Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #547452

Re: The Thought Police Have Declared Water "Well Understood." -- Politics of Water Science --

From Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address>
Newsgroups sci.physics
Subject Re: The Thought Police Have Declared Water "Well Understood." -- Politics of Water Science --
Date 2016-01-23 23:34 +1100
Message-ID <dghaa4Fk8vhU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References <d3818c2b-500c-4b83-9e58-b53343b313b0@googlegroups.com> <dgghmdFebdqU2@mid.individual.net> <f135f0fd-4bed-4d30-af6e-09629c7862b2@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw


On 23/01/2016 4:42 PM, James McGinn wrote:
> On Friday, January 22, 2016 at 9:34:09 PM UTC-8, Sylvia Else wrote:
>
>> They just don't want your cluttering up their newsgroup with nonsense.
>> There are plenty of other places to spout, if you feel the need.
>
> It is because I am a "denier" of global warming.
>

I don't see how you can know that. There are many plausible reasons for 
their having silenced you.

Sylvia.

Back to sci.physics | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

The Thought Police Have Declared Water "Well Understood."  -- Politics of Water Science -- James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 21:13 -0800
  Re: The Thought Police Have Declared Water "Well Understood." -- Politics of Water Science -- Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-01-23 16:34 +1100
    Re: The Thought Police Have Declared Water "Well Understood." -- Politics of Water Science -- James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 21:42 -0800
      Re: The Thought Police Have Declared Water "Well Understood." -- Politics of Water Science -- Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-01-23 23:34 +1100
        Re: The Thought Police Have Declared Water "Well Understood." -- Politics of Water Science -- R Kym Horsell <kym@kymhorsell.com> - 2016-01-23 14:35 +0000
          Re: The Thought Police Have Declared Water "Well Understood." -- Politics of Water Science -- john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-01-23 07:49 -0800
            Re: The Thought Police Have Declared Water "Well Understood." -- Politics of Water Science -- Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-23 10:00 -0600
            Re: The Thought Police Have Declared Water "Well Understood." -- Politics of Water Science -- James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-23 08:43 -0800
        Re: The Thought Police Have Declared Water "Well Understood." -- Politics of Water Science -- benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-23 10:47 -0500
          Re: The Thought Police Have Declared Water "Well Understood." -- Politics of Water Science -- Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-01-28 17:13 +1100
            Re: The Thought Police Have Declared Water "Well Understood." -- Politics of Water Science -- James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 08:04 -0800
  Re: The Thought Police Have Declared Water "Well Understood."  -- Politics of Water Science -- Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 10:22 -0800
    Re: The Thought Police Have Declared Water "Well Understood." -- Politics of Water Science -- Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 13:31 -0600
  Re: The Thought Police Have Declared Water "Well Understood."  -- Politics of Water Science -- James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-27 11:33 -0800

csiph-web