Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #551300
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| References | (2 earlier) <5213102e7d795603ae437dcf79b2049c@dizum.com> <n98sbh$1nhg$1@gioia.aioe.org> <676c242bcfe4e1e3b0ddc61252e043ab@dizum.com> <n999q8$3ff$1@gioia.aioe.org> <ad4c0f6621da930303bf0644d36093fb@dizum.com> |
| Subject | Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast |
| Message-ID | <342eb30aba0dbc06663692a58ff2410c@dizum.com> (permalink) |
| Date | 2016-02-08 18:49 +0100 |
| Newsgroups | alt.free.newsservers, alt.usenet.kooks, sci.physics |
| Organization | dizum.com - The Internet Problem Provider |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, in <news:ad4c0f6621da930303bf0644d36093fb@dizum.com> wrote: > Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> > > Ko0O0oki kensi the lunkheaded libtard, in > <news:n999q8$3ff$1@gioia.aioe.org> did thusly jump head first into the > wood chipper again: >> On 08/02/2016 12:26 AM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler >> Emeritus wrote: > Message-ID: <65d0f5e1ad03d42086b4a492e0eba763@dizum.com> > ======================================================== > ======================================================== > > <http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=134389570800> > > Kensi was "vacationing"... in Pembroke, Ontario, Canada... quite by > coincidence, you understand... LunkHead was there with Nadegda, > apparently. > > And Nadegda and Kensi most definitely were *not* there to double-team > on Paul Derbyshire's mushroom-slathered meatpole. > > Paul Derbyshire is a life-long virgin, you see. He'll never touch > anything more feminine than his hand with a Barbie-doll wig glued to > it, paste-on eyes, and his mother's hooker-pink lipstick smeared > between thumb and index finger knuckle. Ironically, he's named his > f(e)isty lover "kensi". She's really hot in the sack... an expert in > getting anal. Sometimes, she takes it so deeply it pokes out of her > mouth! > > Oh, here's Kensi: > <http://goo.gl/hdpXFC> > > She's Paul Derbyshire's regular Saturday night thang. Ain't she purdy? > I'm sure a lot of guys have hit that. Chimpy's hit that... twice. > > Strangely and quite coincidentally, Paul Derbyshire calls his right > thumb "Nadegda". I found a picture of Nadegda, too. > > <https://goo.gl/sbdRcq> > > You don't wanna know what she's into. *Really* kinky stuff. Suffice to > say sometimes she invites along her four sisters for what she calls > "sexy spelunking". You know what they say... fugly chicks gotta go > kinky. LOL > > > <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sdyBYSuqQBQ> > > > P.S. How's the astrophysics coming along? Have you visited > > any good telescopes lately? > > Ask kensi which observatories nearby have time standard control > capability. That's something every astronomer should know, right? > > <snicker> > ======================================================== > ======================================================== > > I note you've studiously avoided answering which observatories have > time standard control capability, LunkHead... only those who actually > work at an observatory would even know about such a thing, let alone > which observatories have that capability... but then, everyone knows > lumpy dumpy frumpy slumpy wannabes always out their womanly socks > because they're too stoooopid to play the part of the identity they've > assumed. Perhaps for your next sock, you should play the part of a mop > jockey or a streetwalker... that'd be something you could handle, > dude. > > <snicker> >>>> https://www.math.hmc.edu/~gu/curves_and_surfaces/surfaces/sphere.html >>>> Gaussian curvature: one over the radius squared. > Message-ID: <ee7e5d6b47fc9f9b3589e03d58af414a@dizum.com> > ======================================================== > <http://mathworld.wolfram.com/GaussianCurvature.html> > "For a sphere, the Gaussian curvature is K=1/a^2" > > <https://www.math.hmc.edu/~gu/curves_and_surfaces/surfaces/sphere.html> > "Gaussian Curvature: K[u,v] = 1/a^2" > > <http://web.cs.iastate.edu/~cs577/handouts/gaussian-curvature.pdf> > "Thus a sphere of radius r has total Gaussian curvature 1/r^2 * > 4*pi*r^2 = 4* pi, which is independent of the radius r. > ======================================================== > > SPNAK! What's the matter, LunkHead, is that simple math kicking your stoooopid ass? Again? LOL! >>> Nowhere on that web page does it say that, you bootfucked spankard. >>> LOL >> You don't have to keep demonstrating your hopeless incompetence at >> reading comprehension. We're all thoroughly convinced. > Awwww, I've reduced LunkHead the Libtard to pathetic backpedaling and > lying. How's it feel to have lost so badly, LunkHead? I have to ask > because I've never lost. You've been spanked so hard your asscheeks > must be throbbing red by now. > > I won, you lost. Because stupid always loses, Stupid. > > <snicker> >> *snicker* >> >> I'll help the poor struggling koOk a little now, though -- this math is, >> after all, well beyond what a highschool dropout who now spends his days >> doing blue-collar labor on fixer-uppers (if, that is, you're not lying >> about your job) can be expected to cope with. >> >> *snicker* > Now let's watch LunkHead the bootfucked libtarded moron backpedal, lie > and copy-n-paste bleat as he yet again demonstrates that he's too > stupid to do even simple geometry problems. LOL >> Here's a hint: you seem to be confusing, on the one hand, the Gaussian >> curvature, which is defined at each point of a smooth manifold, and the >> integral of that curvature over the manifold, on the other. The latter, >> for closed and bounded manifolds like a sphere surface or torus (donut >> surface), is 2*pi*chi(M) where chi(M) is the Euler characteristic, and >> thus is 4*pi for a sphere (regardless of curvature or size). I just realize that LunkHead doesn't know what "integral" means. He thinks an integral is a separate measure other than the Gaussian curvature! Bwahahaaaaa! What a *moron*. He can't do simple geometry problems, he's demonstrated repeatedly that he doesn't know how to cancel identical terms in an equation, and now he's admitted he doesn't even know what an integral is! LunkHead wrote: "Here's a hint: you seem to be confusing, on the one hand, the Gaussian curvature, which is defined at each point of a smooth manifold, and the integral of that curvature over the manifold" In mathematics, an integral assigns numbers to functions in a way that can describe displacement, area, volume, and other concepts that arise by combining infinitesimal data. So in effect, the integral of the Gaussian curvature is merely the equation that describes that Gaussian curvature, but LunkHead thinks it's separate, another measure of curvature! What a *moron*! He's SPNAK'd himself with his own stupidity yet again! Bwahahahaaaa! > Bwahahahaaa! Yet again LunkHead confuses 'constant curvature' and > 'Gaussian curvature'. What a fucking lackwit *moron*. LOL! >> But the former is 1/r^2 at every point on that sphere. >> In particular, the Gaussian curvature depends on r. > Wrong. Just admit you're too stupid to understand the equations you're > copying and pasting from a web page, LunkHead. You're only making > yourself look more and more pathetic. LOL > > <http://www.applet-magic.com/gaussbonet.htm> > "The Gauss-Bonnet Theorem in 3D space says that the integral of the > Gaussian curvature over a closed smooth surface is equal to 2*pi times > the Euler characteristic of the surface. For example, a sphere of > radius R has a constant curvature of 1/R^2 so the integral of > curvature over the surface of the sphere is the constant curvature of > 1/R^2 times the area of the sphere of 4*pi*R^2 which is equal to > 4*pi." > > What's 2 * pi * 2 (Euler-Poincare number of a sphere), LunkHead? LOL > Do you see the radius anywhere in the end result of the Gauss-Bonnet > Theorem for a sphere, LunkHead? No? SPNAK! LOL > > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gauss%E2%80%93Bonnet_theorem> > "Descartes' theorem on total angular defect of a polyhedron is the > polyhedral analog: it states that the sum of the defect at all the > vertices of a polyhedron which is homeomorphic to the sphere is 4*pi." > > Doesn't 2 * pi * 2 = 4 * pi, LunkHead? SPNAK! LOL > > <http://web.cs.iastate.edu/~cs577/handouts/gaussian-curvature.pdf> > "Thus a sphere of radius r has total Gaussian curvature 1/r^2 * > 4*pi*r^2 = 4* pi, which is independent of the radius r. > > "independent of the radius r". SPNAK! LOL > > Kensi the moron wrote: > ================================ > The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2, and its area is 4*pi*r^2, so > the curvature is 4*pi > ================================ > > Kensi the moron said the Gaussian curvature = 1 / r^2 *and* the > Gaussian curvature = 4 * pi. > > Therefore, 1 / r^2 = 4 * pi > Therefore, r = 0.28209479176 > > Kensi the moron says every sphere in the entire universe has a radius > of 0.28209479176. Of course, being a moron, kensi didn't specify the > units. > > The moron also said the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is dependent > upon that sphere's radius. Wholly incorrect. > > Message-ID: <ee7e5d6b47fc9f9b3589e03d58af414a@dizum.com> > ======================================================== > <http://web.cs.iastate.edu/~cs577/handouts/gaussian-curvature.pdf> > "Thus a sphere of radius r has total Gaussian curvature 1/r^2 * > 4*pi*r^2 = 4* pi, which is independent of the radius r. > ======================================================== > > What's that say, you backpedaling bootfucked spankard? "independent of > the radius r"... which means yet again you've been bootfucked by your > own stupidity because you don't understand the equations you're trying > to use. > > SPNAK! >> Now do you understand? > It's obvious that you don't. It's obvious that you can't. You are, > after all, as retarded as Paul Derbyshire. > > <snicker> >>> No, you're just a l<SMACKAK00K!> >> No, *you're* just a high school dropout. And a lOon. >> >> *snicker* > Awwww, now I've reduced LunkHead the bootfucked libtard moron to > fanfic because he knows he's *wrong*. > > I win, you lose. Because stupid always loses, Stupid. > > <snicker> Now let's watch LunkHead backpedal even faster... I'm betting he tries to k'lame he was talking about the constant curvature in deriving the Gaussian curvature all along... except: Kensi the moron wrote: ================================ The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2, and its area is 4*pi*r^2, so the curvature is 4*pi ================================ So LunkHead can only k'lame that he's stated: Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2 constant curvature = 1/r^2 * 4*pi*r^2 = 4*pi <http://www.applet-magic.com/gaussbonet.htm> ================================ The Gauss-Bonnet Theorem in 3D space says that the integral of the Gaussian curvature over a closed smooth surface is equal to 2*pi times the Euler characteristic of the surface. For example, a sphere of radius R has a constant curvature of 1/R^2 so the integral of curvature over the surface of the sphere is the constant curvature of 1/R^2 times the area of the sphere of 4*pi*R^2 which is equal to 4*pi. ================================ So the constant curvature = 1/r^2, whereas the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2 * 4*pi*r^2 = 4*pi, the exact *opposite* of what LunkHead has k'lamed. That means that *if* LunkHead tries to make that k'lame, he switched the meanings of Gaussian curvature and constant curvature. So yet again LunkHead finds himself 180 degrees out from reality. That's the *only* reason the moronic lackwit would continue to k'lame that the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is dependent upon radius, which it most definitely is not: Message-ID: <ee7e5d6b47fc9f9b3589e03d58af414a@dizum.com> ======================================================== <http://web.cs.iastate.edu/~cs577/handouts/gaussian-curvature.pdf> Thus a sphere of radius r has total Gaussian curvature 1/r^2 * 4*pi*r^2 = 4* pi, which is independent of the radius r. ======================================================== Bwahahahaaaa! What a moronic spankard. Ko0O0oki Kensi the LunkHeaded LibTard k'lames he's an astrophysicist, but he can't even do simple geometry problems! SPNAK! <snicker> -- Kensi the moron wrote: ================================ The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2, and its area is 4*pi*r^2, so the curvature is 4*pi ================================ Kensi the moron said the Gaussian curvature = 1 / r^2 *and* the Gaussian curvature = 4 * pi. Therefore, 1 / r^2 = 4 * pi Therefore, r = 0.28209479176 Kensi the moron says every sphere in the entire universe has a radius of 0.28209479176. Of course, being a moron, kensi didn't specify the units. The moron also said the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is dependent upon that sphere's radius. Wholly incorrect. Kensi the moron was corrected: ================================ Did... did you just say "the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2" *and* "the Gaussian curvature = 4*pi" therefore "1/r^2 = 4*pi"? Now you backpedal, LunkHead. You mean the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2 * (4*pi*r^2) therefore = (4*pi), and therefore the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is independent of r due to its symmetry, thereby proving your original "The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2" blather *wrong*? ================================ But Kensi the moron persists in insisting that what he wrote isn't fucked up, and that the Gaussian curvature of a sphere *does* depend upon its radius, because he doesn't understand the equations he's trying to use, and he's a halfwit who can't figure out even basic geometry problems. Now remember, this is the same moron who k'lames he's an astrophysicist... yet he's stated that the Riemann curvature tensor concept being the central mathematical tool in the theory of general relativity and the modern theory of gravity, and the curvature of space-time being described by the geodesic deviation equation, is "science fiction" and "a howler". In addition, the moron k'lamed that 4-D Minkowski space-time was mostly positive Gaussian curvature, with only small areas of negative Gaussian curvature, which proves the moron has no idea of the effects of mass or magnetism upon the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold. He has k'lamed that the Gaussian curvature of the universe is predominantly positive, which means Lunkhead believes that massive objects such as planets, stars and black holes ride *above* the tangential plane of the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, thereby making the planes of principal curvature positive Gaussian curvature, and thus causing gravity to *repel*. Lunkhead the moron has k'lamed that magnetism has "*no* effect" upon the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, then backpedaled and said there was a "small amount of positive curvature due to the energy density in the field", thereby proving he doesn't know how magnetism affects the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, and denies the existence of magnetic attraction. Thus, Kensi the moron has described a universe in which planets could not maintain their orbits, a universe in which magnets could not work, and therefore a universe which could not exist. Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow at a colder temperature than the surrounding atmosphere is somehow violating the First and Second Laws of Thermodynamics and giving off "blackbody radiation". Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow gives off "blackbody radiation" at wavelengths that would put the temperature of the snow at 489 F. Kensi is the same moron who first denied the existence of the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window, then backpedaled and k'lamed that snow emitted outside that ~11-micron window, and was proven wrong. Then the spankard moron tried to use the backpedal of "blackbody radiation" being at a different wavelength than spectral emission, yet again demonstrating that the moron has no clue how spectral absorption and emission works. Kensi is the same moron who denies the NASA SABER study proving that CO2 is a global *cooling* gas _because_ of the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window. The reality exposed by the NASA SABER study also proves the Klimate Katastrophe Kook Anthropogenic Global Warming k'lame of CO2 being a global warming gas is a fairy tale that violates the First and Second Laws of Thermodynamics, thus destroying CO2-induced AGW, yet this same moron continues to cling to his delusions. Kensi is the same moron who continues to cling to his delusion that global warming causes more intense hurricanes, despite three peer-reviewed studies proving the exact opposite. Kensi is not an astrophysicist, he's far too stupid to be. He's just a slumpy dumpy frumpy lumpy loser trying to pretend that he's intelligent... and failing badly. That would be because Kensi is a moron with an underpowered brain that struggles (and fails) to understand reality.
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-04 02:05 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-03 23:19 -0800
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-02-04 09:20 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-04 18:16 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-04 10:35 -0700
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-04 23:50 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-04 21:30 -0800
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-05 13:58 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-05 11:09 -0800
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Batty <bat@belfry.invalid> - 2016-02-08 14:08 +0000
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-05 07:30 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-05 14:14 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-05 11:19 -0800
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-05 16:41 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-05 14:49 -0800
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-05 16:09 -0700
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-05 18:55 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-05 17:53 -0700
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-06 06:50 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-06 01:57 -0700
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-06 18:15 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-06 10:48 -0700
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-05 16:08 -0700
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-06 06:56 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-06 02:00 -0700
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-05 16:33 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-05 16:07 -0700
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-06 07:17 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-06 06:46 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-06 19:35 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-06 12:07 -0700
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-06 14:34 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-06 07:38 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-06 02:00 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-06 18:20 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-06 10:51 -0700
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-06 20:01 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-06 16:54 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-07 00:39 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-06 20:01 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-07 06:51 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-07 20:51 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-08 06:26 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-08 00:41 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-08 07:53 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-08 18:49 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-08 13:34 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-08 10:40 -0800
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-09 06:17 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-09 01:59 -0700
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-09 02:31 -0800
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-09 06:27 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-09 16:42 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-09 10:21 -0700
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-09 07:57 -0800
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-09 17:14 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-09 10:23 -0700
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-09 10:57 -0800
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe, DoW #2) - 2016-02-09 19:10 +0000
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-09 11:23 -0800
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-10 05:27 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-10 05:45 -0700
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-02-09 15:42 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-09 13:53 -0700
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-09 13:29 -0800
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-09 23:47 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-09 10:22 -0700
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-09 10:25 -0700
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-02-09 15:34 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-09 13:28 -0800
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-08 11:57 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-08 10:06 -0800
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-06 18:38 -0700
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-06 02:02 -0700
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-06 02:16 -0800
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2016-02-06 02:20 -0800
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-06 05:44 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-06 03:59 -0700
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-06 03:04 -0800
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-06 18:57 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-06 11:26 -0700
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-06 16:56 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-07 00:54 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-06 20:16 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-07 06:05 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-07 20:39 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-08 06:06 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-08 00:34 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-08 06:58 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-07 21:55 -0800
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-06 05:17 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-06 03:57 -0700
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-06 03:07 -0800
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-06 18:15 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Jed Clampett <jc@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-10 21:46 -0800
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Jed Clampett <jc@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-10 20:53 -0800
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Skip" <skip@dont-email.me> - 2016-02-05 01:18 +0100
csiph-web