Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #548729

Re: The Thought Police Have Declared Water "Well Understood." -- Politics of Water Science --

Show all headers | View raw

On 24/01/2016 2:47 AM, benj wrote:
> On 01/23/2016 07:34 AM, Sylvia Else wrote:
>> On 23/01/2016 4:42 PM, James McGinn wrote:
>>> On Friday, January 22, 2016 at 9:34:09 PM UTC-8, Sylvia Else wrote:
>>>
>>>> They just don't want your cluttering up their newsgroup with nonsense.
>>>> There are plenty of other places to spout, if you feel the need.
>>>
>>> It is because I am a "denier" of global warming.
>>>
>>
>> I don't see how you can know that. There are many plausible reasons for
>> their having silenced you.
>>
>> Sylvia.
>
> People aren't silenced for saying stupid things. They aren't silenced
> for saying things that are wrong or lies. This much is obvious. They are
> silenced for saying things that go directly against the basic dogma of
> modern science. Warming denying is clearly one of those. Of course
> discussing any "forbidden topic" is equally effective. I got banned for
> life as a "crank" for just MENTIONING the theory of uniformity and
> nobody even accepts it anymore!

In a moderated group, people can just get tired of the noise.

Sylvia.

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

The Thought Police Have Declared Water "Well Understood."  -- Politics of Water Science -- James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 21:13 -0800
  Re: The Thought Police Have Declared Water "Well Understood." -- Politics of Water Science -- Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-01-23 16:34 +1100
    Re: The Thought Police Have Declared Water "Well Understood." -- Politics of Water Science -- James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 21:42 -0800
      Re: The Thought Police Have Declared Water "Well Understood." -- Politics of Water Science -- Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-01-23 23:34 +1100
        Re: The Thought Police Have Declared Water "Well Understood." -- Politics of Water Science -- R Kym Horsell <kym@kymhorsell.com> - 2016-01-23 14:35 +0000
          Re: The Thought Police Have Declared Water "Well Understood." -- Politics of Water Science -- john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-01-23 07:49 -0800
            Re: The Thought Police Have Declared Water "Well Understood." -- Politics of Water Science -- Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-23 10:00 -0600
            Re: The Thought Police Have Declared Water "Well Understood." -- Politics of Water Science -- James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-23 08:43 -0800
        Re: The Thought Police Have Declared Water "Well Understood." -- Politics of Water Science -- benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-23 10:47 -0500
          Re: The Thought Police Have Declared Water "Well Understood." -- Politics of Water Science -- Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-01-28 17:13 +1100
            Re: The Thought Police Have Declared Water "Well Understood." -- Politics of Water Science -- James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 08:04 -0800
  Re: The Thought Police Have Declared Water "Well Understood."  -- Politics of Water Science -- Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 10:22 -0800
    Re: The Thought Police Have Declared Water "Well Understood." -- Politics of Water Science -- Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 13:31 -0600
  Re: The Thought Police Have Declared Water "Well Understood."  -- Politics of Water Science -- James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-27 11:33 -0800

csiph-web