Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory

From	jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Newsgroups	sci.physics
Subject	Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory
Date	2016-03-05 19:24 +0000
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<mborqc-7gk.ln1@mail.specsol.com> (permalink)
References	(5 earlier) <9589c49e-e389-4ad0-a814-d74499c7e586@googlegroups.com> <hfcqqc-uuf.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <219241c5-8d21-49ad-9d3e-3b4df7dfebd1@googlegroups.com> <40nrqc-7gk.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <e4ed05de-e6a5-43a4-a421-d6290f004866@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Saturday, March 5, 2016 at 11:01:07 AM UTC-8, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > On Saturday, March 5, 2016 at 6:05:12 AM UTC-8, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> >> James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> > On Thursday, March 3, 2016 at 8:31:10 PM UTC-8, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> >> > 
>> >> >> I can find lots in all the physics and chemistry books I have as well
>> >> >> as numerous references on the Internet.
>> >> > 
>> >> > It's regrettable you can't provide a direct reference.
>> >> 
>> >> I already provided you with the title and author of one physics reference
>> >> book.
>> > 
>> > It's regrettable you cannot provide a direct reference?  
>> 
>> How is the title of a reference text NOT a direct reference?
>> 
>> If you are looking for page numbers, that is what the index of the text
>> provides.
>> 
>> Do you understand how books work?
>> 
>> -- 
>> Jim Pennino
> 
> Can you drop a link to one of the "numerous" internet reference instead.  

Children know how to do an Internet search, why don't you know how?

Has anyone ever taken out a restraining order on you?


-- 
Jim Pennino

Thread

Meteorology Needs a New Theory James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 11:40 -0800
  Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-03 20:08 +0000
    Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 16:15 -0800
      Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-04 00:46 +0000
        Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 17:35 -0800
          Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-04 02:42 +0000
            Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 18:57 -0800
              Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-04 04:10 +0000
                Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 21:08 -0800
                Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-05 06:55 +0000
                Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-05 06:22 -0800
                Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-05 19:00 +0000
                Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-05 11:09 -0800
                Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-05 19:24 +0000
                Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-05 11:40 -0800
                Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-05 22:10 +0000
                Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-05 14:41 -0800
                Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-05 23:03 +0000
        Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-03-04 02:18 +0000
          Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 18:30 -0800
            Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-03-04 02:32 +0000
              Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 18:53 -0800
                Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-04 04:11 +0000
                Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-03-04 06:58 +0000
                Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-04 07:27 -0600
            Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-04 02:45 +0000
              Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 18:58 -0800
                Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-04 04:12 +0000
          Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-04 02:44 +0000
    Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-03 21:59 -0600
  Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 16:52 -0600
  Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 20:39 -0600
    Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 18:55 -0800
      Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-07 13:10 -0600
        Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-07 11:19 -0800
          Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-07 13:30 -0600
            Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-07 11:32 -0800
              Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-07 13:37 -0600
          Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-07 13:36 -0600
            Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-07 11:41 -0800
              Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-07 13:43 -0600
                Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-07 12:16 -0800
                Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-07 15:55 -0600
                Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-07 14:39 -0800
                Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-07 16:42 -0600
                Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-07 14:54 -0800
                Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-07 20:00 -0600
                Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-07 18:11 -0800
                Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-07 22:02 -0600
              Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-07 14:29 -0600
    Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 05:35 -0800
      Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-04 08:03 -0600
        Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 06:14 -0800

csiph-web