Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #559542

Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory

Path csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Newsgroups sci.physics
Subject Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory
Date Sat, 5 Mar 2016 06:55:13 -0000
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Lines 16
Sender Jim Pennino <jimp@mail.specsol.com>
Message-ID <hfcqqc-uuf.ln1@mail.specsol.com> (permalink)
References <eb2945b9-3a67-42ca-bec7-94581042e1ab@googlegroups.com> <07imqc-4e3.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <972e7ecc-b30d-4b80-9222-476fda2def3b@googlegroups.com> <9f2nqc-e25.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <234812d6-913e-4af4-8a88-cdc9b6f3d364@googlegroups.com> <r89nqc-hq5.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <eb887c09-f7f5-42e7-9baf-77f7834a3c1a@googlegroups.com> <hfenqc-9a6.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <9589c49e-e389-4ad0-a814-d74499c7e586@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="db4120ef82bbc153014637d4cd15a795"; logging-data="9781"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+vNafaQwyhP0A9ogy1Xjzz"
User-Agent tin/2.2.1-20140504 ("Tober an Righ") (UNIX) (SunOS/5.10 (i86pc))
Cancel-Lock sha1:x1CtCu8RnjirLDwPkZD4xywqU+w=
Xref csiph.com sci.physics:559542

Show key headers only | View raw

James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thursday, March 3, 2016 at 8:31:10 PM UTC-8, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> 
>> I can find lots in all the physics and chemistry books I have as well
>> as numerous references on the Internet.
> 
> It's regrettable you can't provide a direct reference.

I already provided you with the title and author of one physics reference
book.

Finding Internet references is so simple children do it all the time.


-- 
Jim Pennino

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Meteorology Needs a New Theory James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 11:40 -0800
  Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-03 20:08 +0000
    Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 16:15 -0800
      Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-04 00:46 +0000
        Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 17:35 -0800
          Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-04 02:42 +0000
            Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 18:57 -0800
              Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-04 04:10 +0000
                Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 21:08 -0800
                Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-05 06:55 +0000
                Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-05 06:22 -0800
                Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-05 19:00 +0000
                Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-05 11:09 -0800
                Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-05 19:24 +0000
                Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-05 11:40 -0800
                Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-05 22:10 +0000
                Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-05 14:41 -0800
                Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-05 23:03 +0000
        Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-03-04 02:18 +0000
          Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 18:30 -0800
            Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-03-04 02:32 +0000
              Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 18:53 -0800
                Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-04 04:11 +0000
                Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-03-04 06:58 +0000
                Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-04 07:27 -0600
            Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-04 02:45 +0000
              Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 18:58 -0800
                Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-04 04:12 +0000
          Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-04 02:44 +0000
    Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-03 21:59 -0600
  Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 16:52 -0600
  Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 20:39 -0600
    Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 18:55 -0800
      Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-07 13:10 -0600
        Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-07 11:19 -0800
          Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-07 13:30 -0600
            Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-07 11:32 -0800
              Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-07 13:37 -0600
          Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-07 13:36 -0600
            Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-07 11:41 -0800
              Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-07 13:43 -0600
                Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-07 12:16 -0800
                Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-07 15:55 -0600
                Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-07 14:39 -0800
                Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-07 16:42 -0600
                Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-07 14:54 -0800
                Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-07 20:00 -0600
                Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-07 18:11 -0800
                Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-07 22:02 -0600
              Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-07 14:29 -0600
    Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 05:35 -0800
      Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-04 08:03 -0600
        Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 06:14 -0800

csiph-web