Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory

From	jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Newsgroups	sci.physics
Subject	Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory
Date	2016-03-04 02:42 +0000
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<r89nqc-hq5.ln1@mail.specsol.com> (permalink)
References	<eb2945b9-3a67-42ca-bec7-94581042e1ab@googlegroups.com> <07imqc-4e3.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <972e7ecc-b30d-4b80-9222-476fda2def3b@googlegroups.com> <9f2nqc-e25.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <234812d6-913e-4af4-8a88-cdc9b6f3d364@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thursday, March 3, 2016 at 4:46:17 PM UTC-8, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > On Thursday, March 3, 2016 at 12:16:08 PM UTC-8, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> >> James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> > We all grow up believing that the moisture in clear air is gaseous.
>> >> 
>> >> Nope, we learn that in grade school science class from text books and
>> >> doing simple experiments.
>> >> 
>> >> Later on in high school both the texts and the experiments become more
>> >> complex.
>> >> 
>> >> By the time we get to the college level stuff it has been completely
>> >> proven.
>> >> 
>> >> Your theories, on the other hand, seem to come from a drug dream.
>> > 
>> > So, What do you think it indicates that you get so emotional about this?
>> 
>> The only one getting emotional is you as is typical of the delusional
>> when their delusions are challenged.
> 
> What's your challenge?

Reality; hundreds of years of research, thousand of text books, repeatable
and reproducible experiments, i.e. facts.


-- 
Jim Pennino

Thread

Meteorology Needs a New Theory James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 11:40 -0800
  Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-03 20:08 +0000
    Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 16:15 -0800
      Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-04 00:46 +0000
        Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 17:35 -0800
          Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-04 02:42 +0000
            Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 18:57 -0800
              Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-04 04:10 +0000
                Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 21:08 -0800
                Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-05 06:55 +0000
                Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-05 06:22 -0800
                Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-05 19:00 +0000
                Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-05 11:09 -0800
                Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-05 19:24 +0000
                Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-05 11:40 -0800
                Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-05 22:10 +0000
                Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-05 14:41 -0800
                Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-05 23:03 +0000
        Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-03-04 02:18 +0000
          Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 18:30 -0800
            Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-03-04 02:32 +0000
              Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 18:53 -0800
                Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-04 04:11 +0000
                Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-03-04 06:58 +0000
                Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-04 07:27 -0600
            Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-04 02:45 +0000
              Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 18:58 -0800
                Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-04 04:12 +0000
          Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-04 02:44 +0000
    Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-03 21:59 -0600
  Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 16:52 -0600
  Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 20:39 -0600
    Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 18:55 -0800
    Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 05:35 -0800
      Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-04 08:03 -0600
        Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 06:14 -0800

csiph-web