Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #559144

Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory

From jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Newsgroups sci.physics
Subject Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory
Date 2016-03-04 04:12 +0000
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <qienqc-9a6.ln1@mail.specsol.com> (permalink)
References (3 earlier) <9f2nqc-e25.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <nbar9d$vqs$1@pcls7.std.com> <0049de30-b33e-4711-93c9-52dc0fdc0143@googlegroups.com> <2f9nqc-hq5.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <aee791c7-3b1a-48d4-aeb8-c9e6a945c4a9@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thursday, March 3, 2016 at 6:46:09 PM UTC-8, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > On Thursday, March 3, 2016 at 6:18:44 PM UTC-8, Michael Moroney wrote:
>> >> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com writes:
>> >> 
>> >> >James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> 
>> >> >> So, What do you think it indicates that you get so emotional about this?
>> >> 
>> >> >The only one getting emotional is you as is typical of the delusional
>> >> >when their delusions are challenged.
>> >> 
>> >> What you're seeing, jimp, is "projection" where the delusional attributes
>> >> to others his own reactions/emotions/etc.  Very common.
>> > 
>> > Do you think you'd be less frustrated if you actually had a genuine dispute?
>> 
>> I don't sense frustration from anyone but you and Sam Wormley.
> 
> Do you think you'd be less frustrated if the evidence confirmed you belief?

As I am not frustrated, you are just projecting again.

 

-- 
Jim Pennino

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Meteorology Needs a New Theory James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 11:40 -0800
  Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-03 20:08 +0000
    Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 16:15 -0800
      Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-04 00:46 +0000
        Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 17:35 -0800
          Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-04 02:42 +0000
            Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 18:57 -0800
              Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-04 04:10 +0000
                Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 21:08 -0800
                Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-05 06:55 +0000
                Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-05 06:22 -0800
                Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-05 19:00 +0000
                Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-05 11:09 -0800
                Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-05 19:24 +0000
                Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-05 11:40 -0800
                Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-05 22:10 +0000
                Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-05 14:41 -0800
                Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-05 23:03 +0000
        Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-03-04 02:18 +0000
          Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 18:30 -0800
            Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-03-04 02:32 +0000
              Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 18:53 -0800
                Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-04 04:11 +0000
                Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-03-04 06:58 +0000
                Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-04 07:27 -0600
            Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-04 02:45 +0000
              Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 18:58 -0800
                Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-04 04:12 +0000
          Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-04 02:44 +0000
    Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-03 21:59 -0600
  Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 16:52 -0600
  Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 20:39 -0600
    Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 18:55 -0800
    Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 05:35 -0800
      Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-04 08:03 -0600
        Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 06:14 -0800

csiph-web