Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #554902
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. |
| Date | 2016-02-20 07:10 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <p4glpc-5ma.ln1@mail.specsol.com> (permalink) |
| References | <145dc270-174e-4c35-9eb5-3c5c0785dc16@googlegroups.com> <na8o22$4mt$1@pcls7.std.com> <8eb76e9a-c316-42ba-9359-1132a84da5d1@googlegroups.com> |
James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote: > On Friday, February 19, 2016 at 7:55:00 PM UTC-8, Michael Moroney wrote: >> >Subject: Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative >> >weight of moist air. >> >> Considering *I*'ve seen it measured, when I was in college, I have to >> believe this is very wrong. > > So, why do you think nobody made the results of the experiment available? Did they forget? Kook babble. The experiments can be done by anyone and the results are always the same. But no, high school science classes don't generally publish the results of common experiments. -- Jim Pennino
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-19 16:34 -0800
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-02-19 16:48 -0800
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-19 17:00 -0800
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-19 17:02 -0800
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-19 19:11 -0600
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-19 17:20 -0800
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-19 19:27 -0600
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 09:38 +0100
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 09:13 -0800
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-20 19:06 +0000
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-19 19:09 -0600
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-19 17:15 -0800
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-19 19:17 -0600
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-19 17:22 -0800
slow, medium & fast waves of Alfven noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-02-19 17:37 -0800
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2016-02-19 20:36 -0500
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-19 17:59 -0800
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-20 01:37 +0000
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-02-20 12:13 -0800
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 21:19 +0100
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-02-20 12:26 -0800
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 21:28 +0100
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 12:33 -0800
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-02-20 12:51 -0800
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 12:27 -0800
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-02-20 12:48 -0800
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 13:10 -0800
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 13:42 -0800
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-02-20 17:03 -0600
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-19 18:14 -0800
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-02-20 12:19 -0800
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 12:33 -0800
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-02-20 17:04 -0600
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-19 20:45 -0800
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-02-20 17:05 -0600
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 09:28 +0100
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-02-19 19:04 -0600
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-02-19 19:06 -0600
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-20 01:33 +0000
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-19 17:56 -0800
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-02-19 21:11 -0600
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-20 04:40 +0000
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-19 21:46 -0800
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-02-20 00:49 -0600
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-20 07:05 +0000
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-19 18:01 -0800
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-20 03:54 +0000
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-19 20:44 -0800
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-20 04:45 +0000
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-19 21:47 -0800
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-20 07:06 +0000
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-19 21:50 -0800
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-20 07:09 +0000
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 07:34 -0800
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-19 22:05 -0800
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-20 07:10 +0000
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-21 06:57 +0000
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-02-21 10:32 +0100
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-21 01:59 -0800
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-21 02:54 -0800
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-21 02:05 -0800
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 09:43 +0100
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 09:16 -0800
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 09:21 -0800
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 09:22 -0800
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-02-20 12:45 -0600
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-19 23:08 -0800
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-20 19:09 +0000
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 11:23 -0800
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-20 19:39 +0000
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-02-20 13:46 -0600
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 12:11 -0800
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-02-20 16:24 -0600
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 16:59 -0600
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-02-21 10:22 +0100
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-21 01:58 -0800
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-21 02:56 -0800
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-21 12:39 -0600
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 12:12 -0800
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-20 20:32 +0000
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-02-20 18:28 -0600
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-21 01:10 +0000
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 17:29 -0800
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-21 02:22 +0000
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 18:53 -0800
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-21 06:03 +0000
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-21 01:16 -0800
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-21 18:25 +0000
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-21 10:35 -0800
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-21 19:29 +0000
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-21 11:57 -0800
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 19:07 -0800
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-21 06:04 +0000
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-21 01:19 -0800
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-21 18:29 +0000
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-21 10:36 -0800
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-21 19:36 +0000
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-21 12:00 -0800
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 21:05 -0800
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-21 06:05 +0000
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-21 02:06 -0800
Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-21 18:31 +0000
csiph-web