Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #555127
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. |
| Date | 2016-02-20 17:04 -0600 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <naared$1am6$2@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <145dc270-174e-4c35-9eb5-3c5c0785dc16@googlegroups.com> <93f86b73-0c93-45c3-9f52-f3b7079ae882@googlegroups.com> <91563603-00db-42e1-8756-bca2dacbd175@googlegroups.com> <27608dfb-f8aa-4f74-99c0-2a00ee97b01e@googlegroups.com> <d627b28f-6063-4e14-869d-0f9bd1caa9d8@googlegroups.com> |
On 2/20/2016 2:33 PM, Solving Tornadoes wrote: > On Saturday, February 20, 2016 at 12:19:59 PM UTC-8, pnal...@gmail.com wrote: >> On Friday, February 19, 2016 at 6:15:02 PM UTC-8, James McGinn wrote: >>> On Friday, February 19, 2016 at 4:48:48 PM UTC-8, pnal...@gmail.com >>> >>>> Tell us about Avogadro's Law, and why it is, or is not, important in this discussion... if you dare. >>> >>> It's not that difficult of a concept. You should have had an answer by now? >>> >>> What do you think the problem is, Jim? >>> >>> Show us your math. Go ahead. We won't bite. >> >> Uhhh.. just who is Jim? > > You failed. > no, he passed with a B+, but you got an F- .
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-19 16:34 -0800
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-02-19 16:48 -0800
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-19 17:00 -0800
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-19 17:02 -0800
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-19 19:11 -0600
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-19 17:20 -0800
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-19 19:27 -0600
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 09:38 +0100
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 09:13 -0800
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-20 19:06 +0000
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-19 19:09 -0600
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-19 17:15 -0800
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-19 19:17 -0600
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-19 17:22 -0800
slow, medium & fast waves of Alfven noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-02-19 17:37 -0800
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2016-02-19 20:36 -0500
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-19 17:59 -0800
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-20 01:37 +0000
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-02-20 12:13 -0800
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 21:19 +0100
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-02-20 12:26 -0800
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 21:28 +0100
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 12:33 -0800
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-02-20 12:51 -0800
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 12:27 -0800
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-02-20 12:48 -0800
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 13:10 -0800
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 13:42 -0800
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-02-20 17:03 -0600
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-19 18:14 -0800
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-02-20 12:19 -0800
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 12:33 -0800
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-02-20 17:04 -0600
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-19 20:45 -0800
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-02-20 17:05 -0600
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 09:28 +0100
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-02-19 19:04 -0600
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-02-19 19:06 -0600
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-20 01:33 +0000
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-19 17:56 -0800
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-02-19 21:11 -0600
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-20 04:40 +0000
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-19 21:46 -0800
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-02-20 00:49 -0600
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-20 07:05 +0000
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-19 18:01 -0800
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-20 03:54 +0000
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-19 20:44 -0800
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-20 04:45 +0000
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-19 21:47 -0800
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-20 07:06 +0000
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-19 21:50 -0800
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-20 07:09 +0000
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 07:34 -0800
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-19 22:05 -0800
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-20 07:10 +0000
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-21 06:57 +0000
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-02-21 10:32 +0100
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-21 01:59 -0800
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-21 02:54 -0800
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-21 02:05 -0800
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 09:43 +0100
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 09:16 -0800
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 09:21 -0800
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 09:22 -0800
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-02-20 12:45 -0600
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-19 23:08 -0800
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-20 19:09 +0000
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 11:23 -0800
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-20 19:39 +0000
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-02-20 13:46 -0600
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 12:11 -0800
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-02-20 16:24 -0600
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 16:59 -0600
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-02-21 10:22 +0100
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-21 01:58 -0800
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-21 02:56 -0800
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-21 12:39 -0600
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 12:12 -0800
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-20 20:32 +0000
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-02-20 18:28 -0600
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-21 01:10 +0000
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 17:29 -0800
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-21 02:22 +0000
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 18:53 -0800
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-21 06:03 +0000
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-21 01:16 -0800
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-21 18:25 +0000
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-21 10:35 -0800
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-21 19:29 +0000
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-21 11:57 -0800
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 19:07 -0800
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-21 06:04 +0000
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-21 01:19 -0800
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-21 18:29 +0000
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-21 10:36 -0800
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-21 19:36 +0000
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-21 12:00 -0800
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 21:05 -0800
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-21 06:05 +0000
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-21 02:06 -0800
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-21 18:31 +0000
csiph-web