Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #547406
| From | Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: The Thought Police Have Declared Water "Well Understood." -- Politics of Water Science -- |
| Date | 2016-01-23 16:34 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <dgghmdFebdqU2@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <d3818c2b-500c-4b83-9e58-b53343b313b0@googlegroups.com> |
On 23/01/2016 4:13 PM, James McGinn wrote: > Jonathan Thornburg [remove -animal to reply] > > 8:13 PM (46 minutes ago) > > > This thread seems to have run its course. The basic thermodynamics > of water in its various phases is well-understood, and no substantive > arguments to the contrary have emerged. After discussion between the > moderators, we have therefore unanamously agreed to close this thread. > > ciao, > They just don't want your cluttering up their newsgroup with nonsense. There are plenty of other places to spout, if you feel the need. Sylvia.
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
The Thought Police Have Declared Water "Well Understood." -- Politics of Water Science -- James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 21:13 -0800
Re: The Thought Police Have Declared Water "Well Understood." -- Politics of Water Science -- Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-01-23 16:34 +1100
Re: The Thought Police Have Declared Water "Well Understood." -- Politics of Water Science -- James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 21:42 -0800
Re: The Thought Police Have Declared Water "Well Understood." -- Politics of Water Science -- Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-01-23 23:34 +1100
Re: The Thought Police Have Declared Water "Well Understood." -- Politics of Water Science -- R Kym Horsell <kym@kymhorsell.com> - 2016-01-23 14:35 +0000
Re: The Thought Police Have Declared Water "Well Understood." -- Politics of Water Science -- john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-01-23 07:49 -0800
Re: The Thought Police Have Declared Water "Well Understood." -- Politics of Water Science -- Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-23 10:00 -0600
Re: The Thought Police Have Declared Water "Well Understood." -- Politics of Water Science -- James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-23 08:43 -0800
Re: The Thought Police Have Declared Water "Well Understood." -- Politics of Water Science -- benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-23 10:47 -0500
Re: The Thought Police Have Declared Water "Well Understood." -- Politics of Water Science -- Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-01-28 17:13 +1100
Re: The Thought Police Have Declared Water "Well Understood." -- Politics of Water Science -- James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 08:04 -0800
Re: The Thought Police Have Declared Water "Well Understood." -- Politics of Water Science -- Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 10:22 -0800
Re: The Thought Police Have Declared Water "Well Understood." -- Politics of Water Science -- Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 13:31 -0600
Re: The Thought Police Have Declared Water "Well Understood." -- Politics of Water Science -- James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-27 11:33 -0800
csiph-web