Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > rec.arts.sf.written > #490532
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | rec.arts.sf.written, sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity, alt.astronomy |
| Subject | irreproducibility crisis |
| Date | 2018-04-17 10:01 -0700 |
| Organization | Netfront http://www.netfront.net/ |
| Message-ID | <5AD62852.4706@ix.netcom.com> (permalink) |
Cross-posted to 4 groups.
"Half the results published in peer-reviewed scientific journals are probably wrong. John Ioannidis, now a professor of medicine at Stanford, made headlines with that claim in 2005. Since then, researchers have confirmed his skepticism by trying—and often failing—to reproduce many influential journal articles. Slowly, scientists are internalizing the lessons of this irreproducibility crisis."
Back to rec.arts.sf.written | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
irreproducibility crisis The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-04-17 10:01 -0700
Re: irreproducibility crisis The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-04-17 11:03 -0700
Re: irreproducibility crisis mcdowell_ag@sky.com - 2018-04-18 11:29 -0700
csiph-web