Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #555267

Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air.

Show key headers only | View raw

James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Saturday, February 20, 2016 at 10:31:05 PM UTC-8, 
> 
>> > You can't produce any real evidence because it doesn't exist. 
>> 
>> Yet more delusional denial of reality.
> 
> You don't have any evidence.  Just belief.   

Nope, the world is full of books, charts, and web sites, all of which
say the same thing.

You just refuse to look at the obvious.

That it a major symptom of delusion.


-- 
Jim Pennino

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-19 16:34 -0800
  Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-02-19 16:48 -0800
    Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-19 17:00 -0800
      Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-19 17:02 -0800
        Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-19 19:11 -0600
          Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-19 17:20 -0800
            Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-19 19:27 -0600
              Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 09:38 +0100
                Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 09:13 -0800
                Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-20 19:06 +0000
      Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-19 19:09 -0600
        Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-19 17:15 -0800
          Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-19 19:17 -0600
            Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-19 17:22 -0800
              slow, medium & fast waves of Alfven noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-02-19 17:37 -0800
            Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2016-02-19 20:36 -0500
              Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-19 17:59 -0800
          Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-20 01:37 +0000
      Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-02-20 12:13 -0800
        Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 21:19 +0100
          Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-02-20 12:26 -0800
            Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 21:28 +0100
            Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 12:33 -0800
              Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-02-20 12:51 -0800
        Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 12:27 -0800
          Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-02-20 12:48 -0800
            Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 13:10 -0800
              Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 13:42 -0800
                Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-02-20 17:03 -0600
    Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-19 18:14 -0800
      Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-02-20 12:19 -0800
        Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 12:33 -0800
          Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-02-20 17:04 -0600
    Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-19 20:45 -0800
      Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-02-20 17:05 -0600
    Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 09:28 +0100
  Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-02-19 19:04 -0600
    Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-02-19 19:06 -0600
  Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-20 01:33 +0000
    Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-19 17:56 -0800
      Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-02-19 21:11 -0600
      Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-20 04:40 +0000
        Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-19 21:46 -0800
          Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-02-20 00:49 -0600
          Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-20 07:05 +0000
    Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-19 18:01 -0800
  Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-20 03:54 +0000
    Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-19 20:44 -0800
    Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-20 04:45 +0000
      Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-19 21:47 -0800
        Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-20 07:06 +0000
      Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-19 21:50 -0800
        Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-20 07:09 +0000
          Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 07:34 -0800
    Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-19 22:05 -0800
      Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-20 07:10 +0000
      Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-21 06:57 +0000
        Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-02-21 10:32 +0100
          Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-21 01:59 -0800
          Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-21 02:54 -0800
        Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-21 02:05 -0800
    Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 09:43 +0100
      Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 09:16 -0800
      Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 09:21 -0800
      Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 09:22 -0800
        Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-02-20 12:45 -0600
  Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-19 23:08 -0800
    Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-20 19:09 +0000
      Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 11:23 -0800
        Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-20 19:39 +0000
        Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-02-20 13:46 -0600
          Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 12:11 -0800
            Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-02-20 16:24 -0600
        Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 16:59 -0600
          Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-02-21 10:22 +0100
            Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-21 01:58 -0800
            Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-21 02:56 -0800
            Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-21 12:39 -0600
      Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 12:12 -0800
        Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-20 20:32 +0000
  Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-02-20 18:28 -0600
  Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-21 01:10 +0000
    Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 17:29 -0800
      Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-21 02:22 +0000
        Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 18:53 -0800
          Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-21 06:03 +0000
            Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-21 01:16 -0800
              Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-21 18:25 +0000
                Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-21 10:35 -0800
                Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-21 19:29 +0000
                Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-21 11:57 -0800
        Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 19:07 -0800
          Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-21 06:04 +0000
            Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-21 01:19 -0800
              Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-21 18:29 +0000
                Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-21 10:36 -0800
                Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-21 19:36 +0000
                Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-21 12:00 -0800
        Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 21:05 -0800
          Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-21 06:05 +0000
            Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-21 02:06 -0800
              Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-21 18:31 +0000

csiph-web