Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #555189

Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air.

Show all headers | View raw

Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> It's not like any of you idiots even understand the convection model.  It's just a simple model that appeal to your simple notions.  None of you idiots will even make the slightest effort to scrutinize it.  Until I brought it up none of your even thought to question it.  You are all brain dead believers.  Sheep.

Convection can be observed with Schlieren imaging.


-- 
Jim Pennino

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-19 16:34 -0800
  Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-02-19 16:48 -0800
    Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-19 17:00 -0800
      Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-19 17:02 -0800
        Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-19 19:11 -0600
          Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-19 17:20 -0800
            Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-19 19:27 -0600
              Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 09:38 +0100
                Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 09:13 -0800
                Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-20 19:06 +0000
      Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-19 19:09 -0600
        Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-19 17:15 -0800
          Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-19 19:17 -0600
            Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-19 17:22 -0800
              slow, medium & fast waves of Alfven noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-02-19 17:37 -0800
            Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2016-02-19 20:36 -0500
              Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-19 17:59 -0800
          Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-20 01:37 +0000
      Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-02-20 12:13 -0800
        Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 21:19 +0100
          Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-02-20 12:26 -0800
            Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 21:28 +0100
            Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 12:33 -0800
              Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-02-20 12:51 -0800
        Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 12:27 -0800
          Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-02-20 12:48 -0800
            Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 13:10 -0800
              Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 13:42 -0800
                Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-02-20 17:03 -0600
    Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-19 18:14 -0800
      Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-02-20 12:19 -0800
        Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 12:33 -0800
          Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-02-20 17:04 -0600
    Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-19 20:45 -0800
      Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-02-20 17:05 -0600
    Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 09:28 +0100
  Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-02-19 19:04 -0600
    Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-02-19 19:06 -0600
  Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-20 01:33 +0000
    Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-19 17:56 -0800
      Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-02-19 21:11 -0600
      Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-20 04:40 +0000
        Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-19 21:46 -0800
          Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-02-20 00:49 -0600
          Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-20 07:05 +0000
    Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-19 18:01 -0800
  Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-20 03:54 +0000
    Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-19 20:44 -0800
    Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-20 04:45 +0000
      Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-19 21:47 -0800
        Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-20 07:06 +0000
      Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-19 21:50 -0800
        Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-20 07:09 +0000
          Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 07:34 -0800
    Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-19 22:05 -0800
      Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-20 07:10 +0000
      Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-21 06:57 +0000
        Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-02-21 10:32 +0100
          Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-21 01:59 -0800
          Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-21 02:54 -0800
        Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-21 02:05 -0800
    Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 09:43 +0100
      Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 09:16 -0800
      Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 09:21 -0800
      Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 09:22 -0800
        Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-02-20 12:45 -0600
  Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-19 23:08 -0800
    Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-20 19:09 +0000
      Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 11:23 -0800
        Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-20 19:39 +0000
        Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-02-20 13:46 -0600
          Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 12:11 -0800
            Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-02-20 16:24 -0600
        Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 16:59 -0600
          Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-02-21 10:22 +0100
            Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-21 01:58 -0800
            Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-21 02:56 -0800
            Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-21 12:39 -0600
      Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 12:12 -0800
        Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-20 20:32 +0000
  Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-02-20 18:28 -0600
  Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-21 01:10 +0000
    Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 17:29 -0800
      Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-21 02:22 +0000
        Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 18:53 -0800
          Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-21 06:03 +0000
            Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-21 01:16 -0800
              Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-21 18:25 +0000
                Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-21 10:35 -0800
                Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-21 19:29 +0000
                Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-21 11:57 -0800
        Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 19:07 -0800
          Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-21 06:04 +0000
            Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-21 01:19 -0800
              Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-21 18:29 +0000
                Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-21 10:36 -0800
                Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-21 19:36 +0000
                Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-21 12:00 -0800
        Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 21:05 -0800
          Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-21 06:05 +0000
            Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-21 02:06 -0800
              Re: Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-21 18:31 +0000

csiph-web