>> So you let TSA gab your privates. Despite the fact that in all
>>>>>>>>>> the years TSA has been doing that, not one terrorist has been
>>>>>>>>>> found. BOO !!!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>     Either you're doing an Oscar worthy performance of someone
>>>>>>>>> who is extremely delusional, or you are extremely delusional.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Nevermind the insults.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     If you find the truth insulting, maybe you should take action
>>>>>>> to change the truth.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Actually prove me worng,....I dare you.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     It befalls you to prove your claims correct. It does not
>>>>>>> befall me to prove them incorrect.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The illogical minds of Bast and the crazy Troofers.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ....And wait until you see what the TPP is going to bring you.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     TPP?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> To Bast the self-proclaimed dyke, TPP stands for Tea Party
>>>>>> Patriots. She/he has no a wide view of the world so everything for
>>>>>> him/her must be simple, simple, simple.
>>>>>
>>>>> She seems to think everyone who is an unbeliever in Troofery is a
>>>>> wingnut. Once again, as always, she's wrong.
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> But you go ahead and keep supporting the bankster run puppets,
>>>>>>>> and see if you get anything out of it.
>>>>>
>>>>> I guess she actually believes that we unbelievers are being paid to
>>>>> post.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Nope not at all.
>>>> Even the government wouldn't waste that money on you.
>>>>
>>>> But it will be funny to see you being the first into the furnaces,
>>>> when they decide you no longer serve any purpose
>>>>
>>>> Just be real nice when they assign you to a nice warm room at the
>>>> FEMA camp, and don't be concerned at all that the lock is only on the
>>>> OUTSIDE of your room.
>>>
>>> It is so simple.  Jets don't just disappear into buildings or dirt as
>>> in Pranksville,
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Of course not.
>> Even hitting water at any speed would simply leave a mass of twisted
>> and torn metal on the surface.
>>
>> Ask anyone who's done a bellyflop off a diving board how "soft" water
>> is.
>>
>> Every action produces and equal and opposite reaction.
>> So if you hit something at "XXX" miles per hour,....it hits back at
>> "XXX" miles per hour.
>> Anyone haunting an astronomy group should know basic Neutonian physics.
>>
>>
>> I dare say
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>  PS and buildings don't just fall at free fall speed on
>>> their own or fall at near free fall speed with fires only.
>>>
>>> And even NIST can not explain why the Twin Towers really came down or
>>> left a pile of rubble with one wall standing much much higher than the
>>> other walls when it was supposed to be a straight down "collapse."
>>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
>>>
>>> Rocky
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> What was more interesting was the TOWER of central columns that
>> remained. Fell straight down through itself,....when logic would have
>> expected it to tilt over and fall to the side.
>>
>> 9/11 WTC pulverized (with CERN antimatter weapon?) in 10 sec. Bethlehem
>> steel column turns into dust
>>
>>  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pdrL19oqhmg
>>
>>
>> I dare any of these DWEEBunkers to explain THAT
>
> I dare say you're as dumb as Lookey is. Antimatter weapon? WTF is wrong
> with you?





Well,.....the title as a QUESTION MARK.

Then why don't you tell  us, what caused steel beams to turn to dust like 
that  ??

Steel might bend, might lean and fall over,....but not collapse directly 
though itself like that.

AND you can go through all the videos, right from the originals the TV 
networks aired on 9/11,.....and that "smoking gun" is in PLAIN sight.




[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#527640

FromBDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com>
Date2015-10-23 10:29 -0400
Message-ID<MPG.30940e596896e50d98c375@news.giganews.com>
In reply to#527617
In article <n0ctn4$5cr$1@dont-email.me>, fakename@nomail.invalid says...
> 
> BDK wrote:
> > In article <n0bkin$iaq$1@dont-email.me>, fakename@nomail.invalid says...
> >>
> >> Rocky wrote:
> >>> "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote in message
> >>> news:n0aqm2$7aa$1@dont-email.me...
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> BDK wrote:
> >>>>> In article <n4cf2b94nvptfskmqucojfg0hj84m7hrsp@4ax.com>,
> >>>>> ninety7gt@cox.net says...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 20:41:55 -0500, "K Wills (Shill #3)"
> >>>>>> <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 10:01:48 -0400, "Bast"
> >>>>>>> <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> K Wills (Shill #3) wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 19:53:45 -0400, "Bast"
> >>>>>>>>> <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>> 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai
> >>>>>>>>>>>>  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XYw3df-Nslk
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Of course the US doesn't care about winning a War on Terror
> >>>>>>>>>>>> because they started it as proven by the lack of crash
> >>>>>>>>>>>> dynamics of the two alleged jets in Nuke York City meaning
> >>>>>>>>>>>> they were just CGI and the fact the following is not
> >>>>>>>>>>>> consistent with a Kerosene Collapse but it is consistent
> >>>>>>>>>>>> with Nuclear Demolitions where people had to stay out of the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>  site for 2 days when the radiation was the highest.
> >>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Incoherent babble of someone desperately in need of
> >>>>>>>>>>> professional help.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> The US government/bankster stoolies needed a new excuse to
> >>>>>>>>>> steal tax dollars outright, get their central banks in control
> >>>>>>>>>> of the economies of the countries they do not yet control.
> >>>>>>>>>> What better cover than to claim BOOGY-MEN all over the worldd,
> >>>>>>>>>> that can't be identified, and they can claim to fight in all
> >>>>>>>>>> the no central bank countries
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Aren't you still afraid of boogy-men hijackers flying a plane
> >>>>>>>>>> into another building like 9/11  ??????
> >>>>>>>>>> So you let TSA gab your privates. Despite the fact that in all
> >>>>>>>>>> the years TSA has been doing that, not one terrorist has been
> >>>>>>>>>> found. BOO !!!
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>     Either you're doing an Oscar worthy performance of someone
> >>>>>>>>> who is extremely delusional, or you are extremely delusional.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Nevermind the insults.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>     If you find the truth insulting, maybe you should take action
> >>>>>>> to change the truth.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Actually prove me worng,....I dare you.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>     It befalls you to prove your claims correct. It does not
> >>>>>>> befall me to prove them incorrect.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The illogical minds of Bast and the crazy Troofers.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> ....And wait until you see what the TPP is going to bring you.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>     TPP?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> To Bast the self-proclaimed dyke, TPP stands for Tea Party
> >>>>>> Patriots. She/he has no a wide view of the world so everything for
> >>>>>> him/her must be simple, simple, simple.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> She seems to think everyone who is an unbeliever in Troofery is a
> >>>>> wingnut. Once again, as always, she's wrong.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> But you go ahead and keep supporting the bankster run puppets,
> >>>>>>>> and see if you get anything out of it.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I guess she actually believes that we unbelievers are being paid to
> >>>>> post.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Nope not at all.
> >>>> Even the government wouldn't waste that money on you.
> >>>>
> >>>> But it will be funny to see you being the first into the furnaces,
> >>>> when they decide you no longer serve any purpose
> >>>>
> >>>> Just be real nice when they assign you to a nice warm room at the
> >>>> FEMA camp, and don't be concerned at all that the lock is only on the
> >>>> OUTSIDE of your room.
> >>>
> >>> It is so simple.  Jets don't just disappear into buildings or dirt as
> >>> in Pranksville,
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Of course not.
> >> Even hitting water at any speed would simply leave a mass of twisted
> >> and torn metal on the surface.
> >>
> >> Ask anyone who's done a bellyflop off a diving board how "soft" water
> >> is.
> >>
> >> Every action produces and equal and opposite reaction.
> >> So if you hit something at "XXX" miles per hour,....it hits back at
> >> "XXX" miles per hour.
> >> Anyone haunting an astronomy group should know basic Neutonian physics.
> >>
> >>
> >> I dare say
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>  PS and buildings don't just fall at free fall speed on
> >>> their own or fall at near free fall speed with fires only.
> >>>
> >>> And even NIST can not explain why the Twin Towers really came down or
> >>> left a pile of rubble with one wall standing much much higher than the
> >>> other walls when it was supposed to be a straight down "collapse."
> >>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
> >>>
> >>> Rocky
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> What was more interesting was the TOWER of central columns that
> >> remained. Fell straight down through itself,....when logic would have
> >> expected it to tilt over and fall to the side.
> >>
> >> 9/11 WTC pulverized (with CERN antimatter weapon?) in 10 sec. Bethlehem
> >> steel column turns into dust
> >>
> >>  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pdrL19oqhmg
> >>
> >>
> >> I dare any of these DWEEBunkers to explain THAT
> >
> > I dare say you're as dumb as Lookey is. Antimatter weapon? WTF is wrong
> > with you?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Well,.....the title as a QUESTION MARK.
> 
> Then why don't you tell  us, what caused steel beams to turn to dust like 
> that  ??

Since they didn't turn to "dust", I can't answer that question, since 
it's a nonsensical claim.


> 
> Steel might bend, might lean and fall over,....but not collapse directly 
> though itself like that.

Your lack of, well, understanding of what happened is just sad...but it 
still makes me smile when I read it.

> 
> AND you can go through all the videos, right from the originals the TV 
> networks aired on 9/11,.....and that "smoking gun" is in PLAIN sight.

The only thing smoking is the burnt out remains of what was your brain.

-- 
BDK: Head Government Shill, Psychotronic World Dominator. Master of 
Remote Viewing. Level 6 expert in kOOkStudies.
Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former 
Black Helicopter color consultant.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#527652

Frommoroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
Date2015-10-23 15:38 +0000
Message-ID<n0dk9d$sm2$1@pcls7.std.com>
In reply to#527640
BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> writes:

>In article <n0ctn4$5cr$1@dont-email.me>, fakename@nomail.invalid says...
>> 
>> BDK wrote:
>> > In article <n0bkin$iaq$1@dont-email.me>, fakename@nomail.invalid says...

>> >> 9/11 WTC pulverized (with CERN antimatter weapon?) in 10 sec. Bethlehem
>> >> steel column turns into dust
>> >>
>> > I dare say you're as dumb as Lookey is. Antimatter weapon? WTF is wrong
>> > with you?

I will say one thing... k=EA=99=A8=EA=99=A8ktards sure have strong imaginations...

>> Steel might bend, might lean and fall over,....but not collapse directly 
>> though itself like that.

>Your lack of, well, understanding of what happened is just sad...but it 
>still makes me smile when I read it.

I did see a video of the core collapsing, taken from a different angle.
It does fall over to the side.

Also, the existence of the core for several seconds proves Rocky's magic
nuke nonsense as just nonsense...why didn't his magic nuke vaporize the
core?  The existence of the core helps explain how those in the stairwell
survived.  The core protected them from the collapse, then it broke off
and fell over at the 6th floor.

>> AND you can go through all the videos, right from the originals the TV 
>> networks aired on 9/11,.....and that "smoking gun" is in PLAIN sight.

...and that's the problem.  Youtube has been (deliberately) flooded with
k=EA=99=A8=EA=99=A8kvids, it will take too long to find the one I saw earlier.

>The only thing smoking is the burnt out remains of what was your brain.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#527772

From"K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com>
Date2015-10-23 18:44 -0500
Message-ID<2jhl2b9va1g0oocd6v6tkdj5edamg7tgu7@4ax.com>
In reply to#527652
On Fri, 23 Oct 2015 15:38:21 +0000 (UTC),
moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) wrote:

>BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> writes:
>
>>In article <n0ctn4$5cr$1@dont-email.me>, fakename@nomail.invalid says...
>>> 
>>> BDK wrote:
>>> > In article <n0bkin$iaq$1@dont-email.me>, fakename@nomail.invalid says...
>
>>> >> 9/11 WTC pulverized (with CERN antimatter weapon?) in 10 sec. Bethlehem
>>> >> steel column turns into dust
>>> >>
>>> > I dare say you're as dumb as Lookey is. Antimatter weapon? WTF is wrong
>>> > with you?
>
>I will say one thing... k=EA=99=A8=EA=99=A8ktards sure have strong imaginations...
>

     If they were to work on it, they could probably write a decent
screen play. A re-write may be required, but they definitely have the
knack for creating fiction.

>>> Steel might bend, might lean and fall over,....but not collapse directly 
>>> though itself like that.
>
>>Your lack of, well, understanding of what happened is just sad...but it 
>>still makes me smile when I read it.
>
>I did see a video of the core collapsing, taken from a different angle.
>It does fall over to the side.
>
>Also, the existence of the core for several seconds proves Rocky's magic
>nuke nonsense as just nonsense...why didn't his magic nuke vaporize the
>core?  

     Do keep in mind that Roger (Rocky) did prove all 9/11 k00k videos
are lies.

>The existence of the core helps explain how those in the stairwell
>survived.  The core protected them from the collapse, then it broke off
>and fell over at the 6th floor.

     Well known and well documented.

[...]

-- 
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#527813

Frommoroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
Date2015-10-24 01:57 +0000
Message-ID<n0eohc$7or$1@pcls7.std.com>
In reply to#527772
"K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> writes:

>On Fri, 23 Oct 2015 15:38:21 +0000 (UTC),
>moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) wrote:

>>BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> writes:
>>
>>>In article <n0ctn4$5cr$1@dont-email.me>, fakename@nomail.invalid says...
>>>> 
>>>> BDK wrote:
>>>> > In article <n0bkin$iaq$1@dont-email.me>, fakename@nomail.invalid says...
>>
>>>> >> 9/11 WTC pulverized (with CERN antimatter weapon?) in 10 sec. Bethlehem
>>>> >> steel column turns into dust
>>>> >>
>>>> > I dare say you're as dumb as Lookey is. Antimatter weapon? WTF is wrong
>>>> > with you?
>>
>>I will say one thing... kꙨꙨktards sure have strong imaginations...
>>

>     If they were to work on it, they could probably write a decent
>screen play. A re-write may be required, but they definitely have the
>knack for creating fiction.

:-)

>>>> Steel might bend, might lean and fall over,....but not collapse directly 
>>>> though itself like that.
>>
>>>Your lack of, well, understanding of what happened is just sad...but it 
>>>still makes me smile when I read it.
>>
>>I did see a video of the core collapsing, taken from a different angle.
>>It does fall over to the side.
>>
>>Also, the existence of the core for several seconds proves Rocky's magic
>>nuke nonsense as just nonsense...why didn't his magic nuke vaporize the
>>core?  

>     Do keep in mind that Roger (Rocky) did prove all 9/11 k00k videos
>are lies.

Yup.  Good job, Rocky!

>>The existence of the core helps explain how those in the stairwell
>>survived.  The core protected them from the collapse, then it broke off
>>and fell over at the 6th floor.

>     Well known and well documented.

Yes.  Something else that probably contributed was the fact that the 7th
floor was a mechanical floor, which was much stronger than the regular
floors, to carry the weight.  They may have been strong enough to help
deflect debris from the stairwell before failing.  Also, except for a
mezzanine, the lobby was open below the 7th or 6th floor outside the core.  
This may have helped as well as debris fell unhindered, and there were no
failing floors pulling on the core.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#527604

Frommoroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
Date2015-10-23 05:22 +0000
Message-ID<n0cg6c$its$1@pcls7.std.com>
In reply to#527522
"Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> writes:

>Ask anyone who's done a bellyflop off a diving board how "soft" water is.

Yup. Just ask the World Trade Center towers how "soft" those aluminum
water balloons (kerosene balloons) are when they come at you at 540 mph.

>Every action produces and equal and opposite reaction.
>So if you hit something at "XXX" miles per hour,....it hits back at "XXX" 
>miles per hour.

So if someone fires a gun at a person, the bullets will just bounce
right off?  Just like in a Superman cartoon?

>Anyone haunting an astronomy group should know basic Neutonian physics.

That's right.  Multiply the mass of the jets by their high speed of
hundreds of miles of hours and you have a hell of a lot of momentum...
and you know what Newton said about momentum...  Multiply that large mass
by the SQUARE of that speed, now you have a hell of a lot of ENERGY to 
break things....  You're right about Newton.  Newton always wins...so the
towers lose...







> PS and buildings don't just fall at free fall speed on
>> their own or fall at near free fall speed with fires only.
>>
>> And even NIST can not explain why the Twin Towers really came down or
>> left a pile of rubble with one wall standing much much higher than the
>> other walls when it was supposed to be a straight down "collapse."
>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
>>
>> Rocky









>What was more interesting was the TOWER of central columns that remained.
>Fell straight down through itself,....when logic would have expected it to 
>tilt over and fall to the side.

>9/11 WTC pulverized (with CERN antimatter weapon?) in 10 sec. Bethlehem 
>steel column turns into dust

>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pdrL19oqhmg


>I dare any of these DWEEBunkers to explain THAT


[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#527661

From"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net>
Date2015-10-23 11:05 -0500
Message-ID<iYOdnZkjR4KBxrfLnZ2dnUU7-cudnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#527604
"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message 
news:n0cg6c$its$1@pcls7.std.com...
> "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> writes:
>
>>Ask anyone who's done a bellyflop off a diving board how "soft" water is.
>
> Yup. Just ask the World Trade Center towers how "soft" those aluminum
> water balloons (kerosene balloons) are when they come at you at 540 mph.

Riiight.  With the wings that you can see right through just like they were 
a CGIs, skipped across the screen just like a CGI and have a impacts 
identical to CGIs.   Gee, I wonder why there are so many similarities 
between the jets in Nuke York City and CGIs?  <G>

Rocky


[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#527717

From"Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
Date2015-10-23 16:18 -0400
Message-ID<n0e4hn$bta$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#527661

Rocky wrote:
> "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message
> news:n0cg6c$its$1@pcls7.std.com...
>> "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> writes:
>>
>>> Ask anyone who's done a bellyflop off a diving board how "soft" water
>>> is.
>>
>> Yup. Just ask the World Trade Center towers how "soft" those aluminum
>> water balloons (kerosene balloons) are when they come at you at 540
>> mph.
>
> Riiight.  With the wings that you can see right through just like they
> were a CGIs, skipped across the screen just like a CGI and have a
> impacts identical to CGIs.   Gee, I wonder why there are so many
> similarities between the jets in Nuke York City and CGIs?  <G>
>
> Rocky





I'm waiting for some of these idiots to tell us that on the highway at 80 
MPH, a bug doesn't splatter on a car windshield.....But goes right through 
leaving a bug shaped hole.
<LOL>
Oh wait,...I'm sure they will say though, that if the car is stationary and 
the bug fly's at it at 80 MPH,.....It's goes right through,  and comes out 
the back window.

The Nobel committee should be immediately informed, and make sure they get a 
nice shiny award for debunking Newton and his silly anti-9/11 physics. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


Page 2 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics


csiph-web