Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #544858

Re: Richard Feynman on Schrödinger eq...

Newsgroups sci.physics
Date 2016-01-12 12:32 -0800
References (2 earlier) <n6ronl$1ma3$6@gioia.aioe.org> <a69f7d43-c998-4af6-b6b5-8e0492366eb2@googlegroups.com> <n70phe$1njn$1@gioia.aioe.org> <b512be65-44ab-4d4d-9603-3b45818b1901@googlegroups.com> <n737qo$1m7q$3@gioia.aioe.org>
Message-ID <94853a5f-1df3-49f3-bea6-3c57504ba778@googlegroups.com> (permalink)
Subject Re: Richard Feynman on Schrödinger eq...
From kenseto <setoken@att.net>

Show all headers | View raw


On Tuesday, January 12, 2016 at 10:58:21 AM UTC-5, Odd Bodkin wrote:
> On 1/12/2016 8:49 AM, kenseto wrote:
> > On Monday, January 11, 2016 at 12:42:16 PM UTC-5, Odd Bodkin wrote:
> >> On 1/10/2016 10:34 AM, kenseto wrote:
> >>> On Saturday, January 9, 2016 at 2:57:46 PM UTC-5, Odd Bodkin wrote:
> >>>> On 1/9/2016 10:37 AM, kenseto wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Schrodinger formulated his equation by reverse engineering. He noted that the
> >>>>> available  experimental data is statistic so he formulated a statistical equation
> >>>>> to fit the experimental data. That's all!!
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Ken, what gives you the right to make up history?
> >>>
> >>> I didn't make up any history.
> >>>
> >>
> >> The above, which you wrote, is counter to documented history. You made
> >> those statements up.
> >
> > You tell us how Schrodinger derived his equation.
> >
> 
> Screw that. You try reading how Schrodinger derived his equation, like 
> the rest of the world does, and you try not making stuff up.

I go by what Feynman said.

Back to sci.physics | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Richard Feynman on Schrödinger eq... Jay Bala <jay1bala@gmail.com> - 2016-01-09 07:45 -0800
  Re: Richard Feynman on Schrödinger eq... Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-09 08:23 -0800
  Re: Richard Feynman on Schrödinger eq... kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-01-09 08:37 -0800
    Re: Richard Feynman on Schrödinger eq... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-09 13:57 -0600
      Re: Richard Feynman on Schrödinger eq... benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-09 19:42 -0500
        Re: Richard Feynman on Schrödinger eq... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-11 10:34 -0600
          Re: Richard Feynman on Schrödinger eq... Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-11 09:14 -0800
          Re: Richard Feynman on Schrödinger eq... benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-11 14:44 -0500
            Re: Richard Feynman on Schrödinger eq... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-11 15:27 -0600
              Re: Richard Feynman on Schrödinger eq... benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-11 17:31 -0500
                Re: Richard Feynman on Schrödinger eq... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-11 17:43 -0600
      Re: Richard Feynman on Schrödinger eq... kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-01-10 08:34 -0800
        Re: Richard Feynman on Schrödinger eq... Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-10 09:17 -0800
        Re: Richard Feynman on Schrödinger eq... Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-01-10 19:02 +0100
        Re: Richard Feynman on Schrödinger eq... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-11 11:42 -0600
          Re: Richard Feynman on Schrödinger eq... kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-01-12 06:49 -0800
            Re: Richard Feynman on Schrödinger eq... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-12 09:05 -0600
            Re: Richard Feynman on Schrödinger eq... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-12 09:58 -0600
              Re: Richard Feynman on Schrödinger eq... kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-01-12 12:32 -0800
                Re: Richard Feynman on Schrödinger eq... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-12 14:53 -0600
            Re: Richard Feynman on Schrödinger eq... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-12 10:12 -0600
    Re: Richard Feynman on Schrödinger eq... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-11 11:49 -0600
  Re: Richard Feynman on Schrödinger eq... "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-01-09 16:34 -0800
  Re: Richard Feynman on Schrödinger eq... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-10 08:10 -0600
  Re: Richard Feynman on Schrödinger eq... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-12 15:23 -0600

csiph-web