Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse

From	"%" <persent@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	alt.astronomy, alt.conspiracy, alt.usenet.kooks, sci.physics
Subject	Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse
Date	2015-08-22 18:54 -0700
Organization	Altopia Corp. - Usenet Access - www.altopia.com
Message-ID	<8n7ucc.tl3.19.1@news.alt.net> (permalink)
References	<bMedneXaFfx7OUrInZ2dnUU7-Y2dnZ2d@giganews.com> <648cd79fd6b7856ac331c02ba509acc7@dizum.com> <KvidnQVn8rrGNkXInZ2dnUU7-K2dnZ2d@giganews.com> <_i3Cx.17952$%u.13620@fx06.iad> <ob2dnXzbU5RwhETInZ2dnUU7-LGdnZ2d@giganews.com>

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

Rocky wrote:
> "benj" <nobody@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:_i3Cx.17952$%u.13620@fx06.iad...
>> On 08/22/2015 01:04 PM, Rocky wrote:
>>> "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus"
>>> <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx>
>>>>
>>>> <http://911review.com/errors/pentagon/nodebris.html>
>>>
>>> ROTFLMAO because despite what the website above wants you to believe
>>> there
>>> were no holes from engines of a 757 in the Pentagon because the
>>> people that
>>> were supposed to plant the explosives for that part of the
>>> verisimilitude didn't want to do too much damage to the Pentagon. <G>
>>>> <http://www.popularmechanics.com/military/a5659/debunking-911-myths-pentagon/>
>>>
>>> Yep, the old straw man argument trick.  They didn't even try to
>>> address the
>>> lack of parts from the wings of the alleged Flight 77 that should
>>> have been
>>> all over the place if they really hit the light poles.  <G>
>>>
>>>> <http://911research.wtc7.net/pentagon/analysis/conclusions/debris.html>
>>>
>>> HAHAHAHAHAHA  This site is filled with so much bullshit it is
>>> unreal. They
>>> talk about the F4 that was rammed into a solid wall and then they
>>> never showed how much debris from the F4 was left on the ground.  They
>>> want you to
>>> believe that the desinegrated F4 floated away instead of leaving a
>>> pile of
>>> debris on the ground.  < In other words that site was super shit >
>>>
>>>> <http://www.rense.com/general32/phot.htm>
>>>
>>> What a crock of shit that site was.  Where is the debris from the
>>> alleged Flight 77.  They claim it burned up but then there would be
>>> evidence of a big fire and that was missing too.
>>>
>>>> Look at all those photos showing plane debris, both outside and
>>>> *inside* the Pentagon. Hull pieces, the wheel rim of (surprise!
>>>> surprise! surprise!) a Boeing 757, a chunk of (surprise!
>>>> surprise! surprise! the Boeing 757 nose cone that actually
>>>> punched all the way through to A-E Drive, turbine compressor
>>>> parts from (surprise! surprise! surprise!) a Boeing 757, and a
>>>> shitload of small plane chunks directly in front of the building,
>>>> exactly as one would expect from those once-together chunks
>>>> slamming into and through concrete at 400 MPH. And that's not to
>>>> mention the eyewitnesses *and* video of the crash.
>>>>
>>>> <http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/911_pentagon_eyewitnesses.html>
>>>
>>> If that site uses Mike Walter then we know it was bullshit because
>>> Mike Walter, the person in the OP was probably the worst Crisis
>>> Actor they hired.
>>>
>>>
>>>> And wouldn't you know it, the pre-collapse punch-through hole on
>>>> the outer Pentagon matches what one would expect to see from a
>>>> 757 hitting it at near ground level... that pilot was relying on
>>>> ground effect to keep the aircraft just off the ground, and
>>>> rammed it in at full throttle.
>>>>
>>>> Here's what the hole in the Pentagon looked like:
>>>> <http://whatreallyhappened.com/IMAGES/pentagon_precollapse-marked.jpg>
>>>> <http://whatreallyhappened.com/IMAGES/pentagon_boeing_large.jpg>
>>>
>>> Picture leading you to believe there were two engines that rammed
>>> into the
>>> Pentagon with no excuse for why they only found one.  <G>
>>>
>>>> You'll note the starboard wing was clipped by the generator unit,
>>>
>>> WTF???  Why couldn't you use the correct term. It was a "Smoke
>>> generator unit.". Duh.
>>>
>>>> shortening the length of the starboard wing punch-through hole to
>>>> the right of the main body punch-through hole.
>>>
>>> And yet the starboard wing didn't shed any parts?  Unbelievable. Well, 
>>> maybe not for you.
>>>
>>>
>>>> Blast expert Allyn E. Kilsheimer was the first structural
>>>> engineer to arrive at the Pentagon after the crash and helped
>>>> coordinate the emergency response. "It was absolutely a plane,
>>>> and I'll tell you why," says Kilsheimer, CEO of KCE Structural
>>>> Engineers PC, Washington, D.C. "I saw the marks of the plane wing
>>>> on the face of the building. I picked up parts of the plane with
>>>> the airline markings on them. I held in my hand the tail section
>>>> of the plane, and I found the black box."
>>>
>>> Too bad it is inconsistent with the lack of debris found outside the
>>> Pentagon and the fact that not one of the security cameras in the
>>> area could
>>> be used to prove there was a 757 near the Pentagon.  <G>
>>>
>>> Love is blind and as long as you are in love with your Television
>>> Set you will have problems with anything that goes against your Set. 
>>> .Duh.
>>>
>>> Still both Pranksville and the Pentagon were damaged by nukes and
>>> the Twin
>>> Towers were damaged by CGIs that couldn't even keep their wing on.
>>>
>>> Rocky
>>
>> Rocky you are worse than a Kook. You are a disinformation specialist
>> like HVAC (or maybe you ARE one of HVAC's "personalities").
>>
>> Anyone looking into the Pentagon evidence finds SEVERE problems with
>> the official story. For one thing supposed flight path of the
>> aircraft compared to eye witnesses showed that story impossible and 
>> wrong.
>> Also there are problems with the size and shape of the Hole in the
>> building and parts scattered around that at first glance are not
>> from the supposed crash plane.
>>
>> So, as usual signs are everywhere of one more gummint coverup. So
>> WHAT is being covered up? Who knows? The idea is to KEEP it covered up! 
>> But
>> the fact that there IS a cover-up is beyond question.
>>
>> And "Rocky" is doing his part in the cover up. He brings together a
>> bunch of the anomalous facts that gets all the conspiracy folks 
>> interested
>> and then after he ties all the "kooks" with a big red bow, he proposes
>> his "NUKE" theory that discredits them all wholesale! This is
>> wonderful tradecraft at the HVAC level!
>
> WTF???  I know there are a lot of other things that prove the
> Pentagon was a BIG LIE but I like the fact that one of the Crisis Actors 
> had to say
> a 757 folded it's wings back to go into the small hole in the wall.
>
> As for the Nukes and the CGIs.  I am calling it like I see it.  The
> remains of the Twin Towers prove something vaporized them from below and 
> not
> above and the wing that fades in and out on the alleged Flight 175 could
> only be recreated exactly by using 3D software.
>
> Rocky

but you're the only one that thinks so

Thread

The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-21 17:22 -0500
  Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse burfordtjustice <burford@uk.mo> - 2015-08-21 18:54 -0400
  Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-21 22:56 +0000
  Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-21 18:59 -0500
  Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-22 06:44 +0200
    Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-22 11:48 -0400
      Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-22 18:47 +0200
        Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-22 15:08 -0400
          Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-22 21:46 +0200
            Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 20:06 -0500
              Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 18:54 -0700
              Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-23 04:07 +0200
              Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 05:21 +0000
            Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-23 03:59 -0400
              Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-23 17:43 +0200
    Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 12:04 -0500
      Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-22 17:23 +0000
        Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 19:44 -0500
          Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 05:23 +0000
          Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 06:43 -0500
      Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 14:36 -0400
        Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 19:54 -0500
          Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 18:54 -0700
            Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 20:53 -0500
              Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 19:01 -0700
                Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 21:02 -0500
                Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 19:49 -0700
              Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 05:26 +0000
                ? 4 Jim about why the Twin Towers look like they were nuked (was: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 05:42 -0500
                Re: ? 4 Jim about why the Twin Towers look like they were nuked (was: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse) je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 04:07 -0700
                2 je suis charly was: ? 4 Jim about why the Twin Towers look like they were nuked (was: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 14:52 -0500
                Re: 2 je suis charly was: ? 4 Jim about why the Twin Towers look like they were nuked (was: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse) je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 13:28 -0700
                Re: 2 je suis charly was: ? 4 Jim about why the Twin Towers look like they were nuked jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 20:20 +0000
                Re: ? 4 Jim about why the Twin Towers look like they were nuked Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 12:15 +0100
                Re: ? 4 Jim about why the Twin Towers look like they were nuked "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 07:23 -0500
                seismic evidence is inconsistent (was: ? 4 Jim about why the Twin Towers look like they were nuked) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 07:35 -0500
                Re: seismic evidence is inconsistent (was: ? 4 Jim about why the Twin Towers look like they were nuked) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 08:42 -0500
                Kent the bullshitter keeps bullshitting (was: seismic evidence is inconsistent (was: ? 4 Jim about why the Twin Towers look like they were nuked)) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 09:05 -0500
                Re: Kent the bullshitter keeps bullshitting (was: seismic evidence is inconsistent Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 18:03 +0100
                T-annoy the pain keeps keeps the bullshit going (was: seismic evidence is inconsistent ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 12:53 -0500
                Re: T-annoy the pain keeps keeps the bullshit going jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 18:19 +0000
                Re: T-annoy the pain keeps keeps the bullshit going Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 21:33 +0100
                Re: Kent the bullshitter keeps bullshitting jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 17:13 +0000
                Re: Kent the bullshitter keeps bullshitting (was: seismic evidence is inconsistent (was: ? 4 Jim about why the Twin Towers look like they were nuked)) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 14:04 -0500
                Re: Kent the bullshitter keeps bullshitting (was: seismic evidence is inconsistent (was: ? 4 Jim about why the Twin Towers look like they were nuked)) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 14:18 -0500
                Re: Kent the bullshitter keeps bullshitting jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 19:50 +0000
                Jim the bullshitter keeps bullshitting "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 15:28 -0500
                Re: Jim the bullshitter keeps bullshitting jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 20:40 +0000
                Re: Jim the bullshitter keeps bullshitting je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 14:20 -0700
                Re: Kent the bullshitter keeps bullshitting (was: seismic evidence is inconsistent Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 21:33 +0100
                Re: Kent the bullshitter keeps bullshitting (was: seismic evidence is inconsistent "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 04:08 -0500
                Re: Kent the bullshitter keeps bullshitting (was: seismic evidence is inconsistent (was: ? 4 Jim about why the Twin Towers look like they were nuked)) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 04:03 -0500
                Re: Kent the bullshitter keeps bullshitting (was: seismic evidence is inconsistent Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 21:33 +0100
                Re: seismic evidence is inconsistent jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 17:11 +0000
                Re: ? 4 Jim about why the Twin Towers look like they were nuked (was: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 06:46 -0500
                Re: ? 4 Jim about why the Twin Towers look like they were nuked jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 17:08 +0000
              Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 06:45 -0500
          Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 05:24 +0000
          Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 06:44 -0500
            Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-23 05:09 -0700
              Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 08:40 -0500
                Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-23 09:36 -0700
                Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 14:07 -0500
                Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-23 13:03 -0700
                Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-24 11:59 -0400
                Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 19:57 -0500
      Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-22 21:35 +0200
        Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 19:41 -0500
          Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 17:55 -0700
            Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 20:13 -0500
              Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 18:55 -0700
          Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-23 03:44 +0200
            Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 20:50 -0500
              Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-23 05:18 +0200
              Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 05:29 +0000
              Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 06:45 -0500
          Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 05:28 +0000
  Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "Ming Tiggle" <none@nomail.com> - 2015-08-21 21:52 -0700
    Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 05:12 -0500
  Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "Ming Tiggle" <none@nomail.com> - 2015-08-21 21:53 -0700
    Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 09:55 -0500
      Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 12:54 -0500
  Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 05:11 -0500
    Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 20:21 -0500
      Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 05:30 +0000
      Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 06:44 -0500
      Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 09:50 -0700

csiph-web