Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #528254
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.conspiracy, sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai |
| Date | 2015-10-26 17:37 +0000 |
| Organization | The World : www.TheWorld.com : Since 1989 |
| Message-ID | <n0lodc$1u5$1@pcls7.std.com> (permalink) |
| References | (19 earlier) <UNqdnZgKsYcRlLDLnZ2dnUU7-fGdnZ2d@giganews.com> <n0j984$bn6$1@pcls7.std.com> <gdudnZjqsbCor7DLnZ2dnUU7-VudnZ2d@giganews.com> <n0jtvt$eeo$1@pcls7.std.com> <ZqidnZRgNpMQGrDLnZ2dnUU7-audnZ2d@giganews.com> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >news:n0jtvt$eeo$1@pcls7.std.com... >> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >> >>>Too bad you can't offer one photo to prove anything crashed at Pranksville >>>or Shanksville, PA. >> >> Plenty of photos available. Just look. >ROTFLMAO because all I found was a site titled "Hunt the Boeing II >Shanksville edition!" See: You have to search some place like Google, not whatever "kOOksites only" server you're using. >> You have yet to provide any evidence of your kookclaims such as Flight 93 >> landing in Cleveland or whatever. Just handwaving. >Well, it had to land somewhere since it didn't land at Shankville which can >now be called Pranksville. So you don't have any evidence that it landed in Cleveland, or anywhere else. On the other hand, a big smoking crater with 95% of a 757 in it is evidence that it crashed (not landed!) in Shanksville. If you weren't lying, you'd have some evidence, wouldn't you? And of course, if it did land safely, where are the passengers and crew? (Here comes more handwaving, Rocky will kookclaim they're chained to a wall, upside down, in a cave below Guatanamo Bay, or some such kooktarded crap) >> Nobody is interested in your 4 hour kookvids full of lies (which you >> yourself proved!) >And yet you can't state how? Nobody is going to watch your 4 hour kookvids full of lies. >>>Michael your story was BS from the start and I love the way there are so >>>many different excuses for why the debris from the jet that was supposed >>>to >>>have hit the Pentagon was neither inside or outside the Pentagon. >> >> They recovered 95% of that plane, mostly from inside. >inside? inside what? inside the hanger where they put the Boeing for >people on it to make their very last phone calls? You know where I mean. Oh, where are _those_ passengers and crew? Are they in the same cave as Flight 93's passengers? >And yet none of the photos prove anything was recovered. As a matter of >fact the photos at the "Hunt the Boeing II" website don't show any remains Nobody is interested in your lying kooksites. You have been provided evidence, which you are ignoring.
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-19 13:52 -0500
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-19 19:53 +0000
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai Shoe-Chucker 2 <georgewk10@yahoo.com> - 2015-10-19 15:57 -0700
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-20 01:01 +0000
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-20 02:56 +0000
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-19 19:53 -0400
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-19 20:22 -0400
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-20 00:58 +0000
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-20 02:58 +0000
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-20 03:56 -0500
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-20 10:01 -0400
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-20 20:41 -0500
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-21 09:30 -0400
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-21 09:18 -0500
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-21 10:59 -0400
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-21 16:16 +0000
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-21 13:25 -0400
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-22 04:13 -0500
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-22 10:06 -0400
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-22 15:42 -0500
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-22 19:07 -0500
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-22 21:34 -0400
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-23 04:29 -0500
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-23 08:45 -0400
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-23 18:44 -0500
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-21 11:35 -0400
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-21 20:59 -0400
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-22 04:13 -0500
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-22 10:11 -0400
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-22 15:51 -0500
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-22 17:33 -0400
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-22 23:20 -0400
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-23 05:15 -0400
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-23 10:29 -0400
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-23 15:38 +0000
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-23 18:44 -0500
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-24 01:57 +0000
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-23 05:22 +0000
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-23 11:05 -0500
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-23 16:18 -0400
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-10-23 23:49 +0100
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-23 19:35 -0400
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-23 18:44 -0500
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-24 10:42 -0500
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-10-24 17:26 +0100
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-25 00:41 +0000
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-24 21:23 -0500
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-25 04:28 -0500
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-25 06:35 -0500
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-25 14:00 +0000
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-25 11:54 -0500
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-25 19:06 +0000
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-25 14:47 -0500
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-26 01:00 +0000
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-25 20:52 -0500
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-26 17:37 +0000
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-26 15:37 -0500
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-26 23:24 +0000
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-27 15:50 -0500
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-28 15:19 +0000
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-10-28 08:32 -0700
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-10-28 09:28 -0700
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-10-28 10:04 -0700
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-29 04:07 -0500
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-23 15:43 -0400
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-22 23:19 -0400
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-23 04:29 -0500
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-23 10:32 -0400
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-22 21:47 -0400
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-22 04:13 -0500
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-22 21:39 -0400
csiph-web