Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #544470
| Subject | Re: Richard Feynman on Schrödinger eq... |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| References | <0990a532-e3d3-4a29-9213-db7d8511019e@googlegroups.com> <47b6b955-86cb-4d23-b952-0032658cbfda@googlegroups.com> |
| From | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
| Date | 2016-01-11 11:49 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <EsGdnSybcom2dg7LnZ2dnUU7-e-dnZ2d@giganews.com> (permalink) |
On 1/9/16 10:37 AM, kenseto wrote: > > Schrodinger formulated his equation by reverse engineering. He noted > that the available experimental data is statistic so he formulated a > statistical equation to fit the experimental data. That's all!! > Background for Seto | Historical background and development > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schrödinger_equation#Historical_background_and_development -- sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated to the discussion of physics, news from the physics community, and physics-related social issues.
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Richard Feynman on Schrödinger eq... Jay Bala <jay1bala@gmail.com> - 2016-01-09 07:45 -0800
Re: Richard Feynman on Schrödinger eq... Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-09 08:23 -0800
Re: Richard Feynman on Schrödinger eq... kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-01-09 08:37 -0800
Re: Richard Feynman on Schrödinger eq... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-09 13:57 -0600
Re: Richard Feynman on Schrödinger eq... benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-09 19:42 -0500
Re: Richard Feynman on Schrödinger eq... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-11 10:34 -0600
Re: Richard Feynman on Schrödinger eq... Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-11 09:14 -0800
Re: Richard Feynman on Schrödinger eq... benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-11 14:44 -0500
Re: Richard Feynman on Schrödinger eq... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-11 15:27 -0600
Re: Richard Feynman on Schrödinger eq... benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-11 17:31 -0500
Re: Richard Feynman on Schrödinger eq... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-11 17:43 -0600
Re: Richard Feynman on Schrödinger eq... kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-01-10 08:34 -0800
Re: Richard Feynman on Schrödinger eq... Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-10 09:17 -0800
Re: Richard Feynman on Schrödinger eq... Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-01-10 19:02 +0100
Re: Richard Feynman on Schrödinger eq... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-11 11:42 -0600
Re: Richard Feynman on Schrödinger eq... kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-01-12 06:49 -0800
Re: Richard Feynman on Schrödinger eq... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-12 09:05 -0600
Re: Richard Feynman on Schrödinger eq... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-12 09:58 -0600
Re: Richard Feynman on Schrödinger eq... kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-01-12 12:32 -0800
Re: Richard Feynman on Schrödinger eq... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-12 14:53 -0600
Re: Richard Feynman on Schrödinger eq... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-12 10:12 -0600
Re: Richard Feynman on Schrödinger eq... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-11 11:49 -0600
Re: Richard Feynman on Schrödinger eq... "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-01-09 16:34 -0800
Re: Richard Feynman on Schrödinger eq... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-10 08:10 -0600
Re: Richard Feynman on Schrödinger eq... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-12 15:23 -0600
csiph-web