Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #714574
| Path | csiph.com!feeder.erje.net!1.eu.feeder.erje.net!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!newsreader4.netcologne.de!news.netcologne.de!peer02.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer02.am4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!post01.iad!fx33.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| Content-Type | Text/plain; charset=UTF-8 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 8bit |
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@Nov.24--6.02pm.Seattle.2018> (permalink) |
| References | <Jeff-Relf.Me@Nov.24--11.52am.Seattle.2018> <ptcapu$17vf$1@gioia.aioe.org> <Jeff-Relf.Me@Nov.24--0.20pm.Seattle.2018> <ptci8i$1jip$1@gioia.aioe.org> <Jeff-Relf.Me@Nov.24--2.30pm.Seattle.2018> <ptcnhu$1rar$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| Newsgroups | sci.physics, comp.os.linux.advocacy, alt.checkmate |
| Subject | We're not AllSeeing, AllKnowing gods. |
| User-Agent | Jeff-Relf.Me/X.HTM |
| Lines | 22 |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@blocknews.net |
| NNTP-Posting-Date | Sun, 25 Nov 2018 02:02:46 UTC |
| Organization | blocknews - www.blocknews.net |
| Date | Sat, 24 Nov 2018 18:02:49 -0800 (Seattle) |
| X-Received-Bytes | 1791 |
| X-Received-Body-CRC | 1034838582 |
| Xref | csiph.com sci.physics:714574 comp.os.linux.advocacy:479311 alt.checkmate:229605 |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
Show key headers only | View raw
Odd_Bodkin replied: > > "The cat is both dead and alive" is PhD (high and Deep) bullshit. > > Tell me the basis for your belief in hidden variables. What does your "question" ( unfounded accusation ) have to do with your (erroneous) claim that we know that " The cat is both dead and alive " ? ! What interpretation of QM are you using ? It ain't " Shut up and calculate ", that's for sure. All we have are our local observations, nothing more. Could they tell us what a distant observer is seeing ? I've no idea. qBism suggests there's room for improvement, ( see: YouTube.COM/watch?v=LQvCTZgNRNw ); after all, we're not AllSeeing, AllKnowing gods. Sure, our ignorance ( not its "randomness" ) is real, -- we don't know if Schrodinger's cat is dead or alive; but "Local Realism" (causality) doesn't need our recognition.
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Scientists could improve their game ( qBism [cubism] ). Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-24 11:52 -0800
Re: Scientists could improve their game ( qBism [cubism] ). Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-24 20:03 +0000
The cat is both dead and alive ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-24 12:20 -0800
Re: The cat is both dead and alive ? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-24 22:10 +0000
"The cat is both dead and alive" is PhD (high and Deep) bullshit. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-24 14:30 -0800
Re: "The cat is both dead and alive" is PhD (high and Deep) bullshit. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-24 23:40 +0000
We're not AllSeeing, AllKnowing gods. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-24 18:02 -0800
csiph-web