Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #550948
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| References | (2 earlier) <063a1950683b63eec1b5ccd593fd83a9@dizum.com> <n92saj$1dp3$1@gioia.aioe.org> <a56f36549e06183d9cbf20e4f756bc5d@dizum.com> <n945me$1143$1@gioia.aioe.org> <ee7e5d6b47fc9f9b3589e03d58af414a@dizum.com> |
| Subject | Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast |
| Message-ID | <cd8a619da336dee5cec7c75f5c1ef6a6@dizum.com> (permalink) |
| Date | 2016-02-06 20:01 +0100 |
| Newsgroups | alt.free.newsservers, alt.usenet.kooks, sci.physics |
| Organization | dizum.com - The Internet Problem Provider |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, in
<news:ee7e5d6b47fc9f9b3589e03d58af414a@dizum.com> wrote:
> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>
> Ko0O0oki kensi the lunkheaded libtard, in
> <news:n945me$1143$1@gioia.aioe.org> did thusly jump head first into
> the wood chipper again:
>> On 06/02/2016 1:38 AM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
>> Emeritus wrote:
> Message-ID: <65d0f5e1ad03d42086b4a492e0eba763@dizum.com>
> ========================================================
> ========================================================
>> <http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=134389570800>
>
> Kensi was "vacationing"... in Pembroke, Ontario, Canada... quite by
> coincidence, you understand... LunkHead was there with Nadegda,
> apparently.
>
> And Nadegda and Kensi most definitely were *not* there to double-team
> on Paul Derbyshire's mushroom-slathered meatpole.
>
> Paul Derbyshire is a life-long virgin, you see. He'll never touch
> anything more feminine than his hand with a Barbie-doll wig glued to
> it, paste-on eyes, and his mother's hooker-pink lipstick smeared
> between thumb and index finger knuckle. Ironically, he's named his
> f(e)isty lover "kensi". She's really hot in the sack... an expert in
> getting anal. Sometimes, she takes it so deeply it pokes out of her
> mouth!
>
> Oh, here's Kensi:
> <http://goo.gl/hdpXFC>
>
> She's Paul Derbyshire's regular Saturday night thang. Ain't she purdy?
> I'm sure a lot of guys have hit that. Chimpy's hit that... twice.
>
> Strangely and quite coincidentally, Paul Derbyshire calls his right
> thumb "Nadegda". I found a picture of Nadegda, too.
>
> <https://goo.gl/sbdRcq>
>
> You don't wanna know what she's into. *Really* kinky stuff. Suffice to
> say sometimes she invites along her four sisters for what she calls
> "sexy spelunking". You know what they say... fugly chicks gotta go
> kinky. LOL
>
>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sdyBYSuqQBQ>
>
>> P.S. How's the astrophysics coming along? Have you visited
>> any good telescopes lately?
>
> Ask kensi which observatories nearby have time standard control
> capability. That's something every astronomer should know, right?
>
> <snicker>
> ========================================================
> ========================================================
>
> I note you've studiously avoided answering which observatories have
> time standard control capability, LunkHead... only those who actually
> work at an observatory would even know about such a thing, let alone
> which observatories have that capability... but then, everyone knows
> lumpy dumpy frumpy slumpy wannabes always out their womanly socks
> because they're too stoooopid to play the part of the identity they've
> assumed. Perhaps for your next sock, you should play the part of a mop
> jockey or a streetwalker... that'd be something you could handle,
> dude.
>
> <snicker>
>>>>> Most infrared thermometers utilize a band of infrared from 5.5 to 14
>>>>> microns, therefore it's measuring outside the ~11-micron infrared
>>>>> atmospheric window
>>>> So is most of the blackbody radiation from a patch of winter snow, kOok.
>>> Lunkhead is now attempting to state that the ~11-micron infrared
>>> atmospheric window extends from 5.5 to 14 micron. LOL!
>>>
>>> Lunkhead doesn't know that atmospheric absorption in the infrared
>>> range rises rapidly below ~8 micron, reaching ~100% absorption at ~6
>>> micron. On the opposite side, atmospheric absorption rises rapidly at
>>> ~12.5 micron, reaching ~100% at ~14.2 micron. So there's a very narrow
>>> window at ~10 to ~12.5 micron, and from ~8 to ~9 micron which
>>> constitutes the infrared atmospheric window.
>>>
>>> Water and ice emit at ~11 micron. Right in the center of the
>>> atmospheric infrared window, thus that energy is radiated straight out
>>> to space unimpeded, without heating the atmosphere, even if clouds are
>>> present. Moron. LOL
>>>
>>> So the infrared thermometer used in that high school-level experiment
>>> would have been picking up reflected IR from ~5.5 to ~8 microns and
>>> from ~12.5 to ~14 microns, which is outside the infrared atmospheric
>>> window and thus reflecting the heat of the infrared laser diode, thus
>>> skewing the results.
>>>
>>> But then, high school-level experiments are the best LunkHead can
>>> do... meanwhile, those peer reviewed studies remain unrefuted, the
>>> NASA SABER study remains undisputed, and LunkHead remains *wrong*. LOL
>>>
>>> --------------------------
>>>
>>> Kensi The K0ok doesn't want anyone to realize that he was yet again
>>> 180 degrees out from reality. To wit, LunkHead k'lamed global warming
>>> causes stronger hurricanes, but in reality:
>>>
>>> "The total and UV solar radiation - A hurricane's maximum potential
>>> energy is _inversely_ related to the temperature at the top of the
>>> convective clouds in the central core (Emanuel, 1991; Holland, 1997).
>>> An active Sun warms the lower stratosphere and upper troposphere
>>> through ozone absorption of additional UV radiation. A warming
>>> response in the upper troposphere to increased solar UV forcing
>>> _decreases_ the atmosphere convective available potential energy
>>> leading to a _weaker_ cyclone (Elsner and Jagger, 2008)."
>>>
>>> To wit, LunkHead k'lamed that CO2 causes global warming:
>>>
>>> <http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2012/22mar_saber/>
>>> =================================================================
>>> "Carbon dioxide and nitric oxide are natural thermostats," explains
>>> James Russell of Hampton University, SABER's principal investigator.
>>> "When the upper atmosphere (or 'thermosphere') heats up, these
>>> molecules try as hard as they can to shed that heat back into space."
>>>
>>> For the three day period, March 8th through 10th, the thermosphere
>>> absorbed 26 billion kWh of energy. Infrared radiation from CO2 and NO,
>>> the two most efficient _coolants_ in the thermosphere, re-radiated 95%
>>> of that total back into space.
>>>
>>> {NOTE: They did this by absorbing then re-emitting that energy at the
>>> wavelength of the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window.}
>>> =================================================================
>>>
>>> To wit, LunkHead k'lames the planet is warming, in spite of the proof
>>> from NASA, UAH, UK Met, RSS, NSIDC, SIDC SILSO and other research
>>> facilities proving it's cooling:
>>>
>>> =================================================================
>>> <http://www.breitbart.com/london/2014/06/26/study-that-warned-of-global-warming-over-past-decade-ridiculed-after-temperatures-drop/>
>>> The UK Met trend shows a -0.014 C per decade (and accelerating)
>>> *decrease*.
>>>
>>> Message-ID: <e46a4017e5a77519d1489cd3f1129c08@dizum.com>
>>> The actual underlying (read: unmanipulated) NOAA data shows a 0.6186 F
>>> *decrease* from 2005 to 2015.
>>>
>>> <http://www.globalresearch.ca/global-cooling-is-here/10783>
>>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4LkMweOVOOI>
>>> Dr. Don Easterbrook shows the past global warming was solar and
>>> orbital forcing induced, the conditions have changed, and global
>>> cooling has set in... since 1998.
>>>
>>> <http://www.reportingclimatescience.com/news-stories/article/global-warming-pause-hits-18-years-on-rss-data.html>
>>> Using UK Met, UAH and RSS data.
>>>
>>> Page 11 - Global temperature rate (C per year): dropping since ~1998.
>>> *Negative* since ~2005. That means temps have been dropping for ~17
>>> years, and the gullible LibTarDs have been lied to for ~17 years:
>>> <http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/media/pdf/e/f/Paper1_Observing_changes_in_the_climate_system.PDF>
>>>
>>> Message-ID: <b41f4a8054430ac46092e607919d7063@dizum.com>
>>> Even NASA admitted that global temperatures were falling in recent
>>> years (before they pulled that page... luckily the WayBack Machine
>>> archived it):
>>> <http://web.archive.org/web/20030816225534/http://icp.giss.nasa.gov/research/methane/greenhouse.html>
>>> Note the center trace for modern times in that graphic... *falling*
>>> temperature, even as CO2 and methane rose.
>>>
>>> "There has been no warming since '98, and a very slight cooling that
>>> is not statistically significant." - James Hansen
>>>
>>> <http://phys.org/news/2014-08-global-temperature-conundrum-cooling-climate.html>
>>> "We have been building models and there are now robust
>>> contradictions," says Liu, a professor in the UW-Madison Center for
>>> Climatic Research. "Data from observation says global cooling. The
>>> physical model says it has to be warming."
>>>
>>> ===============================================================
>>> Taken from the hacked ClimateGate 1.0 and ClimateGate 2.0 emails:
>>> <http://tomnelson.blogspot.com/2012/01/email-4141-glimpse-into-climate-science.html>
>>>
>>> "I think the notion of telling the public to prepare for both global
>>> warming and an ice age at the same time creates a real public
>>> relations problem for us." - Asher Minns, "climate scientist" from
>>> scandal-rocked University of East Anglia, letting the cat completely
>>> out of the bag.
>>>
>>> You'll note he doesn't say "global cooling", he specifically says "an
>>> ice age"... that's telling, don't you think? LOL
>>> ===============================================================
>>>
>>> You can't refute any of the several peer-reviewed studies posted, you
>>> can't refute the NASA SABER study proving CO2 is a global *coolant*,
>>> you can't refute the existence of the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric
>>> window which is how CO2 works as a global *coolant*, and in order for
>>> your k'lame of CO2 being a greenhouse gas to work, you have to somehow
>>> do away with the infrared atmospheric window. To fail to do that means
>>> your kook contention of CO2 being a greenhouse gas violates the First
>>> and Second Laws of Thermodynamics.
>>>
>>> SPNAK!
>> Nope. Reread what I said, kOok. This time for comprehension.
> That's exactly what you said, you backpedaling moron.
>
> I said: "most infrared thermometers utilize a band of infrared from
> 5.5 to 14 microns"
>
> You said "so is most of the blackbody radiation from a patch of winter
> snow".
>
> Good gawd, you're pathetic, you can't even acknowledge when you've
> obviously fucked up. Spankard. LOL
>>> Water and ice emit at ~11 micron.
>> That emission line has nothing to do with *blackbody* radiation, the
>> main radiative mechanism for the transfer of heat, lunkhead.
> Wien's displacement law states that the black body radiation curve for
> different temperatures peaks at a wavelength inversely proportional to
> the temperature.
>
> Wien's Displacement Law:
> Displacement_max = b/T
> Where:
> T = absolute temperature in Kelvin
> b = Wien's displacement constant, 2900 um K
>
> Given that:
> 32 F = freezing point of water
> 32 F = 273.15 K
>
> 2900 um K / 273.15 K = 10.6168 micron blackbody radiation from snow,
> which is as close as one can get to the ~11-micron infrared
> atmospheric window.
>
> And that's a massive SPNAK! on Lunkhead the Backpedaling Moron. LOL!
Here's another SPNAK! on Ko0O0oki Kensi the LunkHeaded Libtard:
We can use Wien's Displacement Law to determine the temperature range
which LunkHead k'lames snow is at when it's emitting blackbody
radiation from 5.5 to 14 micron.
I said: "most infrared thermometers utilize a band of infrared from
5.5 to 14 microns"
Lunkhead said "so is most of the blackbody radiation from a patch of
winter snow".
So let's do the math:
Wien's Displacement Law:
Displacement_max = b/T
Where:
T = absolute temperature in Kelvin
b = Wien's displacement constant, 2900 um K
Given that:
32 F = freezing point of water
32 F = 273.15 K
2900 um K / 273.15 K = 10.6168 micron blackbody radiation from snow,
which is as close as one can get to the ~11-micron infrared
atmospheric window.
So, plugging in 14 microns, we come up with a temperature of 207.1428
K or -86.8128 F.
Now we plug in 5.5 microns, we come up with a temperature of 527.2727
K or 489.4209 F. Lunkhead says snow can exist at 489 F! Bwahahahaaa!
What a *spankard*! What a *moron*! What a backpedaling bleatfarting
*idiot*!
SPNAK!
<snicker>
--
Kensi snipped out any evidence that proved her wrong then demanded
that evidence again and again, only to snip it out again; she denied
having written what she clearly wrote (after she snipped it out, of
course); she k'lamed that I'd written things I clearly didn't (and she
failed to back up her k'lames with proof); she stated that zoanthropy
and transexualism aren't mental illnesses (they are listed in the
DSM); that the psychiatric community is incorrect for listing them as
such by taking an example from nearly 100 years ago (hysteria), long
before modern psychiatry got a grasp on what exactly constitutes a
mental illness; she stated that the CDC is promulgating "FUD" that's
"been debunked in thousands of places" (yet provided no proof of this
k'lamed "debunking"); she's been cornered into admitting her belief
that gays have suffered "no harm" in living a lifestyle that's given
19% of them AIDS, causes the gay community to account for 63% of new
AIDS cases per year (per the CDC) and kills thousands of them per
year; she stated that liberalism is growing when it's actually in
decline (and stated that conservatism is dying when it's actually
growing and has a nearly 2:1 advantage over liberalism), and she had
the audacity to try to use the same exact study from Gallup that I'd
used to prove her wrong in the first place (proving she's kooking out
so badly she's lost her reading comprehension abilities); she stated
the Antarctic ice sheet is shrinking faster than ever when it's
growing (to the tune of 49 gT/yr, when considering that land ice is
slowly growing and sea ice is rapidly expanding, per Nasa's ICESat);
she stated that global temperature is rising when it's been falling
for more than a decade per the UK Met and NASA, and accounting for the
revelations that US climate researchers outright falsified the data to
give the impression that a 90 year cooling trend was actually a
warming trend; she k'lamed CO2 as the driver for global temperature
change, then quoted a web page that says the exact opposite (the same
web page, BTW, that I'd used to prove that CO2 lags temperature
change, proving yet again her loss of reading comprehension)... then
she *admitted* CO2 lags global temperature change, thereby being
forced to agree with me (and reality); she then k'lamed CO2 as the
driver for global temperature change *again*, but as yet has been
unable to explain, given that CO2 levels were at least 5 times higher
in the Ordovician and sun output was nearly the same (0.991
Ordovician, 1 today), why we're not in a perpetual ice age today; she
presented examples of mass-shooting suspects that she k'lamed were
conservative (but they turned out to be liberal, socialist or were the
result of a liberal upbringing); she tried to state that Nazism was a
conservative political party (it's a form of liberal fascism that
takes many of its tenets directly from socialism); she failed to
provide any proof of some of her kooky contentions while k'laming them
as "proof"; she used a flawed and biased dating website poll and
k'lamed that it trumped an actual scientific study (ironic, given that
she's a scientist herself); she melted down so badly she lost her
ability to do simple math; she attempted to k'lame Abraham Lincoln was
a liberal (he admitted he was a conservative); she attempted to k'lame
that every major civil rights advancement was solely due to liberals
(when it was conservatives who've advanced the overwhelming majority
of civil rights bills, to the strident opposition of the liberals),
she k'lamed she knows who I am due to her "kookology experience",
"profound psychological insight" and "cryptanalysis skills", yet she's
thus far run from five challenges to out me, for 562 days and counting
(ie: she doesn't dare provide any of her so-called "proof", for fear
that she outs the fact that she's kooking out and seeing me
everywhere), and her loss of reading comprehension skills resulted in
her apparent loss of being able to determine chronology. As the level
of spankage she was receiving escalated, the time between her posts
grew, and the length of her posts grew shorter as she snipped out more
and more evidence that she's a delusional kook... she's been beating a
strategic retreat for months now.... when she's not attention-whoring
for all the boys because her make-believe husband isn't paying enough
attention to her fat, ugly, delusional ass anymore. LOL
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-04 02:05 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-03 23:19 -0800
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-02-04 09:20 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-04 18:16 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-04 10:35 -0700
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-04 23:50 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-04 21:30 -0800
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-05 13:58 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-05 11:09 -0800
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Batty <bat@belfry.invalid> - 2016-02-08 14:08 +0000
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-05 07:30 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-05 14:14 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-05 11:19 -0800
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-05 16:41 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-05 14:49 -0800
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-05 16:09 -0700
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-05 18:55 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-05 17:53 -0700
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-06 06:50 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-06 01:57 -0700
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-06 18:15 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-06 10:48 -0700
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-05 16:08 -0700
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-06 06:56 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-06 02:00 -0700
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-05 16:33 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-05 16:07 -0700
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-06 07:17 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-06 06:46 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-06 19:35 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-06 12:07 -0700
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-06 14:34 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-06 07:38 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-06 02:00 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-06 18:20 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-06 10:51 -0700
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-06 20:01 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-06 16:54 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-07 00:39 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-06 20:01 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-07 06:51 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-07 20:51 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-08 06:26 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-08 00:41 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-08 07:53 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-08 18:49 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-08 13:34 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-08 10:40 -0800
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-09 06:17 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-09 01:59 -0700
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-09 02:31 -0800
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-09 06:27 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-09 16:42 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-09 10:21 -0700
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-09 07:57 -0800
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-09 17:14 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-09 10:23 -0700
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-09 10:57 -0800
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe, DoW #2) - 2016-02-09 19:10 +0000
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-09 11:23 -0800
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-10 05:27 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-10 05:45 -0700
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-02-09 15:42 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-09 13:53 -0700
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-09 13:29 -0800
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-09 23:47 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-09 10:22 -0700
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-09 10:25 -0700
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-02-09 15:34 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-09 13:28 -0800
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-08 11:57 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-08 10:06 -0800
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-06 18:38 -0700
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-06 02:02 -0700
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-06 02:16 -0800
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2016-02-06 02:20 -0800
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-06 05:44 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-06 03:59 -0700
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-06 03:04 -0800
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-06 18:57 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-06 11:26 -0700
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-06 16:56 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-07 00:54 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-06 20:16 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-07 06:05 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-07 20:39 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-08 06:06 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-08 00:34 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-08 06:58 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-07 21:55 -0800
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-06 05:17 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-06 03:57 -0700
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-06 03:07 -0800
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-06 18:15 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Jed Clampett <jc@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-10 21:46 -0800
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Jed Clampett <jc@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-10 20:53 -0800
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Skip" <skip@dont-email.me> - 2016-02-05 01:18 +0100
csiph-web