Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse

Newsgroups	alt.astronomy, alt.conspiracy, alt.usenet.kooks, sci.physics
Subject	Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse
References	<bMedneXaFfx7OUrInZ2dnUU7-Y2dnZ2d@giganews.com> <648cd79fd6b7856ac331c02ba509acc7@dizum.com>
Date	2015-08-22 11:48 -0400
From	"\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1>
Organization	AUKTard Polizia
Message-ID	<op.x3r0voqdtm21m2@benson.localhost> (permalink)

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 00:44:07 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler  
Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>
> Rocky, in <news:bMedneXaFfx7OUrInZ2dnUU7-Y2dnZ2d@giganews.com>
> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again:
>
>> F<SMACKAKOOK!>
>
> <http://911review.com/errors/pentagon/nodebris.html>
>
> <http://www.popularmechanics.com/military/a5659/debunking-911-myths-pentagon/>
>
> <http://911research.wtc7.net/pentagon/analysis/conclusions/debris.html>
>
> <http://www.rense.com/general32/phot.htm>
>
> Look at all those photos showing plane debris, both outside and
> *inside* the Pentagon. Hull pieces, the wheel rim of (surprise!
> surprise! surprise!) a Boeing 757, a chunk of (surprise!
> surprise! surprise! the Boeing 757 nose cone that actually
> punched all the way through to A-E Drive, turbine compressor
> parts from (surprise! surprise! surprise!) a Boeing 757, and a
> shitload of small plane chunks directly in front of the building,
> exactly as one would expect from those once-together chunks
> slamming into and through concrete at 400 MPH. And that's not to
> mention the eyewitnesses *and* video of the crash.
>
> <http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/911_pentagon_eyewitnesses.html>
>
> And wouldn't you know it, the pre-collapse punch-through hole on
> the outer Pentagon matches what one would expect to see from a
> 757 hitting it at near ground level... that pilot was relying on
> ground effect to keep the aircraft just off the ground, and
> rammed it in at full throttle.
>
> Here's what the hole in the Pentagon looked like:
> <http://whatreallyhappened.com/IMAGES/pentagon_precollapse-marked.jpg>
> <http://whatreallyhappened.com/IMAGES/pentagon_boeing_large.jpg>
>
> You'll note the starboard wing was clipped by the generator unit,
> shortening the length of the starboard wing punch-through hole to
> the right of the main body punch-through hole.
>
> Blast expert Allyn E. Kilsheimer was the first structural
> engineer to arrive at the Pentagon after the crash and helped
> coordinate the emergency response. "It was absolutely a plane,
> and I'll tell you why," says Kilsheimer, CEO of KCE Structural
> Engineers PC, Washington, D.C. "I saw the marks of the plane wing
> on the face of the building. I picked up parts of the plane with
> the airline markings on them. I held in my hand the tail section
> of the plane, and I found the black box."
>
> Whoopsie... they found the black box? Why, that'd let them piece
> together the entire chronology of the event... and that
> chronology proves you're a gullible fuckwit for believing any of
> this 9/11 truther bullshit.
>
> You've been lied to and manipulated by attention-seeking media
> whores who concocted a story to blame the government they hated
> (remember, the truther movement started amongst LibTards during a
> Republican administration) for the attacks. It's a good thing
> only broken-brained kooks like you believe their bullshit,
> otherwise their kooky tactic would have actually worked.
>
> I'm sure the more astute amongst us will notice the parallels to
> the libtard Klimate Katastrophe Kooks and their "zOMG! Globular
> Warmings!" lying blather.
>
> Now shut the fuck up and crawl back into that welfare single-wide
> hole you call a home, you pathetic mindless fuckwit. You're
> nothing more than a laughingstock.
>
> Kook. LOL
>
>> Rocky
>
> Now, get to addressing the 16 ways your kook conspiracy theory
> violates the laws of physics:
>
> ======================================================
> 1) Your estimation of the time between detonation and the time of
> collapse puts the nukes between from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep
> below the towers, a depth we don't even have the technology to
> drill to today, let alone back in 1968. Not to mention the fact
> that at that depth, the temperature is so high things like metal
> *melt*. That's *why* we can't drill much deeper than the 7.636
> miles of the Al Shaheen oil well in Qatar (the deepest hole
> *ever* dug in human history)... the equipment fails. That's why
> the Kola Superdeep Borehole was abandoned at 7.619 miles deep.
>
> 2) The claimed "EMP pulse" in the video *you* provided wasn't an
> EMP pulse at all, it was satellite uplink interference. If it'd
> been a nuke EMP (especially one sized 150 kt), the nanosecond
> time frame of the explosion (and thus the sharp peak of the EMP)
> would have caused the camera's electronics to burn out. No amount
> of shielding would have been sufficient to prevent that. That
> there is video of the immediate aftermath proves there was no
> nuke, especially one sized your claimed 150 kt, which would have
> destroyed all electronics for dozens of miles radius.
>
> 3) The radiation experienced was of such short duration that
> there's no way it was neutron or gamma bombardment from a nuke.
> If it had been from a nuke the metal in the buildings would have
> shown high levels of radioactivity for decades. It was most
> likely the tritium in the aircraft exit signs and law enforcement
> weapon sights that was the source. You didn't specify what type
> of radiation was experienced, and I doubt you're smart or
> educated enough to even know what types of radiation there are.
>
> 4) No nuclear detonation byproducts were found at the WTC complex
> or anywhere in NYC. They found tritium from the aircraft exit
> signs and law enforcement weapons sites, radium from industrial
> sources unrelated to nuclear weapons and background levels for
> all other sources of radiation.
>
> 5) The seismic waves caused by a small 150 kt nuke wouldn't be
> sufficient to drop the buildings, it'd barely even be felt by
> people in the vicinity, especially with the bombs buried, as you
> k'lamed, from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep. It would take on the
> order of 2 MEGAtons to do so, especially at the depths you k'lame
> the bombs were buried.
>
> 6) The trigger that sets off the nuclear explosion is a neutron
> source. It naturally decays over time, and its decay byproducts,
> the elements the neutron source transmutes into as it decays,
> include xenon, which is a neutron absorber. It's called xenon
> poisoning. Any bomb that has sat for 33 years without its trigger
> being replenished will not have a trigger that is viable to start
> any sort of nuclear chain reaction.
>
> 7) I've provided a video from *inside* one of the towers *as*
> *it* *was* *collapsing*, showing the vibration from the buckling
> vertical support column and *NO* EMP:
> ======================
> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1xYjoSvzWeo>
> You'll note the massive shaking from the central support column
> buckling, but *NO* EMP. And that was INSIDE the WTC tower. No
> amount of shielding would have saved that camera from a nuke EMP.
> ======================
>
> 8) Why aren't you explaining how those supposed nukes were going
> to survive at a depth of 37.28 miles (where the temperature would
> be approximately 960 degrees F) to 96.93 miles (where the
> temperature would be approximately 1840 degrees F), Ko0K?
>
> 9) Explain how a nuclear weapon can direct its explosion through
> a hole without any of the compressive blast going out into
> surrounding rock.
>
> 10) Explain how 19 nukes (according to you, another leap of logic
> taken by your broken brain to explain away the 19 instances of
> satellite uplink interference in the video *you* provided) were
> detonated at the WTC complex in rapid succession, yet no ill
> effects were experienced by electronics, the electrical grid or
> aircraft.
>
> 11) Explain why you're now saying there were 34 nukes, as opposed
> to your previously k'lamed 19 nukes (and your previously,
> previously k'lamed 3 nukes)... would it be because your broken
> little brain is squirming under the scorching twin beams of truth
> and reality, screaming in agony at its being forced to see just
> how delusional it truly is? While you're at it, get to explaining
> how the regular rad sweeps at the twin towers (because the space
> was primarily rented by government agencies) showed no nukes, and
> how 23 nukes were obtained and put in place without drawing any
> attention whatsoever.
>
> 12) Why aren't you explaining how the personnel sent down to
> service those nukes (because now that you know the neutron-source
> triggers for nuclear weapons require replacement on a periodic
> basis, your broken brain *had* to construct an entire base at
> 37.28 to 96.93 miles deep (far deeper than we have the technology
> to dig even today, let alone back in 1968), complete with "4
> blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back into the area
> the nukes were maintained", or your brain would have been forced
> to admit it was wrong when it told you those nukes sat untouched
> for 33 years and maintained their viability) are supposed to
> survive in 960 to 1840 degree heat?
>
> 13) You admitted (ed75e9d6f7ccf7296c075fd695673a37@dizum.com)
> that all the materials used in construction of the twin towers
> (all 1.5 million tons of it) had been accounted for and trucked
> off to the Fresh Kills landfill. How will you reconcile your
> admission with your kook blather that significant percentages of
> the buildings "vaporized" (your word) and "floated toward Europe"
> (your words)?
>
> 14) Why can't you provide proof of the nuclear explosion seismic
> signatures for these 19 nukes (now 34 nukes, per your latest
> k'lame) you k'lame were detonated at the WTC site on 11 Sep 2001?
>
> 15) Where were the vertically-directed plumes of dust and debris
> kicked up from your claimed nuclear weapons being detonated deep
> underground, Ko0K?
>
> 16) Explain how these 19 nukes (now 34 nukes, per your latest
> k'lame) could tunnel holes from their underground installation
> 37.28 to 96.93 miles deep, to directly under the WTC complex...
> in 12 seconds... through solid bedrock... prior to detonating
> directly below the WTC towers (which, of course, fucks up your
> timing between the detonations and the collapses, leading you
> back to where your delusion started. Congratulations, Dimwit,
> you've made the full circuit on The Island of Insanity. Now go
> 'round again.).
> ======================================================
>
> There are now 16 ways your kook konspiracy theory violates the
> laws of physics... now you'd better get to work addressing each
> one, point by point, or people are gonna know you're just a
> retard who can't grasp simple physics.
>
> Kook. LOL
>

tell him about how you k0okily believe that climate change isn't caused by  
man at all, you guys might get along.

-- 
http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg

http://cafepress.com/kooktown

http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg

If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers  
containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to  
yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints  
to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful  
information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public.  :)

if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you  
downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try:  
http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2

--

Thread

The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-21 17:22 -0500
  Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse burfordtjustice <burford@uk.mo> - 2015-08-21 18:54 -0400
  Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-21 22:56 +0000
  Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-21 18:59 -0500
  Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-22 06:44 +0200
    Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-22 11:48 -0400
      Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-22 18:47 +0200
        Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-22 15:08 -0400
          Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-22 21:46 +0200
            Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 20:06 -0500
              Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 18:54 -0700
              Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-23 04:07 +0200
              Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 05:21 +0000
            Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-23 03:59 -0400
              Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-23 17:43 +0200
    Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 12:04 -0500
      Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-22 17:23 +0000
        Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 19:44 -0500
          Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 05:23 +0000
          Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 06:43 -0500
      Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 14:36 -0400
        Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 19:54 -0500
          Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 18:54 -0700
            Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 20:53 -0500
              Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 19:01 -0700
                Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 21:02 -0500
                Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 19:49 -0700
              Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 05:26 +0000
                ? 4 Jim about why the Twin Towers look like they were nuked (was: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 05:42 -0500
                Re: ? 4 Jim about why the Twin Towers look like they were nuked (was: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse) je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 04:07 -0700
                2 je suis charly was: ? 4 Jim about why the Twin Towers look like they were nuked (was: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 14:52 -0500
                Re: 2 je suis charly was: ? 4 Jim about why the Twin Towers look like they were nuked (was: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse) je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 13:28 -0700
                Re: 2 je suis charly was: ? 4 Jim about why the Twin Towers look like they were nuked jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 20:20 +0000
                Re: ? 4 Jim about why the Twin Towers look like they were nuked Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 12:15 +0100
                Re: ? 4 Jim about why the Twin Towers look like they were nuked "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 07:23 -0500
                seismic evidence is inconsistent (was: ? 4 Jim about why the Twin Towers look like they were nuked) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 07:35 -0500
                Re: seismic evidence is inconsistent (was: ? 4 Jim about why the Twin Towers look like they were nuked) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 08:42 -0500
                Kent the bullshitter keeps bullshitting (was: seismic evidence is inconsistent (was: ? 4 Jim about why the Twin Towers look like they were nuked)) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 09:05 -0500
                Re: Kent the bullshitter keeps bullshitting (was: seismic evidence is inconsistent Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 18:03 +0100
                T-annoy the pain keeps keeps the bullshit going (was: seismic evidence is inconsistent ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 12:53 -0500
                Re: T-annoy the pain keeps keeps the bullshit going jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 18:19 +0000
                Re: T-annoy the pain keeps keeps the bullshit going Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 21:33 +0100
                Re: Kent the bullshitter keeps bullshitting jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 17:13 +0000
                Re: Kent the bullshitter keeps bullshitting (was: seismic evidence is inconsistent (was: ? 4 Jim about why the Twin Towers look like they were nuked)) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 14:04 -0500
                Re: Kent the bullshitter keeps bullshitting (was: seismic evidence is inconsistent (was: ? 4 Jim about why the Twin Towers look like they were nuked)) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 14:18 -0500
                Re: Kent the bullshitter keeps bullshitting jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 19:50 +0000
                Jim the bullshitter keeps bullshitting "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 15:28 -0500
                Re: Jim the bullshitter keeps bullshitting jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 20:40 +0000
                Re: Jim the bullshitter keeps bullshitting je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 14:20 -0700
                Re: Kent the bullshitter keeps bullshitting (was: seismic evidence is inconsistent Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 21:33 +0100
                Re: Kent the bullshitter keeps bullshitting (was: seismic evidence is inconsistent "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 04:08 -0500
                Re: Kent the bullshitter keeps bullshitting (was: seismic evidence is inconsistent (was: ? 4 Jim about why the Twin Towers look like they were nuked)) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 04:03 -0500
                Re: Kent the bullshitter keeps bullshitting (was: seismic evidence is inconsistent Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 21:33 +0100
                Re: seismic evidence is inconsistent jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 17:11 +0000
                Re: ? 4 Jim about why the Twin Towers look like they were nuked (was: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 06:46 -0500
                Re: ? 4 Jim about why the Twin Towers look like they were nuked jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 17:08 +0000
              Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 06:45 -0500
          Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 05:24 +0000
          Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 06:44 -0500
            Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-23 05:09 -0700
              Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 08:40 -0500
                Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-23 09:36 -0700
                Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 14:07 -0500
                Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-23 13:03 -0700
                Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-24 11:59 -0400
                Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 19:57 -0500
      Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-22 21:35 +0200
        Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 19:41 -0500
          Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 17:55 -0700
            Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 20:13 -0500
              Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 18:55 -0700
          Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-23 03:44 +0200
            Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 20:50 -0500
              Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-23 05:18 +0200
              Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 05:29 +0000
              Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 06:45 -0500
          Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 05:28 +0000
  Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "Ming Tiggle" <none@nomail.com> - 2015-08-21 21:52 -0700
    Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 05:12 -0500
  Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "Ming Tiggle" <none@nomail.com> - 2015-08-21 21:53 -0700
    Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 09:55 -0500
      Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 12:54 -0500
  Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 05:11 -0500
    Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 20:21 -0500
      Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 05:30 +0000
      Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 06:44 -0500
      Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 09:50 -0700

csiph-web