Re: The cat is both dead and alive ?

From	Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	sci.physics, comp.os.linux.advocacy, alt.checkmate
Subject	Re: The cat is both dead and alive ?
Date	2018-11-24 22:10 +0000
Organization	Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID	<ptci8i$1jip$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References	<ptcapu$17vf$1@gioia.aioe.org> <Jeff-Relf.Me@Nov.24--0.20pm.Seattle.2018>

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

<Jeff-Relf.Me  @.> wrote:
> Odd_Bodkin replied:
>>> Scientists could improve their game ( qBism [cubism] );
>>> quantum behavior isn't fully modeled/detected; see:
>>> YouTube.COM/watch?v=LQvCTZgNRNw
>> 
>> Of course scientists could do better.
>> Otherwise it’d be a dead activity. 
> 
> So why do I keep hearing that "Quantum SuperPosition" is real,
> not imaginary ( the cat is both dead and alive ) ?
> 
> wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_superposition#Physical_interpretation
> 
> " Shut up and calculate " makes no such assumptions, right ?
> 
> What interpretation of quantum mechanics says it's real ?
> 

Measurements say it’s real. 

This isn’t about interpretation. 

But there are open questions. 

Of course. There’ll always be. 

-- 
Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

Thread

Scientists could improve their game ( qBism [cubism] ). Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-11-24 11:52 -0800
  Re: Scientists could improve their game ( qBism [cubism] ). Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-24 20:03 +0000
    The cat is both dead and alive ? Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-11-24 12:20 -0800
      Re: The cat is both dead and alive ? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-24 22:10 +0000
        "The cat is both dead and alive" is PhD (high and Deep) bullshit. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-11-24 14:30 -0800
          Re: "The cat is both dead and alive" is PhD (high and Deep) bullshit. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-24 23:40 +0000
            We're not AllSeeing, AllKnowing gods. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-11-24 18:02 -0800

csiph-web