Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #681741

Re: irreproducibility crisis

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw

Thomas Heger wrote:
> 
> Am 18.04.2018 um 19:31 schrieb The Starmaker:
> 
> >>> "Half the results published in peer-reviewed scientific journals are probably wrong.
> >>
> >> The problem is: they don't know which half....
> >>
> >> TH
> >
> >
> >
> > you have to write it in a way...that the person reading it doesn't
> > understand it.
> >
> >
> > All you have to do is throw in a lot of numbers and the reader...
> >
> 
> Well, there are many ways possible, if your intention is to disturb the
> readers mind.
> 
> First you need dogmas, that are blatantly wrong, but absolutely
> untouchable.
> 
> E.g. I'm a proponent of the so called 'Growing Earth' hypothesis. I have
> actually spent years on that subject and have written hundreds of
> messages to various forums. But my arguments are always rejected, since
> 'it cannot be true, because it violates the laws'.
> 
> To question the 'laws' itself is prohibited and once a professional
> does, he will almost certainly loose his job.
> 
> Other 'law' is 'the universal speed limit of c'.
> 
> Someone found, that neutrinos travel faster than c (and subsequently got
> fired).
> 
> We have also the Russian Podclednov, who found certain gravitational
> effects from spinning super-conductive rings (got banned and fired).
> 
> (This goes on and on and on...)
> 
> TH

according to Albert Einstein...'in his own words' he said:

'If you oppose my theories, you're an anti-semitic.'


http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn83030214/1921-04-03/ed-1/seq-3/
http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn83030214/1921-04-03/ed-1/seq-3/ocr/
http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn83030214/1921-04-03/ed-1/seq-3.pdf

""Why were men of science opposed
to your theory when you first made it
known ?"
"No men of science," he replied, em
phasizing the last'word, "were against
the theory."
"But there was some opposition?"
"Yes," was the quiet reply, "but that
was purely political. Even the physi
cists who opposed my theory did so for
 political reasons?in my opinion, o'
 course."
"What do you mean when you say
the opposition was political?"
"Anti-Semitism," was the scientist's
answer. "Because I am a Jew." ""

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

irreproducibility crisis The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-04-17 10:01 -0700
  Re: irreproducibility crisis Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-04-17 10:50 -0700
  Re: irreproducibility crisis The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-04-17 11:03 -0700
    Re: irreproducibility crisis Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-04-18 08:26 -0700
  Re: irreproducibility crisis Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2018-04-18 16:39 +0200
    Re: irreproducibility crisis The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-04-18 10:31 -0700
      Re: irreproducibility crisis Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2018-04-19 18:46 +0200
        Re: irreproducibility crisis Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-04-19 14:14 -0700
        Re: irreproducibility crisis The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-04-19 23:45 -0700
          Re: irreproducibility crisis Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2018-04-20 17:54 +0200
            Re: irreproducibility crisis Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-24 10:33 -0500
            Re: irreproducibility crisis The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-04-24 09:01 -0700
              Re: irreproducibility crisis Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2018-04-24 18:39 +0200
                Re: irreproducibility crisis The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-04-24 09:50 -0700
                Re: irreproducibility crisis Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2018-04-25 14:26 +0200

csiph-web