Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > alt.astronomy > #273296

Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse

From benj <nobody@gmail.com>
Newsgroups alt.astronomy, alt.conspiracy, alt.usenet.kooks, sci.physics
Subject Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse
References <bMedneXaFfx7OUrInZ2dnUU7-Y2dnZ2d@giganews.com> <648cd79fd6b7856ac331c02ba509acc7@dizum.com> <KvidnQVn8rrGNkXInZ2dnUU7-K2dnZ2d@giganews.com>
Message-ID <_i3Cx.17952$%u.13620@fx06.iad> (permalink)
Organization TeraNews.com
Date 2015-08-22 14:36 -0400

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


On 08/22/2015 01:04 PM, Rocky wrote:
> "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx>
>>
>> <http://911review.com/errors/pentagon/nodebris.html>
>
> ROTFLMAO because despite what the website above wants you to believe there
> were no holes from engines of a 757 in the Pentagon because the people that
> were supposed to plant the explosives for that part of the verisimilitude
> didn't want to do too much damage to the Pentagon.  <G>
>
>> <http://www.popularmechanics.com/military/a5659/debunking-911-myths-pentagon/>
>
> Yep, the old straw man argument trick.  They didn't even try to address the
> lack of parts from the wings of the alleged Flight 77 that should have been
> all over the place if they really hit the light poles.  <G>
>
>> <http://911research.wtc7.net/pentagon/analysis/conclusions/debris.html>
>
> HAHAHAHAHAHA  This site is filled with so much bullshit it is unreal.  They
> talk about the F4 that was rammed into a solid wall and then they never
> showed how much debris from the F4 was left on the ground.  They want you to
> believe that the desinegrated F4 floated away instead of leaving a pile of
> debris on the ground.  < In other words that site was super shit >
>
>> <http://www.rense.com/general32/phot.htm>
>
> What a crock of shit that site was.  Where is the debris from the alleged
> Flight 77.  They claim it burned up but then there would be evidence of a
> big fire and that was missing too.
>
>> Look at all those photos showing plane debris, both outside and
>> *inside* the Pentagon. Hull pieces, the wheel rim of (surprise!
>> surprise! surprise!) a Boeing 757, a chunk of (surprise!
>> surprise! surprise! the Boeing 757 nose cone that actually
>> punched all the way through to A-E Drive, turbine compressor
>> parts from (surprise! surprise! surprise!) a Boeing 757, and a
>> shitload of small plane chunks directly in front of the building,
>> exactly as one would expect from those once-together chunks
>> slamming into and through concrete at 400 MPH. And that's not to
>> mention the eyewitnesses *and* video of the crash.
>>
>> <http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/911_pentagon_eyewitnesses.html>
>
> If that site uses Mike Walter then we know it was bullshit because Mike
> Walter, the person in the OP was probably the worst Crisis Actor they hired.
>
>
>> And wouldn't you know it, the pre-collapse punch-through hole on
>> the outer Pentagon matches what one would expect to see from a
>> 757 hitting it at near ground level... that pilot was relying on
>> ground effect to keep the aircraft just off the ground, and
>> rammed it in at full throttle.
>>
>> Here's what the hole in the Pentagon looked like:
>> <http://whatreallyhappened.com/IMAGES/pentagon_precollapse-marked.jpg>
>> <http://whatreallyhappened.com/IMAGES/pentagon_boeing_large.jpg>
>
> Picture leading you to believe there were two engines that rammed into the
> Pentagon with no excuse for why they only found one.  <G>
>
>> You'll note the starboard wing was clipped by the generator unit,
>
> WTF???  Why couldn't you use the correct term. It was a "Smoke generator
> unit.". Duh.
>
>> shortening the length of the starboard wing punch-through hole to
>> the right of the main body punch-through hole.
>
> And yet the starboard wing didn't shed any parts?  Unbelievable.  Well,
> maybe not for you.
>
>
>> Blast expert Allyn E. Kilsheimer was the first structural
>> engineer to arrive at the Pentagon after the crash and helped
>> coordinate the emergency response. "It was absolutely a plane,
>> and I'll tell you why," says Kilsheimer, CEO of KCE Structural
>> Engineers PC, Washington, D.C. "I saw the marks of the plane wing
>> on the face of the building. I picked up parts of the plane with
>> the airline markings on them. I held in my hand the tail section
>> of the plane, and I found the black box."
>
> Too bad it is inconsistent with the lack of debris found outside the
> Pentagon and the fact that not one of the security cameras in the area could
> be used to prove there was a 757 near the Pentagon.  <G>
>
> Love is blind and as long as you are in love with your Television Set you
> will have problems with anything that goes against your Set. .Duh.
>
> Still both Pranksville and the Pentagon were damaged by nukes and the Twin
> Towers were damaged by CGIs that couldn't even keep their wing on.
>
> Rocky

Rocky you are worse than a Kook. You are a disinformation specialist 
like HVAC (or maybe you ARE one of HVAC's "personalities").

Anyone looking into the Pentagon evidence finds SEVERE problems with the 
official story. For one thing supposed flight path of the aircraft 
compared to eye witnesses showed that story impossible and wrong. Also 
there are problems with the size and shape of the Hole in the building 
and parts scattered around that at first glance are not from the 
supposed crash plane.

So, as usual signs are everywhere of one more gummint coverup. So WHAT 
is being covered up? Who knows? The idea is to KEEP it covered up! But 
the fact that there IS a cover-up is beyond question.

And "Rocky" is doing his part in the cover up. He brings together a 
bunch of the anomalous facts that gets all the conspiracy folks 
interested and then after he ties all the "kooks" with a big red bow, he 
proposes his "NUKE" theory that discredits them all wholesale! This is 
wonderful tradecraft at the HVAC level!

HVAC! "Rocky"?  IS that you HVAC? Are you going to "categorically deny"
one more time?


-- 
         ___           ___           ___            ___
        /\  \         /\  \         /\__\          /\  \
       /::\  \       /::\  \       /::|  |         \:\  \
      /:/\:\  \     /:/\:\  \     /:|:|  |     ___ /::\__\
     /::\~\:\__\   /::\~\:\  \   /:/|:|  |__  /\  /:/\/__/
    /:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/  /
    \:\~\:\/:/  / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/  /  \::/  /
     \:\ \::/  /   \:\ \:\__\       |:/:/  /    \/__/
      \:\/:/  /     \:\ \/__/       |::/  /
       \_:/__/       \:\__\         /:/  /
                      \/__/         \/__/

Back to alt.astronomy | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-21 17:22 -0500
  Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse burfordtjustice <burford@uk.mo> - 2015-08-21 18:54 -0400
  Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-21 22:56 +0000
  Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-21 18:59 -0500
  Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-22 06:44 +0200
    Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-22 11:48 -0400
      Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-22 18:47 +0200
        Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-22 15:08 -0400
          Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-22 21:46 +0200
            Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 20:06 -0500
              Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 18:54 -0700
              Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-23 04:07 +0200
              Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 05:21 +0000
            Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-23 03:59 -0400
              Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-23 17:43 +0200
    Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 12:04 -0500
      Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-22 17:23 +0000
        Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 19:44 -0500
          Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 05:23 +0000
      Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 14:36 -0400
        Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 19:54 -0500
          Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 18:54 -0700
            Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 20:53 -0500
              Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 19:01 -0700
                Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 21:02 -0500
                Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 19:49 -0700
              Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 05:26 +0000
                ? 4 Jim about why the Twin Towers look like they were nuked (was: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 05:42 -0500
                Re: ? 4 Jim about why the Twin Towers look like they were nuked (was: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse) je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 04:07 -0700
                2 je suis charly was: ? 4 Jim about why the Twin Towers look like they were nuked (was: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 14:52 -0500
                Re: 2 je suis charly was: ? 4 Jim about why the Twin Towers look like they were nuked (was: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse) je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 13:28 -0700
                Re: ? 4 Jim about why the Twin Towers look like they were nuked Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 12:15 +0100
                Re: ? 4 Jim about why the Twin Towers look like they were nuked "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 07:23 -0500
                seismic evidence is inconsistent (was: ? 4 Jim about why the Twin Towers look like they were nuked) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 07:35 -0500
                Re: seismic evidence is inconsistent (was: ? 4 Jim about why the Twin Towers look like they were nuked) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 08:42 -0500
                Kent the bullshitter keeps bullshitting (was: seismic evidence is inconsistent (was: ? 4 Jim about why the Twin Towers look like they were nuked)) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 09:05 -0500
                Re: Kent the bullshitter keeps bullshitting (was: seismic evidence is inconsistent Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 18:03 +0100
                T-annoy the pain keeps keeps the bullshit going (was: seismic evidence is inconsistent ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 12:53 -0500
                Re: T-annoy the pain keeps keeps the bullshit going Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 21:33 +0100
                Re: Kent the bullshitter keeps bullshitting (was: seismic evidence is inconsistent (was: ? 4 Jim about why the Twin Towers look like they were nuked)) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 14:18 -0500
                Jim the bullshitter keeps bullshitting "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 15:28 -0500
                Re: Jim the bullshitter keeps bullshitting je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 14:20 -0700
                Re: Kent the bullshitter keeps bullshitting (was: seismic evidence is inconsistent Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 21:33 +0100
          Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 05:24 +0000
          Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-24 12:39 -0700
            Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-24 18:44 -0700
      Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-22 21:35 +0200
        Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 19:41 -0500
          Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 17:55 -0700
            Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 20:13 -0500
              Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 18:55 -0700
          Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-23 03:44 +0200
            Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 20:50 -0500
              Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-23 05:18 +0200
              Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 05:29 +0000
          Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 05:28 +0000
  Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "Ming Tiggle" <none@nomail.com> - 2015-08-21 21:53 -0700
    Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 09:55 -0500
  Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 20:21 -0500
    Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 05:30 +0000

csiph-web