Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #544858
| X-Received | by 10.129.27.3 with SMTP id b3mr77017197ywb.0.1452630764749; Tue, 12 Jan 2016 12:32:44 -0800 (PST) |
|---|---|
| X-Received | by 10.50.138.138 with SMTP id qq10mr487383igb.10.1452630764719; Tue, 12 Jan 2016 12:32:44 -0800 (PST) |
| Path | csiph.com!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder01.blueworldhosting.com!peer01.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!6no4518451qgy.0!news-out.google.com!l1ni11681igd.0!nntp.google.com!h5no3591309igh.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail |
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Date | Tue, 12 Jan 2016 12:32:44 -0800 (PST) |
| In-Reply-To | <n737qo$1m7q$3@gioia.aioe.org> |
| Complaints-To | groups-abuse@google.com |
| Injection-Info | glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2602:306:37ed:e9a0:39f8:fb6d:350c:c573; posting-account=rjm6TwoAAADMLtH6W8MCqjnS33iyQI8L |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 2602:306:37ed:e9a0:39f8:fb6d:350c:c573 |
| References | <0990a532-e3d3-4a29-9213-db7d8511019e@googlegroups.com> <47b6b955-86cb-4d23-b952-0032658cbfda@googlegroups.com> <n6ronl$1ma3$6@gioia.aioe.org> <a69f7d43-c998-4af6-b6b5-8e0492366eb2@googlegroups.com> <n70phe$1njn$1@gioia.aioe.org> <b512be65-44ab-4d4d-9603-3b45818b1901@googlegroups.com> <n737qo$1m7q$3@gioia.aioe.org> |
| User-Agent | G2/1.0 |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Message-ID | <94853a5f-1df3-49f3-bea6-3c57504ba778@googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
| Subject | Re: Richard Feynman on Schrödinger eq... |
| From | kenseto <setoken@att.net> |
| Injection-Date | Tue, 12 Jan 2016 20:32:44 +0000 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 |
| X-Received-Bytes | 2493 |
| X-Received-Body-CRC | 354786981 |
| Xref | csiph.com sci.physics:544858 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On Tuesday, January 12, 2016 at 10:58:21 AM UTC-5, Odd Bodkin wrote: > On 1/12/2016 8:49 AM, kenseto wrote: > > On Monday, January 11, 2016 at 12:42:16 PM UTC-5, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >> On 1/10/2016 10:34 AM, kenseto wrote: > >>> On Saturday, January 9, 2016 at 2:57:46 PM UTC-5, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >>>> On 1/9/2016 10:37 AM, kenseto wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> Schrodinger formulated his equation by reverse engineering. He noted that the > >>>>> available experimental data is statistic so he formulated a statistical equation > >>>>> to fit the experimental data. That's all!! > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> Ken, what gives you the right to make up history? > >>> > >>> I didn't make up any history. > >>> > >> > >> The above, which you wrote, is counter to documented history. You made > >> those statements up. > > > > You tell us how Schrodinger derived his equation. > > > > Screw that. You try reading how Schrodinger derived his equation, like > the rest of the world does, and you try not making stuff up. I go by what Feynman said.
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Richard Feynman on Schrödinger eq... Jay Bala <jay1bala@gmail.com> - 2016-01-09 07:45 -0800
Re: Richard Feynman on Schrödinger eq... Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-09 08:23 -0800
Re: Richard Feynman on Schrödinger eq... kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-01-09 08:37 -0800
Re: Richard Feynman on Schrödinger eq... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-09 13:57 -0600
Re: Richard Feynman on Schrödinger eq... benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-09 19:42 -0500
Re: Richard Feynman on Schrödinger eq... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-11 10:34 -0600
Re: Richard Feynman on Schrödinger eq... Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-11 09:14 -0800
Re: Richard Feynman on Schrödinger eq... benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-11 14:44 -0500
Re: Richard Feynman on Schrödinger eq... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-11 15:27 -0600
Re: Richard Feynman on Schrödinger eq... benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-11 17:31 -0500
Re: Richard Feynman on Schrödinger eq... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-11 17:43 -0600
Re: Richard Feynman on Schrödinger eq... kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-01-10 08:34 -0800
Re: Richard Feynman on Schrödinger eq... Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-10 09:17 -0800
Re: Richard Feynman on Schrödinger eq... Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-01-10 19:02 +0100
Re: Richard Feynman on Schrödinger eq... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-11 11:42 -0600
Re: Richard Feynman on Schrödinger eq... kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-01-12 06:49 -0800
Re: Richard Feynman on Schrödinger eq... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-12 09:05 -0600
Re: Richard Feynman on Schrödinger eq... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-12 09:58 -0600
Re: Richard Feynman on Schrödinger eq... kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-01-12 12:32 -0800
Re: Richard Feynman on Schrödinger eq... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-12 14:53 -0600
Re: Richard Feynman on Schrödinger eq... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-12 10:12 -0600
Re: Richard Feynman on Schrödinger eq... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-11 11:49 -0600
Re: Richard Feynman on Schrödinger eq... "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-01-09 16:34 -0800
Re: Richard Feynman on Schrödinger eq... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-10 08:10 -0600
Re: Richard Feynman on Schrödinger eq... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-12 15:23 -0600
csiph-web